logo
Harvey Weinstein sues brother Robert, business associates over $45M loan

Harvey Weinstein sues brother Robert, business associates over $45M loan

USA Today18-02-2025
Hear this story
Despite his ongoing legal woes, Harvey Weinstein is waging a new court battle over a multimillion-dollar loan he signed in 2016.
The embattled movie mogul, who is awaiting a retrial on his overturned 2020 rape conviction, filed a lawsuit Thursday against his brother Robert and other business associates in New York County Supreme Court, according to court documents obtained Monday by USA TODAY.
In the 22-page complaint, Weinstein claims Robert and his associates at The Weinstein Company committed fraud after he became the guarantor on a $45 million loan from AI International Holdings (BVI) Limited. The Oscar-winning producer alleges funds from the loan were "pilfered and misappropriated for their own uses and benefits, in blatant violation of the loan's intended purpose."
Co-founded by the Weinstein brothers in 2005, The Weinstein Co. was an independent film production and distribution company that helped produce box-office hits such as "Django Unchained," "Silver Linings Playbook," "Inglourious Basterds" and "Paddington." The company filed for bankruptcy in 2018 after numerous allegations of sexual harassment and rape were made against Weinstein.
In addition to his brother Robert, Weinstein is suing Weinstein Co. associates David Glasser, Irwin Reiter and a group of 10 John and Jane Does. Glasser served as chief operating officer, while Reiter worked as the executive vice president of accounting and financial reporting.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
Weinstein, who was "solely liable for repayment" of the loan, is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief to be determined at trial.
The lawsuit comes just three months after Weinstein and his legal team filed a $5 million claim notice against Rikers Island Correctional Facility, Bellevue Hospital and New York City officials, accusing the parties of negligent care in attending to the movie mogul's various health issues while he remains in custody.
'Feared for his life':Harvey Weinstein threatens to sue for medical neglect while in jail
Harvey Weinstein alleges 2016 loan was misused for 'personal purposes'
According to Weinstein's lawsuit, the film producer's brother and business partners had a history of misusing company funds, including the 2016 loan from AI International.
Although funds from the $45 million advance were reportedly solely designated for "legitimate business purposes essential to" The Weinstein Co.'s operations, Weinstein claims "significant portions" of the loan were instead used to pay for "unauthorized and personal purposes, including bonuses, unrelated business ventures, and personal expenses."
Citing past financial records, Weinstein alleges Robert Weinstein "withdrew or received at least $2.2 million in personal advances and loans from The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC, between August 2017 and February 2018," despite mounting fiscal troubles and outstanding "debt obligations."
"These self-serving financial extractions were made while creditors, including AI International, remained unpaid, and the companies faced imminent collapse," the lawsuit states. "The timing and pattern of these payments demonstrate a willful disregard for financial responsibilities, supporting the allegations of fraudulent inducement and misappropriation."
Harvey Weinstein:Movie mogul 'begging' for earlier retrial, 'holding on' amid health issues
Weinstein accuses Glasser and Reiter of similar financial misconduct in the complaint. Glasser purportedly "engaged in a systematic pattern of self-enrichment," which allegedly included authorizing a $1 million payment to his father using company funds.
Meanwhile, Reiter — who purportedly had regular access to financial records in his executive role — allegedly failed to prevent "the self-dealing and misappropriations" of loan funds and "actively participated in the approval, facilitation, and concealment of improper financial transactions."
The defendants "wrongfully diverted and misappropriated the loan funds for their own benefit, engaging in a deliberate scheme of self-dealing and mismanagement that left the companies financially drained and unable to meet their obligations," the lawsuit states.
Attorneys for Robert Weinstein, Glasser and Reiter were not available for comment at the time of publication.
Harvey Weinstein calls brother's loan settlement a 'self-serving agreement'
The Weinstein Co.'s inability to pay the AI International loan led to settlement negotiations with the company led by Robert Weinstein and Glasser.
Weinstein alleges in his lawsuit that the settlement, which left him financially responsible for the approximately $30 million total on the loan (including interest), was "conducted with fraudulent and disloyal intentions."
Defendants "reached a self-serving agreement with AI International to settle the debt for a significantly discounted payment of approximately $15 million," the lawsuit states. "Under this settlement, third-party defendants secured a release from liability for the loan while intentionally leaving Weinstein exposed to the full balance of the loan."
Weinstein is in ongoing litigation with AI International in a separate lawsuit after the company filed a complaint seeking to hold him responsible for the loan's repayment.
"Weinstein was wrongfully left solely liable for the loan's repayment when AI International demanded payment," the lawsuit concludes. "Defendants' fraudulent actions have caused Weinstein severe financial damages, as well as reputational harm resulting from their reckless and unlawful conduct."
Contributing: Andrea Mandell, KiMi Robinson and Taijuan Moorman, USA TODAY
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Anna Delvey breaks silence after dumped bunnies social media backlash
Anna Delvey breaks silence after dumped bunnies social media backlash

