&w=3840&q=100)
Why do so many British Pakistanis marry their cousins? Why is it a political issue now?
A debate on banning marriages between cousins has gripped the United Kingdom, where it is not illegal to marry your first cousin. However, the cultural practice has come under scrutiny in recent months.
In December last year, Conservative MP Richard Holden introduced legislation in the UK Parliament, arguing 'the practice is not really conducive to modern British society.' He called for outlawing consanguineous marriages, pointing to 'serious concerns' about the health risks of children of couples who are biological relatives.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
A large majority of Britons oppose such unions, a survey found in May. But many are against banning cousin marriages. But why?
Let's take a closer look.
Cousin marriages in the UK
Marriage between cousins has been legal in the UK since the 16th century. Queen Victoria and Charles Darwin are among the prominent Britons who married their cousins.
However, the practice later faded and became taboo as families became smaller and the awareness about genetic risks to babies born out of such unions grew. Despite this, cousin marriages are normal in some communities in the UK.
Today, between 40 and 60 per cent of the British Pakistani community are in consanguineous marriages, Patrick Nash, an expert on religious law and director of the Pharos Foundation social science research group, said, according to The Week.
Cousin marriages are also acceptable in certain parts of the world, including South Asia, West Asia and North Africa.
An estimated 10 to 15 per cent of newborns have parents who are biological relatives, reported Deutsche Welle.
The cultural practice is about securing wealth and property and keeping the family together. There is an 'optimistic assumption' that such unions would reduce the risk of rifts between in-laws, as per The Economist.
3/4th Britons want cousin marriages outlawed
About 77 per cent of Britons believe first cousin marriage should be illegal, according to a YouGov poll in May.
It also found that 47 per cent of British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis wanted the practice to be banned, while 39 per cent said it should be legal.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Some 77 per cent of white and Indian Britons supported prohibiting cousin marriages, compared to 82 per cent of black Britons.
Eight per cent of white Britons do not oppose consanguineous marriages. Six per cent of black Britons and nine per cent of Indian Britons said marrying your cousin should be legal.
A political hot topic
Cousin marriages were thrown into the limelight last December when Tory MP Richard Holden proposed a bill to ban first-cousin marriage in the UK. The legislation has been supported by Robert Jenrick, the runner-up in last year's Conservative leadership election.
'The British Pakistani community and, to a lesser degree, the Irish traveller community are removing themselves from wider society and closing themselves off,' Holden claimed.
The second reading of the bill in the House of Commons is likely this month.
Holden told DailyMail after YouGov's poll in May, 'The overwhelming majority of Brits, including those of Pakistan i heritage, want to see first cousin marriage banned.
'The fact Sir Keir Starmer and the Labour Party are standing in the way of ending an outdated practice rooted in misogynistic cultural practices shows that he's more interested in promoting cultural relativism than in ending practices that have no place in our country and isolate both individuals and communities from each other.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'If Starmer really believed in British values he'd back my bill, just like every community in Britain does.'
Among the different reasons for those wanting a ban on cousin marriages, one is the health risks to kids born to parents who are related.
As per a briefing on childhood deaths in Bradford, Birmingham and the London borough of Redbridge, '20-40 per cent' of them may be 'due to genetic disorders associated with consanguinity and chromosomal conditions", reported The Week.
The Born in Bradford study found that a child with a first cousin is six per cent more likely to have a congenital health problem, compared to three per cent in the broader population.
Kids born to parents who are biologically related may have health risks. Representational Image/Pixabay
Joyce Harper, a professor in reproductive science at University College London, told BBC that the children born out of a consanguineous relationship could have genetic disease if both parents have faulty genes.
'The issue with cousins marrying is what we call recessive diseases, so things like cystic fibrosis and thalassaemia where both of the couple have to have an error in that same gene.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'So genetics is the main worry, but there are other risks, but it's still very low and I just don't think it's our right to dictate. I think it's our right to educate those communities.'
As per a 2021 study, 55 per cent of British Pakistanis are married to first cousins. However, the practice has been on the decline.
The Born in Bradford project, which studied 13,500 families between 2007 and 2011, found that 60 per cent of couples with Pakistani roots were either first cousins, second cousins or other blood relatives.
But this figure plunged from 60 to 40 per cent in a follow-up study between 2016 and 2020. The rates of consanguineous marriage were around 30 per cent for couples of Pakistani heritage who were both born in the UK.
Norway has banned cousin marriages, while Sweden and Denmark also plan a similar move. As this demand surfaces in the UK, many have warned that outlawing cousin marriages would stigmatise those who are already in such unions.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Independent MP Iqbal Mohamed said earlier that such a ban would be ineffective and called for a 'more positive approach', such as advanced genetic tests for prospective married cousins. He also suggested education programmes to raise awareness of the health risks.
Professor Dominic Wilkinson, an NHS neonatologist and ethics expert at the University of Oxford, has also opposed a ban on consanguineous marriages, calling it 'unethical'. Instead, he proposed offering special screening on the NHS to help such couples decide if they should consider having children.
Nazir Afzal, a former chief prosecutor for north-west England, said last year that cousin marriage should remain legal, highlighting the falling rates. Politicising the issue would mean Muslims 'will be reluctant to talk about it and educate others if they think it's just a hammer which the far right would use to attack their communities', he said at a public debate.
