The firefighters killed and injured in Sunday's attack had nearly 70 years combined experience. Here's what we know
Gun violenceFacebookTweetLink
Follow
Two firefighters were fatally shot and a third is seriously injured after investigators say a lone gunman opened fire on crews responding to a brush fire on Canfield Mountain Sunday, near Coeur d' Alene, Idaho.
The now deceased suspect is believed to have started the fire intentionally to draw-in and target responding firefighters, officials have said.
Within an hour of being deployed, firefighters reported being shot at as the blaze continued to burn.
Various agencies, including the Spokane County Sheriff's Office, Idaho State Police and Coeur d'Alene Police Department, were caught in an exchange of fire for about 90 minutes, according to Kootenai County Sheriff Robert Norris.
The two firefighters killed in the fray have been identified as Kootenai County Fire and Rescue Chief Frank Harwood and Coeur d'Alene Fire Department Battalion Chief John Morrison.
The injured firefighter has been identified as Coeur d'Alene Fire Department engineer Dave Tysdal, according to fire officials. He is in critical condition.
'This wasn't an event that we had trained for,' said Coeur d'Alene Fire Department Chief Tom Greif during a Monday news conference.
'We train every day for high risk, low frequency events that are dangerous in our profession, but we never imagined that we would be ambushed responding to a wildland incident at a command post,' Greif said.
With nearly 70 years of fire fighting experience combined, Harwood, Morrison and Tysdal have left an indelible impact on the Coeur d'Alene community, fire officials said.
Here's what we know:
A member of Kootenai County Fire and Rescue for 17 years, Harwood was married and had two children, Chief Christopher Way said.
Harwood was also a former Army National Guard combat engineer, Way said.
'Chief Harwood was a leader in our organization. He did an amazing job. He was a shift commander and he was well respected by his shift,' Way said Monday. 'This loss is felt by so many, including all of the members of his shift.'
Morrison served with the Coeur d'Alene Fire Department for more than 28 years and moved up the ranks in his department from firefighter to battalion chief, Greif said.
'These guys were hard workers,' said Gabe Eckert, President of the Coeur d'Alene Firefighter's union. 'They loved their families.'
Eckert shared his final memory with Morrison during Monday's news conference, recalling a time when the pair smoked cigars during a rare lull at the fire station.
'We talked about being better fathers, we talked about being better leaders, talked about being better firefighters,' Eckert said.
'I just want to say I am so incredibly grateful that that gets to be my last memory with him.'
An engineer with the Coeur d'Alene Fire Department, Tysdal is recovering after undergoing two surgeries and is in critical condition, according to Greif.
Tysdal has been an engineer with the fire department for 23 years, Grief said.
'We thank everyone for their love and support,' a family statement read by Greif said.
'Dave is surrounded by his family, and he is able to open his eyes and the two surgeries have gone well,' the statement added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
39 minutes ago
- The Verge
The FCC won't enforce a ban on ‘exorbitant' prison phone call prices
The Federal Communications Commission will suspend the enforcement of a rule that would lower the price of prison phone and video calls. On Monday, the Trump-appointed FCC Chair Brendan Carr announced that prisons won't have to comply with the pricing rules until April 1st, 2027, reversing plans to apply the caps this year. Family members and friends of incarcerated people have long been charged fees the FCC described in 2024 as 'exorbitant' to keep in touch with phone or video calls. Though some states — like Connecticut, California, Minnesota, and Massachusetts — have made phone calls from prison free, the majority of states allow fees that can reach as high as $11.35 for a 15-minute phone call, often including kickbacks to the jails and local governments. In 2023, former President Joe Biden aimed to address call prices by signing the Martha Wright-Reed law, a rule that allows the FCC to regulate the rates of phone calls from prison and lower existing price caps. The FCC voted to adopt the new rates last year, promising to drop the price of a 15-minute phone call to just 90 cents in larger prisons. The rules were set to go into effect on a staggered basis starting January 1st, 2025. On Monday, however, the FCC declared it will hold off on enforcing these rules for two more years. In his announcement, Carr says that the efforts to regulate prison phone calls are 'leading to negative, unintended consequences,' claiming that the rules would make the caps 'too low' to cover 'required safety measures' and wouldn't give states enough time to find another source of funds. He adds that the decision to delay these rules is supposed to ensure that 'important safety and security protocols are maintained,' which he indicates could include the adoption of public safety tools with 'advanced AI and machine learning.' Carr partially voted to approve the phone call caps in 2024. FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez slammed Carr's decision to pause the implementation of the Martha Wright-Reed Act. 'Rather than enforce the law, the Commission is now stalling, shielding a broken system that inflates costs and rewards kickbacks to correctional facilities at the expense of incarcerated individuals and their loved ones,' Gomez said in a statement. 'It's time for the FCC to do its job. Its responsibility is not to protect profit-driven contracts — it is to uphold the law and serve the public.'
