‘Amy Bradley Is Missing,' But the Netflix Docuseries Filmmakers Think They Know Where She Is
In 1998, 23-year-old Amy Bradley vanished from the cruise ship she and her family were vacationing on. A full search of the ship revealed nothing, leading officials to believe Bradley likely either jumped or fell overboard on the way to Curaçao. But a body is never found, and over the span of decades, multiple people report seeing Bradley alive on the Dutch Caribbean island (as well as an alleged sighting in Aruba). Evidence that Bradley may have instead been trafficked off of the boat — and potentially through the help of one of the ship's entertainment staff — only gets weirder from there.
More from The Hollywood Reporter
Filming Underway on Season 2 of Netflix's 'Geek Girl,' Layton Williams Joins Cast
'Stranger Things' Season 5's Spectacular First Trailer Released by Netflix
Netflix Earnings Preview: Price Hikes, AI and Cash Flow in Focus
I had a lot of questions, and filmmakers Ari Mark and Phil Lott of Ample Entertainment had to sit through all of them. Read The Hollywood Reporter's Q&A with the Amy Bradley Is Missing directors below.
***
How did you come to tell this story? I admit I didn't know who Amy Bradley was.
ARI MARK People know about Amy Bradley's story if you're in the true-crime, amateur sleuth-y world, which fortunately or unfortunately — however you want to look at it — I am. So I knew about the story. We have a small production company. We've done some cool stuff, but for us to really put the time into making and directing something, and being all in on it — it had to check the boxes from an industry standpoint. It has to feel like we have something that's non-derivative.
On a human level, which I separate from the industry level, if you met this family the way we did, you look at them, you talk to them, you walk into their garage where they still have her [Mazda] Miata shined up with gas in it, and you really want to help. What we have found over the course of these years of doing these shows is that when it comes to true crime, mystery and the unsolved, these platforms can actually do good. I know that's mind boggling, but they can. They can move the needle, and that was what we wanted to do.
PHIL LOTT This is a case that has existed in the true-crime-o-sphere, but it also exists in the fear of every parent. It's super relatable. We've all crammed into a room on a vacation trying to save a few bucks. So they're all crammed in this room, and then just the horror of waking up and finding that one of you is missing, and for good or for bad, no one seems to be listening — or at least not enough for a parent who's just lost their child. I mean, this is terrifying.
You do want to solve it because of the the time that's passed — the family has a commitment to that cause. Every single day they wake up and it's as real as it was yesterday. But also, you have this very human idea that you want to help in some way to sort of mitigate the pain this family has been experiencing every single waking hour.
There are two ways a documentary can help: The filmmaking process could undercover new evidence, and/or the film could elevate the case to a level that demands (more) action. Which one were you primarily aiming for when starting this docuseries?
MARK It depends on the story. With [This Is the Zodiac Speaking], we really felt like we could solve it, as crazy as that sounds. With [Amy Bradley Is Missing], it was initially the curiosity, then the challenge of, 'Ooh, maybe we could find her.' When we first came into this story, and when I was first introduced to the key players, everyone from the FBI, family members, friends, experts, what have you, eyewitnesses — they all convinced me that we're gonna find her.
And there was definitely a moment in this show where I'm looking at Phil going, 'Are we getting on a plane and are we gonna, like, start walking around the Caribbean? And what happens if we [find Amy]?' I really got convinced because the credibility element was there. And when the credibility element is there, we could say whatever we want, we could question things and judge everyone. But when you look somebody in the eye and ask them the hard question, you could tell if the answer is real. You can tell if their story is authentic.
I don't know if that answers your question, but I think with this one, we really thought we could find her. I had [Amy's mom] Iva Bradley calling me every day, saying, 'All of our eggs are in your basket. We're relying on you to find her.' That's quite a responsibility. So the hope is that having this be on a platform like Netflix brings them one step closer. And I really believe it will.
It sounds like you believe she's alive.
MARK Phil, me or you?
LOTT You go for it.
MARK Phil doesn't have the guts to say this. (Both laugh.) I got to the point on this show where I became close enough with the people. Of course, we remain objective, and we were objective through the whole process. There are enough reasons to believe all of these things are possible. That's what makes it compelling. But Brad, [Amy's] brother, says, 'I have to cling to the hope.' He's like, 'I'm not saying it's definitely this, definitely that — but I have to cling to the hope.'
I've kind of gotten to the point where I have to believe she's alive. And people will judge me for that. You immediately fall into a bucket of, 'How could you believe the most far-fetched piece of this?' We're always so used to calculating odds. 'Well, the odds are this happened, and the statistics say …' All of those things are true. But if we're telling a remarkable story, I think there's just as much of a chance that there's a remarkable answer.
