Some firms ‘earn much more money than it costs to provide pay monthly insurance'
Some 'pay monthly' customers may also face a higher charge for the underlying insurance premium – a practice sometimes described as 'double dipping'.
Concerns have been raised that the decision to pay monthly may be factored into the pricing of the underlying insurance premium itself.
The Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) rules require firms should not increase the insurance premium to customers using premium finance without objective and reasonable basis for the change.
Some insurers have said the choice of payment method is correlated with insurance risk for those paying monthly.
The FCA's update paper on its premium finance market study said: 'If we see evidence of firms not having an objective and reasonable basis for taking such an approach, we will consider our supervisory approach on a firm-by-firm basis.'
The update added: 'Where firms charge for premium finance, revenues appear to materially exceed costs for some providers.
'Whereas the profit margin earned on a core insurance policy may be relatively low, we see margins on premium finance that are somewhat higher.
'Different business models will have different ways of recovering costs.
'In some cases, they recover all costs through the insurance product itself, or recoup returns on lower margin insurance product through higher APRs (annual percentage rates).'
The FCA's analysis found premium finance margins (revenue less economic costs as a proportion of revenue) ranging between 14% and 62% across insurers, intermediary lenders, intermediary brokers and specialist premium finance providers (SPFPs) in the period between 2018 and 2023.
SPFPs averaged the lowest margins out of these four, with a weighted average margin of 24% between 2018 and 2023.
Insurers had the highest weighted average margins of 53%, the regulator said.
Firms offering premium finance incur some operational costs, for instance staff, IT and compliance.
Lenders also incur funding costs or must sacrifice investment income by delaying the date of full payment, it added.
Consumer credit products are also priced to compensate firms for high levels of bad debt or default, among other costs.
The update said: 'Nevertheless, we find that some bad debt is incurred by premium finance lenders (with the ratio of bad debt to loan balanceranging from 0.6% for SPFPs to 1% for intermediary lenders) but not at the levels of other consumer credit products (1.9% for credit cards based on a sample of retail banks).'
The FCA said premium finance is an important way of paying for insurance, and in 2023 it was used for around 48% of motor and home policies.
For some consumers, premium finance is a choice, but for many, especially those in more vulnerable groups, it is a necessity because they cannot afford to pay annually, the regulator said.
In 2024, 60% of motor and 41% of home (buildings and contents combined) policyholders who paid by instalments did so because they could not afford to pay in a single annual payment, it added.
There is wide variation in the rates firms charge for paying by instalments.
Typically, when firms charge extra for premium finance, the APRs are in the range of 20% to 30% but almost 20% of consumers pay more than 30%, the report said.
Around 60% of consumers pay headline APRs that are between 20% and 30%.
This would cost an extra £19 to £28 on an illustrative home policy and £35 to £51 on an illustrative motor policy – suggesting that it costs consumers typically between 8% and 11% more to pay monthly rather than annually, the regulator said.
Interest rates on consumer credit vary across products and between consumers, but these APRs compare with monthly advertised interest rates in 2023 of 35% for overdrafts, 11% on a £5,000 personal loan and 23% for credit cards issued by financial institutions as reported by the Bank of England, the FCA's paper said.
It added: 'Our own data, which captures a larger proportion of the market including cards marketed as 'credit builders', shows average APRs on new credit card agreements ranged between 26-32% at the end of 2023.'
The cost of paying monthly also differs substantially between motor and home insurance, the FCA said.
More than a third of home insurance customers pay no more for paying monthly than annually, compared with less than 3% of motor insurance customers.
Some firms have indicated that cancellations and changes of policy tend to occur at a higher rate in motor than home, which leads to higher costs for providing motor insurance premium finance, the regulator said.
Zero per cent finance options for home insurance also seem to be more common than in motor insurance in part because there is greater prevalence of buying direct from the insurer, enabling firms to more easily offset the funding and operational cost of offering monthly payments.
The FCA now plans to carry out further analysis to look more closely at higher-priced products, the value these products provide, profitability, and the extent to which these prices are paid by vulnerable customers.
Where it finds products with prices which are not reflective of the value offered, the regulator said it will be challenging firms to make sure they have considered all these aspects fully.
