Wrong bodies of Air India crash victims reached families in UK
"One family had to abandon their funeral plans after being told by the coroner that the coffin contained the body of an unknown person and not that of their family member," said the lawyer.Another family received the remains of their family members mixed with the remains of another passenger, with the remains of both the victims placed in the same coffin, according to the lawyer."The family had to get the remains of the two passengers separated before carrying out the funeral of their family member," the lawyer told India Today TV. "One family was left with no one to bury after realising that they had received the wrong remains."The crash of Gatwick-bound AI171 in Ahmedabad on June 12 killed 241 people on board. There were 53 British nationals among those killed in the air crash, according to a BBC report.The Daily Mail reported the funerals of several British citizens were carried out in India, while the mortal remains of 12 passengers were sent to the UK.The remains were handed over to the families after DNA tests were conducted at Ahmedabad Civil Hospital as most of the bodies were charred beyond recognition.Sources told India Today Digital that the remains were handed over by the government hospital in sealed coffins to the next of kin, and Air India had no role in it other than facilitating the transfer and supporting the bereaved families."The Ahmedabad hospital called up the relatives for DNA samples and handed over the sealed coffins to them, while Kenyons International Emergency Services, an agency hired by Air India, supported the bereaved relatives in the process," the source said."We are working on establishing the chain of events about how the bodies of the passengers were recovered and identified," the lawyer told India Today TV, adding that an enquiry had been sought into the matter.advertisementThe mix-up in the receipt of the remains was revealed when Inner West London coroner Dr Fiona Wilcox sought to verify the repatriated Britons' identities by matching their DNA with samples provided by the families."While some victims were either speedily cremated or buried in India, in accordance with their religious beliefs, the remains of at least 12 have been repatriated," aviation lawyer James Healy-Pratt, who represents many of the British families, told The Daily Mail.Healy-Pratt is currently helping British families by uncovering the full truth about the crash and making sure they receive fair compensation through the courts, according to the report.SOME FAMILIES RECEIVED WRONG REMAINS AND DESERVE ANSWERS: HEALY-PRATTHealy-Pratt is now currently looking into the reportedly botched identification process."I've been sitting down in the homes of these lovely British families over the last month, and the first thing they want is their loved ones back," the lawyer told the Mail."But some of them have got the wrong remains, and they are clearly distraught over this. It has been going on for a couple of weeks (and) I think these families deserve an explanation," the news outlet quoted Healy-Pratt as saying.While the family who received mixed remains managed to have them separated and proceed with a funeral, he said the other family — referred to as Family X — has been left in limbo.advertisement"Family X have no-one to bury because it was the wrong person in their casket. And if it isn't their relative, the question is, who is it in that coffin? Presumably it's another passenger and their relatives have been given the wrong remains," he told the tabloid.The lawyer said he is now trying to establish the precise chain of events in the recovery and identification process, beginning when the bodies were pulled from the jet's smouldering wreckage.Families trusted officials to handle the process properly and ensure the containers were labelled correctly.Altaf Taju, a grieving son who lost three family members in the plane crash, said, "Nobody looked at the remains. We weren't allowed to."Taju, from Blackburn, lost his London-based parents, Adam, 72, and Hasina, 70. His parents were travelling with their son-in-law Altafhusen Patel, 51, who also died."They just said, "This is your mother or father", and gave us a paper label with an ID number on it. We had to take their word for it. It's horrific that this could have happened, but what could anyone do?," Taju was quoted as saying by The Daily Mail.advertisementTaju was told of the mix-up by a police liaison officer. He takes comfort from the fact that his parents and brother-in-law were not involved in the confusion because they were buried quickly in India, The Daily Mail reported.AIR INDIA PLANE CRASHED IN JUNEThe ill-fated Air India flight bound for London's Gatwick Airport, carrying 242 passengers and crew members, crashed on a hostel of medical students near Ahmedabad's Sardar Patel International Airport on June 12.While one passenger survived, the death toll stood at 260.With the preliminary report out, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) probe is now focusing on the analysis of data retrieved from the Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) and Flight Data Recorder (FDR) - together known as the black box - and evidence from the wreckage site.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
31 minutes ago
- The Hindu
11 kg ganja seized from Nagercoil bound train in Dindigul
The Government Railway Police (GRP) seized 11 kg of ganja from a Nagercoil-bound train at the Dindigul Railway Junction on Tuesday. GRP personnel inspected the Coimbatore-Nagercoil Express. As the train reached Dindigul Junction, the police personnel conducted an inspection and seized 11 kg of ganja kept in a plastic cover in an unreserved coach. The bag was left unattended. The police seized the bag and handed over the ganja to the Anti Narcotics Intelligence Unit.
