logo
EAFF E-1 Men Preview: South Korea vs. Japan Title Decider

EAFF E-1 Men Preview: South Korea vs. Japan Title Decider

Yahoo3 days ago
The 2025 men's EAFF E-1 Football Championship will be decided on Tuesday when South Korea take on Japan. The Taeguk Warriors are looking to reclaim the title they lost to Japan in 2022 and extend their record to six overall, while the Samurai Blue are looking to make it back-to-back titles for the first time.
Advertisement
(Photo by)
Overview & Match Information
Fixture: South Korea vs. Japan
Competition: EAFF E-1 Football Championship Matchday 3
Venue: Yongin Mireu Stadium, Yongin
Date: Tuesday 15th July, 7:24 PM KST
It's the big one, the 'Han-Il Jeon,' South Korea versus Japan, two rivals locking horns in a competitive match for the first time since the 2022 competition decider. Korea, as the host nation, will be under a bit of pressure to beat Japan, but with something of a psychological advantage after the resounding 3-0 win in 2022, not to mention convincing performances in their first two matches.
Advertisement
EAFF E-1 Form
South Korea are yet to concede a goal, having kept clean sheets against both China and Hong Kong. The 3-0 victory over China to start the competition was then followed up by a 2-0 win over Hong Kong with a heavily rotated starting XI.
Hong Kong 0-2 South Korea Highlights
Japan are the tournament's top scorers, having hit Hong Kong for six in the first game thanks in part to four goals in the first half from Ryo Germain. The 6-1 triumph was followed up by a routine win over China, thanks to goals from Mao Hoseyo and Henry Heroki Mochizuki.
Japan 2-0 China Highlights
Head-to-Head
Japan have won the last two meetings, both by the same 3-0 scoreline. The most recent was the 2022 EAFF E-1 title decider with Yuki Soma, Sho Sasaki, and Shuto Machino on target. Before that, in March 2021, Japan ran out 3-0 in a friendly thanks to goals from Miki Yamane, Daichi Kamada, and Wataru Endo. Before that, Korea had remained unbeaten in three against Japan with back-to-back wins in the 2017 and 2019 EAFF competitions.
Advertisement
In EAFF action, there have been 15 total encounters with Japan earning six wins, Korea four, and five draws. Overall, from 71 meetings, Korea have 36 wins, Japan have 17, with 18 draws.
South Korea in Focus with Seo Bo-won
How have Korea's performances been in the first two games?
First of all, Coach Hong Myung-bo utilized a back-three formation, likely with strong opponents at the World Cup in mind. However, since he adopted a more defensive back-three against China in the first match and a more attacking version against Hong Kong in the second, this could indicate a focus on tactical flexibility. Of course, simply using wingers as wing-backs doesn't necessarily equate to being 'flexible,' but at the very least, it shows an effort to address the lack of a Plan B, which the national team struggled with during the third round of World Cup qualifiers. That said, it's a bit concerning that against Hong Kong, players seemed to focus on personal showcases rather than team play. They clearly see this tournament as their last chance to make the final World Cup squad and are playing with urgency, but at times their style appears a bit selfish. Still, the two clean-sheet wins are a satisfactory result.
Advertisement
Japan next in a big game that will decide the tournament, what are you expecting to see from Hong Myung-bo tactically?
While Japan seems to be treating this tournament as a true 'testing ground,' Korea has taken a less experimental approach in terms of squad selection and match management. This makes it harder to predict what tactics Japan might bring, but regardless, Korea needs a proactive approach that doesn't shrink in the face of pressure. I believe this is the best way to truly assess the gap in quality between the two teams. If Coach Hong shares this view, we're likely to see a match with intense physical duels and fast-paced passing to draw out that contrast. Given the hot and humid conditions, I expect both teams will try to decide the game in the first half, and experiment with new options in the second half when the tempo drops.
Korea lost 3-0 to Japan in the last EAFF. What went wrong in that game, and what do Korea need to do this time?
In the last edition of this tournament, Paulo Bento's Korean team couldn't even approach Japan's penalty area. That's how good Hajime Moriyasu's Japan was in terms of ball possession, compactness, and especially their rapid ball progression. Rather than blaming Bento's tactics, I'd say Japan simply played extremely well. In this tournament, too, they've maintained that same tactical identity. The midfielders and wingers combine smoothly to create space, and they've had no problem breaking down deep-lying defensive teams like Hong Kong. What's more, Moriyasu's side now has continuity—and that's where I see the real difference in quality.
Advertisement
Who will be Korea's key players against Japan?
That's quite a tough question… But I would say Lee Dong-gyeong is the most likely key player. Whether or not he can get enough touches on the ball could determine the direction of the match. In fact, for Lee Dong-gyeong to get those touches, Kim Jin-gyu needs to establish a strong presence in midfield. Both players will play crucial roles against Japan. If Lee Dong-gyeong can get the ball in the final third, I believe we might even be able to take the initiative in the match. He has become a more creative player and currently looks to have the sharpest shooting instincts.
- Korean football journalistSeo Bo-won
The Opposition with Sean Carroll
(Photo by)
What have you thought of Japan's performances so far?
I think they've been steady but unspectacular. With a lot of uncapped players (and, in Yuto Nagatomo, one who just made his first appearance for 950 days) and having started with two totally different XIs in their two games, that's perhaps to be expected, though. Overall, they've still managed to control both games, but the Korea game will be the real test.
Advertisement
Who have been their most important players?
That's a tricky one on account of the rotation. Yuki Soma has looked a level above on his third straight appearance in the competition, Satoshi Tanaka impressed in central midfield against China, and both Ryo Germain and Mao Hosoya have shown they can finish up front.
Who will be key for Japan to get the win?
It sounds obvious, but I think the centre backs and strikers. I expect it to be a game of few chances, so there's no room for errors at the back or profligacy in front of goal.
They will have the psychological advantage over Korea after the last meeting. Could this lead to complacency? How seriously are Japan taking this competition, and generally, how seriously does the JFA take it?
I'm not sure the last game really factors into it, as the squads are so different. Moriyasu takes every game seriously and will be demanding the same of his players, and while overseas players obviously can't be called up, I get the impression the JFA see this tournament as a useful exercise to run the rule over players not ordinarily afforded the opportunity to play for their country.
Advertisement
It depends who starts to an extent (Keisuke Osako looks certain to be in goal for instance, so if his Sanfrecce Hiroshima teammate Hayato Araki is in the back three, that will negate the issue a little), but the fact that there is no existing partnership at centre back means Korea could cause problems there.
- Japanese football expert & journalist Sean Carroll
What to Watch
With Japan's superior goal difference (7-5), Korea will have to win to secure the title; a draw won't do and would mean Japan make it back-to-back titles for the first time. This means Korea will have to attack and will have to pick their moments. Japan's quick passing and deadliness in transitions could prove fatal if Korea go in all guns blazing and leave themselves exposed. Central midfield selection will be key, players who can go box-to-box while in attack, Korea will have to be clinical. Joo Min-kyu might just be the man for Hong Myung-bo looks to to lead the line, as he did against China.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Arsenal Keeps Spending: Noni Madueke Join Gunners From Rivals Chelsea
Arsenal Keeps Spending: Noni Madueke Join Gunners From Rivals Chelsea

