Novak Djokovic's wife Jelena reacts to historic Wimbledon victory without using a word. Who is she?
continues to make history at Grand Slam tournaments. Just a month after reaching the 100-win mark at the French Open, the Serbian superstar achieved a similar feat at Wimbledon. The 38-year-old tennis icon, who is in search of his eighth title at the grass Grand Slam, beat Miomir Kecmanovic in straight sets on Saturday, 6-3, 6-0, 6-4. The match lasted just one hour and 47 minutes, with Kecmanovic unable to put up a strong fight.
The Tennis legend has got a courtside constant in his wife, Jelena Djokovic. Following his victory, Novak Djokovic's wife,
Jelena Djokovic
, made sure to celebrate his achievement. While she didn't write any words or send a message to the tennis icon, she made her feelings clear by sharing multiple posts highlighting her husband's historic feat.
— KeithEspino22 (@KeithEspino22)
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
15 Most Beautiful Women Ever
Paperela
Undo
ALSO READ:
Elon Musk's Tesla in trouble again? All about SpaceX CEO's latest move amid feud with Trump
Who is Novak Djokovic's wife?
Novak Djokovic is celebrated as one of the greatest tennis players in history, with an impressive record of Grand Slam victories. But off the court, he also aces another role: a loving husband and a doting father.
According to Women's Weekly, Novak Djokovic and Jelena Ristić met their school days in Serbia and that was the beginning of a cherished love story. A former luxury brand management student at Bocconi University in Milan, Jelena later moved to Monte Carlo so they could be together, taking a temporary job at an oil company. After bonding over tennis and growing up together, they dated for eight years before Novak popped the question in Monte Carlo in 2013, just as his career was taking off.
Live Events
Their bond grew stronger over the years and the couple tied the knot in July 2014 in a romantic ceremony on the stunning Adriatic coast of Montenegro. Jelena, who is a philanthropist and entrepreneur, is also a key figure in Novak's career, often seen supporting him from the stands. They got married just four days after Novak's Wimbledon win.
ALSO READ:
Cardi B's new clues hint at breakup with NFL star Stefon Diggs just one month after going Instagram-official
According to Elle, she now runs the
Novak Djokovic Foundation
, which supports early childhood education in Serbia. Jelena was pregnant at the time with their first child, Stefan, born on October 22, 2014. Their daughter, Tara, followed in September 2017.
In 2024, the couple celebrated 10 years of marriage, with Novak posting a heartfelt tribute on Instagram: 'Ten years of joy. Ten years of dreams. Ten years as one. Ten years of fun. Ten years of you. The best part of me. I love you forever.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Javed Akhtar says it was a risk to cast Amitabh Bachchan for ‘Zanjeer', recalls how him and Salim Khan fought to get their deserved pay: ‘A super-duper hit film with a super-duper flop actor'
Amitabh Bachchan had seen a list of flops before he did 'Zanjeer' which completely changed the game for him. The film written by Salim-Javed ( Salim Khan , Javed Akhtar ), was followed by a string of other movies which were also penned by them, eventually making giving Bachchan his 'Angry Young Man' image. No wonder, the documentary on Salim Javed's life which released recently was titled 'Angry Young Men'. Despite 'Zanjeer' success, it wasn't easy for Salim Javed. They didn't have any work for nine months. In a recent interview, Javed Akhtar opened up on it. He said during a chat with Anu Singh Choudhary for JLF International, 'You know, our first film was Andaz. Second was Haathi Mere Saathi. Third was Seeta Aur Geeta. Fourth was Zanjeer, a super-duper hit film with a super-duper flop actor. Yes. We decided that now, enough is enough. We had given four hits in a row.' Talking about casting Bachchan in the film, he added, 'Zanjeer was a major hit. He gave a great performance. But he always gave great performances, even in those films which didn't run. He was good. That's why we took him. We were not even liking him. We could see that he was a volcano of talent, just not getting good scripts.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like ทองคำกำลังทะยานขึ้นในปี 2025 — นักเทรดแนวหน้าเริ่มคว้าโอกาสกันแล้ว IC Markets อ่านเพิ่มเติม Undo He added how situations are never ideal but one has to fight for it. Javed recalled, 'You know, when we came into the film industry, writers were never mentioned on posters or banners. They were very poorly paid. There was no credit, no money. We fought. One after another, we gave films which were very good, and then we fought.' They fought for getting more money for their work which they deserved. 