Anything you want to add, Phil?
LOTT No, I think that was incredibly well said. When people watch this series, I think you will feel like your preconceptions have been compounded. The easiest thing in the world is to come up to us going, 'Clearly, she fell off the boat.' I think we're as guilty of that coming into this as anyone else. And as you go down the path, and you start answering the first five questions, they all lead to much bigger pieces of mystery. Well, now you have three episodes of that. It's something that just gets bigger and deeper and more compelling.
MARK Our job is essentially to call bullshit, right? We go into these things calling bullshit. So as you go, 'Ooh maybe we're wrong,' it's an evolution. It's a process.
I don't understand how people could deny the photo (advertising a prostitute in Curaçao who looks a lot like Amy Bradley would today) …
MARK You'd be surprised. I think a lot of people don't believe the photo could be her — not because it doesn't look like her, not because the characteristics don't match up, just because the scenario is so hard for them to follow through with.
The most compelling part to me is that the woman was positioned in exactly the way that would hide each of Amy's identifying marks: her birthmarks and tattoos (one Tasmanian Devil and a butterfly).
MARK That part really made us scratch our heads, too. The other piece that's hard to ignore is how seriously the FBI took that photo. It wasn't like they were like, 'Oh, whatever,' they really did chase that down. They analyzed the bed frame, tried to figure out where it was made. They sent an operative down there to actually scope it out. And they did look into that website, and they brought in that trafficking expert — it's hard to ignore.
The other incredible find here is that, on family birthdays and holidays, traffic to the Bradleys' tips website spikes in the same geographical area where Amy has supposedly been spotted. The FBI doesn't have jurisdiction to pull the exact IP address, but they have the ability to, which is incredibly frustrating.
MARK It depends how you look at it. I think from the FBI standpoint, they've exhausted everything. From the family standpoint, they haven't. So it's a tricky situation. The FBI is an easy target because it's always easy to say, 'Why didn't you pursue this or that lead?' And the truth is, most of the time, it's because it's not credible enough for them, and they don't want to spend time on it. And by the way, they don't like sightings. They don't like them because they're not black and white. Unfortunately, there's a lot of gray area here, and that's a hard thing to argue against. No matter how emphatic you are that you saw someone, if you didn't [get] video, it doesn't exist.
[Writer's note: The FBI did not immediately respond to THR's request for an update on the case/search.]
It was a wild piece of information.
MARK That blew us away, too. Actually, that was presented to us in the very, very beginning of this, and it was part of what drew me to wanting to look into this because it was very convincing to me.
Do you guys cruise?
MARK I would never set foot on a cruise ship.
Why?
MARK I was always a little skeptical of cruise ships, just because I'd feel kind of trapped. I do think, though, since working on this show, I have developed much more of a kind of a — I don't want to say 'fear,' but definitely a sensitivity to the idea of bringing my kids on a cruise ship. I do think a ton has changed since 1998. There are cameras everywhere, people have iPhones, etc. — but it's still a multibillion-dollar business with an agenda and you don't have control.
Phil, are you a cruise guy?
LOTT I'm not. I'm from a small country, we're a seafaring country. The idea of the sea is intoxicating for us, naturally. You put us near the water, we want to get out there on a boat. And in this situation — even perhaps more than most — the idea that the world comes to you is enticing. However, you sit for five minutes and talk to the folks who have real knowledge of the legalities, and also just the sheer amount of faith you have to have that someone's looking after you when you go on these boats.
You hear how vulnerable you are, on a criminal level. You go outside the national waters into international waters — even just run yourself a thought experiment for a minute. Who is coming to help? Who do I even call? Who's 9-1-1 for the middle of the sea? I don't know. I couldn't tell you. And now you put your duty of care to your own family into that equation, and it's just one more level of terror that I think this whole story kind of brings to the forefront.
If William Hefner's story is to be believed and Amy couldn't get out of prostitution because of a $200 debt, why wouldn't she (or the family) have been able to buy her freedom? It's been 27 years.
MARK It's a good question. I don't know the answer. I think that it's probably a similar answer to the one that Ron, Amy's dad, gives when I literally said to him, 'Why isn't she calling you?' I think it's a similar situation. Look, we don't know what we don't know. What's been suggested in the show is, maybe threats were made against her family. Maybe she's been told things that aren't true. Maybe she's on drugs. I don't really know the answer to that. It's really puzzled us, too. The only thing we could think of is that she's in a difficult situation where they have some leverage.
