Keller Williams Expands to Singapore
'We are thrilled to welcome KW Singapore to our KW family,' said Soteroff. 'As our growth across Asia continues to gain momentum, Singapore represents a dynamic market where our models and culture will thrive.'
Share
'We are thrilled to welcome KW Singapore to our KW family,' said William E. Soteroff, president of Keller Williams Worldwide (KWW), the international division of KW. 'As our growth across Asia continues to gain momentum, Singapore represents a dynamic market where our models and culture will thrive.'
Led by Regional Operating Principal Melvin Lim, the KW franchise in Singapore is currently initiating operations. In Q3 2025, KW® Singapore is expected to open its first market center.
Lim brings to KW® Singapore 16 years of real estate experience spanning residential sales and brokerage operations. Currently, he serves as the co-founder and CEO of PropertyLimBrothers, a full-service real estate brokerage operating in Singapore.
'Melvin and his PropertyLimBrothers team bring a proven track record of innovation, leadership, and success in the Singaporean real estate market,' said Soteroff. 'We're confident they will set another powerful benchmark for KW's expansion across Asia.'
Lim is also widely recognized for pioneering the use of video home tours in Singapore as a powerful marketing strategy.
'I aspire to watch KW systems and models shape the Singaporean housing market by empowering real estate agents to think like entrepreneurs,' said Lim. 'It is exciting to see how the KW brand has attracted 50 recruits even before the official launch of KW Singapore.'
Singapore marks the eighth KW master franchise in Asia. The brand's other seven regions include Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Japan, Thailand, Mongolia, and India.
As of June 30, KWW has more than 270 market centers (outside the U.S. and Canada) across more than 60 regions. KWW has more than 17,500 affiliated agents collectively operating outside the U.S. and Canada.
KWW is currently exploring further expansion opportunities across Africa, Central and South America, Central and Eastern Europe, and throughout Asia.
Core criteria for new licensees start with having a qualified leadership team grounded in the Keller Williams® culture; KWW also strives for stability in the government, banking, and judicial systems, and a higher maturity level in the real estate market.
Outside of the U.S. and Canada, KWW's regions include Albania; Argentina; Aruba; Bahamas; Belize; Bermuda; Bolivia; Bonaire; Cayman Islands; Colombia; Costa Rica; Curaçao; Cyprus; Czech Republic; Delhi NCR, India; Dominican Republic; Dubai, UAE; El Salvador; France; Germany; Greece; Guatemala; Guyana; Honduras; Ireland; Israel; Italy; Jamaica; Japan; Luxembourg; Malaysia; Mexico; Monaco; Mongolia; Nicaragua; North Macedonia; Panama; Paraguay; Peru; Philippines; Poland; Portugal; Puerto Rico; Romania; São Paulo, Brazil; Saudi Arabia; Scotland; Serbia; Singapore; Sint Maarten; Slovenia; Southern Africa; Spain; Suriname; Thailand; Turkiye; Turks and Caicos; United Kingdom; Uruguay; and Vietnam.
About Keller Williams
Austin, Texas-based Keller Williams Realty, LLC is the world's largest real estate franchise by agent count. It has more than 1,000 market center offices and 162,000 affiliated agents. The franchise is No. 1 in units and sales volume in the U.S.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
6 hours ago
- Business Insider
Torn between Amsterdam and the US for grad school, she made a pros and cons list to guide her decision. Take a look.
