logo
Opinion: Alberta's strength isn't a grievance — it's a privilege

Opinion: Alberta's strength isn't a grievance — it's a privilege

Whenever the debate over Alberta's place in Canada heats up — usually when oil prices fall or equalization cheques make headlines — one familiar grievance always returns: 'Why should we pay more than we get back?'
It's a fair question. Alberta is, by any accounting method, a net contributor to Confederation. We send $44 billion to $47 billion more to Ottawa each year than we receive in services and transfers. That's real money.
And, yes, it's frustrating when it feels like we're paying for programs we didn't ask for, or when provinces that block pipelines benefit from our prosperity. But here's another take: maybe Alberta's overcontribution is something to be proud of. Not a grievance. Not a problem to fix. A sign of strength.
A friend put it well in a recent conversation: 'At the very least,' he said, 'it would be nice if the rest of Canada just said thank you.' And I understood where he was coming from. There's a quiet resentment among some Albertans that we're taken for granted — that we build and others benefit. But then I asked him something that stopped us both: 'Thank us for what, exactly?'
Should the rest of Canada thank us for being lucky enough to live above a massive, hydrocarbon-rich sedimentary basin? For the geology that blessed us with oilsands, gas reservoirs and bitumen the world happened to want — and still does? Because let's be honest: that's the root of Alberta's fiscal power. Geology. Not just policy. Not virtue. Not some uniquely Alberta work ethic.
We didn't earn our resource base. We were born — or more accurately, drawn — into it.
I wasn't born in Alberta. Neither was my friend. Like so many others, we came here for opportunity. For the jobs. For the boom. We came because Alberta had something the rest of the country — and the world — wanted. If that same energy wealth had been discovered under northern Ontario or the Northwest Territories, we'd have gone there.
If the Athabasca Basin had never existed, Alberta would be a very different place.
Smaller. Quieter. Probably poorer. Still beautiful. Still agricultural. But not the engine of national growth it is today.
Without oil, our story would likely resemble Saskatchewan in the 1990s — a province with flat population growth, high debt and few levers to pull in Ottawa. Saskatchewan spent much of that decade wrestling with budget crises, closing rural hospitals and relying heavily on equalization. It's an incredibly beautiful place, and the people are hard-working and hearty — but those were tough years in the Land of Living Skies.
Their young people — like so many from across Canada — moved to Alberta in search of opportunity. Let's not rewrite history: if the resource map had been drawn differently, it might have been us looking east instead of others looking west.
And so, when I hear people say Alberta deserves thanks for its federal overpayments, I wonder: Do we really want applause for having hit the resource lottery? Do we want to pretend we'd still be donating billions to the rest of Canada if the geology had broken another way?
This isn't about undermining our success. It's about contextualizing it. Because when we recognize how contingent our prosperity is, it should make us more thoughtful, not more bitter. Yes, we've built strong institutions.
Yes, we've taken risks, attracted talent and grown our economy. That matters.
But none of that erases the role of luck, or of Canada. We grew within a national framework that provided capital, infrastructure, labour mobility and rule of law. It was Alberta's energy, but it was also Canada's scaffolding.
And that's what grievance politics forgets: we didn't do it alone. Grievance demands repayment. Pride demands stewardship. If Alberta truly wants to lead — not just complain — then we need to reframe our role.
We are not Confederation's victim. We are its engine. And sometimes engines run hotter, carry more weight and burn more fuel than the trailers they pull.
That's not a burden. That's leadership.
We have the chance to show the rest of the country what prosperity used wisely looks like. That means investing in future industries. Supporting national resilience. Being a fair partner, even when we could take more than we give. There's power in saying, 'Yes, we contribute more. Because we can. Because that's what leadership looks like.'
Let others shout about fairness. Let Alberta show what strength really is.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Alberta restaurants more profitable over the last year, Canadian and U.S. tourists up
Alberta restaurants more profitable over the last year, Canadian and U.S. tourists up

Calgary Herald

time4 hours ago

  • Calgary Herald

Alberta restaurants more profitable over the last year, Canadian and U.S. tourists up

