South Korea faces risks from US tariff due to reliance on exports, manufacturing
The manufacturing sector accounted for 27.6 per cent of South Korea's GDP in 2023, far higher than the average 15.8 per cent of the member countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), according to the National Assembly Budget Office (NABO).
It ranked second among OECD member countries, following Ireland at 31 per cent. By comparison, Germany recorded 20.1 per cent and Japan 20.7 per cent.
"While most advanced economies are seeing an increasing share of the service sector, South Korea continues to maintain a relatively high level of manufacturing output," the office said. "Given the size of its economy, South Korea is still regarded as a country with a relatively high dependence on manufacturing."
The manufacturing sector remains the backbone of the Korean economy, with key industries, including semiconductors, rechargeable batteries, shipbuilding and automobiles, maintaining global competitiveness.
Driven by its manufacturing-based economy, South Korea remains highly dependent on exports as a key growth engine.
As of 2024, exports accounted for 44.4 per cent of the nation's GDP, compared with the OECD average of 30 per cent.
Among the Group of Seven (G7) nations, Germany posted the highest export-to-GDP ratio at 41.8 per cent, followed by France with 33.9 per cent, Italy with 32.7 per cent and Canada with 32.4 per cent. The US recorded 10.9 per cent.
South Korea's export dependence on the US stood at 18.8 per cent in 2024, Yonhap news agency reported.
Given the country's high manufacturing ratio and export reliance on the US, the envisioned reciprocal tariffs are feared to deliver a major economic blow.
Last-minute negotiations are under way between Seoul and Washington, as the Donald Trump administration has warned that South Korea will face a 25 per cent reciprocal tariff unless a deal is reached before August 1.
"If the proposed reciprocal tariffs take effect, the Korean economy could suffer a significant impact," said Yang Joon-seok, an economics professor at the Catholic University of Korea.
"We should leverage our strengths in key sectors, such as shipbuilding and semiconductors, during the negotiations," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
20 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US team to visit India on Aug 25 for next round of talks for trade pact
The US team will visit India on August 25 for the next round of negotiations for the proposed bilateral trade agreement between the two countries, an official said on Tuesday. The official added that the two sides continue to be engaged in an interim trade deal as the August 1 deadline is approaching. August 1 marks the end of the suspension period of tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump on dozens of countries, including India (26 per cent). 'The US team is visiting for the sixth round of talks,' the official said. India and the US teams concluded the fifth round of talks for the agreement last week in Washington. India's chief negotiator and special secretary in the Department of Commerce Rajesh Agrawal and Assistant US Trade Representative for South and Central Asia Brendan Lynch held the deliberations. These deliberations are important as both sides are looking at finalising an interim trade deal before August 1. On April 2 this year, Trump announced high reciprocal tariffs. The implementation of high tariffs was immediately suspended for 90 days till July 9 and later until August 1, as America is negotiating trade deals with various countries. India has hardened its position on the US demand for duty concessions on agri and dairy products. New Delhi has, so far, not given any duty concessions to any of its trading partners in a free trade agreement in the dairy sector. Certain farmers' associations have urged the government not to include any issues related to agriculture in the trade pact. India is seeking the removal of this additional tariff (26 per cent). It is also looking at the easing of tariffs on steel and aluminium (50 per cent) and the auto sector (25 per cent). These issues are an important part of the trade pact negotiations. Against these, India has reserved its right under the WTO (World Trade Organization) norms to impose retaliatory duties. The country is also seeking duty concessions for labour-intensive sectors, such as textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, garments, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, oil seeds, grapes, and bananas, in the proposed trade pact. On the other hand, the US wants duty concessions on certain industrial goods, automobiles, especially electric vehicles, wines, petrochemical products, agri goods, dairy items, apples, tree nuts, and genetically modified crops. The two countries are looking to conclude talks for the first tranche of the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) by fall (September-October) this year. Before that, they are looking for an interim trade pact. India's merchandise exports to the US rose 22.8 per cent to USD 25.51 billion in the April-June quarter this financial year, while imports rose 11.68 per cent to USD 12.86 billion.
