
Allahabad HC Refuses Bail To Man Accused Of Sharing Posts Targeting PM Modi
Last Updated: August 06, 2025, 19:36 IST
The High Court noted the discrepancies in the applicant's stand.
The Allahabad High Court (HC) recently refused to grant bail to a man accused of publishing Facebook posts that allegedly demeaned Prime Minister Narendra Modi and glorified Pakistan.
Calling the material 'provocative and objectionable," the court held that it was capable of inciting communal unrest and disturbing public order.
The bail application was filed by Tahir Mewati, a resident of Bulandshahr district, who is facing prosecution under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He has been in custody since May 14, following a First Information Report (FIR) lodged at Salempur police station by a local sub-inspector.
Digital evidence recovered during the investigation, including IP address logs linked to Mewati's residence, metadata, and a mobile phone allegedly used to run the account, was submitted in support of the prosecution's case.
Mewati, in his defence, claimed that the Facebook profile was fake and created by unknown individuals to damage his reputation. His counsel argued that he had neither posted nor shared any offensive material and sought bail on grounds of false implication and clean antecedents.
The High Court, however, noted the discrepancies in the applicant's stand. While he earlier stated in a lower court that 'only certain memes" were uploaded without intent to incite, he later denied posting anything at all, an inconsistency the court said undermined his claim of innocence.
The bench of Justice Sanjay Kumar Singh found the nature of the content attributed to the applicant deeply concerning. Observing that the posts were not only offensive but carried the potential to 'promote a narrative contrary to the interest of national sovereignty," the court pointed to a pattern of 'inclination towards glorification of anti-national ideology."
The court also referred to its own precedent in Niyaz Ahmad Khan v. State of U.P., which had emphasised that while social media is a tool of free expression, it cannot become a platform for abusive or destabilising content. 'Such persons who are deliberately involved in such acts… are hazardous to the civilized society and they are not entitled for any sympathy," the earlier ruling stated.
Swipe Left For Next Video View all
On those lines, the High Court concluded that there was no good ground to release Mewati on bail. The bail plea was therefore denied.
The court clarified that its findings were limited to the question of bail and would not influence the outcome of the trial. Salil Tiwari
Salil Tiwari, Senior Special Correspondent at Lawbeat, reports on the Allahabad High Court and courts in Uttar Pradesh, however, she also writes on important cases of national importance and public interests fr... Read More
Salil Tiwari, Senior Special Correspondent at Lawbeat, reports on the Allahabad High Court and courts in Uttar Pradesh, however, she also writes on important cases of national importance and public interests fr... Read More view comments News india Allahabad HC Refuses Bail To Man Accused Of Sharing Posts Targeting PM Modi Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Read More

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
4 hours ago
- News18
Lawyer Daughter Challenges Ex-IG Father's Order Sacking UP Cop, Gets It Overturned
Last Updated: Retired IPS officer Rakesh Singh faced his daughter, advocate Anura Singh, in Allahabad High Court. Anura argued procedural flaws, leading to a constable's reinstatement. In a striking instance of professional integrity taking precedence over personal ties, a retired Indian Police Service (IPS) officer found himself on the opposite side of the courtroom—facing his own daughter in a legal battle in the Allahabad High Court. The case pertains to the retired top cop's suspension order for a constable, which was challenged by his advocate daughter, who appeared as counsel for the suspended constable, and finally got the order overturned, PTI reported. What's The Case? Rakesh Singh, a 2003-batch IPS officer and former Inspector General (IG) of Bareilly Range, had ordered the dismissal of constable Taufiq Ahmad after a girl accused him of molestation in Jaunray 2023. A POCSO case was filed against Ahmad. While the lower court later acquitted him, the police department dismissed him from service. The then IG Rakesh Singh had taken a 'strict but duty-bound" decision to remove Ahmad from service, citing the severity of the charges. He had also rejected Ahmad's appeal against the dismissal Challenging this, Ahmad approached the Allahabad High Court, appointing advocate Anura Singh, Rakesh Singh's daughter, as his lawyer, the report added. In the court, she argued in the suspended constable's favour and said that the departmental inquiry violated the Uttar Pradesh Police Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991. She further said that the inquiry and dismissal order were flawed and did not comply with legal requirements. Meanwhile, her father — the officer who had signed the dismissal order — was summoned to defend the department's action. On one side stood the seasoned former IG, who defended the police department's decision. On the other hand, his determined daughter highlighted procedural flaws and legal violations in the inquiry process. The High Court eventually quashed the departmental proceedings and ordered Bareilly Police to reinstate Ahmad. 