Haryana charges 6 officials over illegal Aravalli mining in Nuh
The Haryana government has formally acknowledged large-scale illegal mining in Rawa village of Nuh district, dating back to 2011. Acting on a geospatial probe, the state has charged six senior officials from the Department of Mines and Geology under Rule 7 of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules for their alleged role in the mining. An area where illegal mining used to take place at Panchgaon village in Nuh. (HT Archive)
The officials named in the government communique include Assistant Mining Officer R.S. Thakran and Mining Officers Bhupender Singh, BD Yadav, Rajender Prasad, Anil Kumar, and Anil Atwal.
The probe, ordered by Commissioner and Secretary, Mines and Geology, T.L. Satya Prakash, found that around 25 acres of Aravalli hill land in Haryana's revenue territory had been illegally mined by leaseholders from Rajasthan. The excavation spanned from November 2011 to January 2025, resulting in the loss of over 80 lakh tonnes of Aravalli stone.
'While taking strict cognisance of the illegal mining activities, Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini has directed that six officers of the Mining Department be charge-sheeted. He has also ordered action against staff from the Panchayat and Forest Departments found complicit in the case,' the state government said in a statement.
The crackdown follows a complaint alleging excess extraction in Rawa village, located in Ferozepur Jhirka tehsil. Subsequent departmental investigations confirmed the illegal operations.
Despite multiple attempts, Satya Prakash and director general of Mining, Pandurang did not respond to HT's request for a comment.
Environmental activists have long flagged unchecked mining in fragile Aravalli zones like Nuh, warning of severe ecological consequences. A senior official, requesting anonymity, said the Rawa case could be 'just the tip of the iceberg', with more action expected in the coming weeks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC push nudges Jharkhand HC to grant child care leave to woman judge
The Supreme Court on Wednesday noted that the Jharkhand High Court has allowed a 92-day child care leave (CCL) to a senior woman judicial officer -- a single parent, after the top court's firm nudge last week. However, the case took a fresh turn as the officer alleged that the high court sought to tarnish her annual confidential report (ACR) in retaliation for her petition seeking leave. A bench of justices Prashant Kumar Mishra and Manmohan, while taking note of the high court's affidavit allowing part of the officer's requested leave, issued notice to the high court on the judicial officer's additional plea seeking expunging of adverse ACR remarks. The matter will be heard in four weeks. 'In deference to this court's June 6 order, we have taken a decision granting her 92-day leave,' senior advocate Ajit Kumar Sinha, appearing for the Jharkhand High Court, submitted before the bench. Also Read: SC stays Madras HC order, allows toll collection on NH38 However, he added that allowing eight months of continuous leave for an officer heading the district judiciary at Hazaribagh would set an undesirable precedent. 'She has asked for 194 days. Her child has exams in 2026. This kind of stretch leave is not advisable,' Sinha said. Representing the woman officer, advocate Anup Kumar said she had applied for CCL between June 10 and December 20, 2025, to assist her son in preparing for his Class XII board and engineering entrance examinations. He also pointed out that her ACR had been adversely commented upon in a May 23 communication after she moved the Supreme Court. The communication stated that her 'conduct has not been good.' The woman officer's lawyer contended that adverse comments in her ACR dated May 23 appeared part of a retaliatory act by the administration. At this, the bench observed, 'You proceed on leave for 92 days, and we will see later,' before recording the fresh plea regarding her ACR and issuing notice. On June 6, the top court had asked the Jharkhand high court to revisit its decision rejecting the woman judge's CCL application, making it clear that if the matter was not resolved by June 12, it would intervene. The officer, a Scheduled Caste (SC) judicial officer serving since 2002, was transferred in April from Hazaribagh, where her son studies, to Dumka, despite having sought a transfer to Ranchi or Bokaro where better coaching facilities are available. Her request for CCL, soon after, was summarily rejected by the high court on May 10 without assigning reasons. In her plea, the officer pointed out that another judicial officer had recently been granted three months of CCL by the high court and alleged that her case had been treated differently, amounting to discrimination in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution. The petition cited Rule 43-C of the Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972, which entitles eligible female government employees to 730 days of CCL during their service tenure, with full pay for the first 365 days and 80% for the remaining period. A March 2024 resolution of the Jharkhand government and an August 2024 circular by the Registrar General of the Jharkhand High Court reinforced this entitlement, specifically in the context of children's exams, illness, or care requirements. However, the state objected to her petition, with advocate Vishnu Sharma arguing before the court last week that granting such leave would 'open a Pandora's box.' The Supreme Court, on June 6, dismissed the state's apprehensions, clarifying that the matter lay squarely between the high court and its officer. 'There is enough power with the high court unless you think someone is not acting bonafide,' the bench had then remarked.
