Go Ask Alex: Is my online dom/sub relationship healthy?
What do you think about online dom/sub relations? I'm currently getting into one. I'm married, but he isn't into kink, so I have an agreed outlet online where there is a lot of fantasy but no touching.
I guess my question is, do you think that's healthy? It gives me an outlet for my dominant tendencies. But at the same time, it makes me a bit uncomfortable to let this (my predilection for domination) out.
I know you are not Dear Abby, but if you could offer me some advice, I would be grateful. If you can't, that's cool.
Best!
Hi mister,
I am kinda like Dear Abby. Thanks for the 'thick thighs' compliment—you've seen my Instagram. (If anyone reading this would rather submit a question there than via email, it's @badalexcheves).
Reading your question, I'm not sure what advice you need. Advice on being dominant? Or doing it online? What's the issue?
I think it's great to let your dominant side out. But your question is not clear: Are you uncomfortable letting your dominant side out on the internet because it's the internet? Or does your discomfort lie in letting your dominant side out in any capacity?
Related: I'm older & heavy. Will a muscular escort still be into me?
I sense it's the latter. If so, is your hesitation rooted in ethics? Propriety? Social mores? Faith? These are real things you should ask yourself. You ask me specifically if I think it's 'healthy' to let your dominant side out, which could mean many things, but at its simplest, it suggests you believe doing so might be unhealthy in some way.
I'd say that if you have any inclination to be sexually dominant, it's healthier to let that out with someone who willingly consents to it than to repress it or, worse, unleash it on someone who does not desire or consent to it, like your current partner.
Many gay men, when they talk about 'unhealthy' sex, are talking about the in-person kind that involves the risk of sexually transmitted infections. But that risk is nonexistent in an online relationship. So, the 'unhealthy' aspect of it you're worried about must fall somewhere in moral or mental territory. 'Unhealthy' here, then, means something akin to 'wicked' or 'wrong.'
To me, that's scratching at a moral feeling, a belief. I have a rule about those: It is not my job to change anyone's beliefs about sex.
Let me explain that. Beliefs—religious and otherwise—dictate human sexuality. Across the world, beliefs shape and define what we do and don't allow ourselves to explore and experience. I think a sex writer should only offer encouragement (or, when necessary, discouragement) for things people already want to do, or have entertained the idea of doing, or are currently doing.
Related: He gave me a 'pass' for sex with others. Should I take it?
The ethical line, then, is drawn at encouraging something a reader does not want to do—something they do desire or do not believe is right.
To me, that's wrong. Regardless of what I think, suggesting a reader change their beliefs or do something they don't honestly desire feels like a breach of the unspoken, unofficial contract between those who ask for help and those who provide it. I can give facts, tips, and advice, but I can't make you believe something you don't, because beliefs aren't rooted in facts—they're inner things, soul things. I once had little respect for those things, but that's changed. You must do what you believe is right.
There is only so far a digital role-play, dom/sub thing can go. You can have video calls and tell him what to do. You can watch each other, wank to each other, talk to each other, perform on camera, and much else. You can connect deeply, confess, share things you've never shared with anyone else, and develop real, deep feelings. Findom (financial domination) setups are common online. You can consensually humiliate and degrade someone on Twitter by posting (mutually agreed-upon) photos of them from an anonymous account. I know subs who love that sort of thing.
You can also get scammed, conned, abused, hacked, have your pictures uploaded to some site you're not aware of, and all sorts of sinister things. That's the internet, babe.
So, if you choose to do it, remember common-sense safety measures regarding the internet and taking naked pictures that include your face (don't take or send them), showing recognizable tattoos or places in your photos (don't), and so on. If you're chatting on a site, don't create a username that's your real name. Don't send passwords. Be wary of suspicious links.
Ultimately, interacting with strangers online is always a risk. Image sharing online can be a matter of mutual vulnerability: you can screenshot anything he sends you, and vice versa, so it behooves you both to respect the other's privacy. Even so, there are millions of bad actors online, and the potential that he is one is higher if you've never met him in person and never plan to.
Regardless of where your hesitation is coming from, you at least seem aware that sexual self-expression is necessary in a long-term relationship, and you seem comfortable with the idea of pursuing it within the parameters set by you and your partner. That's a good start. I'd give it a shot.
