Singapore envoy eyes stronger cyber and digital links with Japan
'When it comes to cybersecurity, there are so many different areas that you can look at,' Ambassador Ong Eng Chuan said in an interview with The Japan Times ahead of the two countries' 60th anniversary of diplomatic relations in 2026.
'While today is artificial intelligence, tomorrow we're looking at the possibility of quantum technology, taking it a step further,' he said, noting that post-quantum cryptography — the development cryptographic systems designed to be secure against both quantum and classical computers — 'is going to create a whole new set of challenges and opportunities.'
Ong said Singapore hopes to 'collaborate closely' with Japan in this area 'because the country is already developing that technical capability. He pointed to the work being done by Japan's National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, which is working with Intel on a next-general silicon quantum computer.
The ambassador said Japan and Singapore plan to use the 2026 anniversary 'as a benchmark to upgrade our relationship,' noting that the partners also aim to deepen collaboration in the areas of trade and the economy, sustainability and climate change, defense and security and people-to-people exchanges.
One important and overlooked area of cooperation is how Singapore, which has a Ministry of Digital Development and Information, is often seen as a model for Tokyo's transition to a digital economy, especially as Japan continues to lag behind others, ranking 31st in an international comparison of digital competitiveness conducted last year.
Singapore, which ranked No. 1 in the same survey, has been working for at least a decade to become a "smart nation" by leveraging technology to improve different areas such as government, infrastructure and the economy. That drive is supported by a large contingent of government IT engineers, compared with that of Japan — a country of over 120 million people as opposed to Singapore's 6 million.
This includes digitalizing government services, with Singaporeans now using apps such as SingPass or LifeSG that enable them to not only have a digital ID card but also interact with the government electronically and access services such as applying for passports, birth certificates and driver licenses from anywhere.
Japan, which has sent teams to examine Singapore's approach, is believed to have taken inspiration from the city-state when it began integrating its health insurance card into the My Number Card last year.
'Japan is a very advanced country when it comes to technology, but it's more in terms of the implementation that I think we can share a little bit of our experience,' Ong said.
'So maybe once there is more collaboration in that area, more examples of successes in Singapore, people may be more open to see the conveniences that such technologies can bring to their lives,' he added.
'And I think once that happens, Japan will be an even more efficient country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
3 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Integrating New Sources, Voices, and Perspectives in Singapore's History
First-hand accounts from leaders including Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Keng Swee have cast the country's separation from Malaysia in 1965 in a new light. History is not a fixed narrative. It involves evolving accounts of the past shaped by those who lived it, along with those who remember, interpret, and examine them. As Singaporeans celebrate the 60th birthday of their country as an independent nation-state this month, it is a good time to reflect on how the history of Singapore has developed over time, particularly when new primary sources such as artifacts, historical documents, cabinet papers, and first-hand accounts come to light. Such additions can enhance and deepen our understanding of the Singaporean national identity, narratives, and purpose, as well as illuminate the complex dynamics of its politics and people. For a significant part of the 20th century, a dominant version of Singapore's history traced its founding to 1819, with the arrival of Sir Stamford Raffles and his subsequent colonial endeavors. School textbooks and past official narratives commonly marked this date as the starting point of 'modern' Singapore. However, this interpretation, while influential, has since been re-examined in light of compelling primary sources that stretch back centuries earlier, to a thriving community and port city known as Temasek. These sources reveal that pre-colonial Singapore was far from a sleepy fishing village. The Sejarah Melayu (Malay Annals), a 17th-century literary and historical compilation in Jawi, and Chinese records from the Yuan and Ming dynasties, indicate that a strategically important and economically thriving settlement existed as early as the 14th century. Temasek was mentioned as a regional trading port, and archaeological work in Fort Canning, Empress Place, and other parts of the island has confirmed the presence of ancient settlements on Singapore island. These sources challenge the idea that Singapore's history began with British colonization. Rather, they place Singapore within a richly interconnected regional maritime network, a hub that continuously interacted with empires and traders long before the arrival of the British. Recognizing this pre-colonial heritage honors the broader Southeast Asian – and Malay – context in which Singapore existed and developed. Just as the writing of Singapore's premodern history has evolved, the country's modern political history is undergoing a similar revision, with the emergence of new evidence and