When Royanne Ng got into Columbia University last year, she should have been elated. Instead, the nearly $80,000 first-year tuition and fees — not including housing — made her stomach turn. The Singaporean student turned the Ivy League program down and chose one across the Atlantic instead for a fraction of the cost. At Columbia, she was offered a spot in the Film and Media Studies MA with a concentration in emergent media — a track that explores formats like virtual and augmented reality. The 28-year-old is now pursuing a one-year master's in cultural data and AI at the University of Amsterdam, a program that blends machine learning with theory and tech policy. Ng also applied to NYU but wasn't accepted, and she ultimately dropped her application to the University of Edinburgh in the UK. Her postgrad degree had to be "very strategic," she told Business Insider — a move to boost her job prospects and reposition her career in Singapore. "If I'm going to spend this much of my financial savings on a degree, it has to be really, really worth it," she said. The US once had a near-monopoly on elite higher education. But as tuition rises, safety concerns grow, and political rhetoric turns hostile toward international students, the calculation is shifting. Here's how Ng made her choice. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . Prestige vs practicality Columbia's program offered big advantages: name recognition, accomplished alumni, and the implicit promise of career opportunities, Ng said. The brand name, she added, carried the common assumption that it gives students "a head start when it comes to job opportunities." But the costs were impossible to ignore. Columbia's program ran for two years and charged nearly $80,000 in tuition and fees just for its first-year students. In contrast, the University of Amsterdam's fees were about €17,000 for a one-year program. "The difference is just so stark," she said, especially when Columbia required a hefty deposit that felt like too much commitment. It wasn't just about money. She said many US courses were "more traditional" — rooted in legacy disciplines and slower to adapt. Europe had programs that were a lot more novel and flexible, often designed with interdisciplinary or future-facing themes, she added. Amsterdam's curriculum hit the mark. Ng said it aligned with her goal of transitioning from tech communications and a humanities background into a career that connects AI and policy — one she hopes to pursue in Singapore. Safety and geopolitical concerns Ng's family was also worried about her safety if she chose to study in New York — and so was she. For someone who had lived in Singapore her whole life — a country known for its low crime rates and political calm — she was concerned about gun violence, racial politics, and geopolitical uncertainty in the US. Still, she said the right school depends on the student's goals after graduation. Students hoping to stay and work in the US might prioritize a school's brand, alumni network, and credentials. But Ng plans to return to Singapore, so standing out in the local job market mattered more. Ng is set to finish her program in August. Here's her pros-and-cons list of US graduate schools: Ng had created a rough version at the end of 2023 while debating whether to choose the US for graduate school. When BI reached out to her in June, she pulled it together into a neat table: Pros Cons 1) Education quality Vibrant and mentally stimulating study environment, with motivated students and highly reputable professors. There's also an assumption that many top US schools have extremely good courses and teaching 1) Health and safety Worries among family members about safety of living in certain cities, with more risk due to geopolitical instability. Not sure if causing my loved ones to constantly worry would be a worthwhile trade-off for great education 2) Reputation and optics Excellent brand name, which would be helpful for future job securing and possible advancement 2) Financial costs Some schools I applied to cost about 5x more than graduate schools in Europe. Not sure if this cost difference can really be compensated by an equivalent degree of education quality. There were also a lot of miscellaneous fees involved just in applying to schools and securing spots when offered. 3) Solid alumni network Would be in connection with illustrious alumni network, which could also be helpful for career and job advancement 3) Local labour market incompatibility Given that I was looking at programmes within humanities and social sciences departments, I was also very conscious about whether certain courses would help me stand out or gain an edge in the Singapore job market. I had to consider the possibility that even excellent brand names might not be able to change the fact that many companies still look for science, tech and data roles. 4) Course material and programmes During my research of graduate schools, I observed that many US schools offered relatively traditional programmes, based on the write-up and descriptions of Masters courses. I did tend to see more exciting and novel courses offered in the UK and Europe, marketing interdisciplinary skills combining humanities/social sciences, data science or specific sector knowledge. I felt that this interdisciplinary angle was of particular interest as someone wanting to stay relevant in the job market, so this was a major consideration in choosing my graduate programme.
