
Social security to get huge August update for millions of Americans? SSA provides key update
The Social Security Administration has reversed its plan to mandate a one-time PIN for phone verification after facing criticism from advocacy groups. The initial proposal would have required millions to use an online PIN, potentially overwhelming offices with in-person visits. Now, the PIN remains optional, offering a faster verification method for those with online accounts while retaining existing phone procedures.
Reuters
The SSA said it would introduce a new multi-factor authorization policy starting mid-August, adding that it plans to roll out a new Security Authentication Pin
The Social Security Administration is walking back a controversial policy proposal that would have required millions of Americans to verify their identity with a one-time PIN when using the agency's national phone line. The rule, which sparked widespread concern among advocacy groups and retirees alike, will no longer be mandatory, the SSA has now confirmed.
The SSA's previous controversial policy that would have required millions of Americans to verify their identity with a one-time PIN when using the agency's national phone line sparked massive outrage. In August, the agency proposed that anyone calling on to update personal information, check the status of benefits, or request forms would need to retrieve a Security Authentication PIN (SAP) through their online "my Social Security" account before completing their call.
ALSO READ: Social Security in August: Recipients to receive their checks on these dates. How can you make the most of it?
The SSA said it would introduce a new multi-factor authorization policy starting mid-August, adding that it plans to roll out a new Security Authentication Pin (SAP) to protect beneficiaries' personal accounts. That plan drew fierce criticism from organizations like AARP and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, who said the change could have forced millions of seniors and disabled Americans to make in-person visits to field offices. Later on, the SSA issued a clarification in this regard.SSA's announcement of introducing one-time PIN triggered sharp criticism from advocates who suggested that the in-person visits required to facilitate such a shift would put people with disabilities, senior citizens, and rural communities at risk of being left out. As concerns grew, the agency confirmed that in-office visits would not be mandatory for those willing to opt into the SSA's latest security provision. ALSO READ: Stimulus payments August 2025: These US states will receive financial benefit. Do you qualify?'The filing with OMB will be amended to clarify that the use of the Security Authentication PIN (SAP) feature is entirely optional,' a spokesperson for the agency told Newsweek.
'We are encouraging my Social Security account holders to use the enhanced SAP feature to quickly and securely verify their identity when calling the National 800 Number. Beneficiaries and my Social Security account holders are not required to set up or have a SAP for identity verification or manage their benefits over the phone – when calling the National 800 Number, they will continue to use the existing identity verification process.'
"The policy is being updated to clarify that the PIN feature is optional," an SSA spokesperson said, according to Nextgov. "Callers who prefer not to use the SAP will still be able to verify their identity using current phone procedures."According to SSA estimates, the now-abandoned mandate could have led to over three million additional trips to Social Security offices annually, overwhelming a system already facing long wait times and staffing shortages. This update brings relief to many older Americans who feared the change would make it harder to access Social Security services—especially those in rural areas with poor internet connectivity or individuals with disabilities that hinder online access.
ALSO READ: Emergency air quality alert in New York as Canadian wildfire crisis escalates. Here's how you can track and what you should do Rather than requiring callers to use the Speech Access PIN (SAP) system, the agency is now encouraging those with online accounts to use their PIN to help shorten call times. According to the SSA, using a SAP can cut an average of three minutes off each call. However, it remains just one of several available identity verification options.
ALSO READ: Who is Nancy Mace? Lawmaker who loves ICE detention videos now wants to govern South Carolina
The SSA initially intended to require in-person visits for verification, eliminating the phone call option. However, this move would have added 3.4 million additional office visits, according to reports. With recent staffing cuts, each SSA employee is now responsible for an estimated 1,480 beneficiaries, per AFGE data—making the policy unmanageable. As a result, phone verification has been reinstated to ease the burden.This reversal is the latest in a series of policy shifts aimed at modernizing identity protection while still balancing accessibility. Earlier this year, the agency already made online verification mandatory for more sensitive actions like changing direct deposit information or applying for benefits. But even then, exceptions were made for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients and certain Medicare enrollees.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Oil little changed after hitting one-week low, oversupply concerns linger
