logo
The Product Communication Mistake Most Entrepreneurs Make

The Product Communication Mistake Most Entrepreneurs Make

Entrepreneura day ago
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
In the noise of today's business ecosystem, founders often mistake communication for information dumping. But communication — true communication — transcends the act of message transmission. It is not the reiteration of content or the promotion of features. It is the construction of a mental interface through which knowledge is extended, transferred and contextualized — not merely repeated.
Founders who understand this principle craft communications that reshape perception. They don't sell a product. They transfer the reasoning behind its existence. They don't rely on brochures, data sheets or slide decks filled with bullet points about features. Instead, they expose the causal logic that gave birth to the product, inviting customers to trace their own needs back to the same origin.
Related: How to Nail Your Product Messaging with This 8-Step Framework
Every product has a cause — expose it
Any product, whether a tangible good or an intangible service, has a cause for its existence. That cause isn't just an origin story to romanticize your startup journey; it is the concrete, observable requirement that triggered the product's development in the first place.
Causes are not internal inspirations. They are external triggers. They originate in changes in the environment that alter the expected conditions for doing business. Shifts in regulation, cracks in value chains and disruptions in best practices each produce new types of requirements. Those requirements force businesses to seek solutions that didn't exist before. That's when new products emerge — not from creativity, but from causality.
Requirements are the language of business reasoning
Most communication in business is structured around benefits. "Save time." "Increase efficiency." "Lower costs." But benefits, when isolated from the requirements that necessitate them, are hollow. They turn your communication into an echo chamber of universal promises.
Customers don't just ask, Does this product have the features I want? They ask, Do I face the kind of requirements that justify using this product?
Requirements are what executives reason with when evaluating change. Requirements are the language of transformation. If your communication doesn't speak in requirements, it doesn't speak to the reality your audience is navigating.
Don't list features — explain the regulatory shift that demands them
Let's say you've built a cloud-based compliance platform for logistics firms. If your communication lists out features like "automated documentation" and "real-time alerts," you're narrating what the product does. But when you say, "Following new EU cross-border freight directives, logistics firms are required to generate digital customs documentation in under 15 minutes to avoid penalties," you're not describing your product — you're activating reasoning.
Now, the reader doesn't ask, "What does this product do?" They ask, "Do I face that requirement too?"
That's the shift you want. Because if the answer is yes, the next logical step is to ask, "How do I meet that requirement?" And that's where your product enters — not as a pitch, but as a consequence.
Related: 6 Reasons Your Perfect Product Isn't Selling — and How to Avoid the Marketing Mistakes Behind Them
Communication as causal infrastructure
Think of communication not as content but as infrastructure. It carries the reasoning paths your audience walks to reach your solution.
Causal communication begins with context: What changed? Then it traces the consequence: What new requirement did that change create? Only after that do you introduce the solution: What addresses that requirement?
This three-step path — change → requirement → solution — is the cognitive infrastructure that decision-makers follow. If your communication skips the first two steps and jumps to the third, you're asking your audience to build the bridge for you.
Make your product the reasonable response
People don't adopt products. They adopt reasoning. Your goal is to ensure your product is positioned as the reasonable response to a new requirement. That means you must frame your offering not as a tool with features, but as an inevitable step that businesses must take in response to external causality.
When a firm encounters a shift — new compliance mandates, rising labor volatility, environmental accountability — they start a reasoning loop: What changed? What do we need to do differently? What can help us adapt?
That's your window. But you won't be in it unless your communication enters the conversation at the level of the cause, not the consequence.
Don't market the product — market the requirement
You don't need to market the product. You need to market the requirement that mandates its use.
When the requirement is clear, urgent and rooted in visible change, the product becomes self-evident. Think of how quickly companies adopted secure collaboration tools when data breach regulations tightened. The tools didn't change. The environment did. Those who had communicated the regulatory cause and framed their product as its logical response didn't need to sell. They needed to confirm alignment.
This isn't storytelling — it's strategic reframing
There's a common temptation to equate this with storytelling. It's not. Storytelling implies a narrative arc, an emotional appeal, a character. What we're talking about here is not narrative. It's strategic reframing.
You're reframing the way your audience thinks about their environment. You're making them see that what used to be optional is now required. That what used to be efficient is now obsolete. That what used to be a workaround is now a liability.
Related: Why Do Your Customers Really Buy from You?
Build communication as an interface, not a broadcast
The mistake most entrepreneurs make is treating communication as a broadcast. They think it's about reach. In reality, it's about alignment.
Think of your communication as an interface. It should help your customer test whether your reasoning fits theirs. It should reveal not just what your product does, but why it had to exist. And that "why" must be sourced from the world they live in.
Not all businesses will resonate with that cause. That's fine. Your goal is not to convince everyone. Your goal is to become instantly relevant to those who already face the requirement your product was built for.
Entrepreneurs often seek product-market fit without realizing that fit is found through reasoning, not rhetoric. Communication that exposes the causes behind a product's creation doesn't just explain what the product does — it explains why the product makes sense.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Want to be a CEO? Act like a founder
Want to be a CEO? Act like a founder