The FCA will also investigate the extent to which consumers can effectively compare premium finance with other credit products.
Its premium finance market study was launched in October 2024 as part of wider work on motor and home insurance, following concerns that premium finance may not represent fair value for some customers and that competition may not be functioning effectively.
The FCA's findings are based on evidence and data that it has gathered from a request for information (RFI) from a sample of firms.
It is seeking comments to further inform the next phase of the market study, and is inviting views to be sent by 5pm on September 30 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Great news' as Bournemouth post office mooted for closure is saved
The future of Westbourne Post Office has been secured after months of uncertainty. The branch will remain open but be operated by South Coast Retail, rather than directly by Post Office Ltd. The decision comes after a campaign led by Bournemouth West MP, Jessica Toale, which gained the support of more than 2,000 residents across the town. Ms Toale said: "This is great news. "The petition, and people's heartfelt comments, revealed Westbourne Post Office to be so much more than a place to send letters. "Local people relied on it to do banking, prepare documentation for travelling or driving, and stay connected to family and friends abroad. "I'm delighted that a suitable franchisee has come forward to take this site on and ensure these vital services remain in place." South Coast Retail, which already operates several Post Office branches and card shops across the region, including in Christchurch, Swanage, Dorchester and Weymouth, will run the branch while long-term arrangements are finalised. A Post Office spokesperson said: "Our proposed franchise plans mean branches will continue to operate from the same premises while the long-term permanent proposal is confirmed, with customers being able to continue accessing the same products and services with the same opening hours."
Entrepreneur
21 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Investing in a Greener Future
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur United Kingdom, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. Clean energy is no longer just a government target or a topic for climate reports. It has become a global economic driver and a fast-growing space for innovation. What was once viewed as a specialist sector is now central to how countries plan for growth, security and long-term resilience. For UK founders, this presents a moment of real opportunity. Whether your business is in technology, logistics, finance, construction or professional services, understanding clean energy finance is now part of building a future-ready company. As the world transitions toward low-carbon systems, the ability to navigate this space will separate those who can scale sustainably from those left behind. Over the last 15 years, I've worked across public and private sectors. I've helped shape major infrastructure deals in the UK as the Project Finance Advisor for the UK Cabinet Office and Infrastructure Project Authority, and led the design of energy investment strategies in Mongolia, where we are actively positioning the country as a green energy exporter for Asia. What I've learned is that clean energy is not an isolated sector. It cuts across industries, borders and policy frameworks, which means opportunity is everywhere for those who know how to engage with it. Clean energy is part of the mainstream economy This is a critical mindset shift. Clean energy is not a side project or a corporate social responsibility box to tick. It is a core driver of economic transformation. Global investors are now treating renewable energy, battery storage, grid infrastructure and green hydrogen as long-term, high-quality assets. These are not speculative bets, they are increasingly seen as stable investments that align with both climate targets and commercial returns. Institutional investors, pension funds and sovereign wealth funds are actively building portfolios in this space. The environmental and social impact is important, but so are the financial fundamentals. These projects are producing returns, creating jobs and supporting energy independence. For UK founders, this means that if your product or service plays a role in supporting decarbonisation, energy efficiency or the broader clean economy, you are operating in a growth market. Capital is already flowing in, and demand is growing, so the moment to act is now. Public policy is creating new momentum In the UK, the alignment between policy goals and funding mechanisms is becoming stronger. The government's net zero strategy is backed by institutions like the UK Infrastructure Bank, and public-private partnerships are helping accelerate the delivery of climate-aligned infrastructure. This policy shift is opening new doors for founders. Businesses that help reduce emissions, digitise infrastructure, or create smarter, more sustainable systems can now find clearer routes to support. These may come in the form of grants, co-financing, tax incentives, or simply greater access to decision-makers focused on delivering impact at scale. It is rare to see this level of clarity between long-term policy goals and real-world investment tools. For entrepreneurs, especially those building in tech, sustainability, or infrastructure, this is a window worth paying attention to. You don't need to be in the energy sector to be part of this Some of the most promising innovation in clean energy is coming from outside the traditional power and utilities space. This is because clean energy is more than just generation and transmission, it