No Tipu Sultan, Anglo-Mysore Wars In Class 8 NCERT Book; Govt Explains Why
The omission of Tipu Sultan, Haidar Ali, and the Anglo-Mysore wars from the new NCERT Class 8 Social Science textbook has drawn attention in Parliament, with the Centre stating that states have the flexibility to include more content on regional personalities and events in their curricula.
Responding to a question in the Rajya Sabha on Wednesday, Minister of State for Education Jayant Chaudhary said, 'Education being a subject in the Concurrent List of the Constitution and the majority of schools being under the jurisdiction of the State Governments, the respective State Government may adopt or adapt NCERT textbooks or develop their own textbooks based on the National Curriculum Framework. The states have flexibility to provide more coverage about regional personalities and events in their textbooks."
The question was raised by Trinamool Congress MP Ritabrata Banerjee, who asked whether the new Class 8 textbook omits mention of Tipu Sultan, Haidar Ali, or the Anglo-Mysore wars of the 1700s in the chapter on India's colonial era and the reasons behind such exclusions.
NCERT Textbook Reworked Under NEP 2020
In his written reply, Chaudhary explained that the revised Class 8 Social Science textbook (Part 1) has been developed in line with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE) 2023.
'The new textbook comprises four themes: India and the World: Land and the People; Tapestry of the Past; Governance and Democracy; Economic Life Around Us," he said.
'Personalities featured in these themes have been included contextually and in accordance with curricular objectives. The textbook introduces new pedagogical approaches, emphasizes refined classroom practices, and presents a focused syllabus. These textbooks encourage students to explore more through experiential learning, undertake fieldwork, and focus on evidence-based understanding. The approach adopted for the Middle Stage (Grades 6 to 8) is to provide only a broad survey of Indian civilization from prehistoric times all the way to Independence," Chaudhary added.
The updated book, released last month, contains a section on early resistance movements against British colonialism leading up to the 1857 revolt. It mentions the Sannyasi-Fakir rebellion, the Kol Uprising, the Santhal rebellion, and various peasant uprisings of the 1800s.
However, the new edition makes no reference to the four Anglo-Mysore wars or the resistance mounted by Tipu Sultan and Haidar Ali against the East India Company — events that were part of the earlier textbook's section on the expansion of British rule in India.
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
European powers tell U.N. they are ready to reimpose Iran sanctions
Britain, France and Germany have told the United Nations they are ready to reimpose UN-mandated sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme if no diplomatic solution is found by the end of August, according to a joint letter released Wednesday. The letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres and the UN Security Council says the three European powers are "committed to use all diplomatic tools at our disposal to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon". "Iran must not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons under any circumstances," French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said on X, posting a copy of the letter. "If Iran continues to violate its international obligations, France and its German and British partners will reimpose the global embargoes on arms, nuclear equipment and banking restrictions that were lifted 10 years ago at the end of August," Mr. Barrot added. In the letter, the Foreign Ministers from the so-called E3 group threaten to use a "snapback mechanism" that was part of a 2015 international deal with Iran that eased UN Security Council sanctions. Under the deal, which terminates in October, any party to the accord can restore the sanctions. All three have stepped up warnings to Iran about its suspension of cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. That came after Israel launched a 12-day war with Iran in June, partly seeking to destroy its nuclear capability. The United States staged its own bombing raid during the war. "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism," said the foreign ministers of France, Britain and of Germany. All three countries were signatories to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action with the United States, China and Russia that offered the carrot and stick deal for Iran to slow its enrichment of uranium needed for a nuclear weapon. U.S. President Donald Trump pulled the United States out of the accord in 2018 during his first term and ordered new sanctions. The European countries said they would stick to the accord. But their letter sets out engagements that the ministers say Iran has breached, including building up a uranium stock to more than 40 times the permitted level under the 2015 deal. "The E3 remain fully committed to a diplomatic resolution to the crisis caused by Iran's nuclear programme and will continue to engage with a view to reaching a negotiated solution. "We are equally ready, and have unambiguous legal grounds, to notify the significant non-performance of JCPOA commitments by Iran ... thereby triggering the snapback mechanism, should no satisfactory solution be reached by the end of August 2025," the ministers wrote in the letter. End of cooperation The United States had already started contacts with Iran, which denies seeking a weapon, over its nuclear activities. But these were halted by the Israeli strikes in June on Iran's nuclear facilities. Even before the strikes, the international powers had raised concerns about the lack of access given to IAEA inspectors. Iran halted all cooperation with the IAEA after the strikes, but it announced that the agency's deputy chief was expected in Teheran for talks on a new cooperation deal. Last month Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi sent a letter to the UN saying that the European countries did not have the legal right to restore sanctions. The European Ministers called this allegation "unfounded". They insisted that as JCPOA signatories, they would be "clearly and unambiguously legally justified in using relevant provisions" of UN resolutions "to trigger UN snapback to reinstate UNSC resolutions against Iran which would prohibit enrichment and re-impose UN sanctions."
