Harvey Weinstein sues brother Robert, business associates over $45M loan
Hear this story
Despite his ongoing legal woes, Harvey Weinstein is waging a new court battle over a multimillion-dollar loan he signed in 2016.
The embattled movie mogul, who is awaiting a retrial on his overturned 2020 rape conviction, filed a lawsuit Thursday against his brother Robert and other business associates in New York County Supreme Court, according to court documents obtained Monday by USA TODAY.
In the 22-page complaint, Weinstein claims Robert and his associates at The Weinstein Company committed fraud after he became the guarantor on a $45 million loan from AI International Holdings (BVI) Limited. The Oscar-winning producer alleges funds from the loan were "pilfered and misappropriated for their own uses and benefits, in blatant violation of the loan's intended purpose."
Co-founded by the Weinstein brothers in 2005, The Weinstein Co. was an independent film production and distribution company that helped produce box-office hits such as "Django Unchained," "Silver Linings Playbook," "Inglourious Basterds" and "Paddington." The company filed for bankruptcy in 2018 after numerous allegations of sexual harassment and rape were made against Weinstein.
In addition to his brother Robert, Weinstein is suing Weinstein Co. associates David Glasser, Irwin Reiter and a group of 10 John and Jane Does. Glasser served as chief operating officer, while Reiter worked as the executive vice president of accounting and financial reporting.
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
Weinstein, who was "solely liable for repayment" of the loan, is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, as well as injunctive relief to be determined at trial.
The lawsuit comes just three months after Weinstein and his legal team filed a $5 million claim notice against Rikers Island Correctional Facility, Bellevue Hospital and New York City officials, accusing the parties of negligent care in attending to the movie mogul's various health issues while he remains in custody.
'Feared for his life':Harvey Weinstein threatens to sue for medical neglect while in jail
Harvey Weinstein alleges 2016 loan was misused for 'personal purposes'
According to Weinstein's lawsuit, the film producer's brother and business partners had a history of misusing company funds, including the 2016 loan from AI International.
Although funds from the $45 million advance were reportedly solely designated for "legitimate business purposes essential to" The Weinstein Co.'s operations, Weinstein claims "significant portions" of the loan were instead used to pay for "unauthorized and personal purposes, including bonuses, unrelated business ventures, and personal expenses."
Citing past financial records, Weinstein alleges Robert Weinstein "withdrew or received at least $2.2 million in personal advances and loans from The Weinstein Company Holdings LLC, between August 2017 and February 2018," despite mounting fiscal troubles and outstanding "debt obligations."
"These self-serving financial extractions were made while creditors, including AI International, remained unpaid, and the companies faced imminent collapse," the lawsuit states. "The timing and pattern of these payments demonstrate a willful disregard for financial responsibilities, supporting the allegations of fraudulent inducement and misappropriation."
Harvey Weinstein:Movie mogul 'begging' for earlier retrial, 'holding on' amid health issues
Weinstein accuses Glasser and Reiter of similar financial misconduct in the complaint. Glasser purportedly "engaged in a systematic pattern of self-enrichment," which allegedly included authorizing a $1 million payment to his father using company funds.
Meanwhile, Reiter — who purportedly had regular access to financial records in his executive role — allegedly failed to prevent "the self-dealing and misappropriations" of loan funds and "actively participated in the approval, facilitation, and concealment of improper financial transactions."
The defendants "wrongfully diverted and misappropriated the loan funds for their own benefit, engaging in a deliberate scheme of self-dealing and mismanagement that left the companies financially drained and unable to meet their obligations," the lawsuit states.
Attorneys for Robert Weinstein, Glasser and Reiter were not available for comment at the time of publication.
Harvey Weinstein calls brother's loan settlement a 'self-serving agreement'
The Weinstein Co.'s inability to pay the AI International loan led to settlement negotiations with the company led by Robert Weinstein and Glasser.
Weinstein alleges in his lawsuit that the settlement, which left him financially responsible for the approximately $30 million total on the loan (including interest), was "conducted with fraudulent and disloyal intentions."
Defendants "reached a self-serving agreement with AI International to settle the debt for a significantly discounted payment of approximately $15 million," the lawsuit states. "Under this settlement, third-party defendants secured a release from liability for the loan while intentionally leaving Weinstein exposed to the full balance of the loan."
Weinstein is in ongoing litigation with AI International in a separate lawsuit after the company filed a complaint seeking to hold him responsible for the loan's repayment.
"Weinstein was wrongfully left solely liable for the loan's repayment when AI International demanded payment," the lawsuit concludes. "Defendants' fraudulent actions have caused Weinstein severe financial damages, as well as reputational harm resulting from their reckless and unlawful conduct."