I hope it feeds your dominant urge. If not, I hope you at least entertain my belief that purely online dom/sub interactions are a poor substitute for the real thing. If there's any 'danger' here, it's that of liking it too much and wanting more. I don't think that's unhealthy at all, but it might pose a risk to your relationship.
You might, at some point, need to ask yourself if the no-touching rule works for you—and what that means if it doesn't.
I don't want to speed anyone's journey along, but if you wish to fast-forward things a bit, consider discussing with your partner the possibility of opening up your relationship to include real, physical intimacy with others. You can agree on the terms of it—on when, where, and with whom it's allowed. You might not think you want that now, but that is something you should prepare for.
Because getting bitched out as a quivering sub is better in real life, and being a brutal dom is too. I've done both. Trust me: You will want to take it offline and into the bedroom.
Hey there! I'm Alexander Cheves. I'm a sex writer and former sex worker—I worked in the business for over 12 years. You can read my sex-and-culture column Last Call in Out and my book My Love Is a Beast: Confessions, from Unbound Edition Press. But be warned: Kirkus Reviews says the book is "not for squeamish readers.'
In the past, I directed (ahem) adult videos and sold adult products. I have spoken about subjects like cruising, sexual health, and HIV at the International AIDS Conference, SXSW, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, and elsewhere, and appeared on dozens of podcasts.
Here, I'm offering sex and relationship advice to Out's readers. Send your question to askbeastly@gmail.com — it may get answered in a future post.
This article originally appeared on Out: Go Ask Alex: Is my online dom/sub relationship healthy?
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The 3 phases of becoming ‘another milspouse in the group chat'
No one ever told you, but there really are three phases of becoming a milspouse. You're probably already showing up like this in the group chat. But here's the thing: Even if you don't love the group chat, even if you don't admit it's pinned to the top, we know you're already one of us. Everyone thinks they're different at first. You show up to your first duty station with a carry-on full of ambition and exactly zero intention of becoming 'that spouse.' You've got a career. You don't wear red, white, and blue in the same outfit. You don't even own a Cricut. You're just here to support your person and mind your business. And babe? We get it. We've all mentally subtweeted about the welcome coffee invite (that's pre-phase one in case you're wondering). We've all side-eyed the FRG Facebook group. We've all whispered, 'Please don't let me become that person.' (Plot twist: you might already be her because you're on your way to phase one.) Because the truth is… if you've ever cried in your car after a day care drop-off, rage-cleaned your entire base house at midnight, or sent a panicked text about Tricare and then immediately apologized for it? Yeah. You're one of us. Phase one: 'I don't need other spouses.' This is the era of polite distance. You're not judging anyone. You're just… adjacent. You've got your own friends. You're busy. The spouse scene doesn't feel like your scene. It's too pastel. Too perky. Too themed. And then the deployment orders drop. Suddenly, your civilian friends are like, 'Can he just say no?' and you're wondering how to explain the emotional architecture of separation to someone who thinks 'rear detachment' is a car part. You don't want to need the group chat. But you find yourself scrolling through it at 2 a.m. anyway. Looking for someone—anyone—who knows what it's like to hold down the whole damn fort with a frozen lasagna and a stress rash. Spoiler: they're in there. Muted, maybe. But they're there. Phase Two: 'Fine, I'll go do the thing, but I'm not making friends.' As far as phases go, this one is maybe a little easier? Mixer. Potluck. Unit Day with some egregious name like 'Taco 'Bout a Party!' that makes you want to disappear into the wallpaper. But you go. Begrudgingly. Arms crossed. Exit strategy engaged. And then someone else rolls her eyes at the cupcake contest and you laugh, too hard, too suddenly. Next thing you know, you're talking about PCS horror stories and trading blackout dates like war crimes. You didn't plan to connect. You didn't want to. But something softens. And that's when you feel it: the quiet relief of being understood without translation. Phase Three: The soft launch (a.k.a. 