US and Israeli officials float idea of ‘all or nothing' Gaza deal
Loading
'No piecemeal deals, that doesn't work,' he said, according to an audio recording of part of the meeting published by the Ynet Hebrew news site.
'Now we think that we have to shift this negotiation to 'all or nothing' – everybody comes home,' he said. 'We have a plan around it,' he added, without elaborating. A participant in the meeting confirmed that Witkoff made such remarks.
Israel and Hamas do not negotiate directly. Instead, negotiations for a ceasefire between the two sides have run through intermediaries: the United States, Qatar and Egypt.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Trump are said to be working on a new proposal that would involve presenting Hamas with an ultimatum, according to reports in the Israeli news media that were confirmed Sunday by a person familiar with the matter. The White House was not immediately available for comment.
Under the terms of the ultimatum, Hamas would have to release the remaining hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and agree to terms to end the war that include the group's disarmament. Otherwise, the Israeli military would continue its campaign.
'This has been our demand from the beginning'
Mahmoud Mardawi, a Hamas official, said the Palestinian armed group had yet to receive a formal Israeli proposal for a comprehensive deal from Arab mediators. He said that while Hamas supported such an agreement in principle, it would not disarm, which has long been a core Israeli condition.
'This has been our demand from the beginning: an end to the war, the release of prisoners, and day-after arrangements in the Gaza Strip – a clear and comprehensive deal,' Mardawi said in a phone interview.
Loading
The prospects of any rapid advancement toward such a deal appear dim.
Hamas has consistently rejected Israel's terms for ending the war throughout the negotiations. On Saturday, the group said in a statement that it would not disarm unless a Palestinian state was established, despite a call from Arab states last week for the group to do so.
The Israeli government opposes Palestinian statehood.
On Sunday, Itamar Ben-Gvir, the Israeli national security minister, visited the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound, which Jews revere as the Temple Mount, long a tinderbox for Israeli-Palestinian tensions. Arab leaders denounced Ben-Gvir's ascent to the site – during which he openly prayed – as a provocation.
'It's important to convey from this place that we should immediately conquer Gaza, exercise our sovereignty there, and eliminate every last Hamas member,' Ben-Gvir said from the site, in a video shared by his office.
Many Israelis say they support a comprehensive deal to return all the hostages and end the war. But many are sceptical that such a deal can be achieved under the conditions set by the hardline Israeli government, which has vowed to continue fighting until Hamas surrenders or is destroyed.
On Sunday night, Netanyahu argued that Hamas 'does not want a deal' and vowed to press on in the attempt 'to release our captive sons, eliminate Hamas and ensure that Gaza no longer poses a threat to Israel'.
'Give us victory'
Given the firm positions of both sides, an Israeli and American push for a comprehensive deal may not bring an agreement closer, according to analysts.
'Hamas is essentially saying to Israel: 'If you want the 20 living hostages out, give us a full victory',' said Ehud Yaari, an Israel-based fellow of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, an independent research group.
Hamas' terms are far beyond what Netanyahu would accept, Yaari said. But, he added, the prime minister 'has to keep convincing the Israeli public and his own voters that he is doing everything he can, and he has to reassure the families of the hostages'.
Mardawi said that Hamas saw little reason to negotiate with Israel, given the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza.
'What is the point of talks when people are dying of starvation?' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
5 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Has state recognition changed the game in Gaza? Only for the deluded
When Australia joined France, the UK and Canada in planning to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly next month, Anthony Albanese argued that Hamas didn't support a two-state solution. Its aim, he said, was instead to control all the land between the river and the sea. The prime minister was right about that. Reaching a compromise with Israel, dividing the territory so that two countries could live side by side in peace was the path chosen by Fatah, which controlled the West Bank, not Hamas, which controlled Gaza. But Hamas is prepared to make political capital out of a plan to recognise the state of Palestine, even if it's one it opposes. Hamas is looking to claim a victory, any victory, after 22 months of conflict in Gaza. More than 60,000 Palestinian lives have been lost, according to Hamas Health Ministry figures, including most of the senior Hamas leadership there. Huge swathes of the strip have been destroyed. Images of Gaza from the air conjure up the destruction of Grozny in Chechnya by the Russian military at the start of this century – or Dresden after Allied bombing during World War II. Hamas began this round of its conflict with Israel on October 7, 2023, murdering and raping some 1200 people, mostly Israelis, and taking some 250 into the Gaza Strip as hostages, uploading images to social media live as they went. It was the deadliest raid since the creation of the state of Israel in 1948, leading to the longest conflict in Israel's history, and the costliest one for the people of Gaza. Last month, there was unprecedented criticism from Arab sources, with calls from the Arab League for Hamas to lay down its weapons, to release the remaining Israeli hostages and leave Gaza. Hamas leader Ghazi Hamad came out fighting. One of the group's 'external leadership' members based in Qatar, Hamad did a long interview on Al Jazeera, asserting that Hamas would never lay down its weapons, while spinning the Gaza war as a victory. 'Why are all these countries recognising Palestine now? Had any country dared to recognise the state of Palestine prior to October 7? … October 7 forced the world to open its eyes to the Palestinian cause, and to act forcefully in this respect,' he said. 