Glasgow City Council staff sent strike ballot amid pay row
The workers are part of tens of thousands of council staff in Scotland who have been sent the papers.
The move comes as part of a dispute over pay, according to UNISON Scotland, who say the ballot is the largest of its kind for many years.
READ MORE: Stagecoach bus strikes suspended after legal threat
The union is balloting all staff it represents in local government in Scotland, with more than 80,000 workers across all 32 councils given the opportunity to take part from Thursday, May 1 until June 12.
This follows a recent consultation in which 92% backed strike action.
The local government employer body, Cosla, has proposed a 3% pay increase for all council workers in Scotland for 2025-2026.
READ MORE: Can you spot yourself? Hundreds flock to Glasgow parks to bask in the sunshine
However, David O'Connor, UNISON Scotland co-lead for local government, said: "Dedicated council staff have seen the value of their pay fall for more than a decade, as wages failed to keep pace with the cost of living.
"These workers deliver high-quality, vital services to communities, despite increasing pressures, dwindling resources and significant staffing shortages.
"Cosla's offer only adds to the real financial hardship faced by employees, especially with rent, council tax and energy bills continuing to soar."
'Strike action is always a last resort, but local government workers have been underpaid and undervalued for far too long.
"Cosla and the Scottish government need to step up and offer a decent wage increase that reflects the value of these workers.'
READ MORE: Thousands to march in Glasgow for Scottish independence rally
Susanne Gens, chair of UNISON Scotland's local government committee, said: "Staff have indicated overwhelmingly that they've reached their limit.
"They can't afford to shoulder the burden of real-terms pay cuts.
"Local government workers are the glue that holds communities together and provide essential services on which everyone relies.
"The Scottish Government and Cosla must recognise their worth and respond with a fair pay offer that values these essential workers."
Cosla has been approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
The signs from Labour are more welfare cuts in Spending Review
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (centre), Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar (right) and Ed Miliband, Energy Security and Net Zero Secretary (left), during a visit to St Fergus Gas Terminal, a clean power facility in AberdeenshirePicture: Jeff J Mitchell/PA Wire This week's UK Spending Review presents a stark choice: a continuation of Westminster austerity or a long-overdue shift toward investment in people, services and the economy. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... So far, signs from the Labour Government suggest more of the same cuts that have already failed families for over a decade. As always, it is the most vulnerable in our society who will pay the price. With household bills high and public services already stretched, now is the time for serious, compassionate action. Yet Labour has refused to rule out real-terms cuts to affordable housing, police recruitment, and local government funding. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad At the same time, the UK Government is pressing ahead with damaging welfare reforms – including proposed cuts to disability benefits, the continuation of the two-child benefit cap, and delays to anti-poverty action like the long-promised child poverty taskforce. All of this risks worsening the cost-of-living crisis and driving already struggling families into deeper hardship, especially in communities already hit hardest by past austerity measures. The SNP has laid out a clear and achievable alternative. The Chancellor must fully reverse planned welfare cuts, protect public services and unlock investment in clean energy and economic growth. In particular, Labour must finally deliver full and immediate funding for Scotland's Acorn carbon capture project – a vital climate initiative that has faced years of Westminster delay. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The UK Government must also fully cover the cost of its increase to employer National Insurance, which threatens to drain frontline budgets in areas like health, social care and education. Scotland is already delivering targeted, effective support – and the evidence speaks for itself. According to new House of Commons Library research, nearly two million families across the UK would be lifted out of poverty if Labour adopted SNP policies: a UK-wide rollout of the Scottish Child Payment, scrapping the two-child cap, and ending the bedroom tax. Under the SNP, Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling. The Scottish Child Payment alone delivers £27.15 per eligible child per week – a direct boost to family incomes that is helping to turn the tide on child poverty across our communities. By contrast, the UK Government's own impact assessment shows that proposed cuts to disability benefits could push a further 250,000 people – including 50,000 children – into poverty. Families affected stand to lose £4500 a year on average. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And despite repeated calls from campaigners, Labour MPs have failed to back even basic reforms, like abolishing the two-child limit, voting against it in the House of Commons just last year – a decision that remains indefensible in the face of rising need. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has made clear that, without new revenue, the UK Government's current fiscal rules mean public spending will fall in real terms across most departments. That includes justice, local government and housing – all critical areas already under severe strain. If the Chancellor refuses to invest and clings to outdated austerity thinking, the consequences will be felt in every community across the UK for years to come. In Scotland, the SNP is focused on lifting people out of poverty and building a fairer, greener, more resilient economy. But we cannot shield families indefinitely from the consequences of Westminster choices. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Labour must use this Spending Review to deliver the funding and flexibility Scotland needs – not double down on the failed cuts that brought us here in the first place. MSP for Edinburgh Central and Constitution, External Affairs and Culture Secretary