the integration of additional primary accounts. A central example of this is the narrative of Singapore's separation from Malaysia in 1965. Singapore officially joined the Federation of Malaysia in September 1963. However, the increasing differences between the governments of Singapore and Malaysia led to a separation in August 1965. For decades, many Singaporeans grew up with the impression that the country was 'kicked out' of the Malaysian Federation, casting the republic as the reluctant child of independence, unwanted and thrust into statehood unprepared. While dramatic, this version of events has increasingly been scrutinized by certain scholars and researchers, who have examined primary documents, including cabinet papers, letters and contemporary first-hand accounts, which reveal a more complex picture. These include the memoirs of then-Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew and the oral history accounts of then-Finance Minister Dr. Goh Keng Swee and Law Minister E.W. Barker, which can be found in the National Archives of Singapore. A significant piece of evidence that has come to light in recent years is the 'Albatross File,' a remarkable collection of notes and documents that Goh compiled during the secret negotiations with Malaysia. Based on excerpts seen by this author, the Albatross File illustrates how Goh came to view Singapore's integration into Malaysia in 1963 as increasingly unworkable, particularly due to the deep structural and political-economic divides between Malaya and Singapore. By December 2025, the previously confidential contents of the file will be published for the first time in a new book authorized by the Singaporean government. This book will provide the public with more details about the negotiations that preceded the separation. The personal accounts of these three leaders reveal that Singapore's separation from Malaysia was not imposed unilaterally. Instead, it was a carefully negotiated and planned outcome pursued out of necessity and strategic foresight. In a previously top secret memorandum to the cabinet, Lee wrote in early 1965 that Malaysian Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman mentioned to Goh in December 1964 about his desire to have Singapore 'hived off' from Malaya. Lee's analysis was the 'greatest attraction of this re-arrangement is our hope to get the benefit of both worlds, the common market, political stability with economic expansion, and autonomy in Singapore, without interference from K.L.' or Kuala Lumpur, the capital of Malaysia. In Goh's handwritten notes, he recorded the meeting with Malaysian ministers Tun Razak and Dato Isamil on the morning of July 20, 1965. In Tun Razak's office, he proposed the separation. According to Goh's oral history interview, he told them that the only way forward 'was for Singapore to secede completely' and that this should be 'done very quickly and very quietly, and presented a fait accompli.' Then, in July 1965, according to Lee's memoir and Barker's oral history account, Lee asked Barker to draft legal documents anticipating the state's separation and independence, revealing that legal, administrative, and political preparations were well underway, long before the televised declaration of separation. While familiar to academics and researchers who have accessed the National Archives, these first-hand sources undermine the earlier portrayal of Singapore as a reluctant recipient of independence, and instead positions the country's leaders as strategic decision-makers, actively working toward the possibility of sovereign independence. Understanding history through these recently surfaced documents and perspectives does more than simply correct the record; it can potentially rejuvenate our sense of citizenship and deepen our shared identity. A primary source, like a cabinet paper, if read carefully, does not just tell us what happened; it tells us why it happened the way it did, and how leaders responded in times of crisis. These findings strengthen the image of Singapore's leaders as political architects with foresight, determination, and clarity of purpose, as well as provide Singaporeans with a deeper and more nuanced understanding of this vital phase in the nation's history. As more documents are declassified and made available to the public, educators, historians, and the public have a critical role in responsibly interpreting these materials. The evolving understanding of the past is a result of cumulative learning, where we must be open to new discoveries, reinterpretations, and retellings. This calls for flexibility in the design of the Singaporean school curriculum, enabling students to explore multiple narratives and engage with different types of sources, whether it's an ancient Chinese document describing Temasek or Goh's Albatross File. Teaching history is less about memorizing dates than about analyzing evidence, interpreting motives, and asking critical questions. Rather than fear the revision of history, we should embrace it as a sign of a mature, analytical, reflective and forward-looking society. The understanding of Singapore, whether as ancient Temasek or a modern independent republic, will continue to evolve as researchers uncover more sources and make space for diverse viewpoints and richer evidence. Let us adopt a spirit of intellectual humility and curiosity, recognizing that history is not inscribed in stone, but a vibrant dialogue between the past and the present. By doing so, the national narratives become not only more accurate and inclusive, but also more empowering, so as to help us make better sense of our present and shape a more thoughtful and purposeful future.