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Top Losers and Gainers on July 29: Apar Industries, Tata Chemicals, Welspun Corp, Birlasoft among top gainers today
Indian equities ended Tuesday's trading session higher after a range-bound trade, snapping a three-day losing streak that had pushed the benchmark indices to a six-week low. The rally was led by select heavyweights, including Reliance Industries and HDFC Bank, which helped markets stage a strong rebound. Markets opened flat and remained volatile during the first half but gained momentum in the second half, with the Nifty 50 ending the trade with a gain of 0.57% to 24,821 points, while the S&P BSE Sensex jumped 469 points or 0.58% to 81,360. The sustainability of the rally will depend on an improvement in upcoming earnings, as the first batch of Nifty 50 results has been muted, and on clarity over a potential trade deal between the US and India, which continues to weigh on sentiment. US President Donald Trump has recently finalized trade agreements with major partners, largely favoring the US. Negotiations between India and the United States remain deadlocked over tariff cuts on agriculture and dairy products, dimming hopes of a trade deal ahead of Trump's August 1 deadline, Reuters reported last week, citing two Indian government sources. Trump said on Monday that most trading partners who do not negotiate separate deals would soon face tariffs of 15–20% on exports to the US, significantly higher than the 10% tariff imposed in April. Meanwhile, US and Chinese officials concluded the first of two days of talks aimed at extending their tariff truce beyond a mid-August deadline and exploring ways to maintain trade ties while safeguarding economic security. The muted June-quarter earnings season has also prompted overseas investors to turn aggressive sellers, with FPIs offloading ₹ 6,082 crore worth of stocks on Monday, marking their largest single-day selling in India since May 30, according to provisional data. Key market triggers this week include the Federal Reserve's rate decision, while the Bank of Japan is also set to announce its policy stance. Fed Chair Jerome Powell and his colleagues will begin a two-day meeting on Tuesday to deliberate on rates amid political pressure, evolving trade policy, and complex economic cross-currents. Traders currently see no change in US interest rates this week, while expecting a quarter-point rate cut in mid-September, with around 100 basis points of easing anticipated over the next 12 months. Several stocks witnessed a strong surge in demand on Dalal Street following the release of their June quarter earnings. Apar Industries emerged as the top gainer among Nifty 500 stocks, rallying 12% to ₹ 9,693 after the company reported a net profit of ₹ 263 crore in Q1 FY26, up from ₹ 203 crore in the same quarter of the previous fiscal year. Netweb Technologies also closed with a sharp gain of 8.17% at ₹ 1,975 apiece, resuming its winning streak seen earlier in July after the release of its June quarter results. Welspun Corp saw its stock jump 7.13% to ₹ 924 apiece after the company reported a 41% YoY rise in net profit to ₹ 350 crore. Tata Chemicals gained 7% to ₹ 1,000 apiece, snapping a three-day losing streak. Meanwhile, PNC Infratech surged 6.6% to ₹ 318 apiece after being declared the lowest bidder by South Eastern Coalfields (SECL) for a mining project in Chhattisgarh worth ₹ 29.57 billion.