Fast Company

time5 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

Want to be a CEO? Act like a founder

IMPACT COUNCIL Take a page from Satya Nadella and Greg Peters's playbooks. Think about the company first, don't chase titles. The Fast Company Impact Council is an invitation-only membership community of top leaders and experts who pay dues for access to peer learning, thought leadership, and more. BY Listen to this Article More info 0:00 / 4:53 It's no secret that the most exciting companies are often run by their founders. What's less obvious is that the rare opportunities to become CEO—especially of fast-growing tech companies—tend to go to people who have been acting like founders all along. Founders often bring the rare combination of vision, grit, and salesmanship that can take a company from idea to juggernaut. As a result, founder-run companies tend to dominate the tech space. In fact, founders remain CEOs at 88% of B2B software companies at IPO, according to recently published SaaStr analysis of 65 major IPOs in this space. I remember being very intrigued during the 2017 Uber CEO search, precisely because of this dynamic. For a company as exciting and transformative as Uber, it was quite rare to have an open CEO role. And for that reason, candidates who were CEOs of much larger revenue scale companies were rumored to be considering the role, including CEOs of companies like General Electric and Hewlett Packard. Dara Khosrowshahi was chosen for the role, and it was no accident that he had trained so closely with IAC founder, Barry Diller. I think most would agree that Khosrowshahi, despite having never been a founder, has been excellent at Uber's helm (and the stock price shows it). The same is true of nonfounder CEOs Satya Nadella of Microsoft, Nikesh Arora of Palo Alto Networks, and so many others—like Greg Peters, who rose through the ranks at Netflix and became co-CEO in 2023. Show up for the company In early 2024, I started getting calls to interview for CEO roles, including one at Figure, a fast-growing blockchain and fintech company. The founder was considering moving into an executive chairman role. Instinctively, I knew this was a big opportunity. I had worked for its founder, Mike Cagney, before and my fintech experience had shown me the enormous opportunities in solving capital market inefficiencies with blockchain technology. I think a big reason why I had these opportunities is that I had been operating like a founder rather than an executive for years. I remember distinctly when I was the VP of finance at SoFi, but was asked to turn around the mortgage division. A number of people advised me against it: The role was very specific (not every company has a mortgage division, but every company has a finance department) and I had to move out of San Francisco to an operations center far outside the city. I chose to do it, because that was what the company needed. I optimized for the company's needs rather than what I thought was the career-optimizing decision. Ultimately, optimizing for the company was the career-optimizing decision too, as I was later promoted to chief revenue officer. However, whenever I share that anecdote—whether talking with mentees or employees about them making similar moves, I have been almost universally rejected. It can be unnatural to optimize for companies. But for a founder, it's second nature. Volunteer for opportunities That lesson came back again at Brex, which I joined following SoFi. Our initial public product launch was highly anticipated internally, as we had worked for over a year to build the product, and were keeping our $50 million in capital raises in stealth. Three months before the scheduled launch, we unexpectedly lost our marketing head. I knew nothing about marketing at the time, but I had witnessed SoFi's marketing success firsthand. I was the CFO, but I knew we had to have a marketing launch, so I stepped up, offering to run marketing and the launch. This was a high stakes launch, and I had no experience. It was tough, with a lot of ups and downs. But ultimately it was not only hugely rewarding for me, but also a very successful marketing launch. In looking back at my experiences, and of people I admire, there are a few common themes: Optimize for the company, not your resume. A founder mentality does what needs to be done for the company's success, whereas an executive mentality can view it as presenting more downside than upside. The best opportunities don't involve applications Rather, they're created by those who think and act like founders long before they're given the CEO title. They almost always come from inside organizations or via referral. Get comfortable with being uncomfortable. Whether it's stepping into unchartered territory or taking on that role that looks like a headache—it might just be your best move yet. The best CEO jobs may seem unavailable or out of reach, but if you act like a founder today, you might just be asked to fill one tomorrow. Michael Tannenbaum is CEO of Figure.