USA Today

time44 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Anna Delvey breaks silence after dumped bunnies social media backlash

Anna Delvey is breaking her silence after being accused of dumping multiple rabbits used during a photoshoot in New York City. The "Dancing with the Stars" alum and convicted con artist took to her Instagram Story on Aug. 11 to address now-viral claims that she left two rabbits that were found abandoned in Brooklyn's Prospect Park. The backlash follows Delvey posting a photo carousel with the pair of bunnies and a companion video last week on social media. Delvey explained that a person named Christian Batty, who she described as a "member of the hair team I briefly met" during fashion week last year, had said he "knew someone who could lend us bunnies for a few hours." "I later discovered that, instead of borrowing animals from a legitimate source like (Batty) claimed, he had obtained them via Facebook Marketplace and intended to release them into Prospect Park," Delvey wrote in a lengthy note to fans. "(It was) a plan of which I had no knowledge," Delvey continued. "The idea that someone would compromise the well-being of innocent animals for personal networking opportunities is deeply disturbing to me." In an Aug. 12 statement to USA TODAY, Delvey said that "I'm appalled, and frankly terrified, by the violent threats and hundreds of vile, harassing messages flooding my social media." "I've provided overwhelming proof of my innocence, yet nothing seems to satisfy the performatively outraged masses whose only real aim is to churn hate in my comments and DMs," Delvey added. USA TODAY also reached out to reps for Jasper Egan Soloff, a photographer who worked on the shoot. According to People and The New York Times, Batty released statements on since-deleted social media pages addressing the incident and saying "I felt overwhelmed and made the worst possible choice." 'Dancing With the Stars' Anna Delvey elimination episode received historic fan votes Delvey (aka Anna Sorokin) is the real-life subject of the Netflix series "Inventing Anna" from Shonda Rhimes and served a prison sentence for swindling banks, hotels, and rich friends with a false reputation as a wealthy German heiress. Delvey said on Instagram that she was "appalled by what transpired," adding that "it's not my job to source or return animals" as talent. "But as an animal lover, I can promise I will never work with them again without knowing exactly where they came from and how they're getting home," she added. "I do not eat meat, and I had no involvement in the acquisition, transport or return of these animals. I would never condone these actions." After Delvey posted the photoshoot on social media, vegan influencer Terry Chao said in a post that she noticed that the bunnies from the photo were the same ones she had helped with two neighbors after she saw that there were lost bunnies found in the New York City park in a local Facebook group. "Animals are not props, they are beautiful, living things that we need to honor and cherish," Chao added.

