Smart Roadster: spice up summer with a £1500 gem
The most obvious, and persistent, was the between-gears interruption generated by the automated manual transmission. The Roadster's gearbox was not an especially speedy shuffler of clustered cogs and its six gears meant that, unless cruising, you'd experience perpetual ascents and descents of its generous ratio set. And if you left the 'box to think about its own shifting, you'd find that you were never quite ready for the moment when it chose to cut the power supply from the mid-mounted triple, even with familiarity.
There were dynamic hesitations too. This was an exceptionally light, mid-engined sports car that ought to have changed direction like a dragonfly. Spear a bend, and in the first instant you'd think it was going to do just that, the front wheels eagerly steering a new trajectory. But then the Smart's athleticism would start to evaporate. You couldn't call it understeer, but if you were expecting Lotus Elise balletics, well, you'd have to buy the real thing.
There was more, besides – the Roadster's traction control dropping the curtain on any on-the-limit expeditions before they really started. It looked like a sports car, and an exciting one at that, but the Roadster's cornerus interruptus methods protected its occupants from almost all kinds of on-the-road excitements. Still, after Mercedes' adventures with toppling A-Classes and Smart Fortwos accelerating hard enough to land flat on their backs, you could understand the caution.
In plenty of other ways, though, the Roadster was the result of some admirably brave decisions. The bold Smart project wobbled for more than stability reasons, the two-seat city car falling massively short of sales expectations following its (delayed) 1998 debut, but that didn't stop the Roadster project going ahead. Indeed, this dinky little device promised to deal with Smart's mild glamour deficit.
It was also admirably true to the Fortwo's construction concept. There was the so-called Tridion safety cell, this the pressed steel inner tub that provided a structure from which to hang the suspension, powertrain and a colourful collection of composite body panels. The engine was the same lively 698cc turbo triple that powered the Fortwo, its 80bhp impressive for one so small, and less burdened than it might have been with only 815kg to shove along.
The Roadster benefited from Smart's appealingly distinct cabin furnishing schemes too, chunks of its dashboard sheathed with non-reflective cloth. Much of it was grey, but there were multiple shades of the stuff and you could give the interior ambience a cheerfully spectacular lift by specifying orange cloth. And like the Fortwo's, the Roadster's instrument pods were so shapely that you wanted to pick them up.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
44 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Mercedes' ultra futuristic new EV boasts ‘shape-shifting' LED grille to display ‘messages' – would YOU buy it?
The light-up feature will vary depending on where you buy the car BIG REVEAL Mercedes' ultra futuristic new EV boasts 'shape-shifting' LED grille to display 'messages' – would YOU buy it? MERCEDES has launched a brand new EV which has an incredible 'shape-shifting' LED grille. The ultra-futuristic motor can even display messages on the screen on its front, in a 'new era' for the brand. Advertisement 3 The light up grid has over 900 pixel-like dots Credit: Mercedes 3 The vehicle is part of Mercedes' mission to take back its 'pedigree' Credit: Mercedes-Benz AG The incredible GLC with EQ technology has a giant 'hyper-screen' on its EQE and EQS models. According to the car manufacturer, the motor will begin a 'new era of iconic design at Mercedes-Benz'. The EQS will have a bright chrome surround and a screen with 942 pixel-like dots. The dots can be illuminated from behind and can be animated to display a variety of exciting graphics. Advertisement Mercedes has added its logo in the centre of the screen, though the amount that you can illuminate this will vary depending on where the motor is sold. In Europe, for example, you'll be able to light up the star but not the circle around it. Ola Källenius, Mercedes' CEO, said: 'When 100+ new companies are launching in China and cooling requirements are changing, how do you keep your identity? 'We are taking our heritage and pedigree and looking into the future.' Advertisement Design boss Gorden Wagener added: 'Our new iconic grille is not just a new front for the GLC. 'It redefines the face of our brand. Mercedes reveals its new luxury EV with 'superscreen' passengers can play video games or watch Netflix on while on move 'It is the perfect fusion of lasting design codes reinterpreted for the future, making our cars instantly recognisable.' The news comes as after the brand launched a new 4x4 vehicle which can rotate 360 degrees - just like a tank. Advertisement The incredible motor will cost a staggering £154,000 and is designed to be a rival to the upcoming EV Range Rover. Mercedes' battery-powered G-Wagen - also known as the G580 - boasts a top speed of 112mph, with 0-62mph in just 4.7 seconds. It weighs a staggering 3085kg, meaning it could breach the 3.5-ton weight limit if the driver loads it with 415kg of luggage. 3 Mercedes Benz think the motor represents a 'new era' for the brand Credit: Alamy Advertisement
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Iveco has closely coordinated Tata, Leonardo deals with Italian government
MILAN, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Iveco ( opens new tab has closely coordinated with the Italian government deals to sell its truck business to Tata Motors and its defence unit to Leonardo, a source with knowledge of the matter said on Monday. India's Tata Motors ( opens new tab last week agreed to buy Iveco in a deal valuing it at 3.8 billion euros, while the Italian truck and bus maker separately agreed to sell its IDV defence business to Leonardo ( opens new tab, giving it an enterprise value of 1.7 billion euros.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Who will get a car loan scheme payout and how much might they receive?
