logo
What was the first human species?

What was the first human species?

Yahoo2 days ago
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
All humans today are members of the modern human species Homo sapiens — Latin for "knowing man." But we're far from the only humans who ever existed. Fossils are revealing more and more about early humans in the genus Homo — ancestors like Homo erectus (Latin for "upright man"), who lived in Africa, Asia and parts of Europe between 1.9 million and 110,000 years ago.
Scientists now recognize more than a dozen species in the Homo genus. So what, exactly, was the first human species? The answer, it turns out, is not crystal clear.
Fossil finds in Morocco have revealed that anatomically modern humans emerged at least 300,000 years ago. But the oldest human species scientists definitively know about is called Homo habilis, or "handy man" — a tool-using primate who walked upright and lived in Africa between 2.4 million and 1.4 million years ago.
However, earlier fossils hint that other Homo species may predate H. habilis. The scarcity of early human fossils makes it challenging to know if unusual specimens are a newfound species or simply an atypical member of a known species. On top of that, evolution can be gradual, so it's hard to pinpoint when a new species emerges, especially when fossils have a mix of features from different species.
"The process of evolution is continuous, but the labels we place on it for convenience are static," Tim D. White, a paleoanthropologist at the University of California Berkeley, told Live Science.
Related: Why did Homo sapiens outlast all other human species?
Earliest Homo
Most evolutionary theories suggest that H. habilis evolved from an earlier genus of primate named Australopithecus — Latin for "southern ape" because its fossils were first discovered in South Africa.
Sign up for our newsletter
Sign up for our weekly Life's Little Mysteries newsletter to get the latest mysteries before they appear online.
Various species of Australopithecus lived from about 4.4 million to 1.4 million years ago. It may be that H. habilis evolved directly from the species Australopithecus afarensis — the best-known example of which is "Lucy," who was unearthed at Hadar in Ethiopia in 1974.
The fossils of our genus are usually distinguished from Australopithecus fossils by Homo's distinctively smaller teeth and a relatively large brain, which led to the greater use of stone tools.
But White noted that traits like smaller teeth and bigger brains must have emerged at times in the Australopithecus populations that early Homo evolved from.
"If you had an Australopithecus female, there wasn't a birth at which point she would have christened the child Homo," he said.
As a result, there is no fixed point in time in which Homo originated; instead, the Homo genus emerged roughly between 2 million and 3 million years ago, White said.
Evolving in Africa
Since the 1970s, researchers in Africa have discovered fossils that they've attributed to another ancient species, Homo rudolfensis, which challenges the idea that H. habilis was the earliest Homo.
H. rudolfensis seems to have been physically much bigger, had a larger brain and a flatter facial structure than H. habilis, which may have made it look more like a modern human.
Its fossils are roughly the same age as H. habilis — as much as 2.4 million years old. But "there is only one really good fossil of this Homo rudolfensis," according to the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, so scientists don't know if H. rudolfensis is an unusual H. habilis or even an Austrolopithicus with a larger-than-usual brain.
Paleoanthropologist Rick Potts, who heads the Smithsonian Institute's Human Origins program, told Live Science that even older fossils from Africa appear to be from the genus Homo and may predate both of those species.
RELATED MYSTERIES
—What did the last common ancestor between humans and apes look like?
—Are Neanderthals and Homo sapiens the same species?
—Why did Homo sapiens emerge in Africa?
The oldest of those fossils date from about 2.8 million years ago, but they are only fragments — a few jaw bones and a few teeth — so they are not enough to establish if they came from a different, unnamed species of Homo, he said. A 2025 study found additional teeth dating to 2.59 million and 2.78 million years old that may also belong to this mysterious early Homo species.
So it may be that the first human species has not yet been found. "There's a whole lot of excitement, but there is also a lot of uncertainty, about trying to discover more about the origins of the genus Homo," Potts said.
Human evolution quiz: What do you know about Homo sapiens?
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watch a bright fireball explode above Japan, turning night to day (video)
Watch a bright fireball explode above Japan, turning night to day (video)

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Watch a bright fireball explode above Japan, turning night to day (video)