'I can send ridiculous memes and no one will judge me') You've worked through all the other phases, but this one starts with a reaction. A heart emoji. A 'same.' Then someone mentions their partner just headed out for an FTX, and now you're casually dropping a list of survival tips like a seasoned oracle of training exercise chaos. You don't even realize it at first, but now? Now you're in. Suddenly, you're one of the people who knows where to get good wine and which gate guard won't check your ID if you're crying. You've become part of the thing you swore you'd never need. And weirdly? It doesn't suck. Why we resist (and why it makes sense) Here's the thing: most of us showed up to this life with sharp edges and big plans. We weren't trying to be 'different.' We were just trying not to disappear into the miasma of being a military spouse. It's scary to get close to something that might swallow you whole. It's scary to be seen in a role you didn't choose. So we armor up. We keep our distance. We pretend not to care. But military life doesn't ask you to give yourself up. It asks you to let others in. You don't have to bake themed cupcakes or chair a committee or memorize all the acronyms. (Probably should memorize a few of them.) You just have to admit (either on some late night or after a hard day) that it's okay to be held by the weird, warm chaos of this community. Because this life will break you open. And the group chat? That's where we hold the pieces. You don't have to love the group chat But you're already part of it, whether or not you have accepted it. You're allowed to be skeptical. You're allowed to keep your sarcasm (Also, all parts of the phases, too). You're allowed to be a whole, wild, complex person who still doesn't fully understand what your partner does for a living. But don't sell yourself short by pretending you don't need anyone. You do. We all do. You don't have to become someone else to belong. You just have to stop pretending you're the exception. Because if you've ever cried into a load of uniform laundry, prayed there will still be leave left over to go home for the holidays, or sent a vulnerable meme into a thread of half-strangers who made you feel less alone, you're not 'like other milspouses.' You're exactly like us. Welcome to the chat. Mighty MilSpouse Mighty MilSpouse The 3 phases of becoming 'another milspouse in the group chat' By Jessica Evans PCS One month to go: 5 things every military family should do before a PCS One month to go: 5 things every military family should do before a PCS By Daniella Horne PCS PCS Hair Hustle: Why finding a Black stylist shouldn't be a military mission PCS Hair Hustle: Why finding a Black stylist shouldn't be a military mission By Tamika Sherman Mighty MilSpouse You're already behind on back-to-school budgeting, but here's how to catch up fast You're already behind on back-to-school budgeting, but here's how to catch up fast By Tamika Sherman PCS PCS Purgatory: The untold chaos of moving overseas with kids, pets, and a whole lot of baggage PCS Purgatory: The untold chaos of moving overseas with kids, pets, and a whole lot of baggage By Tamika Sherman Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
PCS Hair Hustle: Why finding a Black stylist shouldn't be a military mission
The Unofficial Duty Station Checklist: Update DEERS Enroll the kids in school Find a Black stylist before your edges give up If you know, you know. For Black women in the military community—both in uniform and in camo cargo pants doing the school run—each PCS move is more than boxes and base maps. It's a high-stakes, sometimes tear-filled mission to find someone who knows their way around a hot comb, respects the importance of a clean part, understands kinky curl patterns and hair types, and doesn't flinch at shrinkage. 'We Don't Do That Here.' – An actual quote from the first salon I walked into at our new duty station. If you've ever sat in a swivel chair and had to explain what a silk press is (again), or heard the dreaded, 'We don't really have products for your type of hair' while side-eying a wall of mousse and dry shampoo, welcome. You are not alone. Moving every two to three years means you're constantly resetting. It's not just where you live or where your kids go to school, but how you care for your crown. In communities where diversity behind the chair is lacking, maintaining your hair isn't just self-care; it becomes a full-blown tactical op. It's More Than Hair—It's Identity Hair for Black women isn't a luxury. It's a legacy. Whether it's a silk press for promotion photos or fresh braids before deployment, our hair connects us to culture, creativity, and confidence. When we don't have access to proper care, it chips away at more than our ends; it messes with our sense of belonging. And let's be honest: when your hair is in disarray, your mood follows. That's not vanity. That's vibe maintenance. The Search Party: Powered by Group Chats and God Here's how we find stylists in a new town: Call your old stylist and beg for someone's cousin's roommate's info Dig through Facebook group threads like a cyber detective Try to approach someone who has a decent style PX without being weird Sending an SOS anytime you meet/see a new sister in your town for that good old word-of-mouth recommendation You'll ask: 'Can she press my hair type?''Does she double-book?''Does she do more than braids?''Does she really do natural or just say she does?' It's a sacred rite of passage—and if she ends up being the one, you book every appointment three months in advance and pray she doesn't move before you do. The PX/BX Salon Chronicles You walk in with