Jobseeker exposes 'absolutely ridiculous' reason they were rejected: 'Never seen anything like this'
Jobseeker exposes 'absolutely ridiculous' reason they were rejected: 'Never seen anything like this'

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Jobseeker exposes 'absolutely ridiculous' reason they were rejected: 'Never seen anything like this'

A worker has revealed how he was rejected for a job because he asked about some of the most basic elements of the role during the interview process. The jobseeker, named Gavin, received an email after attending a meeting for an unknown position, explaining he unfortunately wasn't successful. But the employer added this was because he asked about salary, the job responsibilities, and the work culture within the business. Gavin shared his experience with entrepreneur Ben Askins, who called it "absolutely ridiculous" and one of the most bizarre reasons not to hire someone. "What on earth are you meant to talk about in an interview if you're not allowed to talk about any of those things?" he said on TikTok. RELATED Boss blasted over outrageous text sent to worker FIFO worker's huge compensation win after being unfairly sacked Rare 5 cent coin worth 25,000 times its value due to 'double headed' detail "I would argue those are the only three things you should be talking about in an interview. "I have never seen anything quite like this...I really do think it's right up there, because I'm genuinely trying to think of questions you could actually ask that don't fall in those three categories." Role responsibilities are typically addressed in job interviews, as employers want to see how your past experience would line up with what's you ask about pay during a job interview? Conversations around salary can be tricky. Askins shared another worker's experience where they were rejected from a role because they asked a few basic questions about certain benefits. Recruitment expert Tammie Christofis Ballis told Yahoo Finance talking about how much a role is paying is perfectly acceptable, but you need to time it properly. "I actually recommend my clients to ask in the first phone call," she said. "So when they do the phone interview, ask about pay at the end so you don't just look like you're there about the money, and you've had a proper, professional conversation with them. "You want to make sure that you're not wasting your time either." She said the "last thing" you want is to find out what the job is paying later down the track, like when you're given a formal offer, and discover it's far lower than what you were expecting. "That happens a lot because people are scared to ask earlier," she added. How do you bring up pay in an interview and why is this important? Ballis suggested all you need to ask is "what is the salary range for this role", and see what they say. Sometimes jobseekers will be asked what their salary expectations are for the job, but Ballis explained that putting the question on the employer first can help ensure you don't accidentally low-ball yourself. If you copped that question and said you're expecting $100,000 per year, when the actual salary range is $120,000 to $130,000, they might hire you on that much lower number. First-round phone interviews are usually done with a recruiter or HR. This is why Ballis said it's more appropriate to ask about pay here, rather than when you're sitting down with a potential manager, who will be more interested in your experience and what you would bring to the job. She added that pay discussions can tip in the jobseeker's favour if their skills are specialised or highly favourable. However, she cautioned people against bringing up pay if it's an entry-level position as one role could attract hundreds of applicants, and it's harder to stand out in that type of environment. As for work culture, that usually comes from the jobseeker at the end of an interview when they're asked if they have any questions about the company. Askins said it's perfectly reasonable to want to know about the type of business they could be stepping into, and what the 9-5 is really in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data

Assurant's quarterly profit rises on global housing business strength
Assurant's quarterly profit rises on global housing business strength

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Assurant's quarterly profit rises on global housing business strength

(Reuters) -Insurer Assurant posted a 25% jump in second-quarter profit on Tuesday, driven by strength in its global housing business. Insurance spending has remained relatively stable even as carriers raise premiums and tighten underwriting standards, reflecting the essential nature of coverage for both consumers and businesses. Analysts say this resilience stems from the non-discretionary role insurance plays in areas such as health, property and auto, where coverage is often mandatory or deeply embedded in financial planning. The company's global housing unit — which offers lender-placed homeowner insurance, manufactured housing insurance and flood coverage — posted net earned premiums, fees and other income of $697.7 million, a 10% jump from last year. The specialty insurance industry is expanding as traditional coverage models adapt to changing consumer needs, rising asset values and evolving technology. Meanwhile, insurers also benefited from higher investment returns in the second quarter as markets rebounded in June, shrugging off tariff concerns. Assurant's net investment income rose to $128.7 million in the quarter ended June 30, from $124.7 million a year earlier. Quarterly adjusted profit came in at $5.10 per share, compared to $4.08 per share last year. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store