Mint
20 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's new trade order is fragile
President Donald Trump has achieved the remarkable: raising tariffs by more than the notorious Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, while—it appears—avoiding the destructive trade war that followed. Including the deal struck over the weekend with the European Union, the U.S. will impose an effective tariff rate of about 15% on its trading partners, by far the highest since the 1930s, according to JPMorgan Chase. Japan and the EU have together committed to investing $1.15 trillion in the U.S. Europe also agreed to energy and military purchases. And what did the U.S. give up in return? Nothing. So Trump has hit his goals, for now. But these deals don't yet represent a new trade order. They are sort of a way station, more fragile and with less legitimacy than the system they have supplanted. The formula for this achievement was distinctively Trumpian. The president calculated that others had more to lose from a trade war than the U.S. He picked off each trading partner in turn with the prospect that failure to strike a deal on his terms would result in worse treatment later. Among American allies, only the EU has the heft to inflict enough pain on American companies to change Trump's calculus. But despite drawing up plans for retaliation, it never pulled the trigger. Along with the economic pain of a trade war, Europe feared Trump would abandon Ukraine and perhaps NATO altogether. A one-sided deal was the price of keeping, for now, Trump committed to the trans-Atlantic security alliance. Of the major trading partners yet to strike deals, South Korea, Mexico and Canada can likely expect, like the U.K., Japan and the EU, to give up plenty and get nothing in return. China, the only country to have broadly retaliated, might fare differently. Trump has avoided a trade war, but it remains to be seen if the trade peace will last. Since the 1980s, Trump has believed that other countries have ripped off the U.S., producing deep trade deficits. His solution: charge for access to the U.S. market and the protection of its military. Others have now accepted his terms for access to the market, while NATO partners have agreed to boost defense spending to 5% of GDP. This seems to have softened Trump's prior antipathy toward the alliance and Ukraine. On Monday, he shortened the deadline for Russia to agree to a cease-fire with Ukraine or face sanctions. It might be too soon to announce 'mission accomplished," but it certainly looks like Trump has begun rebalancing the relationship between the U.S. and its allies. 'The two concerns Trump had about Europe is that they were free riding on the U.S. security umbrella and their trade was unbalanced, with their market a fortress," said Mujtaba Rahman, managing director for Europe at Eurasia Group, a consultancy. 'On both, Trump has implemented a shakedown." The 15% baseline tariff and 5% military commitment represent Trump wins that put the trans-Atlantic alliance on a 'slightly more solid" basis than in February, he said. Whether tariffs achieve Trump's economic goals remains to be seen. In a recent speech, Trump's trade ambassador, Jamieson Greer, set three benchmarks: first, reduce the goods trade deficit; second, raise after-inflation incomes; and third, boost manufacturing's share of gross domestic product. The incentives in these deals to reshore production and purchase American goods should help meet these relatively low bars. As for how much of the tariffs consumers will ultimately bear, the jury is still out. From 1947 through 2012, the U.S. presided over a steady fall in trade barriers and growing economic integration. It came through painstakingly negotiated pacts. Everyone gained something and gave something up and were thus invested in the pacts' success. Such pacts 'require Congress to approve them, are deep and substantive, take a long time to negotiate, and last a long time," said Doug Irwin, a trade historian at Dartmouth College. 'They are a binding commitment on the U.S." By contrast, Irwin said, these latest agreements are 'handshake deals" with a president who isn't legally bound to adhere to the terms. Trump is at liberty to threaten higher tariffs again for any reason, from wresting Greenland from Denmark to protecting U.S. tech companies from European taxes or censorship. Europe, having foresworn retaliation, has few chips with which to bargain tariffs down, under this or a future president. Trump acted entirely without Congress. Indeed, one court has already ruled his use of a sanctions law to impose across-the-board tariffs was illegal. Should an appeals court uphold that finding, the legality of those deals would come into doubt. (Trump could turn to a different law that limits tariffs to 15%, for 150 days.) The one-sided nature of these deals also makes them more fragile. Other countries will be less willing to comply with something they don't think is in their economic interest, especially with so many details unsettled. Already, Japan has cast doubt on Trump's interpretation of its $550 billion investment commitment, and the Europeans' $600 billion pledge seems similarly vague. Deals made under duress are politically unpopular and thus less durable. Especially noteworthy was the negative reaction of far-right populist leaders who are already hostile to the EU and trade deals. Marine Le Pen, a leader of France's populist right-wing National Rally, which is slightly favored to win the presidential election in 2027, called the EU deal a 'political, economic and moral fiasco." Alice Weidel, leader of Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany, wrote on X, 'The EU has let itself be brutally ripped off." Trump got his deals because of the leverage other countries' deep economic and security ties gave to the U.S. In coming years, that leverage will wane as those countries cultivate markets elsewhere and build up their own militaries. The resulting international system will be less dependent on the U.S.—and less stable. Write to Greg Ip at