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Dead fences and crumbling walls, Kerala's prisons vulnerable to more breaches
The escape of rape and murder convict Govindachamy from the Kannur Central Prison has exposed deep-rooted lapses in Kerala's prison security system, where outdated infrastructure and administrative inertia have long gone unaddressed. The electric fencing at the prison, meant to deter such breakouts, has not been functioning for nearly three years. This is not an isolated lapse. Except for the Viyyur Central Prison and the adjacent High Security Prison, all central prisons in the State suffer from similar vulnerabilities. Sources point to chronic underfunding and poor interdepartmental coordination as key reasons delaying much-needed security upgrades of prison facilities. While electric fencing has been installed around the central prisons, except the Thavanur Central Prison and the High Security Prison, several years ago, the absence of live power supply has rendered these systems ineffective. At the Poojappura Central Prison, the fencing has been inoperative for nearly two years. The issue stems from expired annual maintenance contracts (AMC) and persistent delays by implementing agencies, including the Public Works department, in preparing repair estimates. Even the High Security Prison stares at a similar situation, with its AMC having lapsed. Compounding the problem, the lack of periodic maintenance has also hampered the surveillance infrastructure within prisons, as many CCTV cameras lack technical support. Further exposing prisons to more potential jailbreaks, boundary walls in certain facilities are crumbling, forcing prison superintendents fund makeshift repairs using their own funds. These challenges are particularly acute in ageing institutions built during the British era. The situation has been exacerbated by Kerala's ongoing fiscal crisis. The government had allocated ₹20 crore in the last State Budget for prison upgrades, despite proposals for nearly ₹100 crore being submitted. Half of the allocated amount was later slashed due to budgetary constraints, further straining prison resources. The Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services has now pinned its hopes on the decisions taken at a recent meeting chaired by Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan that resolved to make electric fences fully operational in all major prisons. The prison authorities have also expedited the ongoing security audit of its correctional facilities. At present, the periodic assessment is complete in 39 prisons, with steps under way to conduct the exercise in the remaining 18. Director General of Prisons and Correctional Services Balram Kumar Upadhyay told The Hindu that a number of steps are being planned to enhance security measures. 'Electric fencing will be the top priority for all central prisons. In addition, we will soon install 340 more CCTV cameras across jails to strengthen the existing network of nearly 1,500 cameras,' he says. To improve night-time security, high-mast lighting has already been installed on five major prison complexes. 'We are looking into every aspect (of security vulnerabilities) after the incident. Security measures are being reassessed. We hope to implement the upgraded measures within a couple of months,' he says. Sources indicate that the Home department is also exploring new technologies, including motion-sensing surveillance systems. The possibility of partnering with start-ups to pilot motion sensors is also being explored to detect unauthorised movement and potential breaches.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 hours ago
- Business Standard
Air India: DGCA audit flags 51 safety lapses, training, and crew gaps
India's aviation regulator, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), has identified 51 safety-related issues during its July audit of Air India. These include insufficient pilot training, the use of simulators not approved by authorities, and a faulty rostering system, according to an official government report seen by Reuters. Although the audit is unrelated to the recent Boeing 787 crash in Ahmedabad that killed 260 people, it comes at a time of increased scrutiny for the airline. Significant violations, compliance deadlines The 11-page confidential DGCA report flagged seven serious 'Level I' safety breaches that must be addressed by July 30. It also listed 44 other compliance issues that need to be resolved by August 23. The report revealed 'recurrent training gaps' among some Boeing 787 and 777 pilots. These pilots reportedly failed to complete mandatory observation duties—where they monitor cockpit instruments—before their periodic evaluations. Air India operates 34 Boeing 787s and 23 Boeing 777s, as per data from Flightradar24. Training at challenging airports falls short The DGCA criticised Air India's approach to training for Category C airports—airfields that are known to have difficult layouts or surrounding terrain. According to the report, the airline used simulators that did not meet required standards for this training. 'This may account to non-consideration of safety risks during approaches to challenging airports,' the report stated. Air India's response In a statement to Reuters, Air India said it had been 'fully transparent' during the audit and would 'submit our response to the regulator within the stipulated time frame, along with the details of the corrective actions.' A preliminary report into the June crash suggested confusion in the cockpit, with one pilot asking the other why he had turned off the fuel switches. The other pilot reportedly replied that he had not. Fatigue & flight-time limits breached The DGCA audit also highlighted ongoing issues with crew fatigue management. In one instance, a Milan-to-Delhi flight operated by Air India last month exceeded the legal flight-duty time limit by 2 hours and 18 minutes, which was classified as a 'Level I' violation. The audit team, which included 10 inspectors and four additional auditors, criticised the airline's rostering software for not issuing strong alerts when crew numbers fell short of required minimums. The report cited at least four international flights that departed with too few cabin crew on board. Operational oversight, passenger complaints Since Tata Group acquired Air India in 2022, the airline has expanded its global reach but continues to face complaints about service quality, including broken armrests, dirty cabins, and malfunctioning entertainment systems. Reuters recently reported that senior Air India officials, including the directors of flight operations and training, were issued notices on July 23 pointing to 29 'systemic' lapses and ignoring 'repeated' warnings. Air India has said it plans to respond. Gaps in supervision & documentation The DGCA report further noted discrepancies in 'door checks and equipment checks' and pointed out missing or incomplete training records. It also highlighted that no chief pilots had been appointed for the Airbus A320 and A350 fleets. 'This results in a lack of accountability, and effective monitoring of flight operations for these aircraft types,' the report said. Last year, aviation authorities penalised airlines 23 times for safety breaches -- 11 of which involved the Air India Group. The most severe penalty was a $127,000 fine for not maintaining adequate oxygen supply on certain international flights.