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Call for watchdogs to be scrapped to curb Scottish Water execs pay
They are saying that having three bodies with regulatory oversight of the industry is wasteful and means there is a lack of responsibility and suggest there should be only one. They say restructuring will allow the same level of scrutiny with clearer lines of accountability and less expense. Andrew Thomson, GMB Scotland's representative rep at Scottish Water, has said that the current set-up has encouraged creeping privatisation at the company and led to workers being scapegoated for executive failures. The branch has been supported by the union in calls for ministers to implement strict conditions around public sector executive pay and bonuses through its Public Sector Pay Strategy – extending this to the quangos, commissions and regulatory bodies. The issue surrounds a complex web of three separate regulators operating to oversee operations at Scottish Water - the Water Industry Commission for Scotland (WICS) which examines finances, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) which oversees pollution issues and the Drinking Water Quality Regulator for Scotland which investigates safety. WICS, which the branch says is "a disgrace" has been at the centre of a scandal over what watchdog Audit Scotland described as inappropriate public spending, including: a £77,000 Harvard Business School course for a senior executive, lavish spending on meals, with some exceeding £200 per head and £100 gift vouchers for staff, surpassing the £75 limit for gifts. SEPA was told by watchdog Environmental Standards Scotland (ESS) in September, last year, to improve monitoring after finding that pollution of Scotland's rivers and beaches was far more widespread than realised because ministers have failed to take the problem seriously. The union has been concerned that ten days of strikes in a bitter pay dispute is to cost nearly £3m in bringing in extra staff as part of a contingency plan. It comes amidst a row over Mr Plant receiving a 50% rise in the existing pay package - despite public sector pay rules saying he should expect to have a 10% cut. Alex Plant (Image: Supplied) The £483,000 remuneration for Alex Plant over just ten months of 2023/24 is nearly £100,000 more than the outgoing chief executive Douglas Millican, received in his last full year before taking flexible retirement which resulted in a cut in salary and reduced pension benefits. The Scottish Government's public sector pay policy has since 2010 included an "expectation" that the remuneration of a new chief executive appointment will be at least 10% lower than that of the outgoing officer. MSPs raised their concerns in the Scottish Parliament after The Herald further revealed that executives of the nation's state-owned water supplier saw bonuses hiked by over a third in one year - taking a five-year total to nearly £1.6m despite public sector pay rules suspending the payments. Read more by Martin Williams: It has told users: "We will do all we can to ensure customers do not experience any disruption to their water supplies and that treatment of the country's waste water continues as usual, despite the planned industrial action. Union members on the picket line (Image: Andrew Milligan) While Scottish Water has remained included on the list of public sector organisations that should conform with the pay policy, the Scottish Government say that they are exempt. Mr Thomson has taken the calls for changes to GMB Scotland's Congress saying that regulation of the water industry "is required to ensure drinking water is safe and accessible, and that wastewater is dealt with responsibly to protect human life, environmental health and our waterways". He says that excessive regulatory demands from the three agencies has created a "blame culture within Scottish Water where workers – not management – are held to account for organisational failures and that "this motivates management to place excessive responsibilities and pressures on the performance of the workforce affecting health and morale". He said that an "excessive number of regulatory bodies, overbearing [Scottish Water] board governance and a lack of transparency have created a top-heavy system of patronage and a culture of elitism where undisclosed contracts and bonuses are given to executives while the pay of Scottish Water workers lags far behind the private sector leading to the increased threat of industrial action". SEPA (Image: Archive) The branch says a full review of regulatory bodies is required in relation to Scottish Water with an aim to consolidate responsibilities and reduce costs. GMB Scotland said the long-running and ongoing industrial action at Scottish Water only underlined the need for root and branch reform. Mr Thomson said: "It is time government which is ultimately the main regulator, concentrated on cutting preposterous costs at the high end; hold management to account and stop allowing the victimisation of workers for wasteful regulation failures. "Prosecute the bosses and protect the workers." A 10-day ballot of workers on a revised pay offer delivered to unions by Scottish Water will start on Wednesday but Claire Greer, GMB Scotland organiser, said disruptive and expensive strikes could have been averted months ago if executives had seriously engaged with the workforce. She said: 'There has now been a series of different disputes at this company all marked by the same failure of management to negotiate with clarity or urgency. A Scottish Water protest'That not only suggests systemic problems at an executive level but a failure to provide effective and proper oversight by the board and independent watchdogs. 'Scotland was meant to be different to the rest of UK with Scottish Water being structured to ensure the people of Scotland retained ownership and control. 'That means nothing unless there is rigorous and independent oversight of management by board members and expert and respected regulators. 'That is clearly not happening and a complicated and needlessly expensive system of oversight must be rebuilt for the benefit of all Scots. A Scottish Government spokesman said: 'We remain committed to a water industry model where Scottish Water is publicly owned, commercially run and independently regulated. "Ministers have set out their policy in relation to public sector pay. It is a matter for Scottish Water and its unions to agree a settlement within the constraints of that policy and affordability. " A Scottish Water spokesperson said: "After the latest talks with the Joint Trade Unions on Friday, we made an improved pay offer that would see average wages increase by more than 7% over two years. This included a minimum increase of £2,825 over the period. 