LinkedIn User's Fake Harvard MBA Stunt Sparks Debate, Lawyer Sets Record Straight
"Master's degrees are useless. I gave myself one on LinkedIn just for fun (there's no verification process). Since adding this to my profile, the DMs have been flowing in. Every other message mentions how 'impressive' my academic background is. So instead of spending $100K+ and wasting years of your life on a degree, just add it to your LinkedIn. No one checks. No one questions. Fake it till you make it has never been easier," the LinkedIn user wrote.
Reacting to his post, SMB Attorney issued a stern warning against falsifying credentials. "Guys, do not do this. And, yes, this is legal advice," he wrote.
See the post here:
Guys, do not do this. And, yes, this is legal advice. pic.twitter.com/HWb3vE6c8k
— SMB Attorney (@SMB_Attorney) August 18, 2025
The post sparked controversy, with some users calling it career-damaging and foolish, while others were amused by the stunt. One user noted that thorough background checks can uncover credential falsification, warning that such lies can have serious consequences.
Some users drew parallels with the TV show Suits, sharing stories of fictional characters facing consequences for similar deception. Others debated the legal implications, with one user arguing that lying on LinkedIn or a resume is not illegal, but creating fake credentials is.
One user wrote, "Why did bro snitch on himself. That's like Mike Ross walking into the Prosecutor's office, turning on a loudspeaker and saying he successfully frauded his way to the top."
Another said, "Masters are useless if you aren't seeking wisdom just for the sake of wisdom. If you want to make money, Masters and PhDs aren't where you start. But there are people seeking wisdom just for the sake of wisdom too. Masters aren't useless to them."
A third noted, "As a person who has hired quite a few people, Background checking is a thing. Sterling will check every single credential and job in your history. Making a mistake by a month or two on a job timeline is one thing, but substantially lying about your credentials is foolish."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
IndiGo pilot ‘barged into' loo I was using on flight, alleges woman flyer
NEW DELHI: A woman entrepreneur has alleged a humiliating incident on board an IndiGo flight, claiming that a pilot barged into the restroom while she was using it. Rhea Chaterji, co-founder of Mumbai-based Safegold, shared her ordeal in a LinkedIn post on August 18, describing it as deeply disturbing. Her post has since gone viral, drawing widespread support for speaking out. IndiGo's offer to refund her airfare as compensation has attracted criticism, with many slamming the airline for its alleged lack of empathy. The incident reportedly took place on August 8 on flight 6E 5295 from Bengaluru to Mumbai. In her post, Chaterji alleged: 'An IndiGo First Officer barged in on me while I was using the loo before take-off, but the airline doesn't feel this warrants meaningful redressal.' 'On Friday the 8th, I boarded a late flight & went to use the facilities before take-off. At least one flight attendant was at the galley and the forward washroom was unlocked. I locked the door & once seated, heard a knock, which I replied to. Shortly after, there was another knock, which I replied to more loudly,' her post continued. 'Before I'd even fully spoken, the door was forcibly opened, and a male crew member was gazing directly at me while I was in a vulnerable state.' She added that the crew downplayed the incident, saying they were 'sorry for the inconvenience' and that they were sure 'he hadn't seen anything.' Chaterji wrote that she felt 'utterly violated' and described experiencing a 'deep sense of revulsion' and isolation. She alleged the crew continued to engage her throughout the flight despite her repeated requests to be left alone. She further claimed that she was asked to meet the First Officer and Captain in the cockpit, which only heightened her anxiety. Chaterji said she had emailed IndiGo's top leadership, including the CEO, but received only 'lip service full of corporate jargon' and repeated apologies. She said the airline's compensation offer amounted to a refund of her ticket and vouchers worth just over half that amount, adding: 'The price of a woman's dignity according to IndiGo is the refund of the airfare and a little over half that sum in airline vouchers.' Her post has attracted strong reactions online. Jacob Joh, a security and investigation expert, wrote: 'Surely action should be taken if it was intentional infringement.' HR advisor Yankila Thakur commented: 'Ah! Incidents like these definitely leave a long-lasting fear. Indigo (InterGlobe Aviation Ltd) where is the empathy?' Another LinkedIn user, Raghav Gakhar, asked: 'Shouldn't that person who barged inside the washroom be fired?' Juie Merchant wrote: 'No matter what – whether male or female, invasion of one's privacy is unforgivable. Indigo should have taken responsibility instead of hiding behind refunds and vouchers.' Brand builder PS Prankika commented: 'This is deeply disturbing to read. Indigo this isn't about refunds or vouchers – not every passenger is seeking compensation. Sometimes, it's simply about doing the right thing.' Responding to the backlash, IndiGo said it 'profoundly apologised' for the 'inadvertent mistake by one of our crew.' It added that the crew member had been counselled and sensitised, and training would be reinforced to ensure such incidents are not repeated. An IndiGo source told TNIE that the airline had offered to refund Chaterji's full fare. 'The Flying Officer had made a genuine mistake,' the source said. 'There was no forcible opening of the door of the toilet. Possibly, the door was not latched properly and it opened when the Flying Officer pushed it.' The airline declined to share the flight number despite repeated requests.
