Marva Johnson is the right choice for Florida A&M University
Much has been written and said about Florida A&M University's new President-elect, Marva Johnson, and as a former board of trustee member appointed by Gov. Jeb Bush, let us put everything in the proper perspective.
First, every governor has exerted influence in the selection of university presidents, some more than others, and governors have an obligation to because higher education is a multi-billion-dollar enterprise.
Second, Florida university presidents are not academicians anymore, with a few exceptions, but politicians, former politicians, and friends of politicians. To lament that is to ignore the fact that Florida has been the No. 1 university system in the country for some time now.
Third, university presidents do not run the university; they have a provost for that, along with a COO and a CFO, and a host of other administrators.
Fourth, the best Florida presidents know how to walk the halls of the legislature to secure new buildings, classrooms, residence halls, and use their insightful understanding of the appropriations and legislative process to bring home the millions needed to succeed.
They also know that they must work with their board of trustees, the Board of Governors, and the governor.
FAMU is special not only because it is the only public HBCU in Florida, but also because it has special programs that graduates more minorities than any other HBCU in the country, and most are first-time college students.
The College of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Public Health, is highly reputed, and its School of Business & Industry has been a trendsetter for decades, and corporate America recruits heavily from the SBI.
FAMU again has been designated, for the sixth consecutive year, the No. 1 public HBCU in the nation, and the third best among both public and private HBCUs.
FAMU also just achieved a very high honor when it earned dual recognition in the 2025 Carnegie Classification as both a Research 2 University and an Opportunity College and University, an outstanding accomplishment despite FAMU being historically disrespected and discriminated against, which has only made the university stronger and better.
Fifth, no president of any university has ever 'dismantled' a university, and FAMU will not become the first one, as that is just overheated hyperbole and plain hogwash.
Johnson, whom I have met on several occasions over the years, has all the tools to be a highly successful university president, and frankly, FAMU is quite lucky to have someone with her talents, connections, and lobbying experience, and the support of the legislature, Board of Governors, and the governor.
Her appointment portends well that FAMU will receive the additional dollars necessary to continue to reach new heights.
While some contend her selection is about ideology, you are wrong. A university's responsibility is not to promote any one ideology or philosophy, but rather to teach students to think outside the box, to listen and understand all points of view - whether you agree with them or not - and then to be able to articulate your position cogently.
FAMUans have a glorious history of doing all these things very well.
Barney Bishop III is a former executive director of the Florida Democratic Party and a CEO of Associated Industries of Florida. He is currently the CEO of Barney Bishop Consulting and can be reached at Barney@BarneyBishop.com.Send letters to the editor (up to 200 words) or Your Turn columns (about 500 words) to letters@tallahassee.com. Please include your address for verification purposes only, and if you send a Your Turn, also include a photo and 1-2 line bio of yourself. You can also submit anonymous Zing!s at Tallahassee.com/Zing. Submissions are published on a space-available basis. All submissions may be edited for content, clarity and length, and may also be published by any part of the USA TODAY NETWORK.