Contributing: Andrea Mandell, KiMi Robinson and Taijuan Moorman, USA TODAY
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kaja Sokola, a former model from Poland, applauds Weinstein conviction
It wasn't exactly the verdict that Harvey Weinstein accuser Kaja Sokola had hoped for, but it was the verdict she said women determined to fight against sexual predators needed. Sokola, a former runway model from Poland, was one of three women who accused Weinstein of sexually assaulting them more than a decade ago. On Wednesday, a Manhattan jury found Weinstein guilty of assaulting former 'Project Runway' production assistant Miriam Haley but not her. And it deadlocked on a third-degree rape charge against Weinstein in the alleged sexual assault of former actor Jessica Mann. 'It's not ideal for me,' Sokola told NBC News shortly after the verdict was announced. 'But it doesn't change that much the most important thing, that he's convicted.' What does it mean for the #MeToo movement, which was galvanized in 2020 by Weinstein's landmark conviction for sexually abusing young women? 'I think it sends the message that we still have some work to do,' said Sokola, 39. Sokola also said she doesn't want what happened to her in court to deter other sex assault victims from coming forward. 'There's no win or lose for me. I was not the one who was on the trial,' she said. 'So I would not want these kind of decisions to discourage others from speaking their truth or from participating in proceedings like this, because we have one life to live, and if we won't fight for our own justice, then who will?' Sokola's attorney, Lindsay Goldbrum, a partner at Goddard Law PLLC, said she and her client were prepared for the outcome. 'We are in a different culture than we were five years ago when this trial first happened,' she said. 'But as a former prosecutor, I knew from the beginning that it was going to be an uphill battle for the prosecutors to be able to establish proof beyond a reasonable doubt about a crime that occurred almost 20 years ago.' Sokola wasn't among the women who testified against Weinstein at his first trial, in which he was convicted of third-degree rape of Mann in 2013. He was also convicted of first-degree criminal sexual act for forcibly performing oral sex on Haley in 2006. The convictions were overturned after an appeals court found that the judge in that trial had improperly allowed testimony against Weinstein based on allegations that weren't part of the case. Sokola was added to the case after she filed her own lawsuit against Weinstein in December 2019 under New York's Child Victims Act. On the stand, Sokola told the court that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her at a Manhattan hotel in 2006, when she was 19 years old. The alleged abuse first began in 2002, when she was 16, and Weinstein forced her to masturbate him, she said. 'I know what he did to me when I was 16, when I was 19, and nothing will change that,' Sokola told NBC News. Sokola's testimony may have been undermined by her estranged older sister, Ewa Sokola, who had been subpoenaed as a prosecution witness. She testified that Sokola seemed 'extremely tense' after a 2006 post-lunch meeting with Weinstein but didn't say she had been assaulted. 'She was proud of knowing him,' Ewa Sokola testified. Asked about that testimony, Sokola said, 'I don't have nothing to be ashamed of.' 'I think she does, or she should have,' she said of her sister. Sokola said she has never spoken with Haley and has talked to Mann just once, about two years ago. Initially, Sokola was part of a group of women who filed a class-action lawsuit against Weinstein and his companies, alleging he had sexually abused them. At first, she hid her identity behind a pseudonym. Unhappy with a proposed deal under which almost all the civil cases against Weinstein would be settled for $47 million and he would not have to admit to wrongdoing, Sokola unmasked herself in December 2019 when she filed her lawsuit. In the suit, Sokola said she was 16 in 2002 when she had just moved from Warsaw to New York City and was first introduced to Weinstein. She said that when he learned she wanted to become an actor, he told her he could help her career. Three days later, the complaint said, Weinstein picked Sokola up for what was supposed to be a business lunch and instead took her his Manhattan apartment and demanded sex. When a weeping Sokola tried to resist, Weinstein told her he had 'made' the careers of the actors Penelope Cruz and Gwyneth Paltrow and warned the teenager that she 'would never work as an actress unless she acquiesced to his demands,' according to the complaint. Sokola said at Weinstein's retrial that he demanded that she masturbate him while he touched her. Sokola, 39, became one of three women who accused Weinstein of sex assault at his retrial after she told prosecutors he had also forcibly performed oral sex on her in 2006. That allegation of assault mirrored the testimony of Haley, who accused Weinstein of doing the same to her in 2006 when she was looking for work in entertainment production. Weinstein, who was hit with an additional charge of first-degree criminal sexual act, denied assaulting Sokola. He also denied assaulting Mann and Haley. Weinstein spokesman Juda Engelmayer said that 'we consider this a little bit of a victory' because Weinstein was acquitted on the Sokola charge. 'He's feeling, you know, not good about being convicted for Miriam but relieved that he wasn't convicted on Kaja and hopeful on the Jessica part,' Engelmayer said of Weinstein at a news conference. Sokola is getting back to the dreams she says Weinstein stole from her after the alleged assaults, with the launch of her own production company, Falcon 88. 'Healing means doing what I love and being able to be a helpful member of society, being a producer that listens to others, respects others, treats people with dignity that they deserve,' she said. 'It's named after my dad. He was 88 years old when he died.' Her first project is executive producing a film, 'The Eden Express,' starring Jonah Hauer-King and David Duchovny. Sokola is also a single mom with a young son. And when she was asked how she hopes her son will react when he finds out she testified against Weinstein, she smiled. 'I hope he will think that his mom is a badass and that his mom stands for the truth and is not afraid to speak her truth,' she said. This article was originally published on
