
Exact date when the world's next shortest day will occur as Earth's rotation expected to speed up AGAIN
On July 9, the world experienced one of the shortest days in recorded history, at 1.3 milliseconds shorter than the average day.
Now, scientists have revealed exactly when the next shortest days will occur as Earth's rotation speeds up once again.
Scientists predict that July 22 and August 5 will be even shorter than July 9, at 1.38 and 1.51 milliseconds shorter than average.
This is because the moon will be at its furthest point from Earth, reducing how much the tides hold back the planet's rotation.
Since an average blink lasts about 100 milliseconds, you won't be able to notice this difference.
However, Earth's rotation has been unexpectedly speeding up over the last few years, with atomic clocks picking up the change in 2020 and 2022.
While scientists have suggested multiple theories from changes in the atmosphere to the weakening magnetic field, the exact reason for the acceleration remains a mystery.
Normally, the Earth takes 24 hours, or 86,400 seconds, to rotate fully on its axis in a 'solar day'.
While this constant might be something we often take for granted, the Earth's rotation isn't actually stable.
On average, the Earth is actually slowing down by about two milliseconds per century.
This means that a T Rex in the Mesozoic era, about 250 million years ago, lived through days that were 23 hours long.
Even as early as the Bronze Age, the average day was about 0.47 seconds shorter, and in 200 million years' time, the days will be 25 hours long.
This slowing is largely due to the pull of the moon in a process called tidal braking.
When the moon's gravity pulls on Earth, it causes the oceans to bulge out slightly.
In addition to creating the tides, this tug actually pulls Earth backwards and slows its rotation.
However, when the moon is at its furthest point from Earth, known as the apogee, this pull is weaker and the planet can spin faster than normal.
That is why July 22 and August 5 will be so much faster than other days this year.
But these exceptionally short days are only possible because the Earth is currently in an unusual phase of acceleration.
This change has been so sudden that some experts think we will need to subtract a leap second for the first time ever in 2029.
Prior to 2020, there had never been a day much more than a millisecond shorter than average according to the US Naval Observatory and international Earth rotation services.
Now, scientists have recorded a string of days more than 1.3 milliseconds shorter than normal.
The shortest day ever recorded occurred on July 5 last year, which was a full 1.66 milliseconds shorter.
Dr Leonid Zotov, a leading authority on Earth rotation at Moscow State University, told Time and Date: 'Nobody expected this. The cause of this acceleration is not explained.'
Overall, scientists expected the planet's rotation to slow. This is partly due to the slowing rotation of the inner core, which affects Earth's rotation in space
Most scientists believe that this is due to something changing deep within Earth's core, which is affecting the planet's momentum.
In the future, Dr Zotov and other scientists expect that the trend will return to gradual slowing.
'I think we have reached the minimum. Sooner or later, Earth will decelerate,' says Dr Zotov.
This is because there are a number of factors which are jointly working to slow the planet down.
In addition to tidal braking, scientists also found that the planet's inner core began to slow around 2010 and is now moving backwards, subtly affecting the Earth's rotation in space.
This is expected to slightly slow the planet down over the coming years.
Likewise, recent research shows that melting ice and moving groundwater, linked to climate change, have increased the length of our days by 1.33 milliseconds per century between 2000 and 2018.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 minutes ago
- The Independent
Temporary barriers spared Alaska's capital from severe flooding. A long-term solution is elusive
The glacial flooding that sent residents of Alaska 's capital city scrambling this week has become an annual ordeal for those who live along the picturesque river that winds from the nearby Mendenhall Glacier. This year, a giant wall of reinforced sandbags erected with the help of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers held back the worst of the flooding in Juneau, to residents' great relief. The damage was nothing like what happened the last two years, when flooding was rampant and some homes washed away. But the wall is merely a temporary barrier. The effort to devise a permanent solution is complicated by what scientists don't yet know about how human-caused global warming will impact the yearly outbursts of water from an ice dam at the glacier. Juneau is just one of many communities around the globe struggling to engineer a way out of the worst damage from climate change. 'We can't keep doing this,' said Ann Wilkinson Lind, who lives on the banks of the Mendenhall River. 'We need a levee or some other permanent fix. ... This is an emergency situation that can't take 10 years for this study and that study and every other study. It needs to be done now.' The Mendenhall Glacier is about 12 miles (19 kilometers) from Juneau, home to 30,000 people in southeast Alaska, and is a popular tourist attraction due to its proximity and easy access on walking trails. Homes on the city's outskirts are within miles of Mendenhall Lake, which sits below the glacier, and many front the Mendenhall River. The glacial outburst flooding from the Mendenhall is itself a phenomenon caused by climate change, which is thinning glaciers around the world. A glacier nearby retreated, leaving behind a large bowl — Suicide Basin — that fills each spring and summer with rainwater and snowmelt dammed by the Mendenhall. When that water builds up enough pressure, it forces its way under or around the ice dam, enters Mendenhall Lake, and flows down the Mendenhall River toward Juneau. Flooding from the basin has been an annual concern since 2011 and has gotten worse, with new water-level records being set each of the last three years. City officials responded this year by working with state, federal and tribal entities to install the temporary barrier along roughly 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) of riverbank. The 10,000 'Hesco' barriers are essentially giant, reinforced sandbags intended to protect more than 460 properties, said emergency manager Ryan O'Shaughnessy. The Juneau Assembly required homeowners in the flood zone to cover 40% of the barrier's cost — about $6,300 each over 10 years. Additionally, a handful of homeowners were asked to chip in $50,000 toward reinforcing the river bank. About one-quarter of the residents formally objected, not enough to torpedo the project. This week, some water seeped between the bastions or through pipes underneath them that are designed to allow water to drain from yards into the river. Valves in the pipes are supposed to prevent floodwater from entering. But officials uniformly called the project a success, while acknowledging that some homes were damaged and that the barrier needs to be further extended. The barriers are designed to last for up to 10 years to allow time for a long-term solution. But questions abound. The capacity of Suicide Basin seems to be growing, and scientists aren't sure what a worst-case flood might look like. They predict that within a few decades, the Mendenhall itself will retreat far enough that it no longer acts as a dam, eliminating the risk of a flood outburst from Suicide Basin. But the persistent melting could also form other glacially dammed lakes that could function in a similar way. 