'We said, 'No, these are our terms and conditions. If you cannot pay us that much, if you cannot accept our terms and conditions, we will not work.' We fought. Maybe it is not very easy for everybody to fight the way we did, but at least, as a group, as a whole community of writers, you can stand up and say, 'That much, and no more.' Nobody will give you anything on a platter. Nobody gave us anything on a platter. We fought for it.' He added, 'So we decided that we will take X amount. I remember the amount. But I also remember, in the subject department… After four hit films, for nine months we could not sign a single film, because nobody was willing to pay. They would laugh in my face. 'Kitna bola?' I had bought a second-hand Ambassador for ₹13,000. That was sold again, because there was no work. But after nine months, we took that price. Again, we decided on a price. And we fought to get it. So, nothing comes easily. Don't complain. Situations have never been ideal for anybody.'
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Explained: Why critics say new Superman movie is 'anti-Israel' — decoding the politics of James Gunn film
TL;DR Superman sparks backlash: The new Superman film is accused of portraying Israel negatively through allegorical storytelling. Fictional war, real parallels: Viewers say the fictional conflict between Boravia and Jarhanpur mirrors the Israel–Gaza war. Filmmakers deny intent: Director James Gunn insists no real-world countries were referenced—but critics aren't convinced. Social media erupts: Posts praising the film's perceived pro-Palestinian message have gone viral, fueling debate. The Allegory at the Centre of the Controversy James Gunn's much-anticipated Superman reboot is drawing unexpected fire—not for its plot, but for its perceived politics. The film introduces a fictional border conflict between two countries: Boravia, a wealthy, militarised state supported by the US, and Jarhanpur, a poorer neighbouring nation whose civilians face repeated airstrikes and forced displacement. To many critics and viewers, the imagery is unmistakable: Boravia resembles Israel; Jarhanpur, Palestine. The moral framing of the conflict—military might versus civilian suffering—has ignited a firestorm online, especially as the film arrives amid ongoing real-world violence in Gaza. What Audiences Are Saying Across social media, audiences have called the film 'openly anti-Israel,' with posts like: 'Y'all were not kidding about how anti-Israel and pro-Palestine that Superman movie was… they were not slick with it AT ALL.' Others have praised the film for 'taking a stand' in what they see as a David vs Goliath morality tale. In particular, the film's refugee camp scenes and its depiction of white-suited Boravian soldiers firing on fleeing civilians has led to fierce comparisons with IDF footage from Gaza. Arab media outlets from Dawn to The New Arab have amplified these readings, while pro-Israel commentators have condemned the film as 'propaganda in a cape.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Benefits of Trading Bitcoin CFDs IC Markets Learn More Undo What the Filmmakers Say Director James Gunn has flatly denied that the film has any direct real-world allegory. In an interview earlier this month, he said: 'When I wrote this the Middle Eastern conflict wasn't happening. So I tried to do little things to move it away from that, but it doesn't have anything to do with the Middle East. ... It really is fictional.' Gunn says the film is about Superman's struggle to remain moral in a morally grey world, not a political commentary on the Middle East. His defenders argue the film's real theme is immigration, not occupation. But critics argue that intent doesn't matter when the imagery is this pointed. Moses, Jesus and Ubermensch In the past, Superman has been widely compared to both Moses and Jesus, with his origin story echoing Moses as a baby sent away from a dying world to be raised by strangers, and his life on Earth reflecting Christ-like motifs—an only son sent by a father, performing miracles, sacrificing himself, and symbolically resurrecting. At the same time, some have interpreted Superman through a Nietzschean lens, casting him as a kind of Übermensch—a being who transcends human limitations. Yet this comparison remains contested: while he possesses godlike powers, Superman doesn't forge new