Forbes
40 minutes ago
- Forbes
Diddy Trial: Jury Asks For Clarity On Racketeering Charge As Deliberations Continue
The jury deliberating whether Sean 'Diddy' Combs is guilty of racketeering and sex trafficking sent a note to the judge seeking clarity on the racketeering charge, the jury's second question after it told the judge one of the jurors may not be able to follow instructions. The jury in the criminal case against Diddy began deliberating Monday. (Photo by Amy Sussman/Getty ... More Images for MRC) Getty Images for MRC The jury asked Judge Arun Subramanian late Monday afternoon, the first day of deliberations, for clarity on whether it is considered drug distribution if a person who is asked for controlled substances provides them to that person, CNN reported. Drug distribution is one of the alleged acts jurors are being asked to consider when deciding whether Combs is guilty of the racketeering charge, alongside bribery, forced labor, kidnapping, arson and sex trafficking, according to the jury's verdict sheet. Subramanian said Tuesday morning he would refer the jury to language in its instructions about drug distribution: 'The word 'distribution' means actual, constructive, or attempted transfer. To distribute simply means to deliver, to pass over, or to hand over something to another person, or to cause it to be delivered, passed on, or handed over to another. Distribution does not require a sale.' The jury will return to deliberations Tuesday, after it deliberated for more than five hours on Monday. Quickly after deliberations began Monday, the jury gave Subramanian a note that said: 'We have a juror, No. 25, who we are concerned cannot follow your honor's instructions.' Subramanian returned a note to the jury reminding 'every juror of their duty to deliberate and their obligation to follow my instruction on the law,' urging them to continue deliberating. Mark Zauderer, a veteran trial and appellate lawyer, told Forbes jury questions are not uncommon and that the problem may blow over if the jury moves on and does not request any more intervention from the judge. When Could The Jury Return A Verdict—and Will Diddy Be Convicted? It's unclear, as the jury will deliberate as long as it needs to reach a verdict. Subramanian has previously said he wanted to wrap up the trial, which began in May, by the July 4 weekend. Legal analysts previously told Forbes the prosecution presented a strong case against Combs, but it is impossible to know what a jury will decide. Zauderer said he believes Combs is more likely to be convicted than acquitted, but noted such a verdict may depend on whether the jury believes prosecutors sufficiently proved Combs ran a 'criminal enterprise,' which would satisfy the racketeering charge. Former federal prosecutor Mark Chutkow also said the prosecution made a 'very compelling case,' noting the prosecution's emphasis on surveillance video depicting Combs attacking his ex-girlfriend and a key witness in the case, Cassie Ventura, in a Los Angeles hotel. Chutkow said, however, a jury may feel the video depicts domestic violence, which he is not charged with, instead of sex trafficking or racketeering. Chutkow also said it is possible the trial could end with a hung jury, meaning not all jurors agree on a verdict. Combs faces five federal charges: two counts of sex trafficking, two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution and one count of racketeering conspiracy. He pleaded not guilty to all charges. Throughout the trial, the government has called high-profile victims to testify, including Ventura, considered a key witness for both the racketeering and sex trafficking charges. She testified Combs coerced her into 'freak-off' sex performances throughout their decade-long relationship, which she said his employees assisted in producing, which some legal experts said could be evidence of Combs operating a criminal enterprise. Rapper Kid Cudi also testified Combs broke into his home and said he believed Combs was involved with setting his car on fire after he discovered Kid Cudi and Ventura were dating. Other alleged sex trafficking victims central to the prosecution's case testified under the pseudonyms 'Jane' and 'Mia.' Judge Orders Diddy Jury To 'Continue Deliberating' After Concerns Over Juror No. 25 (Forbes) Jury Begins Deliberating Criminal Case Against Diddy: Here's Why A Verdict Is So Unpredictable (Forbes)
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Sean "Diddy" Combs trial jury resumes deliberations as judge responds to another question
With no verdict reached in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial on the first day of deliberations, the jury of eight men and four women gathered again Tuesday to continue discussing the charges. Judge Arun Subramanian began by addressing with the prosecution and defense a question posed Monday from the jury about one of the alleged racketeering acts — possession with intent to distribute drugs — which relates to the racketeering conspiracy charge Combs is facing. The jury sent a note asking for clarification on the part of the instructions addressing drug distribution. Subramanian said he would remind jurors of the instructions he gave them on that part of the case before they started deliberating on Monday. Combs' lawyers had pushed for a more expansive response, but prosecutors argued — and Subramanian agreed — that doing so could end up confusing jurors more. An exchange between Subramanian and Combs' defense team got a little testy as they wrangled over the response. "Can you do what I'm asking or no?" the judge asked. "Of course I can do what your honor is asking," one of the defense lawyers responded. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to federal charges of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking, and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution for allegedly arranging to fly sex workers across state lines. The first day of deliberations saw several notes from the jury, as well as Combs and his supporters bowing their heads in prayer in the courtroom. One of the notes came not long after jurors started deliberating and raised concerns from several jurors about another member of the panel. They told the judge they thought "he cannot follow your honor's instructions." After a discussion between the judge, attorneys for Combs and prosecutors, the judge reminded the jurors of their obligation to follow the law and sent them back to resume their deliberations, but said if more issues should arise, the foreperson should send another note. To help them come to a verdict, jurors were provided with a laptop loaded with all of the exhibits shown in court, including text messages, photographs and videos of the sexual encounters at the heart of the case. Five alternate jurors are also on standby in case they're needed to fill in on the main jury. The jury will sift through seven weeks of at times graphic and emotional testimony about the rap, fashion and reality TV impresario's propensity for violence and his sexual predilections, including drug-fueled sex marathons dubbed "freak-offs" or "hotel nights." Defense lawyers argued that there was no conspiracy and that his conduct did not violate federal laws. contributed to this report.