'In addition, we also proposed a number of other enhancements including improved stand-by payments and carers' leave. 'This is a very strong and progressive offer that balances the interests of our people and customers' and we asked the Joint Trade Unions to ballot their members on the new proposal. So we are glad they are doing so and hope members vote to accept our offer. 'It is in everyone's interests that the current dispute is resolved so that our people can get the pay increases they deserve and return to delivering an essential service to the people of Scotland.' WICS declined to comment.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
The Scottish Tory who has perfected the art of 'vice-signalling'
I believe Fraser, like myself, is straight. Being straight, I tend to leave it to the LGBT community to decide what's homophobic. Fraser, however, seems to believe that including trans people is a homophobic act. It rather bewildered Scotland's LGBT community. Certainly, when I asked friends who are gay - ranging in age from 25 to 82 - they were mystified by Fraser suddenly becoming a warrior against homophobia. In 2014, when the Scottish Parliament voted for gay marriage, Fraser was one of just 18 MSPs opposed. Last year, whilst running for leadership of the Scottish Tory Party, Fraser said he's still opposed to gay marriage. It's due to his religious beliefs, apparently. Still, none of this stopped him shooting his gob off in a thoroughly attention-seeking fashion which seemed designed to both offend and be unnecessarily cruel. Which is vice-signalling in a nutshell. Though maybe Fraser had different conversations than I with his own gay friends that justified his actions? Anas Sarwar, realising that nothing matters so much as thirsting to be the centre of attention, got in on the vice-signalling act. He accused John Swinney of running a 'disgraceful' campaign. That's the same John Swinney who defended Sarwar when Nigel Farage's Reform unleashed 'racist' attack adverts against him. Now clearly, nobody needs to be thanked for calling out bigotry, but it's pretty difficult to see how Swinney ran a disgraceful campaign whilst simultaneously having Sarwar's back. Perhaps, being raised rich and well-connected insulates Sarwar from silly notions like decency and courtesy? Evidently, Scottish MSPs are mere minnows compared to the King and the Kong of vice-signalling: the politicians of London and Washington. Reform's newest MP Sarah Pochin wasted no time getting straight to vice-signalling by resurrecting the 'ban the burqa' culture war. Kemi Badenoch clearly felt left out of the cruelty derby so quickly told the world that she won't speak to women who wear burqas in her constituency surgery. How thoroughly democratic of her. Badenoch has her work cut out though. One of the nastiest characters in British politics wants her job: Robert Jenrick, who as Tory immigration minister ordered the removal of cartoon murals in a centre for refugee kids in case they found it too welcoming. Gleeful bullying, sneering mockery and spiteful grandstanding are everywhere you look these days. Among the New Right, dead-naming trans people seems to be a modern-day Olympic sport, and laughing at poverty positively required. God help us, one American-Israeli "comedian" even seeks laughs from dead Palestinian babies. Donald Trump (Image: Ap) The entire Trump presidency - which seems rapidly shifting towards outright militarised authoritarianism - has turned vice-signalling into an art form. The White House puts out tweets designed explicitly to hurt, mock and humiliate. One featured a group of handcuffed people being deported to the soundtrack "Na, na, hey, hey, kiss him goodbye" by Bananarama. It takes quite the talent to be both ghoulish and childish simultaneously. I reckon there's a few psychological assumptions we can make about what's happening. First, some people are just nasty b******s and they like wearing the nasty b*****d badge. They're like the kid you went to school with who had no friends but could sometimes be found torturing cats down by the riverbank. Most vice-signallers, though, probably aren't raving psychopaths. They're the more interesting, from a clinical point of view anyway. Why do they act in ways that many of us never would? Well, for a start, more and more people are beginning to act like this. The anonymity and immediacy of social media both protects the goon squad and encourages their behaviour. It's like the old adage: "If everyone is doing it, then why can't I?" Monkey see, monkey do. The more blood-soaked the online world becomes the more people want blood. Sometimes literally. I rarely use Twitter today, but when I do I'm stunned by the levels of actual, physical violence on display. Then there's the fact that a large minority of people are rather pathetic and attracted to bullies and thugs. It's likely a sign of their own psychological and physical weakness. They see someone kicking the daylights out of an innocent person and reckon it's much safer to cheer on the attack than step in and do the right thing. To step in requires courage and risks them becoming the target. On a deeper level though, perhaps humanity is simply subconsciously at the end of its tether? We can all behave appallingly when we're tired and scared. Who amongst us hasn't had a terrible day and then acted like a petty idiot to someone who didn't deserve it, taking our misery out on the innocent? Just look at this sulphurous world. We're living on a planet that's nuked up to the eyeballs with wars of profound brutality raging and the people in charge either don't care or seem out of their minds. The Earth is being destroyed, as we level rain forests and gobble up resources. We're wilfully allowing climate change to ruin the future for our children. We know the next virus could decimate us. We've no clue how to fix poverty, but each day there's more billionaires. Is it any wonder that cruelty is in fashion? Being a b*****d is the new black because as a species we're terrified of the future and hate our failures and what we've become.