Millions of people are in line for payouts after the City regulator announced on Sunday that it would launch a compensation scheme for people affected by the car finance scandal. Here we explain who might be eligible, how much they might receive and what they need to do. On Friday the supreme court largely overturned last October's court of appeal ruling on car finance that could have led to compensation payouts of up to £44bn. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) set out its plans for a redress scheme 48 hours later, saying it would consult on a scheme covering loans dating back to 2007, with estimates putting the total cost to lenders at between £9bn and £18bn. It's partly because the FCA has been running its own investigation into so-called discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs), a particularly controversial type of car finance. With these deals, motor finance lenders – typically banks – gave dealers the power to set interest rates on car loans, with dealers getting more commission the higher the interest rate. This practice, which allegedly incentivised dealers to overcharge customers, was banned by the FCA in 2021. Given the regulator's concern, it was always likely that many DCA cases were going to be in line for compensation; about 14.6m contracts included this arrangement between 2007 and 2020. The FCA is proposing that the compensation scheme covers DCAs 'if they were not properly disclosed', – believed to be the case for the vast majority of the loans. However, the supreme court also upheld one of the three test cases on Friday – not a DCA one – deeming it 'unfair'. This was due to the size of the commission paid to the car dealer – a particularly large 55% of the total cost of the credit (in other words, the interest and fees) – and a failure to explain the structure of the deal clearly enough in documents provided to the customer. The FCA said that that court decision 'makes clear that non-disclosure of other facts relating to the commission can make the relationship unfair'. Many people, therefore, who signed car finance deals between 2007 and 2024 whose agreement did not include a DCA may still be in line for a payout if there are unfair elements. However, this potential payout will depend on the facts of each case. Clearly a large commission could be a factor, and others will be how financially literate the borrower was when they signed the contract, and how much information was provided to them. The regulator will start consulting on the scheme by early October. The consultation is due to take six weeks and the FCA aims to finalise the scheme 'in time for people to start receiving compensation next year'. People who have already complained do not need to do anything as they should be 'in the system'. For the rest, the FCA says: 'Consumers concerned they were not told about commission and who think they may have paid too much for the finance should complain now.' The MoneySavingExpert website has free tools that create an email for you to send to the relevant lender based on your answers to a few key questions. Or you can complain yourself. It is free and simple, the FCA says. You will need to complain to the company you were paying each month, and ideally do it in writing. Complaining now gives the company concerned a chance to track down your information, and if there is a problem it is probably better to know now rather than later. The short answer? No. Claims management companies and consumer law firms have been touting for business for some time, and appear to be ramping up their efforts to encourage people who may have lost out to sign up. But the FCA and Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) are concerned that some firms are not telling consumers about free alternatives, are making bold and sometimes misleading claims about payouts, and are charging fees worth up to 30% of any compensation. Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, said: 'Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy to participate in, so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm. If you do, it will cost you a significant chunk of any money you get.' The FCA estimates 'most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation'. It has previously said that in the case of loan agreements that included a DCA, consumers may have been overcharged by £1,100, as a result of paying too much interest on a typical £10,000, four-year car finance deal. Some claims law firms have said some clients were charged much more, amounting to several thousand pounds in hidden commission. Also, because the FCA thinks that the scheme should cover agreements dating back to 2007, there will be people who bought several cars during this period, who may be entitled to multiple payouts. However, the FCA has indicated that it would need to balance the interests of consumers, firms and the broader economy when setting up a scheme. Presumably, that may mean people might not get back all of their 'loss'. That said, any amount people get is likely to be boosted by interest, which could add up to a reasonable amount if it is several years' worth. The FCA said it planned to consult on an interest rate for each year of the scheme based on the average Bank of England base rate that year, plus 1%. 'This would be in the ballpark of a simple [ie, not compound] interest rate of 3% per annum,' it said. Yes, this is a concern, as it is thought that most banks typically purge customer data after six years. The FCA ordered firms to stop deleting car finance documents when it launched its initial investigation in January last year. But the files relating to customers with contracts that ended more than six years earlier may have already been lost. The Financing and Leasing Association, which represents leading car loan providers, said: 'We have concerns about whether it is possible to have a fair redress scheme that goes back to 2007 when firms have not been required to hold such dated information, and the evidence base will be patchy at best. We will be interested to see how the FCA addresses this point in its consultation.' However, many people will have kept their paperwork. During the payment protection insurance (PPI) scandal, banks were urged to err on the side of consumers, even when there was no documentation, but it is not yet clear if this will happen with car loans.
