Revisiting some of Hefin David's hilarious Senedd moments
But he also had something in spades that few politicians possess: a proper sense of humour.
For many people, their abiding memory will be of a kind-hearted family man who had a knack for making people laugh and smile – even at the most trying times.
In that spirit, we trawled through the archives to bring you just some of Dr David's very many witty contributions in the Senedd over the years.
'We'll get one off Temu'
Often a forward-thinker, he led a debate in February on future flight technology, everything from drones to flying cars, laying down a challenge to economy secretary Rebecca Evans.
'Far from being the stuff of sci-fi, these air vehicles are actually working,' he told the debating chamber. 'I invite the minister to try one – we'll get one off Temu.'
Scrutinising the housing minister in June, he asked whether the Welsh Government would give more money if the leader of Caerphilly council called for it.
'Just say, 'yes', and I'll let him know,' he remarked before his colleague could answer.
He was known for his sharp sense of humour (Image: Chris Haines, ICNN Senedd Reporter)
Dr David was a heckler extraordinaire, often getting a ticking off from the chair.
Calling for order in January, Elin Jones, the Senedd's speaker or Llywydd, said: 'Can we listen to the minister's response? She's being heckled by her own backbenches.'
He jokingly set the record straight, intervening to point out that he was heckling Plaid Cymru's Cefin Campbell – not his partner Vikki Howells, the higher education minister.
'Don't put that on a leaflet'
During a debate about rugby TV rights in July last year, he said he had a lot in common with Rishi Sunak who had bemoaned going without 'lots of things' as a child including Sky TV.
'My dad wouldn't let us have Sky either and we had to listen to it on the radio,' He told the Senedd, stressing that's all he had in common with the former Tory prime minister.
Plaid Cymru's Delyth Jewell later joked: 'Who knew you had so much in common with Rishi Sunak? For anyone who missed the beginning of the debate, I'm not going to give context.'
Dr David told his political opponent: 'Don't put that on a leaflet!'
In February last year, as the Senedd discussed apprenticeships, he thanked colleagues for referencing a report on transitions to employment which he had authored.
He said: 'I'd be far too modest to do so myself but now that they have…'
'Wayne David isn't my dad'
In mid-November, he paid tribute to the first minister's warmth during a debate on Eluned Morgan's first 100 days in office.
He told the Senedd: 'We've known each other a long time now, she's the only first minister who gives me a cwtch every time I see her. I can see Mark Drakeford getting a little worried there – I'm not expecting anything, finance minister.'
Dr David had a way of diffusing a fraught situation with humour, as in September 2023, when the Senedd was asked to express no confidence in the then-transport minister over 20mph.
He paid credit to the Conservatives: 'They've achieved something today that many have tried and many have failed: they've united two thirds of this chamber around Lee Waters.'
Then, he told the Senedd about an email he received from a constituent, saying: 'It may well be you have an ambition to be our representative in Westminster when your dad retires.'
He clarified: 'Wayne David isn't my dad, and I think we need to make that absolutely clear.'
'Promoted to the backbenches'
He often had Senedd members, including the opposition, in stitches (Image: Chris Haines, ICNN Senedd Reporter)
During first minister's questions in July 2022, he struggled to hold it together to ask his question due to a colleague mucking about on the back benches.
He said: 'I'm sorry. Alun Davies was being very silly there, he made me laugh.'
The speaker joked: 'That statement is now on the record.'
On another occasion, he congratulated his Labour colleague on his 'promotion' to the backbenches after he was sacked by then-incoming first minister Mark Drakeford.
Following a fiery exchange between the then-first minister and Plaid Cymru's leader at FMQs in December 2022, he lightened the mood as he would often do.
'Last week marked the one-year anniversary of the co-operation agreement, I'm glad to see it's still so healthy,' he said, prompting laughter around the chamber.
'She's either staring me out or she's frozen'
When Dawn Bowden revealed in a June 2022 meeting that Dr David told her he would hide in the changing rooms to avoid PE at school, he joked: 'That was a confidential conversation!'
And, in a remote meeting during the pandemic, he wasn't 100 per cent sure if the then-culture minister was having technical troubles. 'She's either staring me out or she's frozen,' he said.
In June 2021, he told the Senedd: 'You won't believe this but I was awful at sport in school,' as he claimed credit for the Senedd rugby side 'absolutely smashing' Westminster's team.
'But, in school, I was not interested in sport because I felt it was a team game,' he said. 'And the chief whip will know I'm not so good at team stuff sometimes.'
When a transport chief lost their thread while appearing before a Senedd committee in January 2021, he could hardly resist pointing out: 'You lost your train of thought.'
'One thing I haven't done is upset the Queen'
In 2019, Dr David, a child of the 1980s, was chuffed to bits with the title of a committee report about the Welsh Baccalaureate, proclaiming 'Bacc to the future' as one of the best ever.
Another time, while trying to pry a clear-cut answer out of his friend and colleague Vaughan Gething, he said: 'I feel like Jeremy Paxman interviewing Michael Howard.'
Dr David wasn't afraid to poke fun at himself. When a witness described sixth formers as 'more mature' in 2020, he replied in typical fashion: 'You didn't know me in sixth form, then.'