hope. You walk out with trauma. The base salon may be a hit for some, but many of us have learned the hard way that asking for 'a trim' might mean losing three inches and a slice of dignity. There's a gap, and it's not just in the part. It's in representation. Military installations need to do better with inclusive hair care options and stylist directories that actually reflect the community they serve. Let's Talk Solutions (Because Sis, We're Tired) Here's how we collectively make the PCS hair hustle easier: If you find a good stylist, SHARE. THE. PLUG. Don't gatekeep. Your girl in the Facebook group is out here detangling with tears and coconut oil. Help her. Use your IG stories or TikTok to share reviews, tag stylists, and post your results. Be honest, but kind. Your hair testimony could be someone's breakthrough. Command, family readiness groups, even base pages on Facebook—start including a verified local stylist list. Make it as common as the vet recs and the Facebook yard sale group. In Conclusion: We PCS often, but our edges deserve consistency. We're holding down households, careers, and everything in between—the battle we should be fighting is for a proper silk press. Final Thought:The military might move us like pawns, but our crowns? That's royalty. And royalty deserves care, wherever we land. Mighty MilSpouse PCS 3 unofficial rules for surviving your new duty station By Jessica Evans Travel 5 Reasons why a national cemetery belongs on your summer road trip itinerary 5 Reasons why a national cemetery belongs on your summer road trip itinerary By Daniella Horne Mighty MilSpouse Everything you need to know to prepare for your first 'deployment spiral' Everything you need to know to prepare for your first 'deployment spiral' By Jessica Evans Mighty MilSpouse 4 Ways to fake it til you make it at your first change of command ceremony 4 Ways to fake it til you make it at your first change of command ceremony By Jessica Evans Financial Military pay is predictable until it's not – and the unpredictable happens more than you'd think Military pay is predictable until it's not – and the unpredictable happens more than you'd think By Jessica Evans Solve the daily Crossword
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Radioactive wasp nest discovered by workers at former nuclear bomb site
Officials at a former nuclear bomb site in South Carolina have discovered a radioactive wasp nest. Workers were conducting a routine radiation level check at the Savannah River Site near Aiken when a nest was identified with liquid nuclear waste tanks, The Associated Press (AP) reported. The U.S. Department of Energy filed a report on July 22 stating the nest had 10 times the radiation level that is permitted by federal regulations. Officials said no wasps were found at the nest. "The wasp nest was sprayed to kill wasps, then bagged as radiological waste," the report said. "The ground and surround[ing] area did not have any contamination." It is believed the nest became radioactive through "onsite legacy radioactive contamination" from activity left when the site was fully operational. The site now makes fuel for nuclear plants and cleanup, AP reported. There are still 43 of the underground tanks in use, while eight have been closed. A watchdog group, Savannah River Site Watch, called out the report, saying it lacked details about the source of the contamination and how the wasps encountered it, according to AP. Tom Clements, Savannah River Site Watch executive director, slammed the report in text messages obtained by AP. "I'm as mad as a hornet that SRS didn't explain where the radioactive waste came from or if there is some kind of leak from the waste tanks that the public should be aware of," Clements wrote, as AP reported. The Savannah River Mission Completion monitors the site and provided a statement to the Aiken Standard, a local news outlet. "Upon discovery of the contaminated nest, the immediate area was secured and surveyed; no contamination was found in the area," the statement noted. "I'm as mad as a hornet [about this]." "There were no impacts to workers, the environment or the public." The nest was found in F Tank Farm area, which is "centrally located inside the 310-square-mile Savannah River Site. Generally, wasps travel only a few hundred yards from their nest," it continued. In 1950, President Harry Truman announced that the United States would accelerate the atomic energy program; the plant opened during the start of the Cold War. The plant was in charge of producing "basic materials" in support of American defense programs, primarily tritium and plutonium-239, according to the Savannah River Site. It has produced over 165 million gallons of liquid nuclear waste, reducing it through evaporation to about 34 million gallons, according to Savannah River Mission Completion. Of the remaining 43 tanks, eight have closed. Regarding the radioactive wasp nest, three additional nests have since been discovered at the site, The New York Times reported on Saturday. The Savannah River Site occupies some 310 square miles in the sandhills of South Carolina, near the Georgia border.