Fox Sports

time2 hours ago

  • Fox Sports

Arsenal Keeps Spending: Noni Madueke Join Gunners From Rivals Chelsea

Arsenal's transfer spree continued with the signing of England forward Noni Madueke from Chelsea on Friday. He is Arsenal's fourth signing of the offseason after midfielders Martin Zubimendi and Christian Norgard and goalkeeper Kepa Arrizabalaga. The 23-year-old Madueke's move comes after two and a half years at Chelsea, where he won the Club World Cup and Conference League. "Noni already has valuable experience at the top level and we know he will make a big impact at Arsenal," sporting director Andrea Berta said. Madueke reportedly signed for a fee of 48.5 million pounds ($65 million) on a five-year contract. Madueke is also a part of Thomas Tuchel's England squad and is in contention to play at next year's World Cup if the team qualifies. "Noni is an exciting and powerful young player, with his performances and numbers in recent seasons being of consistently high quality," Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta said. "At just 23, Noni already brings experience of club and international football, and he knows the Premier League very well." Reporting by The Associated Press. Want great stories delivered right to your inbox? Create or log in to your FOX Sports account and follow leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized newsletter daily! Get more from the English Premier League Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more

Arsenal signs England forward Noni Madueke from Chelsea
Arsenal signs England forward Noni Madueke from Chelsea