In September 2022, he recalled an encounter with the Queen at the Senedd's official opening after he was first elected in 2016: 'She was looking directly at me. I have to say, Llywydd, I feel uncomfortable when you look directly at me.
'I wasn't sure whether she had a frown on her face. I wasn't sure whether I had upset her, and I was thinking, 'Oh my God, I've upset her – it's probably because I'm wearing a red tie'.
'But … she did actually give me – and I'm not making this up – a reassuring smile. So, I could rest easy… and think, 'One thing I haven't done is upset the Queen'.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
12 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Anthony Albanese's government swings the axe on the NDIS with huge changes as costs soar past $48.5billion a year
Anthony Albanese 's government plans to remove children with mild autism or minor developmental delays from the NDIS, as the scheme's costs continue to spiral.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Netanyahu has pushed Hamas to the brink of destruction
It's often been said that there is nothing as pathetic – and embarrassing – as British politicians opining about what they want to see happen in the Middle East. The days when we ran the show ended many decades ago, and the idea that anyone in Israel or the rest of the region gives a damn about what some nonentity British MP thinks is risible. But as the past few weeks have shown, it's not quite as simple as that. The reaction by Hamas to the Government's plan to recognise a Palestine state – the same applies to similar announcements by France, Canada and Australia – shows that we nonetheless have the ability to throw a giant spanner in the works. Sir Keir Starmer's statement last month had one immediate effect: it emboldened Hamas and destroyed ceasefire talks that had appeared to be making progress. As Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, put it: 'When you have all these European nations saying, 'Israel's not going to have a ceasefire, we're going to go ahead and unilaterally recognise a Palestinian state,' what do you think that did with Hamas? It emboldened them. It empowered them. And that's when negotiations were over right then.' That is the context in which the latest development in the ceasefire talks needs to be seen, with Hamas reportedly agreeing to a joint Egyptian-Qatari proposal for it to release 10 of the remaining living hostages and 18 bodies (there are believed to be 20 still alive, and another 30 or so dead) during a 60-day truce, with further negotiations over a permanent ceasefire. The question being asked is why Hamas has seemingly done a volte-face and agreed to a ceasefire, barely three weeks after walking away from the last round. First, we simply don't know what, if any, pressure is being applied by Qatar, which is the only nation other than Iran that can force Hamas to act as it wants. But we do know that there is even more pressure on Hamas now from another direction: Israel. Benjamin Netanyahu has been pilloried in Britain and elsewhere for his recently announced plan to occupy Gaza City and to widen military action to all of Gaza.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The real difficulty ministers face is that the Epping hotel judgment is a clean and fair application of the law: ANDREW TETTENBORN
There's a beautiful irony in the Epping hotel injunction. The Government's immigration policy of putting asylum seekers in hotels in some of the less well-off parts of the country has received a major blow from the legal class that Keir Starmer, Lord Hermer and many of their learned friends themselves inhabit. And it's a blow that sees the long-term viability of the Government's immigration policy unravel, as councils up and down the country will seek to use this ruling to shut down their own troublesome migrant hotels. The difficulty for the Government is that Mr Justice Eyre's decision is a clean, fair, straightforward application of the law. He has ruled that, if planning permission exists for a hotel, it's a blatant breach of planning law to use the premises as a long-term asylum reception centre. Who'd have thought it? At bottom, it's no different from a convoy of travellers breaking planning law by parking caravans on a public recreation ground, or a farmer building a holiday camp on an arable field. The courts regularly issue stiff injunctions in cases like these, and rightly so. But Starmer and the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, were surprisingly complacent, imagining that somehow this didn't apply to their own activities. When the penny dropped at the last minute, they scrambled to influence the result, sending barrister Edward Brown KC to argue that the local authority 'should, in fact, have given some consideration to the wider public interest in this application'. In other words, that an injunction should not be allowed because it would make life very difficult for the Government. Counsel for the hotelier took much the same line, effectively ignoring the concerns of the local people who had been protesting outside The Bell ever since an Ethiopian asylum seeker lodging there was charged with sexual assault against a 14-year-old schoolgirl. 'Fears as to an increase of crime associated with asylum seekers or a danger to schools are common,' he said. 'But that does not make them well founded.' The hotelier's barrister was, of course, doing his job. Nevertheless, such legal arguments blithely take no notice of local problems caused by uncontrolled immigration and the small boats crisis, which has seen more than 50,000 undocumented illegal migrants crossing the Channel to Britain in the 13 months since Labour came to power. Until now, the Home Office has seemed content to dump the problem on councils such as Epping, where voters traditionally mistrust Labour. Now those voters have rightly dumped it back on the Government. What seriously spooks the Home Office is that Epping will not be a lone case. Across the kingdom we could now see multiple injunctions, forcing the Home Secretary in short order to relocate tens of thousands of asylum seekers currently in hotels – there are more than 32,000 according to figures released in March. And it is urgent: The High Court has given the Government only three weeks, until September 12, to vacate The Bell. The Government must act, and fast. One option might be to set up more dedicated reception centres, as in Germany and France. Another is to deter small-boat crossings by making it more difficult for illegal migrants to enter the black economy. The ball is firmly, and legally, in its court.