Restaurant sales in Alberta rose by 6.8 per cent in May from last year, according to Statistics Canada — and an economist says multiple factors explain the increase. Article content Alberta isn't alone. Instead, the trend is consistent across Canada, and its most important driver is a push to buy local and ditch travel plans to the U.S. following President Donald Trump's threats of tariffs and annexation, says Siddhartha Banerjee, an economist with financial institution ATB, which is also a provincial crown corporation. Article content Article content Article content Trump's rhetoric has prompted a decline in air travel among Canadians. The number of Albertans returning from airports in the U.S. fell by 7.2 per cent in June from last year, and the Canadian average rises to 19.2, according to ATB. Article content The flow of American tourists, meanwhile, has only been rising. Article content ATB's analysis shows that the number of Americans entering Canada via Alberta's airports has grown by more than 11 per cent. 'That's definitely boosting revenues,' Banerjee said. Article content Also propelling the province's hospitality industry is population growth. Alberta swelled by more than 200,000 residents last year, and Banerjee said ATB projects more than 120,000 newcomers will have moved to the province by the end of this year. Despite the pressures on infrastructure, the pattern has proved favourable for certain industries. Article content Article content More people mean more demand and more labour. Employment in the food and accommodation sector in the first half of this year was up by 4.9 from the same period in 2024. The trend is buffeted by a softer inflation, which fell from 5.9 per cent in 2023 to 3.6 per cent in 2024. However, higher revenues could also be a result of increased prices over the years. Article content Alberta, however, isn't the province with the highest revenue gains in its hospitality sector. New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario and Saskatchewan all boast a rise of 8 per cent or more in proceeds from the previous year, although the numbers don't include the economic impact from hosting the G7 and the Rotary convention, which drew thousands of people to Alberta. Article content Banerjee said geopolitical tensions have inevitably infiltrated the domestic markets in Canada, and so he expects a drop in consumer purchases over the next few months as the effects of tariffs begin to unfold. However, the restaurant industry may remain relatively unscathed.

Opinion: Albertans will fight to keep their Canada Pension Plan
Opinion: Albertans will fight to keep their Canada Pension Plan

Edmonton Journal

time6 hours ago

  • Edmonton Journal

Opinion: Albertans will fight to keep their Canada Pension Plan

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is pictured during a news conference about the Alberta pension plan on Sept. 20, 2024. Photo by Darren Makowichuk / Postmedia Your pension isn't just a line on your pay stub. It's the reward for a lifetime of hard work. The promise that when your working years are over, you'll be able to retire with dignity and security. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters. Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account. Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by David Staples, Keith Gerein and others, Oilers news from Cult of Hockey, Ask EJ Anything features, the Noon News Roundup and Under the Dome newsletters. Unlimited online access to Edmonton Journal and 15 news sites with one account. Edmonton Journal ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors That's why Albertans are rightfully alarmed by Premier Danielle Smith's push to pull the province out of the Canada Pension Plan and gamble our retirement savings on a risky, untested Alberta pension plan. This isn't just a policy debate. It's personal. And the premier knows Albertans don't want this. When her government surveyed Albertans about leaving the CPP, 63 per cent said they wanted to stay. Just 10 per cent supported leaving. The UCP buried those results for nearly two years, only releasing them after Alberta's Information and Privacy Commissioner intervened. Get the latest headlines, breaking news and columns. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This is a classic case of manufacturing consent: Using selective data, public money, and a rigged consultation process to build support for an unpopular idea. Rather than listen to Albertans, the government has tried to shape public opinion to fit its agenda. At a May town hall hosted by the Alberta Prosperity Project, a separatist group, Smith was asked why she hadn't called a referendum. She admitted she thought the idea was a 'no-brainer' and expected young people to rally behind it. Instead, she admitted she had 'misjudged where Albertans were at.' Then she offered this telling line: 'At the moment, I just feel like if we were to put it to the people, it would be voted down … and I think they'd vote it down because they don't have full information at the moment.' She knows Albertans would reject her plan. Rather than accept that, she blames them for not understanding. This saga began with the debunked claim Alberta is entitled to $334 billion, more than half the CPP's assets. Canada's chief actuary and independent economists quickly said the real number is closer to 20 to 25 per cent. Even Trevor Tombe, a University of Calgary economist handpicked by Smith to sit on her Alberta Next panel, rejected the UCP government's number. He called the actuary's formula 'straightforward' and estimated Alberta's share at about $135 billion. Instead of backing down, the UCP spent millions of public dollars on a one-sided ad campaign. They avoided face-to-face consultation by holding phone-in town halls, and the survey offered no option to simply say yes or no. Smith is now floating the idea of putting the pension question on a referendum ballot, possibly alongside other partisan initiatives, hoping confusion or fatigue will succeed where persuasion has failed. This advertisement has not loaded yet. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The pension issue has been folded into the Alberta Next process, a rebranded consultation effort that poses as open dialogue but is carefully scripted to manufacture support for a plan Albertans have soundly rejected. Before taking the Alberta Next survey, Albertans must first watch a video claiming the province overpays into the CPP and would 'pay less, get more' under an APP. But it's not the province contributing — it's individual workers and their employers. The video glosses over risks and costs, and the survey repeats loaded language about Alberta 'subsidizing' Canada without ever asking the core question: Should we leave the CPP? Meanwhile, the CPP remains one of the most trusted public pension plans in the world. It's independent, portable, and professionally managed. Would you trust a premier who never mentioned leaving the CPP during the 2023 election then made it one of her government's first moves? Albertans are right to be skeptical. This isn't about securing your pension. It's about politics. And when politicians start eyeing your retirement savings as a tool for leverage or ideology, it's time to hit the brakes. Pensions shouldn't be gambled with, politicized, or controlled by any one premier or party. If Alberta leaves the CPP, there's no do-over. It would trigger years of legal wrangling, cost millions, and permanently undermine the retirement security of millions of Albertans. And for what? A risky, untested, politically managed pension plan that no one asked for. This is a solution in search of a problem. And the cost of getting it wrong is irreversible. Smith may not trust Albertans to make the right choice, but we do. The CPP belongs to us, and we're not letting it go without a fight. Court Ellingson is the finance critic for the Alberta NDP. We invite you to write letters to the editor. A maximum of 150 words is preferred. Letters must carry a first and last name, or two initials and a last name, and include an address and daytime telephone number. All letters are subject to editing. We don't publish letters addressed to others or sent to other publications. Email:letters@ Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss the news you need to know — to your bookmarks and sign up for our newsletters here. You can also support our journalism by becoming a digital subscriber. Subscribers gain unlimited access to The Edmonton Journal, Edmonton Sun, National Post and 13 other Canadian news sites. Support us by subscribing today:The Edmonton Journal |The Edmonton Sun.