Fox Sports

time2 hours ago

  • Fox Sports

Arsenal signs England forward Noni Madueke from Chelsea

Associated Press LONDON (AP) — Arsenal's transfer spree continued with the signing of England forward Noni Madueke from Chelsea on Friday. He is Arsenal's fourth signing of the offseason after midfielders Martin Zubimendi and Christian Norgard and goalkeeper Kepa Arrizabalaga. The 23-year-old Madueke's move comes after two and a half years at Chelsea, where he won the Club World Cup and Conference League. 'Noni already has valuable experience at the top level and we know he will make a big impact at Arsenal," sporting director Andrea Berta said. Madueke reportedly signed for a fee of 48.5 million pounds ($65 million) on a five-year contract. Madueke is also a part of Thomas Tuchel's England squad and is in contention to play at next year's World Cup if the team qualifies. 'Noni is an exciting and powerful young player, with his performances and numbers in recent seasons being of consistently high quality," Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta said. 'At just 23, Noni already brings experience of club and international football, and he knows the Premier League very well. Having seen the quality of Noni's performances up close in recent seasons, we're really excited he is joining us." ___ AP soccer:

Extreme Heat Is Putting 2026 World Cup Athletes at Risk
Extreme Heat Is Putting 2026 World Cup Athletes at Risk

Time​ Magazine

time2 hours ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Extreme Heat Is Putting 2026 World Cup Athletes at Risk