How did you get Alistir 'Yellow' Douglas' daughter Amica to participate? Did he know the phone call was being recorded and, possibly, for a documentary?
MARK I spent months talking to Amica and her mother. There's some details not in the show. And we really worked hard to try to be fair to Alistir because there's a side of this where he's a guy whose life is being upended and he's being vilified all over the internet for something where, frankly, there's just no proof. So that's his perspective, right?
Amica reached out to the Bradleys and then I reached out to Amica. This was very much something she wanted to do. She has been the recipient of a lot of this negative treatment online, as you can imagine. She has a daughter. She has spent her own time learning about this case and really trying to figure out if her dad's involved. And she feels that something is off, right? So that, for me, was enough to say, 'Well, you're his daughter. So if you think something's off, we should probably look into this.'
She gave a great interview, she was super emotional. She wanted to confront her dad. I had tried reaching out to Alistir many times. At one point, he was considering doing an interview, so he knew about us. So when she called him, he was aware of our existence. Let's put it that way.
***
Amy Bradley Is Missing is now streaming on Netflix.
Best of The Hollywood Reporter
'The Studio': 30 Famous Faces Who Play (a Version of) Themselves in the Hollywood-Based Series
22 of the Most Shocking Character Deaths in Television History
A 'Star Wars' Timeline: All the Movies and TV Shows in the Franchise
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Taron Egerton on if He'll Return for Hit Netflix Action Movie Sequel
Taron Egerton, who plays Ethan Kopek in the 2024 Netflix action thriller feature Carry-On, gave a not-so-promising update about the potential sequel to the movie. Carry-On debuted on the streaming giant on December 13, 2024. It drew considerable viewership on the platform and currently has an impressive 88% approval rating on the review-aggregating site Rotten Tomatoes. Taron Egerton on why Carry-On 2 'is really hard' Egerton indicated during an interview with The Hollywood Reporter that he was unsure whether Carry-On 2 would happen. When asked if he would consider returning for a sequel now that the movie's director, Jaume Collet-Serra, has inked a new deal with Netflix, Egerton responded, 'Carry-On 2 is really hard. It's a celebration of Christmas and a celebration of people who work at Christmas. It then needs to have this huge plot that needs to be foiled and maybe the earwig component. All of that is quite hard to achieve in a sequel without it feeling contrived and to the point of defying credulity.' However, the Kingsman film series star didn't completely rule out the prospects for the second movie. 'So I have not heard anything, but who knows, stranger things have happened,' he added. Egerton also mentioned that he and Collet-Serra wanted 'to do more together' and that they had a 'nice dinner' recently. In July 2025, Collet-Serra signed a new contract with Netflix. 'From production to release, my experience making Carry-On with the Netflix team was everything a filmmaker could hope for,' the director told Variety. 'I'm thrilled to call Netflix my creative home and excited to keep pushing boundaries together, beginning with An Innocent Girl,' he added. T. J. Fixman penned the script for Carry-On. The cast includes Jason Bateman as The Traveler, Sofia Carson as Nora Parisi, and Danielle Deadwyler as Elena Cole. Egerton's latest feature, a crime thriller titled She Rides Shotgun, is currently in select theaters in the U.S. Originally reported by Tamal Kundu on ComingSoon. The post Taron Egerton on if He'll Return for Hit Netflix Action Movie Sequel appeared first on Mandatory. Solve the daily Crossword


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Pamela Anderson addresses rumors that Meghan Markle's cooking show was ‘a rip off' of her own series
Pamela Anderson has finally responded to the comparisons between her and Meghan Markle's cooking shows. The 'Baywatch' actress, 58, appeared on Andy Cohen's 'Watch What Happens Live' Sunday with rumored beau Liam Neeson and was asked if she thought Markle, 44, copied 'Pamela's Cooking With Love' in her Netflix series 'With Love, Meghan.' 9 Pamela Anderson on 'Watch What Happens Live.' Bravo 'On a scale from 1 to 10, how much did you think a rip off did you feel like 'With Love, Meghan' was of your show, 'Pamela's Cooking With Love?'' Cohen, 57, asked Anderson. '1,' a perplexed Anderson replied. 