With inputs from agencies
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
18 minutes ago
- Hans India
MLAs defections: SC gives Speaker 3 months to decide
Hyderabad/New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a crucial verdict on the petition filed by the BRS leaders on the disqualification of 10 of its MLAs, who had joined the ruling Congress party. The apex court asked the Telangana Assembly speaker to take a decision within the next three months. In its 74-page judgement, the court struck down the orders of the division bench of the High Court and wanted the Parliament to take a decision on the time-limit for the speaker to take a decision. It observed that it cannot allow a situation of 'operation successful, but patient dead' by allowing the petition to be kept pending, which would eventually allow the MLAs to benefit. The apex court rejected the prayer by the petitioners that it should decide the disqualification petitions, referring to the precedents in Kihoto Hollahan and Subhash Desai cases of a similar nature. BRS working president K T Rama Rao and MLA Padi Kaushik Reddy had filed the petitions against the MLAs' defections. The Supreme Court observed that the MLAs should not ask for extending the process as if they persist with such a plea, the Speaker can take an adverse decision. Political defections have become a topic of discussions and if these are not stopped, these have the power to damage democracy, it held. 'We have also examined various speeches made in Parliament on this issue on various occasions. The Speaker's decision on disqualification proceedings is to avoid delay in courts. The Speaker is empowered to act against those who have changed parties. The powers of judicial review in relation to Articles 136, 226, 227 are very limited. The division bench erred in interfering with the orders of the single judge of the Telangana High Court. The Speaker, while acting as a judicial officer, acts as a tribunal subject to the jurisdiction of the High Court and the Supreme Court,' the court ruled. The Court observed that the Speaker cannot get constitutional protection by acting in such a manner. 'We are setting aside the judgment of the division bench of the Telangana High Court on November 22, 2014. Even in important decisions, Speakers of the Legislative Assembly are delaying action against defectors who pose a threat to democracy. Therefore, there was a need for Parliament to review the existing mechanism for disqualification of MLAs under the Anti-Defection Act. Such actions become meaningless after years. It is unfortunate that the Speaker has issued a notice on the issue only after the Supreme Court had issued a notice'.


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Opposition will derail Punjab's development if voted to power, says Arvind Kejriwal
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convener and former Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal on Thursday said that the development trajectory of Punjab would be derailed if the opposition returns to power. Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) national convener Arvind Kejriwal along with Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann, cabinet minister Aman Arora and senior AAP leader Manish Sisodia at an event in Shaheed Udham Singh Wala town on Thursday. (HT) He made the statement while addressing a public gathering on the martyrdom day of freedom fighter Udham Singh and laying the foundation stone for development projects worth ₹85 crore in Shaheed Udham Singh Wala town. Accompanied by Punjab chief minister Bhagwant Mann, cabinet minister Aman Arora and senior AAP leader Manish Sisodia, Kejriwal criticised previous governments led by Congress and the Akali-BJP alliance for 'looting public wealth' and 'introducing drugs' into the state. He accused them of misusing power, promoting corruption and neglecting vital sectors like education and healthcare. 'The previous regimes ruined Punjab. They never cared for the youth, hospitals were in shambles and public money was mercilessly looted for personal gain,' Kejriwal said. He added that even after 75 years of Independence, the vision of India's freedom fighters remained unfulfilled due to the actions of such leaders. The event was also a tribute to Shaheed Udham Singh, the legendary freedom fighter who avenged the Jallianwala Bagh massacre by assassinating Michael O'Dwyer in 1940. Chief minister Bhagwant Mann, speaking at the event, highlighted the importance of commemorating martyrs and preserving their legacy. 'It is our solemn duty to honour heroes like Shaheed Udham Singh. He waited 21 years to avenge the massacre, and his courage laid the foundation for India's eventual independence,' Mann said. Mann emphasised that naming airports, universities and institutions after national heroes helps in keeping their sacrifices alive in public memory. He also criticised the British colonial administration for honoring collaborators with titles like 'Sir', citing the example of a family that hosted General Dyer on the very day of the Jallianwala Bagh massacre. 'Every inch of this sacred land carries the legacy of our Gurus, saints and martyrs, who showed us how to resist tyranny and injustice,' the CM concluded.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Pakistan jails more than 100 members of ex-PM Imran Khan's party for 2023 riots
A Pakistani anti-terrorism court on Thursday sentenced more than 100 members of jailed former Prime Minister 's party to prison terms on charges related to riots that targeted military sites in 2023, a court order said. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Fifty-eight of the defendants, who included parliamentarians and senior officials, were sentenced to 10 years in prison and the rest were given sentences ranging from one to three years, the court said. The accused include Omar Ayub Khan and Shibli Faraz, the leaders of Khan's opposition Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party (PTI) in the lower and upper houses of parliament respectively, the court order seen by Reuters read. "The prosecution has proved its case against the accused without a shadow of doubt," it said in announcing the sentences. Khan, who has been in prison since 2023 facing charges of corruption, land fraud and disclosure of official secrets, is being tried separately on similar charges related to the riot. The government accuses him and other leaders of inciting the May 9, 2023, protests, during which demonstrators attacked military and government buildings, including the army headquarters in Rawalpindi. He denies wrongdoing and says all the cases are politically motivated as part of a military-backed crackdown to dismantle his party. The military denies it. Khan's arrest had prompted the countrywide violent protests. Thursday's ruling does not directly affect the incitement case against him in which prosecution is still presenting witnesses. The PTI party said it will challenge the verdict. The ruling is the third such mass conviction this month; Khan's party says they have included at least 14 of its parliamentarians. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They will lose their seats in parliament under Pakistani laws, which will shred Khan's opposition party's strength. Another 77 were acquitted for lack of evidence in the latest verdict, which is linked to an attack on the office of an intelligence agency in eastern city of Faisalabad, the court said. The party plans new protests starting on August 5, the second anniversary of Khan's jailing, to demand his release.