values like Nietzsche's ideal but instead adheres to a strict moral code rooted in traditional human ethics. This tension—between godhood and goodness, destiny and choice—has kept Superman hovering between myth, morality, and modern philosophy for nearly a century. Why This Matters The Superman controversy underscores a broader cultural war over art and politics—especially in Hollywood, where creators are increasingly accused of embedding political messages into superhero narratives. To Israel's supporters, the film is part of a creeping normalisation of anti-Israel sentiment in Western culture. To critics of Israel's actions in Gaza, the film merely reflects what journalists and humanitarian organisations have been documenting for months. FAQ Is the film explicitly about Israel and Palestine? No. The movie features fictional countries—Boravia and Jarhanpur—and makes no direct reference to Israel or Gaza. Why do people think it is about Israel? The visual parallels are striking: a powerful, Western-backed nation using overwhelming force on a neighbouring population with fewer resources, often civilians. The timing of the release, during the Gaza war, amplified those associations. Has there been backlash? Yes. Pro-Israel groups have criticised the film, while many Arab and pro-Palestinian voices have praised it for supposedly taking a moral stand. Is this unusual for superhero films? Increasingly less so. Modern superhero films often grapple with real-world issues—immigration, surveillance, civil liberties—but allegories about active geopolitical conflicts remain controversial. Final Word Whether it was intentional or not, Superman has entered the Israel–Palestine debate through the back door of allegory. And like all superhero stories, this one too is being read less as fantasy—and more as a mirror to the world outside the screen.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
NYT Connections hints and answers for today (July 15, 2025)
NYT Connections hints and answers for today NYT Connections is back with another thrilling word puzzle. If you're diving into today's New York Times Connections puzzle and find yourself stumped, you're not alone. This clever word game, updated daily, challenges players to sort 16 words into four related groups. Some connections are obvious, while others rely on wordplay, obscure references, or clever phrasing. Today's puzzle, like many before it, mixes straightforward groupings with tricky ones that might require a second glance. Whether you're playing to maintain a long streak or just want to warm up your brain, we've gathered all the hints, group themes, and full answers you need to solve the July 15 edition. What is NYT Connections Connections is a daily word game by The New York Times that tests your ability to find hidden relationships among words. The goal is to identify four groups of four words that share a common link. These links can be thematic, structural, or even more subtle, like phrases or cultural references. How to play NYT Connections by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription Techno Mag Learn More Undo You're presented with a grid of 16 words and your task is to sort them into four groups of four related words. These groups vary in difficulty, with one usually being quite easy and another relying on wordplay or obscure connections. You can shuffle the grid to help you spot connections, and you have four chances to get it right before the game ends. If you're close to a correct grouping, the game might tell you that you're one word away. Playing on the New York Times website or app, you can also share your results and track your streak over time. Today's NYT Connections hints Here are some subtle hints to guide your thinking: Yellow – Gear you'd spot in Simone Biles' gym bag Green – Ways to show someone the door Blue – Titles that kept you on the edge of your seat Purple – Words that begin the same way One word from the each group Here's one example from each category to help nudge your thinking: Yellow – Gymnastics Green – Ejections Blue – Thrillers Purple – Prefixes Today's NYT Connections answers Yellow group – BARS, BEAM, RINGS, VAULT Green group – BOOT, BOUNCE, EJECT, REMOVE Blue group – NOPE, PEARL, SCREAM, SMILE Purple group – FEATHERS, PLAY, POWER, SHOE That wraps up today's puzzle. Whether you solved it solo or needed a boost, check back tomorrow for new clues and answers to keep your Connections streak going strong. Also read | Wordle today #1487: Get hints and answer to today's puzzle July 15, 2025 AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
