
Solicitor general creates fake ‘Supreme Court of Karnataka' X account to prove misinformation point, deletes later
Mehta handed his mobile phone to justice M Nagaprasanna to show the fake account, complete with the court's photograph and official-looking handle, arguing it proved how easily false content could spread online.
'We have opened one account in the name of Supreme Court of Karnataka. And Twitter (X) has opened that account. And it is a verified account by Twitter (X)... now I can post anything in that, and lakhs and lakhs of people who view that account will say Supreme Court of Karnataka has said this,' Mehta told the court.
The demonstration was meant to underscore the need for stronger government oversight of social media platforms. In response, X Corp's counsel, senior advocate KG Raghavan, questioned the propriety of creating fake handles without officially placing them on record.
Then, as the two-hour hearing concluded, Raghavan announced X had already suspended the fictional account.
'Just to end on a good note, that account has been suspended. We are a responsible organisation,' Raghavan told the court, much to the amusement of the bench. He also clarified that contrary to the solicitor general's claim, the account was not verified by X.
Mehta clarified the account was 'purely representational' for 'demonstrative purposes' with no posts made from it, but used the episode to advance broader arguments about user anonymity and platform accountability.
'If a user posts illegal content and is anonymous, who will the aggrieved party sue? X Corp has no officers in India except a grievance officer. Where is the accountability?' he asked.
The courtroom drama unfolded during X's legal challenge to the Union government's Sahyog portal, which the company calls a 'censorship portal' that bypasses constitutional safeguards. X argues the portal allows thousands of government officials to issue content takedown orders without proper oversight.
Mehta criticised X for resisting Indian regulatory frameworks while complying with local laws elsewhere. 'All other intermediaries have joined the Sahyog portal. Only X Corp has refused. They object to even a non-binding mechanism,' he said. The government has revealed that 38 intermediaries including Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Telegram have joined the portal, with Meta currently testing integration. X remains the most prominent holdout. The government created Sahyog portal to handle notices under Section 79(3)(b) for quick action against illegal online content. The portal is meant to streamline the process by allowing a number of authorised officials— at the state and central levels — to dispatch notices to intermediaries who are onboarded onto the platform.
The solicitor general also challenged X's fundamental right to bring the case, arguing the platform lacked legal standing as a foreign company not incorporated in India. The government contended that constitutional protections under Articles 14, 19, and 21 extend primarily to Indian citizens and, in certain cases, to entities incorporated within the country. Additionally, Mehta dismissed X's free speech arguments, contending the platform cannot invoke constitutional protections since it claims to be merely an intermediary. 'They say they are not speakers or authors of the posts, only intermediaries. If that is true, how can they invoke free speech rights?' he asked. The case stems from X's March petition challenging the government's directive mandating social media platforms join the Sahyog portal. The company argues the government is creating parallel blocking mechanisms under Section 79(3)(b) that bypass safeguards required under Section 69A, which the Supreme Court upheld in the landmark Shreya Singhal case.
X has previously objected to what its lawyers called takedown orders from 'every Tom, Dick, and Harry' government official, drawing sharp criticism from government representatives.
The Karnataka High Court will hear the case next on July 25, when X will file its rejoinder submissions.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
26 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Govt will not tolerate violence in the name of language dispute: CM
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis on Thursday said violence in the name of language dispute will not be tolerated and dealt firmly. 'There is no dispute between Hindi and Marathi. While one should be proud of Marathi, which is not only the mother tongue of Marathi people but also a classical language, one cannot ignore other Indian languages,' said Fadnavis during a speech at the Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi. The Chief Minister laid the foundation stone for the Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Special Centre for Security and Strategic Studies, planned under the School of International Studies which aims to explore war strategy and traditions based on the Maratha empire. The centre is going to become the study centre of military history, strategy and future policy development rooted in India's past. Shortly after his arrival, the Student Federation of India (SFI) protested over the Maharashtra Special Security Bill and growing instances of attack against non-Marathi residents (North Indians and others) in several parts of the state and failure of the government to deal with it effectively. In response to the protest, Chief Minister Fadnavis said, 'There is nothing wrong in insisting on Marathi language in Maharashtra. At the same time, there should be no disregard for other Indian languages. Violence of any kind in the name of language dispute cannot be tolerated. Wherever such instances occurred, strong action has been taken. And if it reoccurs, it will be firmly dealt with.' 'Marathi is a culturally rich language that was accorded the status of a 'classical language' by the Narendra Modi government. There is nothing wrong with having pride in Marathi language. The issue here is not about Marathi vs Hindi. What needs to be understood is that along with Marathi, one should also respect other Indian languages. As someone just mentioned, Tamil is also historically and culturally a very rich language. The Chola dynasty ruled for a thousand years and there is a huge history which we cannot overlook,' said Fadnavis. Referring to the visionary king Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj, Fadnavis said, 'Shivaji Maharaj has never taught us to be narrow minded. With limited resources and manpower, he defeated the mighty Mughal army through his strategic ruler Aurangzeb was finished and his 'kabar' built but Shivaji's 'swaraj' lived eternally.' The Kusumagraj centre at JNU will offer postgraduate and certificate-level programmes to promote multilingualism and cultural understanding. Under this, MA in Marathi and certificate courses to go with the NEP for non-Marathi speakers will be offered.


Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
India-UK FTA to pave way for transborder telecom operations in non-discriminatory manner
India and the UK have signed a telecom deal as part of their free trade agreement, granting non-discriminatory market access for telecom services. This move could potentially lead to Indian telecom operators expanding into the UK market. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New Delhi: India and the UK have signed a deal, as part of the free trade agreement ( FTA ), to allow non-discriminatory access of each other's market for telecom services -- a move that may pave the way for a potential expansion of services by Indian telecom operators in the United pact, officially called the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), has included provisions on mobile number portability in their territory as well."Each party shall ensure that a service supplier of the other party is accorded access to and use of any public telecommunications network or service, including leased circuits, offered in its territory or across its borders on a timely basis and on reasonable, transparent and non-discriminatory terms and conditions," the agreement Vodafone had full-fledged operations in India with 100 owned subsidiaries before its merger with Idea Cellular . However, no Indian telecom operator has ever entered the UK telecom agreement between the two countries has provision for spectrum allocation, interconnection, etc, to the transborder service providers."Each party retains the right to establish and apply spectrum and frequency management policies which may affect the number of suppliers of public telecommunications networks or services, provided that it does so in a manner that is consistent with this agreement. Each party also retains the right to allocate frequency bands taking into account current and future needs and spectrum availability," the agreement agreement calls for radio spectrum allocation -- in an open and transparent process -- to players from other countries for public telecommunications services that is in public interest and promotes agreement talks about allowing major telecom operators to ensure non-discriminatory access to its various resources to the operator from other markets in a manner it would have allowed access to its subsidiary."Each party shall ensure that a major supplier in its territory accords suppliers of public telecommunications networks or services of the other party treatment no less favourable than major supplier accords in like circumstances to itself, its subsidiaries, its affiliates, or any non-affiliated supplier of public telecommunications networks or services regarding," the agreement said.


Economic Times
26 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India-UK FTA to pave way for transborder telecom operations in non-discriminatory manner
Representational New Delhi: India and the UK have signed a deal, as part of the free trade agreement (FTA), to allow non-discriminatory access of each other's market for telecom services -- a move that may pave the way for a potential expansion of services by Indian telecom operators in the United Kingdom. The pact, officially called the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), has included provisions on mobile number portability in their territory as well. "Each party shall ensure that a service supplier of the other party is accorded access to and use of any public telecommunications network or service, including leased circuits, offered in its territory or across its borders on a timely basis and on reasonable, transparent and non-discriminatory terms and conditions," the agreement said. UK's Vodafone had full-fledged operations in India with 100 owned subsidiaries before its merger with Idea Cellular. However, no Indian telecom operator has ever entered the UK market. The telecom agreement between the two countries has provision for spectrum allocation, interconnection, etc, to the transborder service providers. "Each party retains the right to establish and apply spectrum and frequency management policies which may affect the number of suppliers of public telecommunications networks or services, provided that it does so in a manner that is consistent with this agreement. Each party also retains the right to allocate frequency bands taking into account current and future needs and spectrum availability," the agreement said. The agreement calls for radio spectrum allocation -- in an open and transparent process -- to players from other countries for public telecommunications services that is in public interest and promotes competition. The agreement talks about allowing major telecom operators to ensure non-discriminatory access to its various resources to the operator from other markets in a manner it would have allowed access to its subsidiary. "Each party shall ensure that a major supplier in its territory accords suppliers of public telecommunications networks or services of the other party treatment no less favourable than major supplier accords in like circumstances to itself, its subsidiaries, its affiliates, or any non-affiliated supplier of public telecommunications networks or services regarding," the agreement said.