'This writ petition thus, succeeds and is allowed. The inquiry report dated 14.04.2023 and order of the disciplinary authority dated 11.12.2023 are hereby quashed," the judgment dated July 31, 2025, said, as reported by the news agency. 'This was simply about doing our respective jobs," Anura said, adding that the authority of the court stands above all personal equations. Rakesh Singh said he was proud his daughter upheld her professional role, while Ahmad expressed gratitude, saying he was unaware of the personal connection during the case. view comments First Published: August 10, 2025, 17:06 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
In rare courtroom twist, lawyer daughter wins case against ex-IG father; restores sacked cop's job, honour
'Just doing our jobs,' say both sides Live Events From accusation to acquittal & redemption (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel In a real-life legal drama fit for the big screen, a daughter-lawyer and her former police chief father found themselves on opposite sides of a case — yet both insist there was no personal feud, according to a TOI Anura Singh, practising at the Allahabad High Court , successfully fought for the reinstatement of UP Police head constable Tofeek Ahmad, who had been dismissed from service after being accused of molesting a the other side was her father, retired Inspector General of Bareilly Range, Dr. Rakesh Singh , who had upheld Ahmad's dismissal during his High Court, in its July 31 order, overturned both the departmental inquiry report and the dismissal, clearing the way for Ahmad's return to duty. The compliance order will now be sent to the SSP Bareilly before his reinstatement is described the unusual courtroom moment as strictly professional. 'My father was representing the government's position, and I was defending my client. The High Court stands above any administrative authority — our job was to present the facts and secure justice,' she Singh agreed, adding, 'I'm proud of her. She worked hard, argued within the legal framework, and achieved what she set out to do.'For Anura, the case was about exposing flaws in the termination process, particularly since her client had been acquitted by a lower court due to investigative lapses, TOI further Dr. Singh, his earlier decision reflected the department's policy that an officer's conduct must not tarnish its reputation, especially in sensitive cases involving the POCSO ordeal began in January 2023, when he was arrested for allegedly molesting a 17-year-old girl, the daughter of a BSF jawan, aboard the Triveni Express. Following a departmental probe, IG Singh ordered his dismissal. Even after a court acquittal, Ahmad's appeal for reinstatement was of his lawyer's family connection, Ahmad approached Anura for help. She took on the case and convinced the court that the inquiry and disciplinary action were deeply flawed, noted the TOI revelation that his 'saviour' was the daughter of the officer who had sacked him left Ahmad stunned. 'She put truth above family ties and upheld the law. She gave me back my job and my honour,' he said.


The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
U.P. cop reinstated by High Court after ex-IG's daughter argues case against father's order
In a striking instance of professional integrity taking precedence over personal ties, the Allahabad High Court has reinstated a police constable dismissed by then Bareilly Range Inspector General Rakesh Singh (now retired), after the constable's appeal was argued by Mr. Singh's daughter, advocate Anura Singh. Constable Taufiq Ahmad was dismissed on January 13, 2023, following departmental proceedings over allegedly sexually assaulting a woman passenger and offences under the POCSO Act, lodged at the GRP police station. He was also sent to jail in connection with the case. Mr. Rakesh Singh had taken a "strict but duty-bound" decision to remove him from service, citing the severity of the charges. Mr. Ahmad challenged the dismissal in the High Court, where Mr. Anura Singh argued that the inquiry violated the Uttar Pradesh Police Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991. She contended that the inquiry officer had not only found the charges proved but also recommended punishment — a power reserved solely for the disciplinary authority. Justice Ajit Kumar agreed with the argument, quashed the inquiry report and the dismissal order, and directed Mr. Ahmad's reinstatement with a fresh inquiry to be completed within three months. "This was simply about doing our respective jobs," Mr. Anura said on Sunday (August 10, 2025), adding that the authority of the court stands above all personal equations. Mr. Rakesh Singh said he was proud his daughter upheld her professional role, while Mr. Ahmad expressed gratitude, saying he was unaware of the personal connection during the case.