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
24-hour span to produce accused before magistrate begins when the person is detained: HC
The Kerala High Court has said the 24-hour period to produce an accused before a magistrate commenced from the time the person is effectively detained or his/her liberty curtailed, and not from the time of arrest that the police recorded. A Bench of Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas said the non-recording of arrest under one pretext or another was often resorted to under the guise of investigation. Police brutalities generally occured during these periods of uncontrolled authority. Unless there was a check, such unrecorded periods of custody could be the source of human rights violations, the court observed. The Constitution mandates that the person arrested be produced before the nearest magistrate within 24 hours of the arrest. Other than the time needed to reach the magistrate court from the place of arrest, there is a peremptory prohibition that the person arrested shall not be detained beyond the said period without the magistrate's authority, it said and granted bail to Biswajit Mandal of West Bengal, who had been arrayed as accused in a drug case. Mr. Mandal contended that he was detained beyond the 24-hour period, in violation of constitutional and statutory prescriptions and had sought bail. To decide the legal issue regarding when the 24-hour period began, the court had appointed Nikhina Thomas and Neha Babu, second-year students of Ramaiah College, Bengaluru, as amici curiae for providing assistance.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Now, BJP levels ‘vote theft' allegations against Rahul, Akhilesh, other senior Opp leaders
The BJP on Wednesday claimed irregularities in voter registration in a number of Opposition Lok Sabha seats — including Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's Rae Bareli, TMC leader Abhishek Banerjee's Diamond Harbour and SP chief Akhilesh Yadav's Kannauj — and accused these leaders of securing victory through 'vote theft'. At a press conference in the capital, former Union minister Anurag Thakur presented an analysis of electoral rolls in these constituencies to make a range of allegations — duplicate votes, fake addresses, fake relatives, incorrect ages and large-scale voter additions. He also claimed voter registration irregularities in the Lok Sabha seats of Wayanad (Priyanka Gandhi Vadra) and Mainpuri (Dimple Yadav), and the Tamil Nadu Assembly seat of Kolathur held by Chief Minister M K Stalin. Thakur's claims followed Rahul's allegations of 'vote chori' last week. On Thursday, the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha cited data from the 2024 Lok Sabha polls to claim that over one lakh votes were 'stolen' in Karnataka's Mahadevapura assembly segment through duplicate voters, fake and invalid addresses and single-address voters. On Tuesday, Opposition leaders took out a protest march from Parliament over the issue of 'vote theft' and special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar. Thakur on Wednesday said the Opposition leaders he named should resign. He claimed that there were about 2.99 lakh 'doubtful voters' registered in the Rae Bareli constituency. The BJP leader also claimed there were about 2.69 lakh 'doubtful voters' in the Diamond Harbour seat, 93,499 in Wayanad, 2.51 lakh in Kannauj, 2.55 lakh in Mainpuri and 19,776 in Kolathur. 'My direct question is, Akhilesh ji, Rahul ji, Priyanka ji, when will you resign? And as far as the propaganda king is concerned, you all know this is not a new face. Every time, his work is the same — to spread fear and confusion. Before elections, to spread lies and rumours in the name of the Constitution, to run propaganda among the people, and after losing the elections, to quietly go on a foreign trip,' he said. Thakur said the Congress as well as the larger INDIA bloc were opposing the SIR exercise to 'protect their infiltrator vote bank'. He alleged that the Congress had laid the foundation of 'electoral corruption' in the very first election of 1952 in which B R Ambedkar lost by 14,561 votes. He added that the Congress did the same in 1957 in the form of 'booth capturing'. In 1967, he alleged, the Congress carried out 'complete rigging' of the elections in Jammu and Kashmir and in 1988, in collusion with the National Conference, the Congress 'carried out large-scale rigging.' Meanwhile, the BJP launched a separate attack on senior Congress leader Sonia Gandhi with the party's National Information & Technology Department head Amit Malviya claiming that the former Congress president's 'tryst with India's voters' list is riddled with glaring violations of electoral law'. He shared a purported copy of electoral rolls of the Gandhi family from 1980 which stated that her name was struck off due to her nationality. 'Her name first appeared on the rolls in 1980 — three years before she became an Indian citizen and while she still held Italian citizenship…' he said. 'Following an outcry in 1982, her name was deleted from the list — only to reappear in 1983. But even her reinstatement raised serious questions… The qualifying date for registration was January 1, 1983 — yet she was granted Indian citizenship only on April 30, 1983…' he alleged. Responding to Malviya's allegation, Congress MP Sukhdeo Bhagat said: 'In 1980, it was pointed out that Sonia Gandhi ji's name shouldn't be in the electoral roll. It was an error by the ECI. The name was withdrawn respectfully, and reinstated in 1983. We are saying that when the ECI makes an error, we are fixing responsibility, and not running away.' 'Now, let's talk about Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He has been contesting from Varanasi for three times now. He has to be in the electoral roll there. Then, how did the PM cast his vote in Sabarmati in 2022,' said Bhagat.