includes everything from how buildings are heated and cooled, to how transport systems operate, to how supply chains are monitored. Founders in sectors like agriculture, logistics, retail and software are already creating tools that help track energy use, reduce emissions, or integrate renewable sources. It could be a data platform that helps companies report on their carbon footprint. It could be a startup working on smart insulation materials for homes, or it might be a digital service helping consumers manage their household energy use more effectively. The clean energy economy is broad, what matters most is that the solution addresses a real need, delivers measurable results, and can scale sustainably. The barriers to entry are lower than many assume, but the rewards for getting it right are growing every day. There is untapped opportunity in global partnerships One area that is often overlooked is the opportunity to scale internationally by supporting emerging markets. Countries with abundant renewable resources, like Mongolia, are increasingly looking to attract international expertise and capital to help build out their energy systems. This is where blended finance plays a key role, combining funding, concessional loans and commercial investment to reduce risk and get projects moving. UK-based founders with technical knowledge, digital solutions, or infrastructure experience are well placed to contribute to these efforts. These partnerships do take time and they require patience, cultural awareness and long-term commitment, but they also offer access to new markets and the chance to be involved with transformational projects on a global scale. Founders who are open to these kinds of collaborations often find that they can grow faster, diversify revenue streams, and play a leadership role in shaping how the global energy transition unfolds. Flexibility and resilience will carry you further than speed alone Clean energy is moving fast, but it is also complex. Technologies are constantly evolving, regulatory environments shift, and the needs of end users can change quickly. Founders who build their businesses around adaptability, rather than just speed, are far more likely to succeed. That means understanding that what works in one country may not work in another. It means designing solutions that can scale up or down depending on funding, policy or local infrastructure, and it means accepting that long-term value often comes from solving problems steadily and sustainably, not from rushing into markets without a clear plan. Resilience can be built into the core of a business. Whether through flexible financing structures, modular technology, or an agile operating model, founders who prepare for change will be better equipped to respond when challenges arise. This mindset, grounded in practical awareness and long-term thinking, is what sets resilient companies apart in the clean energy space. A final word for UK founders The global shift toward clean energy is one of the defining transformations of our time. It brings together climate action, economic opportunity, and international collaboration. For UK founders, there is a real chance to contribute to this transition in meaningful and commercially viable ways. You do not need to be an energy specialist to get involved. What matters is that your business is built to solve a real challenge, that it can evolve with the market, and that it aligns with the direction the world is already moving in. Clean energy is not just about emissions. It is about creating a fairer, more resilient, and more prosperous economy. Founders who recognise this will be better placed to lead in the years ahead, not just by building successful companies, but by building a better future too.
New York Times
23 minutes ago
- New York Times
Countries Promise Trump to Buy U.S. Gas, and Leave the Details for Later
Trade negotiations have for years focused on the rules of the road for commerce between nations. Under President Trump, the deal making has been more direct, especially when it comes to energy. Countries are now agreeing to purchase American fossil fuels, in specific amounts and often years into the future, whether or not their economies will demand it or whether the United States will have the ability to supply it. That adds a layer of government sway over what are typically open market transactions. And it's not clear how — or whether — political leaders will get private companies to go along. 'This is new, and generally that's because in trade agreements you want things that are clear and enforceable,' said David Goldwyn, a former U.S. diplomat and U.S. Energy Department official. 'These energy commitments are neither clear nor necessarily enforceable. They're more aspirational, political encouragements.' The European Union, for example, committed to purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy products — including crude oil, nuclear reactor fuel, natural gas and other petroleum derivatives — over three years. On an annual basis, that would amount to more than three times the amount the bloc bought last year from the United States. Trump's deal with Europe The deal would require a huge jump in U.S. energy exports in the future. Note: Estimate based on the E.U.'s commitment to buy $750 billion in U.S. energy exports through 2028. Source: ClearView Energy Partners analysis of Census Bureau data By The New York Times The European Union has been buying more American gas since Russia, previously a big supplier, attacked Ukraine in 2022, and there is appetite to buy more. But purchasing $250 billion a year would require the bloc to use the United States as essentially its only supplier. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