Oil prices were little changed on Tuesday after three days of declines on mounting oversupply concerns after OPEC+ agreed to another large output increase in September, though the potential for more Russian supply disruptions supported the market. Brent crude futures were unchanged at $68.76 a barrel by 0036 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $66.27 a barrel, down 2 cents, or 0.03%. Productivity Tool Zero to Hero in Microsoft Excel: Complete Excel guide By Metla Sudha Sekhar View Program Finance Introduction to Technical Analysis & Candlestick Theory By Dinesh Nagpal View Program Finance Financial Literacy i e Lets Crack the Billionaire Code By CA Rahul Gupta View Program Digital Marketing Digital Marketing Masterclass by Neil Patel By Neil Patel View Program Finance Technical Analysis Demystified- A Complete Guide to Trading By Kunal Patel View Program Productivity Tool Excel Essentials to Expert: Your Complete Guide By Study at home View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Both contracts fell by more than 1% in the previous session to settle at their lowest in a week. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies, together known as OPEC+, pumps about half of the world's oil and had been curtailing production for several years to support the market, but the group introduced a series of accelerated output hikes this year to regain market share. In its latest decision, OPEC+ agreed on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September. Live Events It marks a full and early reversal of the group's largest tranche of output cuts, amounting to about 2.5 million bpd, or about 2.4% of global demand, though analysts caution the actual amount returning to the market will be less. At the same time, U.S. demands for India to stop buying Russian oil as Washington seeks ways to push Moscow for a peace deal with Ukraine is increasing concerns of a disruption to supply flows. U.S. President Donald Trump is threatening to impose 100% secondary tariffs on Russian crude buyers. This follows a 25% tariff on Indian imports announced in July. India is the biggest buyer of seaborne crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million bpd of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. "India has become a major buyer of the Kremlin's oil since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Any disruption to those purchases would force Russia to find alternative buyers from an increasingly small group of allies," ANZ senior commodity strategist Daniel Hynes wrote in a note. Traders are also awaiting any developments on the latest U.S. tariffs on its trading partners, which analysts fear could slow down economic growth and dampen fuel demand growth.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Miners and banks drive Australian shares higher
Aug 5 (Reuters) - Australian shares climbed on Tuesday, driven by gains in miners and banks, while investors globally firmed their bets for a U.S. rate cut in September after last week's soft jobs data. The S&P/ASX 200 index rose 0.9% to 8,741.60 by 0037 GMT, trading near its record high of 8,776.40 hit on July 18. Data released on Friday showed that U.S. employment growth was weaker than expected in July while the nonfarm payrolls count for the previous two months was revised down, raising fears of slowing growth in the world's largest economy. The weaker numbers bolstered expectations for a Federal Reserve interest rate cut in September, with the CME Fedwatch tool showing a more than 94% probability. In Sydney, index heavyweight miners gained 1.4% after iron ore prices strengthened overnight, helped by firm near-term demand in top consumer China. Mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP gained 1.1% and 1%, respectively. Gold stocks jumped 2.2%, with Northern Star Resources rising 3.1%. Banks advanced 0.8%, with the "Big Four" banks gaining between 0.4% and 1.2%. The Reserve Bank of Australia is set to announce its next cash rate decision on August 12, and investors are pricing in a 51% chance of an interest rate cut, according to the RBA Watch tool. In July, the central bank left rates steady at 3.85%. Technology stocks tracked their U.S. peers higher and were last up 1.6%. WiseTech Global climbed 1.4%. Among individual stocks, TPG Telecom fell 2.5% as the company cut its annual pro-forma earnings forecast. Earlier in the day, it rallied as much as 4.2% to its highest since August 2022. In New Zealand, the benchmark S&P/NZX 50 index rose 0.6% to 12,764.82, ahead of the second-quarter jobs report due on Wednesday. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand policy decision is due on August 20 and investors have priced in an 80% chance of a 25-basis-point rate cut. (Reporting by Shivangi Lahiri in Bengaluru; Editing by Subhranshu Sahu)


The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
U.S. reverses pledge to link disaster funds to Israel boycott stance
The Trump administration on Monday (August 4, 2025) reversed course on requiring U.S. cities and States to rebuke boycotts of Israeli companies in order to receive disaster funds, according to a statement, and deleted the earlier policy from its website. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security removed its statement that said States must certify they will not sever 'commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies' to qualify for the funding. Reuters reported on Monday that the language applied to at least $1.9 billion that states rely on to cover search-and-rescue equipment, emergency manager salaries and backup power systems, among other expenses, according to 11 agency grant notices reviewed by Reuters. This is a shift for the administration of President Donald Trump, which has previously tried to penalise institutions that don't align with its views on Israel or antisemitism. Economic pressure on Israel The disaster funding requirement took aim at the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement designed to put economic pressure on Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian territories. The campaign's supporters grew more vocal in 2023, after Hamas attacked southern Israel and Israel invaded Gaza in response. 'FEMA grants remain governed by existing law and policy and not political litmus tests,' said DHS Spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin in a statement on Monday afternoon. DHS oversees the Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA in grant notices posted on Friday said states must follow its 'terms and conditions' to qualify for disaster preparation funding. Those conditions required that they not support what the agency called a 'discriminatory prohibited boycott,' a term defined as refusing to deal with 'companies doing business in or with Israel.' The new terms, posted later on Monday, do not include that language.