The Diplomat
a day ago
- The Diplomat
Southeast Asia's Uneven Tourism Recovery, Explained
If we look back to the time before the COVID-19 pandemic brought international travel to a halt, tourism across Southeast Asia was absolutely booming. The six major markets (Singapore, Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia) attracted more than 127 million foreign tourists in 2019. Of these, Thailand was far and away the leader with nearly 40 million. Two years later, during the thick of global lockdowns, the figure dropped to 2.6 million. Since then, tourism in the region has been on a slow road to recovery, but even now has yet to regain those 2019 pre-pandemic heights. In 2024, the same six markets combined for 114 million tourist visits, roughly 89 percent of 2019 levels. And there are indications that the recovery is slowing, especially in certain markets. The Philippines has consistently struggled to attract visitors since the pandemic. The country was not a huge tourism draw to begin with, bringing in around 8 million visitors in 2019, even when the region as a whole was booming. Last year, inbound travelers were clocked at 5.4 million, just 66 percent of their pre-pandemic level. Thailand remains the regional leader with 35.5 million inbound tourists in 2024. But despite the big headline figure, the outlook is not great. As of June 2025, arrivals were roughly 5 percent lower than they were at the same time last year. That means unless it finishes the year with a big surge, Thailand is currently on pace to see fewer tourists than it did in 2024. At this rate, surpassing the pre-pandemic threshold of 40 million could take a while. Other markets are seeing more sustained recoveries, though they still fall short of pre-pandemic levels. Singapore is currently on track to slightly improve from the 16.5 million tourists who arrived in 2024. And Indonesia continues to see a steady recovery, with 13.9 million arrivals in 2024. As of June 2025, this was 9 percent ahead of last year's pace and the country looks set to exceed 14 million arrivals this year. To put that into perspective, 14 million was the number of tourists that visited Indonesia in 2017, a full eight years ago. Malaysia is almost back to pre-pandemic numbers with 25 million tourist arrivals in 2024, just below the 26 million they saw in 2019. If we include excursionists (visitors who come for the day but don't spend the night), that figure jumps up to 38 million, meaning Malaysia is actually ahead of Thailand in raw visitor traffic. But Malaysia is a bit of a special case in this regard, as many Singaporeans cross the border during the day for a variety of reasons (work, day trips, etc), but aren't really what we have in mind when talking about international tourist flows. Finally, Vietnam is a very interesting story to watch here. Before COVID-19, Vietnam saw 18 million inbound tourists. Last year, it was at 17.5 million, 98 percent of the pre-pandemic level. As of June 2025, more than 10 million tourists had entered the country, putting the country on pace to blow past the 2019 figure. Remarkably, this boom is being driven primarily by two countries: South Korea and China. Together they accounted for 8.3 million, or just under half, of all visitors last year. Clearly, there is substantial variation in terms of the pace and drivers of tourism recovery across the region. Some markets are bouncing back strongly, others more slowly. Making sense of this is complicated by the fact that tourism plays a different role in each national economy. For economies that are heavily reliant on exports, like Thailand and Vietnam, a strong recovery in tourism (which is a service export) is essential for economic stability. Even though Thailand is posting big headline figures of around 35 million arrivals, the fact that visitor numbers still haven't reached 2019 levels and seem to be weakening is not good news, given the challenges facing the Thai economy right now. Vietnam, meanwhile, appears to be rapidly catching up as the region's next big powerhouse exporter, not just of goods but also of services. For Indonesia, a modest recovery that takes a long time to return to 2019 levels could potentially be a good thing. Inbound tourism in Indonesia is heavily concentrated in and around Bali, and is linked to a range of problems like resource depletion, over-development, pollution and so forth. A more measured recovery allows time, if used wisely, for the industry to adjust to the influx of visitors and the strains that come with it. The breakneck pace of tourism growth in Vietnam, on the other hand, while good for the country's export-led style of economic development, will place considerable pressure on businesses, regulators and planners to keep up.
Japan Today
2 days ago
- Japan Today
Trump meets with Intel CEO after demanding he resign
U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday said he had a "very interesting" meeting with the chief of U.S. chip maker Intel, just days after calling for his resignation. Trump said on his Truth Social platform that he met with Lip-Bu Tan along with Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick and Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent. "The meeting was a very interesting one," Trump said in the post. "His success and rise is an amazing story." Trump added that members of his cabinet are going to spend time with Tan and bring the president "suggestions" next week. "Mr. Tan had the honor of meeting with President Trump for a candid and constructive discussion on Intel's commitment to strengthening U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership," the company said in a posted statement. Intel added that it looks "forward to working closely with him and his Administration as we restore this great American company." Trump demanded last week that the recently-hired boss of Intel resign "immediately," after a Republican senator raised national security concerns over his links to firms in China. "The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem," Trump posted on Truth Social last Thursday. Tan released a statement at the time saying that the company was engaged with the Trump administration to address the concerns raised and ensure officials "have the facts." Intel is one of Silicon Valley's most iconic companies but its fortunes have been dwarfed by Asian powerhouses TSMC and Samsung, which dominate the made-to-order semiconductor business. In a statement, Tan said there has been "a lot of misinformation circulating" about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems. "I have always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards," Tan said. The Malaysia-born tech industry veteran took the helm at struggling Intel in March, announcing layoffs as White House tariffs and export restrictions muddied the market. Intel's niche has been chips used in traditional computing processes, which are steadily being eclipsed by the AI revolution. © 2025 AFP