Business Insider
3 days ago
- Business Insider
Eastern Region Group: Crypto Firms Shift from Singapore to Dubai Amid Regulatory Changes
Dubai, United Arab Emirates, July 25th, 2025, Chainwire Eastern Region Group announced the publication of a new analysis examining recent shifts in crypto business migration patterns, with a particular focus on movement between Singapore and Dubai. Based on the firm's direct experience advising digital asset companies, investors, and international founders in both jurisdictions, the report outlines key regulatory, operational, and strategic factors influencing these relocations and explores the broader implications for the digital assets industry. Over the past year, a decisive shift has taken place in the global crypto market. For more than a decade, Singapore was seen as the go-to destination for digital asset businesses in Asia — offering regulatory credibility, political stability, and institutional respect. But that reputation has come under pressure. In 2025, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) introduced a sweeping requirement: any crypto company serving clients abroad must obtain a full domestic license — regardless of whether they onboard Singaporean users or not. There was no grace period, no transitional licensing path, and no exemptions for smaller players or startups. As a result, a number of major crypto firms have begun shifting their core operations to Dubai, a jurisdiction that increasingly offers what Singapore no longer can: regulatory clarity, licensing flexibility, and structural support for global businesses. From Asia's Crypto Darling to a Regulatory Bottleneck Singapore's goal in tightening its rules was clear: reduce risk, protect retail investors, and prevent crypto-related financial crimes. But in doing so, it has made it almost impossible for non-institutional platforms to grow globally under its regime. Licensing can take more than a year, and approval is far from guaranteed, even for large, well-capitalized companies. Projects focused on DeFi, tokenization, Web3 services, or blockchain-based financial products often find themselves in legal grey zones, facing operational uncertainty and mounting legal costs. This shift in regulatory approach has led to a noticeable increase in corporate relocations within the digital assets sector. Several major firms have scaled back their operations or licensing efforts in Singapore, redirecting compliance and operational resources to jurisdictions such as the United Arab Emirates. In parallel, a number of mid-sized platforms and token issuers have withdrawn regulatory applications or suspended expansion plans in Singapore, opting to explore alternative hubs for growth and compliance alignment. Dubai's Rise: More Than Just Tax-Friendly Dubai's appeal lies not only in its 0% personal income and capital gains tax on crypto earnings, but in the regulatory optionality it offers. Companies can choose between: VARA, the world's first dedicated virtual assets regulator; DIFC, home to fintech and funds operating under English common law; ADGM, offering regulated digital finance with direct access to global capital; Free Zones like IFZA and DMCC for support functions and tech development. Licensing timelines are faster — often between 4 and 6 weeks — and the process is more transparent, with fewer surprises and stronger regulator engagement. The UAE maintains FATF-aligned AML standards and requires economic substance, giving credibility in the eyes of banks and global investors. Meanwhile, the government is actively backing blockchain development: Incentives for Web3 firms and token-based projects Flagship events like TOKEN2049 Dubai with 15,000+ attendees Dedicated real estate projects like Crypto Tower, turning the city into a global hub for next-gen digital finance What This Means for the Industry The decision between Singapore and Dubai is no longer only about geography — it's about vision. One model is increasingly focused on restriction and containment. The other enables innovation under clear rules. For founders, investors, and developers, Dubai is no longer the backup — it is the benchmark for globally scalable, legally sound, and economically viable crypto ventures. Eastern Region Group: At the Forefront of the Shift Eastern Region Group is actively tracking regulatory shifts and policy developments across major financial centers, with particular attention to the United Arab Emirates. The firm's regulatory specialists identify Dubai as a jurisdiction gaining prominence in the global digital assets sector. In response to these developments, Eastern Region Group has expanded its focus on Web3 strategy, licensing, and corporate structuring. The firm offers advisory services to companies evaluating jurisdictional options to support scalable and compliant digital asset operations. Eastern Region Group, where expertise meets innovation, and tailored solutions pave the way to a business's triumph. At ERG, they are more than just a service provider. They're a strategic ally, dedicated to supporting business founders, investors, employees, and their families in navigating the complex world of business in the United Arab Emirates and abroad.
Axios
3 days ago
- Axios
CEO of Singapore's GIC warns of "valuation overshoot" in frothy market
This year may turn out to be historic for investors, requiring high levels of discipline to avoid chasing unreasonable valuations, the CEO of Singapore's sovereign wealth fund GIC said Thursday. Why it matters: GIC is one of the world's largest investors, with more than $800 billion under management, so its cautious view at a time of surging markets globally is noteworthy. What they're saying: " 2025 may be a turning point in markets — and in history. 'There are decades where nothing happens, and weeks where decades happen.' We are living in one of those moments," GIC CEO Lim Chow Kiat wrote in his annual letter. "Situations like the Nikkei bubble in the late 1980s, the Nasdaq collapse in the early 2000s, and the periodic bursting of meme stock bubbles all illustrate the dangers of valuation overshoot," he wrote. "Long horizons offer little help in such situations. Even if asset prices eventually recover, the time lost will have been too great. This is why we remain disciplined on price." Context: GIC, established in 1981, manages Singapore's foreign reserves. The Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute ranks it as the world's eighth-largest such fund. It has a more reserved approach than some peers; the word "cautious" is frequently used in the financial press to describe the fund. Zoom in: One area of increasing focus for GIC is AI, per separate comments from Lim released Thursday evening. "AI's disruptive potential is a key area that we are very much focused on, because when some companies succeed, it will have to be at the expense of other companies. If you are simply playing the role of an agent or intermediary, then you can be replaced by technology," he wrote. He added that the fund is adopting AI more actively internally, including piloting a virtual investment committee that can review memos and question deal teams on their analyses.