This article originally appeared on Tallahassee Democrat: Marva Johnson is the right choice for Florida A&M University | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
2 days ago
- Los Angeles Times
What to know about Iran's nuclear sites
DUBAI — Israel attacked multiple Iranian nuclear and military sites on Friday as tensions reached new heights over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. Israeli leaders said the attack was necessary to head off what they claimed was an imminent threat that Iran would build nuclear bombs. Iran long has insisted its program is peaceful and U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran was not actively pursuing the bomb. The attack came one day after the International Atomic Energy Agency's Board of Governors censured Iran for the first time in 20 years for not working with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site in the country and swap out some centrifuges for more-advanced ones. The U.S. and Iran had been in talks that could have resulted in the U.S. lifting some of its crushing economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for Tehran drastically limiting or ending its enrichment of uranium. Here's a look at some major Iranian sites and their importance in Tehran's program. Iran's nuclear facility at Natanz, located some 135 miles southeast of Tehran, is the country's main enrichment site. Part of the facility on Iran's Central Plateau is underground to defend against potential airstrikes. It operates multiple cascades, or groups of centrifuges working together to more quickly enrich uranium. Iran also is burrowing into the Kūh-e Kolang Gaz Lā, or Pickax Mountain, which is just beyond Natanz's southern fencing. Natanz has been targeted by the Stuxnet virus, believed to be an Israeli and American creation, which destroyed Iranian centrifuges. Two separate sabotage attacks, attributed to Israel, also have struck the facility. Iran's nuclear facility at Fordo is some 60 miles southwest of Tehran. It also hosts centrifuge cascades, but isn't as big a facility as Natanz. Buried under a mountain and protected by anti-aircraft batteries, Fordo appears designed to withstand airstrikes. Its construction began at least in 2007, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, although Iran informed the U.N. nuclear watchdog about the facility in 2009 only after the U.S. and allied Western intelligence agencies became aware of its existence. Iran's only commercial nuclear power plant is in Bushehr on the Persian Gulf, some 465 miles south of Tehran. Construction on the plant began under Iran's Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in the mid-1970s. After the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the plant was repeatedly targeted in the Iran-Iraq war. Russia later completed construction of the facility. Iran is building two other reactors like it at the site. Bushehr is fueled by uranium produced in Russia, not Iran, and is monitored by the United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency. The Arak heavy water reactor is 155 miles southwest of Tehran. Heavy water helps cool nuclear reactors, but it produces plutonium as a byproduct that can potentially be used in nuclear weapons. That would provide Iran another path to the bomb beyond enriched uranium, should it choose to pursue the weapon. Iran had agreed under its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers to redesign the facility to relieve proliferation concerns. The facility in Isfahan, some 215 milessoutheast of Tehran, employs thousands of nuclear scientists. It also is home to three Chinese research reactors and laboratories associated with the country's atomic program. The Tehran Research Reactor is at the headquarters of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, the civilian body overseeing the country's atomic program. The U.S. actually provided Iran the reactor in 1967 as part of America's 'Atoms for Peace' program during the Cold War. It initially required highly enriched uranium but was later retrofitted to use low-enriched uranium over proliferation concerns. Gambrell writes for the Associated Press. The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corp. of New York and Outrider Foundation.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Why did Israel attack Iran's nuclear and military sites?
(NewsNation) — Israel launched a wave of strikes across Iran on Friday targeting its nuclear program and military sites, killing at least two top military officers and raising the prospect of an all-out war between the two bitter Middle East adversaries. Iran quickly retaliated, sending a swarm of drones at Israel as Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei warned of 'severe punishment.' The attack comes as tensions reached new heights over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. On Thursday, the Board of Governors at the International Atomic Energy Agency, for the first time in 20 years, censured Iran for not working with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site in the country and swap out some centrifuges for more advanced ones. The Israeli Defense Forces said in a statement Thursday that it 'launched a preemptive, precise, combined offensive to strike Iran's nuclear program' and that the strikes were 'on dozens of military targets, including nuclear targets in different areas of Iran.' 