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
'Whip/Nae Nae' child star pleads guilty but mentally ill, gets 30 years for cousin's death
'Whip/Nae Nae' child star pleads guilty but mentally ill, gets 30 years for cousin's death The "Watch Me (Whip/Nae Nae)" rapper, 27-year-old Silentó, has been sentenced to 30 years in prison after pleading guilty to the 2021 death of his cousin. According to court records reviewed by USA TODAY, the musical artist, whose real name is Ricky Lamar Hawk, on June 11 pleaded guilty but mentally ill to four charges: voluntary manslaughter – a reduced charge from his initial malice murder count – aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during a felony crime, and concealing the death of his cousin, 34-year-old Frederick Rooks III. Voluntary manslaughter came with a 20-year prison sentence, while the firearm possession and concealment of death counts entail five years each. Hawk has been in jail since his February 2021 arrest. On Jan. 21, 2012, DeKalb County Police officers responded to a call in Panthersville, Georgia, about 10 miles southeast of Atlanta. Per police, Rooks was found with multiple gunshot wounds and ten bullet casings near him. Hawk was arrested Feb. 1, 2021, after one of Rooks' family members told officers he was last seen with Hawk on a drive back from a friend's house. They were in a white BMW SUV that matched one seen in security footage. Hawk allegedly admitted to shooting Rooks in an interview with police. The prior year, he was charged while living in Southern California for allegedly threatening two people with a hatchet. He'd been on bail after a recent arrest. According to the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office, Hawk "walked into an unlocked stranger's home" and attempted to strike the two people in the home with a hatchet before one of them managed to disarm him." The case is ongoing. Who is Ricky Lamar Hawk, the rapper Silentó? As a 17-year-old high schooler, Hawk integrated the "whip" and "nae nae" dances into the 2015 hit "Watch Me (Whip/Nae Nae)," which spent 51 weeks on the Billboard Top 100 after its release. It peaked at No. 3. He went on to release a few albums, including a March 2021 record called "Bars Behind Bars" that came out while he was incarcerated. Amid his viral success, Hawk told USA TODAY in 2015, "It was an awesome opportunity making this song and having it where I can go back to school, and people can just be like, 'Wow, you did it.'"
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Social Security cost-of-living adjustment may be 2.5% in 2026, new estimate shows
The cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security could be 2.5% in 2026, based on the latest inflation data, new estimates show. That's up from last month's estimate of 2.4%, said Mary Johnson, an independent Social Security and Medicare policy analyst who forecasts 2026 COLA using monthly inflation data. A 2.5% increase would be the same gain beneficiaries received this year, but there's still time for the 2026 estimate to rise because the full impacts of President Donald Trump's tariffs are still unknown. "This estimate may rise with four more months of data still to come in before the 2026 COLA will be announced in October," Johnson said. Even though May inflation remained tame, most economists predict Trump's tariffs will raise inflation, which in turn, boosts the COLA. "Another month goes by with little evidence of tariffs, but the longer-term inflation challenge they pose remains," said Ellen Zentner, chief economic strategist for Morgan Stanley Wealth Management. Ken Kim, senior economist at KPMG, sees inflation peaking above 4% annually in the fall. That would be sharply higher than the 2.4% annual increase in the May consumer price index, a measure of average changes in goods and services costs. The average monthly Social Security check in May reached a record high $1,948.17. Based on that, a 2.5% increase would raise the monthly benefit by about $40.70. Roughly 75 million Americans, or about a fifth of the population, receive Social Security benefits. COLA is an annual adjustment to benefits meant to keep beneficiaries' purchasing power from being eroded by inflation. The final COLA for the following year is typically announced in October by the Social Security Administration. COLA is based on the percentage increase in the consumer price index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers from July through September of the last year as compared to the same three months of the current year. CPI-W tracks the overall inflation rate but can differ slightly. In May, annual CPI-W rose 2.2%, compared with the 2.4% rise in overall consumer prices. Medora Lee is a money, markets, and personal finance reporter at USA TODAY. You can reach her at mjlee@ and subscribe to our free Daily Money newsletter for personal finance tips and business news every Monday through Friday morning. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Social Security COLA may be 2.5% in 2026, but tariffs could lift it