Mint
29 minutes ago
- Mint
Maharashtra: Country, imported premium liquor prices to soar as cabinet approves excise duty hike on IMFL
On Tuesday, the Maharashtra cabinet approved several revenue-enhancing measures in the excise department, including an increase in liquor duty. The state excise duty on Indian-made foreign liquor (IMFL) soared by more than 50%, leading to a significant rise in retail prices by over 60%. It has also hiked the duty on country liquor and imported premium liquor, which will increase their retail prices by 14% and over 25% respectively, HT reported. However, the excise duty on beer and wine has not risen as the retail price of beer, which has a lesser percentage of alcohol in comparison to hard liquor, is among the highest in the country, officials said. When it comes to wine, the state follows a policy of promotion, as Maharashtra is home to a large portion of the country's wineries and a significant number of grape-supplying farmers are based in the region, the report stated. The government anticipates that the substantial hike will boost its revenue to ₹ 57,000 crore, an increase of ₹ 14,000 crore from the ₹ 43,620 crore collected in FY 2024-25. It expects this to contribute 10% of the projected ₹ 5.60 lakh crore in total revenue receipts for the 2025-26 financial year. In an effort to generate revenue to support the strained exchequer and fund populist schemes like Ladki Bahin, along with benefits for farmers and other communities, the Mahayuti government formed a committee in January, led by then Additional Chief Secretary Valsa Nair, to suggest ways to boost liquor revenue. The committee submitted its report in April, and the state cabinet approved its recommendations on Tuesday, the report added. Following the committee's recommendations, IMFL will now be subject to an excise duty that is 4.5 times the manufacturing cost, up from the current rate of three times. An IMFL official told HT, 'This will vary based on the manufacturing price but could lead to a huge hike of over 60% in retail prices.' Currently priced between ₹ 120 and ₹ 150 for 180 ml, the cost of IMFL will now rise to a minimum of ₹ 205. Premium brands, which currently range from ₹ 210 to ₹ 330 for 180 ml, will now start at ₹ 360. Meanwhile, the price of a 180-ml bottle of country liquor has increased from ₹ 70 to ₹ 80. The government has introduced a new category called Maharashtra-made liquor (MML), which will be exempt from the duty hike. Made from grains, MML will be priced at a minimum of ₹ 148 for 180 ml, a rate deliberately set within the current IMFL price range to help MML compete with and capture a share of the IMFL market. The excise duty hike on IMFL brands is the first in 14 years. Officials noted that, despite the increase, the duty remains lower than in neighbouring states such as Madhya Pradesh and Telangana. Another official pointed out that the duty increase on country liquor was kept minimal to prevent a shift towards illicit alcohol, as a sharper rise in price could drive such consumption. "It is also because the last hike was done in 2022,' he stated. "Maharashtra was the most highly taxed state in the country in terms of this industry. The new decision is likely to make the situation worse. High prices in a particular state leads to the smuggling of alcohol from less taxed states or from neighbouring states. At the look of it, I think this decision is far from ground reality and not a good decision,' Indian Express quoted Pramod Krishna, former Director General, Confederation of Indian Alcoholic Beverage, as saying.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Knowledge Nugget: Lok Sabha deputy speaker — What you must know for UPSC Exam
Take a look at the essential events, concepts, terms, quotes, or phenomena every day and brush up your knowledge. Here's your knowledge nugget for today on Lok Sabha deputy speaker. (Relevance: The topic of Speaker and Deputy Speaker is highly relevant for the UPSC exam. Previously, various questions have been asked on these topics. For instance, in this year's prelims, a question was asked on the office of Speaker. Thus, it becomes essential to be aware of these constitutional offices, especially when they are in the news.) Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge on Tuesday (June 10) urged Prime Minister Narendra Modi to urgently initiate the process of electing a deputy speaker of the Lok Sabha, underlining the ongoing delay in the matter despite constitutional provisions for it. In a letter to PM Modi, Kharge pointed out that each Lok Sabha, from the first to the sixteenth, had seen the appointment of a deputy speaker in both Houses of Parliament, adding that it had also been a 'well-established convention' to appoint the person from among the members of the principal Opposition party. 'However, for the first time in independent India's history, this position has remained vacant for two consecutive Lok Sabha terms. No Deputy Speaker was elected during the Seventeenth Lok Sabha, and this concerning precedent continues in the ongoing Eighteenth Lok Sabha,' Kharge pointed out. In this context, let's know about the post of the deputy speaker of Lok Sabha. 1. Article 93 of the Constitution of India states that 'The House of the People shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the House to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker'. 