Senate Democrats say a new crypto bill raises the risk of 'financial meltdown'
Senate Democrats say a new crypto bill raises the risk of 'financial meltdown'

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

Senate Democrats say a new crypto bill raises the risk of 'financial meltdown'

Republicans in Congress are trying to extend a winning streak of crypto legislation that kicked off last month, but Democrats are ringing more alarm bells over the latest proposed bill. In July, a group of Senate Republicans introduced a draft discussion of the Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2025 (RFIA). It was originally introduced in 2023 by Senators Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand. The bill seeks to build on the recently passed CLARITY Act, which establishes a regulatory framework for digital assets. However, the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs' democratic staff recently released a fact sheet on the bill, laying out key concerns. In stark contrast to Republican lawmakers who have touted the economic benefits of crypto, Democrats see it as potentially destabilizing and riddled with potential conflicts. In a letter from Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee, lawmakers flagged risks to Americans' retirement savings, which they say are created by compromising the Securities and Exchange Commission's authority to regulate the sector, instead, assigning responsibility to the "chronically under-resourced CFTC." "Most concerningly, the bill provides a superhighway for traditional assets to escape the SEC's authority simply by converting stocks and other non-crypto securities into tokens." The letter says that the proposed legislation would use the concept of an "ancillary asset," allowing companies to sell crypto to investors without the protections under securities law. Sellers could "self-certify," avoiding the SEC oversight meant to protect investors. "Even for Americans who invest in non-crypto companies, this would mean exposing their retirement accounts and investments to greater volatility while stripping away existing federal and state enforcement tools to protect and help investors who get scammed." They also argue that the bill raises the risk of a "financial meltdown" as FDIC-insured institutions engage with crypto and are exposed to its risks. "The bill would bring crypto activities firmly within the taxpayer safety net, threatening the Deposit Insurance Fund, the safety and soundness of the banking system, and the ongoing availability of the critical non-crypto banking services that businesses and households rely on." Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the committee's ranking member, previously outlined the principles she believes are necessary to establish a crypto market framework that effectively regulates the market. "Ancillary assets draw the clearest legal line between securities and commodities and provide consumers with the disclosures they need to make informed decisions."

'He grabbed my knee': Fisherman recalls being attacked by shark
'He grabbed my knee': Fisherman recalls being attacked by shark

USA Today

time5 hours ago

  • USA Today

'He grabbed my knee': Fisherman recalls being attacked by shark

Editor's note: This story contains graphic images that may be disturbing to some viewers. A fisherman is recovering after being attacked by a shark in the Florida panhandle, according to the survivor and local officials. The incident took place on Aug. 2 in waters off the northwest city of Pensacola. Naval Air Station Pensacola responded to the rescue, Escambia County Fire Rescue confirmed to USA TODAY. "It was just after noon," Chance Armand told USA TODAY, as he recalled his attack involving an 8-foot-long shark while spearfishing about 20 miles offshore of Pensacola Pass. "He grabbed my knee then let go and grabbed the fish off of my shaft. It 100% was going for the fish I had shot." Armand, 28, of Milton, said after the shark bit him, his friends pulled him into a boat and applied a tourniquet to his leg before Santa Rosa EMS transported him to a hospital to be treated for the injury. "Spicy Bull shark decided he wanted my fish too on my way up from a dive today," Armand posted on Facebook after the incident. "Couldn't have asked for better people to help me out in the moment. Love what we do but definitely a reminder to soak up every moment with your family and friends because a routine day can be your last." United States shark attacks: See which states had them so far in 2025 How many shark attacks have been reported in Florida this year? In addition to Armand's incident, as of Tuesday, Aug. 12, there had been seven other reported shark attacks in The Sunshine State. According to the most recent reported attack took place on July 22 about 660 miles southeast in Hollywood. About 3 p.m. that day, a Canadian tourist was injured and hospitalized after a shark bit him. The man was in chest-deep water with a friend when a fish jumped over his head and a shark immediately attacked him, Hollywood Fire Rescue and Beach Safety reported. How many people die from shark attacks every year? According to data from the International Shark Attack File (ISAF), run by the Florida Museum of Natural History, the world averages 65 documented shark attacks annually. On average, six fatal attacks are reported each year, data shows. Last year, 47 people were bitten in unprovoked attacks. Natalie Neysa Alund is a senior reporter for USA TODAY. Reach her at nalund@ and follow her on X @nataliealund.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store