9 Pamela Anderson on 'Pamela's Cooking with Love.' Flavour Network 9 Meghan Markle on 'With Love, Meghan.' JENNA PEFFLEY/NETFLIX 'I didn't,' she added. When Cohen asked Anderson if she thought there were 'any similarities' between the two shows, she responded, 'I didn't really look. I didn't invent cooking shows.' 'So, I mean… she's just doing her thing,' Anderson added. 9 Andy Cohen and Pamela Anderson. Bravo 9 Pamela Anderson during her appearance on 'Watch What Happens Live.' Bravo Markle was accused of copying Anderson in March when she released her 8-part Netflix series, which sees the Duchess of Sussex offer up a 'how-to' guide for hosting and entertaining at home with appearances from several of her celebrity pals. Anderson's show — which was produced in the summer of 2023 and premiered in Feb. 2025 — features the 'Naked Gun' star join forces with world-class chefs to prepare a selection of plant-based meals at her home on Vancouver Island. 9 'With Love, Meghan' premiered on Netflix in March 2025. Netflix Royal expert Neil Sean, in a video for his YouTube channel, called 'With Love, Meghan' a 'frame-for-frame' copy of 'Pamela's Cooking With Love' in some cases. 9 'Pamela's Cooking with Love' premiered on Flavour Network in Feb. 2025. Flavour Network Jesse Fawcett, co-creator of Anderson's show, responded to the copying claims at the time. 'We take pride in planting the first seeds – creating original, distinctive programming that audiences love – and it's a compliment to see our work with Ms. Anderson resonate so strongly,' Fawcett told the Daily Mail. 9 Pamela Anderson in her cooking show. Flavour Network Despite their similarities, the two shows got very different responses from fans. 'Pamela's Cooking With Love' premiered with a 9.8 out of 10 on IMDB, while 'With Love, Meghan' only has a 3.2 on IMDB. 9 Meghan Markle cooking in her Netflix show. JAKE ROSENBERG/NETFLIX Markle's show also failed to land on the list of Netflix's top 300 most-watched titles between January and June 2025. Despite 'With Love, Meghan' getting a Season 2, Markle and Prince Harry's $100 million deal with Netflix is not being renewed. Along with the cooking show, the couple also came out with their five-part 'Harry & Meghan' docuseries in 2022 and Harry's 'Polo' doc — which also got a scathing reception from critics — in 2024.


Cosmopolitan
2 hours ago
- Cosmopolitan
Margaret Qualley Took the Cosmo Quiz Between Making Movies
You know when someone is so booked and busy it feels kind of spiritual? That's Margaret Qualley right now. Case in point: The very morning she sat down to chat with Cosmopolitan editor-in-chief Willa Bennett for her 60th anniversary cover interview, her latest film Honey Don't!—the second entry in Ethan Coen and Tricia Cooke's Drive-Away Dolls lesbian road trip trilogy—was announced to premiere at Cannes. Not bad for a random Wednesday. And that's not all she has going on right now. She is also starring in Richard Linklater's Blue Moon and just wrapped Huntington, a darkly funny thriller with Glen Powell—and yes, you did spot her in Happy Gilmore 2 on Netflix last weekend. Somehow, she still managed to show up to the set of her cover shoot on time and with the vibe of a girl who borrowed her best friend's sweater on the way out the door—not the air you'd expect of someone redefining screen stardom before our very eyes. She understandably had no time to fill out her version of our iconic Cosmo Quiz between photo setups, but she promised she'd get it done—and she's a woman of her word! So she FedEx'd us her completed copy from yes, she was working on yet another movie. (We knew she'd come through!) Over more than a decade in the game, Margaret's made a name for herself inhabiting characters who sit right at the intersection of womanhood, contradiction, and full-blown emotional hurricane. And we wouldn't have it any other way. The answers to her quiz aren't indicative of any characters though. They're quintessentially Margaret. Married. Jack Antonoff. Adam Sandler. Asheville, NC. My dad. My wedding day. Listen to your heart and share how you feel. Anything that involves playing that game is Pictionary. Today. Like 10 minutes ago. Smokey and Jack. Rhinestone butterflies. Björk's swan, duh. Bleachers Stone Pony. Super-high paying with flexible hours. Fine, wings, wave. 4.8 Avocado toast, Fml. Hutch, aka Shawn Hutchinson from Bleachers. Killed anyone. The Kardashians. Show up. Go outside and ride my scooter around in a circle in the driveway while listening to Daniel Powter's 'Bad Day.' Hair by Evanie Frausto for PRAVANA. Makeup by Romy Soleimani. Manicure by Yukie Miyakawa for Dior. Set design by Nicholas Des Jardins. Production by Dana Brockman at Viewfinders. Shot on location at The Penthouse of 1 East 62nd Street, represented by Zina Raslan with the Gambino Group at Compass, and Classic Harbor Line.