2. The Constitution does not specify a time frame for making the appointments. It is this gap in the provision that allows governments to delay or avoid appointing a Deputy Speaker. However, constitutional experts have pointed out that both Article 93 and Article 178 use the words 'shall' and 'as soon as may be' – indicating that not only is the election of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker mandatory, it must be held at the earliest. 3. According to Article 95(1), the Deputy Speaker performs the duties of the Speaker if the post is vacant. The Deputy Speaker has the same general powers as the Speaker when presiding over the House. All references to the 'Speaker' in the Rules are deemed to be references to the Deputy Speaker as well for the times when he or she presides. P.D.T. Achary wrote in the opinion piece for The Indian Express, 'The history of the office of Deputy Speaker goes back to the Government of India Act of 1919, when he was called Deputy President, as the Speaker was known as the president of the Central Legislative Assembly. Although the main functions of a Deputy Speaker were to preside over the sittings of the assembly in the absence of the Speaker and chair the select committees, etc., the position was considered necessary to share the responsibility of running the House with the Speaker and guide the nascent committees.' 1. The Deputy Speaker is elected from among the Lok Sabha members by a simple majority of members present and voting. 2. The election of the Deputy Speaker usually takes place in the second session, even though there is no bar on having this election in the first session of the new Lok Sabha or Assembly. But the election of Deputy Speaker is generally not delayed beyond the second session unless there are some genuine and unavoidable constraints. 3. In the Lok Sabha, the election of Deputy Speaker is governed by Rule 8 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha. According to Rule 8, the election 'shall be held on such date as the Speaker may fix'. The Deputy Speaker is elected once a motion proposing his or her name is carried. Once elected, the Deputy Speaker usually continues in office until the dissolution of the House. 4. Under Article 94 the Speaker or Deputy Speaker 'shall vacate his office if he ceases to be a member of the House of the People'. They may also resign (to each other), or 'may be removed from office by a resolution of the House of the People passed by a majority of all the then members of the House'. As per Rule 9 of the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, 'at the commencement of the House or from time to time, as the case may be, the Speaker shall nominate from amongst the members a panel of not more than ten Chairpersons, anyone of whom may preside over the House in the absence of the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker when so requested by the Speaker or, in the absence of the Speaker, by the Deputy Speaker.' 1. Article 178 contains the corresponding provision for the Speakers and Deputy Speakers in the state Assemblies. It says, 'Every Legislative Assembly of a State shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the Assembly to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker thereof, and, so often as the office of Speaker or Deputy Speaker becomes vacant, the Assembly shall choose another member to be Speaker or Deputy Speaker, as the case may be.' 2. Article 179 talks about the 'Vacation and resignation of, and removal from, the offices of Speaker and Deputy Speaker ' in state legislative assembly. It says, the Speaker or Deputy Speaker 'shall vacate his office if he ceases to be a member of the House of the People'. They may also resign (to each other), or 'may be removed from office by a resolution of the House of the People passed by a majority of all the then members of the House'. 1. The Deputy Chairman is a constitutional position created under Article 89 of the Constitution, which specifies that Rajya Sabha shall choose one of its MPs to be the Deputy Chairman as often as the position becomes vacant. The office becomes vacant either by resignation or removal from office or when the Rajya Sabha member's term gets over. 2. The Deputy Chairman is the one position that is elected solely by members of Rajya Sabha. It is a critical position not just because s/he steps in when there is a vacancy in the office of Chairperson/Vice President but also because s/he plays a critical role in ensuring the smooth running of the House. Consider the following statements: (UPSC CSE 2018) 1. The Speaker of the Legislative Assembly shall vacate his/her office if he/she ceases to be a member of the Assembly. 2. Whenever the Legislative Assembly is dissolved, the Speaker shall vacate his/her office immediately. Which of the statements given above is/are correct? (a) 1 only (b) 2 only (c) Both 1 and 2 (d) Neither 1 nor 2 (Sources: 'Concerning precedent continues': Kharge urges PM Modi to begin process to elect Lok Sabha deputy speaker, Decode Politics: What is the Deputy Speaker's role and how often has it been an Opposition MP?, Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X. 🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for May 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at Roshni Yadav is a Deputy Copy Editor with The Indian Express. She is an alumna of the University of Delhi and Jawaharlal Nehru University, where she pursued her graduation and post-graduation in Political Science. She has over five years of work experience in ed-tech and media. At The Indian Express, she writes for the UPSC section. Her interests lie in national and international affairs, governance, economy, and social issues. You can contact her via email: ... Read More