Chelsea defied expectations on July 13 with a stunning 3-0 win against reigning European champions Paris Saint-Germain in the Club World Cup final. Players battled through scorching 85°F heat at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey, a persistent problem throughout the four-week tournament. Extreme temperatures peaked when a record-breaking heat dome settled over the U.S. in late June. Amid a heat emergency in Philadelphia, Chelsea manager Enzo Maresca said it was 'impossible' to train properly because of the 98.6°F weather. Midfielder Enzo Fernandez said the 96°F heat during Chelsea's semi-final on July 8—a 3:00 p.m. kick-off at MetLife Stadium like the final—was 'very dangerous.' It was so hot at one point that he 'had to lie down on the ground' after feeling 'really dizzy.' The severe conditions have raised concerns ahead of the 2026 World Cup hosted in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. The Club World Cup, held across 12 venues in the U.S., was a smaller dress rehearsal of next year's tournament, but it also tested players' capacity to withstand the realities of a warming world and how organizers and teams plan to protect them. 'Extreme temperatures can be particularly harmful as the body produces heat while exercising and needs to release that heat in order to cool down,' says Madeleine Orr, assistant professor of sport ecology at the University of Toronto. 'But if the ambient temperature and humidity are too high and it's impossible to sweat effectively, that can lead to trouble pretty quickly, starting with symptoms like fatigue, cramping, and nausea, progressing to more serious outcomes like exertional heat stroke if there's no cooling intervention.' Climate change is making extreme heat an increasingly significant issue across sports. In 2020, Australian rugby league player Keith Titmuss died aged 20 from exertional heat stroke after a pre-season training session. In 2021, Daniil Medvedev raised the prospect of dying to the umpire while playing tennis at the Tokyo Olympics, and 75% of athletes surveyed by World Athletics in 2023 said their health and performance had been negatively impacted by climate change. The inaugural edition of the expanded Club World Cup has now increased fears that extreme heat will intensify the effects of soccer's already overpacked schedule and how that will impact player welfare (an issue over which FIFPRO—the union representing over 66,000 professional soccer players globally—and domestic leagues are taking legal action against FIFA). To help alleviate concerns about players being overworked, FIFA claimed to reach 'consensus' over minimum rest periods with players' representatives on July 12, agreeing 72 hours between matches and three weeks holiday between seasons. FIFPRO, however, wasn't invited to the meeting where this decision was made. Those present included officials from organizations expelled from FIFPRO for corruption and former board members who were voted out of office. FIFA did not respond to TIME's request for comment. Ahead of the Club World Cup final, FIFPRO president Sergio Marchi said in a statement to TIME: 'We have been warning about the overcrowded schedule, the lack of physical and mental rest for players, and the lack of dialogue on the part of FIFA. This way of organizing tournaments … [is] based solely on a logic of economic profitability, not human sustainability.' FIFA guidelines usually permit one cooling break midway through each half when the Wet-Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT) reaches 89.6°F. This standard is used around the world to determine when heat reaches a dangerous level, taking into account temperature, humidity, wind speed, sun angle, and cloud cover. But scientists are concerned that the 89.6°F mandate underestimates player strain because WBGT only considers environmental factors. Following FIFPRO's intervention early in the tournament, FIFA lowered the threshold for cooling breaks at the Club World Cup to 82.4°F, as well as increasing water, ice, and towels around the pitch. While Major League Soccer's WBGT threshold is 84.2°F, FIFPRO states that matches should be postponed if the WBGT exceeds 82.4°F. Three Club World Cup matches exceeded these levels, including Benfica vs. Bayern Munich where temperatures peaked at 104°F in Charlotte, N.C. on June 24. 'I don't think I have ever played in this much heat before,' said 21-year-old Andreas Schjelderup after scoring for Benfica in a 1-0 victory. 'I don't think it's healthy.' In a June 30 FIFPRO media briefing attended by TIME, the union's medical director Vincent Gouttebarge explained that FIFPRO's WBGT threshold aims to prevent players' core temperature—usually between 96.8°F and 100.4°F—from exceeding 104°F. At this point, there's a risk of heat stroke where 'you don't sweat anymore because dehydration occurs,' he said, 'you have a lack of muscle control, you can barely walk, in some cases your cognitive process is affected, and, in the worst case, you can lose consciousness.' 'FIFA seems quite happy with 89.6°F as a threshold because there have not been any serious heat-related illnesses in the sport up to this temperature,' says Christopher Tyler, reader in environmental physiology at the University of Roehampton, London. 'But this is not the best evidence because players can down-regulate their intensity to lower heat strain,' for example, by sprinting less. 'The speed of the game is not the same, everything becomes very slow,' said Enzo Fernandez ahead of the final. 'Let's hope that next year they change the schedule,' he continued, protecting players and providing fans with a 'beautiful and attractive football spectacle.' Following his side's quarterfinal defeat against Real Madrid in 90°F afternoon heat, Borussia Dortmund manager Niko Kovac echoed this sentiment by suggesting evening kick-offs would raise the intensity of matches 'much higher.' On June 21, Dortmund subs watched the first half of their match against Mamelodi Sundowns from inside the locker room to avoid the blazing midday 90°F heat in Cincinnati, Ohio, conditions Kovac likened to a sauna. Almost 50% of Club World Cup matches were scheduled at either noon or 3:00 p.m. FIFPRO WBGT estimates shared with TIME, however, determined that if World Cup matches are played during the afternoon in Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Kansas City, Miami, and Monterrey, there would be an 'extremely high risk' of heat-stress injury. To estimate the WBGT in 2026 World Cup host locations during an average summer, Queen's University Belfast published a study in January 2025 that used meteorological data from 2003-2022. The researchers found that in June and July—the same period that the World Cup will take place—average temperatures in 14 out of 16 host cities experienced afternoon temperatures that frequently exceeded 82.4°F, while six cities typically exceeded the 89.6°F threshold. Beyond changing the schedule, other solutions like cooling vests and cold-water immersion are becoming more common. Amid the Philadelphia heat wave, Chelsea used large fans to spray water on the players to cool down, while teams like Real Madrid prepared for the tournament using heated tents to help players acclimatize to conditions they'd have to play in. Another option is deploying stadium roofs to shield against heat. Five 2026 World Cup stadiums in Atlanta, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles, and Vancouver have roofs, which FIFA president Gianni Infantino said will 'definitely' be used more for daytime matches. However, only 37.5% of matches are due to take place across these five venues. FIFA could also schedule matches 'proactively based upon forecast conditions,' says Tyler, but this isn't without its challenges. Last-minute scheduling that's dependent on the weather would create broadcasting and sponsor conflicts by scheduling more matches at times that aren't ideal for the global television audience, particularly in Europe and Asia. This 'scheduling Tetris,' as Orr describes, is even more complex after FIFA expanded the World Cup from 32 to 48 teams, meaning 104 matches instead of 64 and many times more fans. The Club World Cup isn't the first time that extreme weather has prompted schedule-change requests. At the 1986 World Cup in Mexico, 65% of matches were scheduled to kick off at 12:00 p.m. despite temperatures exceeding 100°F. Before leading Argentina to glory, Diego Maradona said at the time: 'It should be part of the rules once and for all that the organizers should take the soccer players into account. Without us, there would be no spectacular. We are the indispensable ingredient to the World Cup. At least the hours of the games should be set to the time in which we play best, not when there is the most heat.' Four decades later, the reality of climate change has kicked in and FIFA's critics are hoping the governing body adapts faster to the rising threat of extreme heat. FIFPRO's Marchi said in the statement shared with TIME that the 'extremely hot' periods Club World Cup matches were played in are 'unacceptable conditions' that 'cannot be allowed to happen again under any circumstances' at the World Cup, demanding that FIFA puts players 'at the heart of every decision.' In FIFPRO's June 30 media briefing, the union's general secretary Alex Phillips said FIFA is 'likely to be more flexible' over World Cup kick-off times after seeing the effects of extreme heat on the Club World Cup, but added that 'we have absolutely no power to force them to.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store