Mint
5 hours ago
- Mint
Oyo CEO Ritesh Agarwal opens up on GenZ vs Millennial debate online: ‘Both are right about the world they inherited…'
Ritesh Agarwal, founder and CEO of hospitality chain OYO Rooms has shared his thoughts on the 'GenZ in the workplace' debate. In a post on social media platform X (formerly known as Twitter), Agarwal pointed out that there is a difference in how GenZ and Millennial engage in the workplace, but added that it is not necessarily a 'clash', but a 'relay' or 'handing of the baton'. In a humourous post on X, with the video titled 'Asked my Genz intern to edit a video and this is what she sent me', Ritesh Agarwal noted, 'Gen Z treats the internet like a buffet—taste everything, move fast, no FOMO. Millennials are more fine-dining; they read the menu, ask the chef, and savour the story.' He however was of the opinion that neither one is wrong in their approach, stating, 'Honestly, both are right about the world they inherited. Gen Z's pace isn't shallow; it's survival in an attention economy that never blinks. Millennials' depth isn't slow; it's a protest for meaning.' 'One generation translates chaos into culture; the other translates culture into clarity. I don't see a clash; I see a relay. Speed hands the baton to substance. The timeline may be noisy, but the thesis is clear: energy finds form,' he added. Agarwal's views come at a time when social media is flush with either appreciation for or dread over GenZ work culture. Earlier today, a likely Gen Z's reply to her manager, who asked her to reach the office despite heavy traffic, has become the talk of the town, with one netizen hilariously pointing out that it left the 'manager in deep pain'. While age was not confirmed, the user who posted the screenshot of the entire chat, captioned it as 'GenZ workforce.' According to the screenshot of a chat posted on X, the employee had informed that she will not be able to reach office because of traffic. Her manager, however replied that the employee needed to be in office, even if it gets late and received a two-worded response: 'Not possible.' The screenshot of the chat garnered over one lakh views, leaving netizens in splits. And earlier this year, a millennial boss, highlighted the challenges associated with managing a team—stuck between the expectations of senior management and the evolving demands of younger employees. In a viral social media post on LinkedIn, Mayank Sharma, founder of a Gurgaon-based HR firm, outlined the contrasts between an old-school leadership that insists on long hours, daily office attendance, and a formal dress code vs the younger workforce, which prioritises flexibility, work-life balance, and a casual dress code. He added: 'Funny thing is, in the process of keeping a good balance, you often end up disappointing both parties.'
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Anupam Mittal on ban on real money games: Hope we're not trying to out-ban China and ...
Anupam Mittal Anupam Mittal , the founder and CEO of parent People Group, has criticised India's ban on real-money games. In a post shared on professional networking site LinkedIn, the Shark Tank judge called the government's proposal " moral policing dressed up as policy." He warned that the decision could cost the government billions in tax revenue and push users toward black market alternatives. Mittal argued that the ban is counterproductive, comparing it to the ineffective prohibition on products like gutka. He noted that the real-money gaming sector generates significant revenue, including Rs 27,000 crore in GST and Rs 10,000 crore in advertising, while providing legitimate livelihoods. He questioned why the government would ban a whole industry due to the risks of addiction and financial harm, while other risky activities like stock trading and alcohol remain legal. The investor cautioned that the government loses revenue, and users lose protection when such bans are implemented, leading to the rise of black markets. He concluded his post by saying, "Hope we're not trying to out-ban China," suggesting that the government is exercising excessive control. What Anupam Mittal said about ban on real money games by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years IC Markets Learn More Undo In his LinkedIn post, Mittal wrote: 'We banned gutka but have people stopped chewing? 🤷♂️ India also just banned real-money gaming. In one shot, we killed a sector that - pumped in ₹27,000 cr of GST annually - drove ₹10,000 cr+ of ad revenue - gave thousands a legit livelihood in games of skill Why? Because many got addicted. Some went broke. Fair concerns but do we ban alcohol because some become alcoholics? Do we ban stock trading because some blow up their savings? Most bans usually have the same outcome 👇 👉 Govt loses revenue 👉 Users lose protection 👉 Black markets win (reportedly 8.3 lakh crore illegal gaming market in India 😱) Short term, this feels like we've shot ourselves in the foot. Long term, hopefully it allows real gaming & e-sports to emerge as one of the largest globally. But let's be honest, right now it looks like moral policing dressed up as policy. Hope we're not trying to out-ban China 😉' WhatsApp Makes Group Calls Smarter AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