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A fireball briefly turned night to day in the skies over Japan on the night of Aug. 19, before appearing to fragment over the Pacific Ocean. The fireball flared to life at 11:08 p.m. local time on Aug. 19, appearing to streak southwest through the skies above southern Japan. Its brief but dramatic descent was captured on several surveillance cameras and dashcams located in the western cities of Kagoshima and Kumamoto and was even spotted as far east as Osaka's Kansai Airport, located approximately 124 miles (200 kilometers) away. Social media footage documenting the event revealed that the meteor emitted a series of green-blue flashes that briefly overwhelmed some camera sensors, before letting off a final flare of orange-red light and breaking apart as it neared the horizon. So-called "shooting stars" become visible when hunks of ancient space debris left over from the creation of the solar system collide with Earth's atmosphere. The particles are swiftly overwhelmed by atmospheric friction, burning up in a dramatic display that can be easily visible to the naked eye. Larger pieces of debris that burn bright enough to outshine even the brightest planets in the night sky are referred to as fireballs. The Perseid meteor shower — which is known for producing spectacular fireballs — is currently active, as are the weaker kappa Cygnids (KCG). However, it's difficult to tell whether the Aug. 19 event was associated with a meteor shower, or the result of a random piece of space debris striking Earth's atmosphere, known as a 'sporadic'. Editor's Note: If you capture an image of a fireball and want to share it with readers, then please send your photo(s), comments, and your name and location to spacephotos@

Watch a bright fireball explode above Japan, turning night to day (video)
Watch a bright fireball explode above Japan, turning night to day (video)

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Watch a bright fireball explode above Japan, turning night to day (video)

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A fireball briefly turned night to day in the skies over Japan on the night of Aug. 19, before appearing to fragment over the Pacific Ocean. The fireball flared to life at 11:08 p.m. local time on Aug. 19, appearing to streak southwest through the skies above southern Japan. Its brief but dramatic descent was captured on several surveillance cameras and dashcams located in the western cities of Kagoshima and Kumamoto and was even spotted as far east as Osaka's Kansai Airport, located approximately 124 miles (200 kilometers) away. Social media footage documenting the event revealed that the meteor emitted a series of green-blue flashes that briefly overwhelmed some camera sensors, before letting off a final flare of orange-red light and breaking apart as it neared the horizon. So-called "shooting stars" become visible when hunks of ancient space debris left over from the creation of the solar system collide with Earth's atmosphere. The particles are swiftly overwhelmed by atmospheric friction, burning up in a dramatic display that can be easily visible to the naked eye. Larger pieces of debris that burn bright enough to outshine even the brightest planets in the night sky are referred to as fireballs. The Perseid meteor shower — which is known for producing spectacular fireballs — is currently active, as are the weaker kappa Cygnids (KCG). However, it's difficult to tell whether the Aug. 19 event was associated with a meteor shower, or the result of a random piece of space debris striking Earth's atmosphere, known as a 'sporadic'. Editor's Note: If you capture an image of a fireball and want to share it with readers, then please send your photo(s), comments, and your name and location to spacephotos@

The Milky Way's faintest satellite may not be what astronomers thought. 'These results solve a major mystery in astrophysics'
The Milky Way's faintest satellite may not be what astronomers thought. 'These results solve a major mystery in astrophysics'

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Milky Way's faintest satellite may not be what astronomers thought. 'These results solve a major mystery in astrophysics'

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A ghostly object orbiting the Milky Way has left astronomers questioning its composition: Is it a dark-matter-dominated dwarf galaxy or a star cluster bound by a hidden swarm of black holes? Ursa Major III/Unions 1 (UMa3/U1), the faintest known satellite of our galaxy, orbits the Milky Way at a distance of more than 30,000 light-years. It is a compact stellar system that contains only 60 visible stars. Ursa Major III was long thought to be a dark dwarf galaxy — a small galaxy with an unusually high mass-to-light ratio suggesting it's filled with dark matter — but new evidence suggests it is instead a compact star cluster whose gravity is held together by a core of black holes and neutron stars, according to a statement from the University of Bonn in Germany. "Dark star clusters form when gravitational interactions with the Milky Way over billions of years remove the outer stars from a star cluster," Hosein Haghi, co-author of the study who is conducting research at the University of Bonn, said in the statement. After repeated gravitational encounters with the Milky Way, only a dense, invisible core of Ursa Major III remains. Since this dark core gives off no light, astronomers initially thought the cluster was packed with dark matter. Using computer simulations and observational data of Ursa Major III's orbital motion and chemical composition, astronomers calculated the gravitational interactions of thousands of stars with great precision to reconstruct the object's structure over time. The simulations show that a dense core of black holes could hold the remaining stars together gravitationally, without the need for dark matter, according to the statement. Related Stories: — Our expanding universe: Age, history & other facts — Milky Way galaxy: Everything you need to know about our cosmic neighborhood — What is dark matter? "Our work shows for the first time that these objects are most likely normal star clusters," Pavel Kroupa, co-author of the study, said in the statement. "These results solve a major mystery in astrophysics." Whether a dwarf galaxy or star cluster, Ursa Major III provides important clues about the formation and composition of the Milky Way. Their findings were published Aug. 7 in the Astrophysical Journal Letters. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store