'The powerful blow that was delivered to Israel on October 7 has yielded important historic achievements… People who thought that defeating Israel is difficult, [realised] today that it is very easy. Today, through October 7, we proved that defeating Israel is not as difficult as people had thought.' However, most Palestinians don't regard this Gaza war as a victory for themselves, or for Hamas, according to polls conducted across Gaza and the West Bank over the past 22 months by Palestinian pollster Khalil Shikaki. They show that the October 7 attacks are viewed with increasing disfavour by Palestinians – as is Hamas itself. 'The resistance', as the Islamist group styles itself, is less popular now than it was before the war, with support for a negotiated settlement with Israel climbing. In Israel, polls show that more than 75 per cent of Israelis want the war in Gaza to end, so that as many Israeli hostages as possible can be returned. It's estimated that Gaza militants hold about 50 hostages, of whom 19 are believed to still be alive. Or half alive. On August 1, 664 days after taking him captive from the Nova Music Festival, Hamas released a video showing an emaciated Evyatar David given a shovel with which to dig his own grave. Tal Shoham, who had been held hostage with him, but was released during the second ceasefire back in April, said their thirst was so severe they drank from the toilet. PM Benjamin Netanyahu's latest plan to expand Israel's military operation and to occupy Gaza City 'temporarily' – forcibly relocating a further 800,000 Palestinians – is not popular in Israel. It was not supported by Israel's military, with Chief of General Staff Eyal Zamir arguing it could expand Gaza's humanitarian crisis as well as endangering the hostages. Still, the widening of the war was pushed through by the most hard-line government in Israeli history, including parties led by Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, who say openly they wish to move the Palestinian population out of Gaza and return Jewish settlers there in their stead.
The Age
5 minutes ago
- The Age
Has state recognition changed the game in Gaza? Only for the deluded
When Australia joined France, the UK and Canada in planning to recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly next month, Anthony Albanese argued that Hamas didn't support a two-state solution. Its aim, he said, was instead to control all the land between the river and the sea. The prime minister was right about that. Reaching a compromise with Israel, dividing the territory so that two countries could live side by side in peace was the path chosen by Fatah, which controlled the West Bank, not Hamas, which controlled Gaza. But Hamas is prepared to make political capital out of a plan to recognise the state of Palestine, even if it's one it opposes. Hamas is looking to claim a victory, any victory, after 22 months of conflict in Gaza. More than 60,000 Palestinian lives have been lost, according to Hamas Health Ministry figures, including most of the senior Hamas leadership there. Huge swathes of the strip have been destroyed. Images of Gaza from the air conjure up the destruction of Grozny in Chechnya by the Russian military at the start of this century – or Dresden after Allied bombing during World War II. Hamas began this round of its conflict with Israel on October 7, 2023, murdering and raping some 1200 people, mostly Israelis, and taking some 250 into the Gaza Strip as hostages, uploading images to social media live as they went. It was the deadliest raid since the creation of the state of Israel in 1948, leading to the longest conflict in Israel's history, and the costliest one for the people of Gaza. Last month, there was unprecedented criticism from Arab sources, with calls from the Arab League for Hamas to lay down its weapons, to release the remaining Israeli hostages and leave Gaza. Hamas leader Ghazi Hamad came out fighting. One of the group's 'external leadership' members based in Qatar, Hamad did a long interview on Al Jazeera, asserting that Hamas would never lay down its weapons, while spinning the Gaza war as a victory. 'Why are all these countries recognising Palestine now? Had any country dared to recognise the state of Palestine prior to October 7? … October 7 forced the world to open its eyes to the Palestinian cause, and to act forcefully in this respect,' he said. 'The powerful blow that was delivered to Israel on October 7 has yielded important historic achievements… People who thought that defeating Israel is difficult, [realised] today that it is very easy. Today, through October 7, we proved that defeating Israel is not as difficult as people had thought.' However, most Palestinians don't regard this Gaza war as a victory for themselves, or for Hamas, according to polls conducted across Gaza and the West Bank over the past 22 months by Palestinian pollster Khalil Shikaki. They show that the October 7 attacks are viewed with increasing disfavour by Palestinians – as is Hamas itself. 'The resistance', as the Islamist group styles itself, is less popular now than it was before the war, with support for a negotiated settlement with Israel climbing. In Israel, polls show that more than 75 per cent of Israelis want the war in Gaza to end, so that as many Israeli hostages as possible can be returned. It's estimated that Gaza militants hold about 50 hostages, of whom 19 are believed to still be alive. Or half alive. On August 1, 664 days after taking him captive from the Nova Music Festival, Hamas released a video showing an emaciated Evyatar David given a shovel with which to dig his own grave. Tal Shoham, who had been held hostage with him, but was released during the second ceasefire back in April, said their thirst was so severe they drank from the toilet. PM Benjamin Netanyahu's latest plan to expand Israel's military operation and to occupy Gaza City 'temporarily' – forcibly relocating a further 800,000 Palestinians – is not popular in Israel. It was not supported by Israel's military, with Chief of General Staff Eyal Zamir arguing it could expand Gaza's humanitarian crisis as well as endangering the hostages. Still, the widening of the war was pushed through by the most hard-line government in Israeli history, including parties led by Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, who say openly they wish to move the Palestinian population out of Gaza and return Jewish settlers there in their stead.