Calgary-area separatist lawyer reprimanded, ordered to pay $10K in costs
Calgary-area separatist lawyer reprimanded, ordered to pay $10K in costs

Calgary Herald

time7 hours ago

  • Calgary Herald

Calgary-area separatist lawyer reprimanded, ordered to pay $10K in costs

The Law Society of Alberta has reprimanded one of the leaders of the Albert separatist movement after finding he twice broke professional standards. Article content In a June 25 hearing report that was published online Tuesday, a three-person law society committee imposed the reprimand on Jeffrey Rath and also ordered that he pay $10,000 in costs by June 30. Article content Article content 'You have a responsibility to the members of the public and to the law society to represent their best interest. You failed in this case,' the report reads. Article content Article content 'This failure represents the type of thing that the law society strives to avoid, and the confidence we need to instill in the public is that we have to ensure that they believe and know that they will be treated, by our members, conscientiously and honestly. You failed in this case. You must do better.' Article content Article content The report notes Rath admitted guilt to two citations, the first of which states he was fired by Thunderchild First Nation (TFN) but failed to cooperate in transferring legal records to its new lawyer, taking six months to eventually transfer the documents. Article content The second citation states he misrepresented to the court that he remained TFN's lawyer in November of 2019 when in fact TFN had effectively sacked him as their representative two months earlier. Article content 'As a member of this law society, you will be expected to look at what you have done to determine whether or not you can improve on what has happened, learn from this particular matter, and, of course, to move forward,' the report reads. Article content Article content The report states Rath's lawyers noted his cooperation, health issues, and completion of coursework regarding the law society's code of conduct. Article content Rath is based in Foothills outside of Calgary and specializes in environmental law as well as treaty and Indigenous rights. Article content He has emerged a leading figure in the Alberta separatist movement through the Alberta Prosperity Project. Article content In March, he made a two-minute appearance on Fox News where he touted Alberta as potentially joining the United States as its 51st state. Article content On air, he claimed 'hundreds' of Albertans were seeking 'to explore the benefits of either Alberta becoming an independent sovereign nation with economic union to the United States, becoming a U.S. territory, or pursuing full statehood.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store