'Today, Iran is closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon. Weapons of mass destruction in the hands of the Iranian regime are an existential threat to the State of Israel and to the wider world. The State of Israel has no choice but to fulfill the obligation to act in defense of its citizens and will continue to do so everywhere it is required to do so, as we have done in the past,' the IDF said. Israeli leaders cast the attack as necessary to head off an imminent threat that Iran would build nuclear bombs, though it remains unclear how close the country is to achieving that. President Donald Trump on Friday responded to Israel's strikes on Iran, calling on Tehran to reach a deal to avoid further escalation. 'I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal,' Trump wrote in a social media post. 'I told them, in the strongest terms, 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they were, they just couldn't get it done.' He added: 'Now everyone is dead, and it's only going to get worse but there is still time to stop this slaughter – before the next attacks, which are expected to be even more brutal. Iran must reach a deal. Just do it, before it's too late. God bless you all!' Did Trump play Iran on nuke talks? Ex-AP editor wonders Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Thursday the U.S. was not involved in the attack. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense. President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel,' Rubio said in a statement. Trump acknowledged several weeks ago that he had warned Netanyahu against taking any action that could threaten negotiations. Trump is expected to hold a Cabinet meeting Friday morning to address the escalating crisis. The Hill and the Associated Press contributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
2 days ago
What to know about Iran's nuclear sites
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates -- Israel attacked multiple Iranian nuclear and military sites on Friday as tensions reached new heights over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. Israeli leaders said the attack was necessary to head off what they claimed was an imminent threat that Iran would build nuclear bombs. Iran long has insisted its program is peaceful and U.S. intelligence agencies have assessed that Tehran was not actively pursuing the bomb. The attack came one day after the International Atomic Energy Agency's Board of Governors censured Iran for the first time in 20 years for not working with its inspectors. Iran immediately announced it would establish a third enrichment site in the country and swap out some centrifuges for more-advanced ones. The U.S. and Iran had been in talks that could have resulted in the U.S. lifting some of its crushing economic sanctions on Iran in exchange for Tehran drastically limiting or ending its enrichment of uranium. Here's a look at some major Iranian sites and their importance in Tehran's program. Iran's nuclear facility at Natanz, located some 220 kilometers (135 miles) southeast of Tehran, is the country's main enrichment site. Part of the facility on Iran's Central Plateau is underground to defend against potential airstrikes. It operates multiple cascades, or groups of centrifuges working together to more quickly enrich uranium. Iran also is burrowing into the Kūh-e Kolang Gaz Lā, or Pickax Mountain, which is just beyond Natanz's southern fencing. Natanz has been targeted by the Stuxnet virus, believed to be an Israeli and American creation, which destroyed Iranian centrifuges. Two separate sabotage attacks, attributed to Israel, also have struck the facility. Iran's nuclear facility at Fordo is located some 100 kilometers (60 miles) southwest of Tehran. It also hosts centrifuge cascades, but isn't as big a facility as Natanz. Buried under a mountain and protected by anti-aircraft batteries, Fordo appears designed to withstand airstrikes. Its construction began at least in 2007, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency, although Iran only informed the U.N. nuclear watchdog about the facility in 2009 after the U.S. and allied Western intelligence agencies became aware of its existence. Iran's only commercial nuclear power plant is in Bushehr on the Persian Gulf, some 750 kilometers (465 miles) south of Tehran. Construction on the plant began under Iran's Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in the mid-1970s. After the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the plant was repeatedly targeted in the Iran-Iraq war. Russia later completed construction of the facility. Iran is building two other reactors like it at the site. Bushehr is fueled by uranium produced in Russia, not Iran, and is monitored by the United Nations' International Atomic Energy Agency. The Arak heavy water reactor is 250 kilometers (155 miles) southwest of Tehran. Heavy water helps cool nuclear reactors, but it produces plutonium as a byproduct that can potentially be used in nuclear weapons. That would provide Iran another path to the bomb beyond enriched uranium, should it choose to pursue the weapon. Iran had agreed under its 2015 nuclear deal with world powers to redesign the facility to relieve proliferation concerns. The facility in Isfahan, some 350 kilometers (215 miles) southeast of Tehran, employs thousands of nuclear scientists. It also is home to three Chinese research reactors and laboratories associated with the country's atomic program. The Tehran Research Reactor is at the headquarters of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, the civilian body overseeing the country's atomic program. The U.S. actually provided Iran the reactor in 1967 as part of America's 'Atoms for Peace' program during the Cold War. It initially required highly enriched uranium but was later retrofitted to use low-enriched uranium over proliferation concerns.