Sky News AU
5 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Cultural gatekeepers write off 'Take Back Australia' marchers worried about the cost of living as racist xenophobes
Australians are not racist - we are simply fed up. Do you want lower immigration and to protect our culture, heritage and way of life? Congratulations. You have committed a thought crime. The reality is mainstream Australians deserve the right to be heard without being branded as bigots. And now on August 31, those same people are being urged to take to the streets of Sydney, Melbourne and other city locations 'to be confirmed' to Take Our Country Back. The goal is for this rally, we're told, is to represent the ordinary citizen - the single mum skipping meals so her children can eat, the young tradie still living in his parents' spare room because rent chews up his pay and the cafe owner poleaxed by power bills and supplier costs. Marching for jobs, affordable homes and fair immigration, not for hate. To be clear, no one wants these marches hijacked by the National Socialist Network, their flags or their warped ideology. If the NSN turns up, they don't speak for the ordinary Australian. They speak only for themselves as a tiny, toxic fringe. The marches were announced this week amid Australia's recognition of a Palestinian state. It took less than 48 hours for Hamas to celebrate this conditional support, after PM Anthony Albanese swore it was the last thing they would welcome. Anyone with a basic grasp of Middle East politics saw this coming a mile off, especially when Hamas co-founder Hassan Yousef then rejected calls for the terror group to put down its arms. What a tangled mess we find ourselves in, one that bolsters the perception that Canberra's priorities are anywhere but at home. For some, "culture" is a code word for exclusion. Many others see it as the stuff that matters such as the rule of law, free speech, women's equality, mateship and the right to live here without fear of sectarian violence. Essentially, what binds us together rather than what divides us. The August 31 events are billed as grassroots, peaceful protests not intended to 'incite hate or violence'. We've had that type of protest quite recently you'll recall - on Sydney's Harbour Bridge and along Melbourne's King Street in support of Palestine. No allegations of racism then. There were over 90,000 people expressing disgust at civilian slaughter in Gaza, starvation and Israel, arguing that none of it was mutually exclusive. But before anyone has marched for Australia, the verdict is already in from the cultural gatekeepers. Take Our Country Back, if it proceeds, will be xenophobic and dangerous. This snap judgement says a lot about where this country's conversation on immigration has gone and how little room there is for nuance. Also, what a truly awful way to denigrate Australians who simply want to express their concerns about a nation they adore but no longer recognise, especially when it comes to the priorities of our federal government. The feelings have been bubbling for a while, however. A 2025 Lowy Institute poll found less than half of those surveyed (45 per cent) believe immigration is either "about right" (38 per cent) or "too low" (seven per cent). Earlier, a 2023 Resolve Strategic survey said 59 per cent of Australians believed the current level of migrant intake is 'too high'. Deakin University's Samantha Schneider also made a poignant observation earlier this year in a piece she wrote for 'Many ordinary Australians are able simultaneously to feel positive about multiculturalism and migrant communities while expressing fears around the perceived impact of population growth resources, for example, in relation to housing, health care and urban amenity,' she wrote. Critics like Abbie Chatfield, who posted a furious expletive-laden attack on the marches, dismiss everyone who disagrees as a 'loser' or 'freak' instead of engaging with their legitimate concerns. Housing, cost of living and public services are reduced to a blame immigrants versus blame corporations-style fight. And in eye-watering echo-chamber thinking, Ms Chatfield and her cheerleaders assume anyone attending the rally is ignorant, privileged or a neo-Nazi. This, I would argue, is an ignorant way to view a complex national debate on where Australia is heading. In the inner suburbs, the immigration discussion is often abstract such as a dinner-party chat about 'enriching diversity'. Then there's the progressive enclave that is state-sponsored media, with a SBS article on Thursday citing experts who warn the protests "stem from misinformation and fear". But in regional towns, the issue is immediate and it is not that regional Australians are less tolerant. They simply see the impacts first-hand without the safety net of big-city infrastructure. None of this excuses genuine racism, violence or threats. That is the line and it must be policed. But it is just as wrong to treat every concern about immigration levels as a dog whistle. If people are told their legitimate worries are forbidden topics, they do not become more tolerant. They become more resentful. People will not be turning up on August 31 because they hate diversity. It will be because they feel invisible. Louise Roberts is a journalist and editor who has worked as a TV and radio commentator in Australia, the UK and the US. Louise is a winner of the Peter Ruehl Award for Outstanding Columnist in the NRMA Kennedy Awards for Excellence in Journalism and has been shortlisted in other awards for her opinion work