'There's still a lot to be learned,' said Nate Ramsey, Juneau's engineering and public works deputy director. 'We have to assume this will be an annual event for the next many, many years. Is something like a temporary, soil-filled basket levy the best we can do over that period of time? ... We've got to keep looking for a long-term solution.' The Army Corps of Engineers has nearly $5 million set aside to begin working on a long-term solution, which for now largely consists of data collection. 'It's like trying to solve a math problem when the variables are always changing,' Army Corps Brig. Gen. Clete Goetz said Thursday. 'Seeing the problem is not the hard part. Engineering the solution is the challenge. That's what we're here for.' ___ Johnson and Attanasio reported from Seattle. Rush reported from Portland, Oregon.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Abortion drug could help reduce risk of breast cancer, group of medics says
A drug used in medical abortions could help prevent women at high risk of breast cancer from developing the disease, according to an international group of doctors and scientists. However, 'stigma' around mifepristone is stopping pharmaceutical companies from investigating its potential as a new treatment doctors could offer to reduce the risk of breast cancer, they say. Companies appear reluctant to carry out trials despite the fact that three previous studies all found that the drug shows promise as a way of slowing down the growth of cancerous cells. Mifepristone's role in medical abortions and fact that access to abortion is restricted in some countries is preventing much-needed research being done, the experts claim. It is one of two drugs, alongside misoprostol, that women in the UK take when ending a pregnancy that began up to 10 weeks earlier. They take a mifepristone tablet, then wait for 24-48 hours and then take the misoprostol. 'It is deeply disappointing that the successful application of mifepristone in one area of clinical medicine is hindering more extensive research into other indications that could benefit public health,' the opinion piece written by eight co-authors and published in The Lancet Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Women's Health says. All are experts in reproductive health or reproductive cancer working in London, Edinburgh, Stockholm and Erbil in Iraq. 'The time is long overdue to give mifepristone the opportunity it deserves to be investigated as a non-surgical option for primary prevention [of breast cancer],' they add. Breast cancer is the most common female cancer in most countries in the world and kills an estimated 670,000 women globally every year, according to the World Health Organization. Although small-scale, the three previous studies offered evidence mifepristone can limit the effect of the hormone progesterone, which drives the cell growth found in breast cancer. They were published in 2008, 2022 and 2024. Mifepristone is a type of drug known as a selective progesterone receptor modulator. If proven to work, it could help women who are at high risk of breast cancer, such as those who carry a variant of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Currently they are offered surgical options for their treatment, such as a mastectomy, or drugs that are of 'low efficacy', the authors say. UK cancer charities endorsed the plea for drug companies to look seriously into the role mifepristone could play in breast cancer care and for governments to enable that to happen by easing regulations that restrict its use to abortion. Dr Simon Vincent, the chief scientific officer at Breast Cancer Now, said: 'More risk-reducing treatment options for women with a high risk of developing breast cancer, that also protects their quality of life, are desperately needed. And we need to explore all avenues, including existing drugs, to achieve this. 'So early research into mifepristone is an important step forward and we need further studies to understand if these drugs are safe and effective.' Dr Marianne Baker, Cancer Research UK's science engagement manager, said the 57,900 new diagnoses a year of breast cancer in Britain showed that 'it's vital we invest in research exploring new ways to prevent the disease'. She added: 'Cancer develops when cells grow uncontrollably. Early studies showed that mifepristone slowed down cell growth in breast tissue, so it might be useful in delaying or preventing cancer. 'But we need more research to understand whether it's effective, how it works and who would benefit most from it.' Prof Kristina Gemzell Danielsson, the piece's lead author, and who heads the department of women's and children's health at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, said: 'Stigma around mifepristone used for abortion is describing part of why mifepristone is not more extensively researched for prevention of breast cancer. 'Taken together, our data support the use of mifepristone for prevention of poor prognosis breast cancer. All studies were randomised controlled trials using a low dose of mifepristone for two or three months.'


Times
3 hours ago
- Times
Brain chip could translate thoughts into speech
Technology with the ability to decode a person's inner thoughts and translate them into speech in real time has moved a step closer after the testing of a new brain implant, scientists have claimed. Researchers at Stanford University in California said that their device was able, with 74 per cent accuracy, to detect a person's 'inner speech' — where they imagined saying a specified set of words in their mind without any effort to physically utter them — and decipher which words they were thinking about. They said that it could represent a breakthrough for people with various forms of paralysis or impairments that prevent them from speaking unaided and could one day 'restore communication that is as fluent, natural and comfortable as conversational speech'.