logo
UK accounting watchdog fines KPMG $1.7 million for Carr's Group audit breaches

UK accounting watchdog fines KPMG $1.7 million for Carr's Group audit breaches

Reuters2 days ago

June 12 (Reuters) - The British accounting watchdog imposed a penalty of 1.25 million pounds ($1.7 million) on audit firm KPMG LLP on Thursday as a result of an investigation into the financial audit of UK manufacturing firm Carr's Group (CARRC.L), opens new tab.
KPMG and audit engagement partner Nick Plumb failed to ensure compliance with applicable independence requirements, the Financial Reporting Council said.
"In this case, whilst the quality of the audit work performed by the two firms is not brought into question, the breaches were serious," FRC Deputy Executive Counsel Jamie Symington said in a statement published on its website.
($1 = 0.7374 pounds)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HMRC can't be bothered to send letters (unless you owe it money)
HMRC can't be bothered to send letters (unless you owe it money)

Times

time16 minutes ago

  • Times

HMRC can't be bothered to send letters (unless you owe it money)

HM Revenue & Customs will stop sending physical letters to taxpayers in the latest move to 'modernise' and save £50 million a year. The tax office confirmed it would 'eliminate' outbound post unless it is revenue generating, cutting the number of letters it sends by 75 per cent by the 2028-29 tax year. The government promised an extra £500 million in funding over the next four years in Wednesday's spending review, with the aim of pushing at least 90 per cent of customer interactions online and making HMRC a 'digital-first organisation'. Lindsay Scott from the Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT), a trade body, said withdrawing physical letters prematurely 'risks further damaging customer service'. 'Plans to phase out post must be handled with care, with robust safeguards to protect those who are digitally excluded or lack digital confidence,' Scott said. This year, 70 per cent of the tax office's interactions with taxpayers were 'digital self-serve', but HMRC estimates that about a fifth of its customers, or seven million people, still need assistance to use its digital services. Last year, more than 300,000 filed their tax returns on paper. The department's previous attempts to digitise have also been widely criticised. Its Making Tax Digital initiative has cost at least £1 billion more in real terms than its initial £226 million budget when it was proposed in 2016, according to the National Audit Office, which scrutinises government spending. In 2023, it said the rollout for self-assessment tax returns was at least eight years behind schedule. The tax office has also come under fire for its track record with customer communications. Its webchat service, launched in 2015, connected less than half of the time, according to a report by the CIOT and the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, a trade body, published in December. The report also showed taxpayers were satisfied with webchats 28 per cent of the time and the phonelines 56 per cent of the time, although HMRC's own satisfaction estimates are much higher. On the phone lines, callers spent an average of 23 minutes on hold in the last tax year and 34 per cent of callers gave up before they were connected in 2023 — more than double the target of 15 per cent or less. The investment announced on Wednesday comes as part of a wider push to revitalise the tax office, with an additional £1.6 billion in spending over the next four years also confirmed for reforming its technology and data infrastructure. The full spending package aims to raise £7.5 billion additional tax revenue a year by 2029-30, by digitising services and hiring an extra 7,900 staff to work on compliance and debt management. The government said it will use the extra revenue to 'fund vital public services'. HMRC said: 'Reducing the number of letters we send and communicating in different ways instead will provide a better service for our customers in line with modern-day expectations, as well as deliver savings of £50 million by 2028-29.'

Reeves faces welfare revolt after Labour rebels rejected an 'olive branch' designed to head off a Commons mutiny over benefit cuts
Reeves faces welfare revolt after Labour rebels rejected an 'olive branch' designed to head off a Commons mutiny over benefit cuts

Daily Mail​

time20 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Reeves faces welfare revolt after Labour rebels rejected an 'olive branch' designed to head off a Commons mutiny over benefit cuts

was on collision course with Labour welfare rebels last night after they rejected an 'olive branch' designed to head off a Commons mutiny over benefit cuts. The Chancellor is facing a ferocious backlash from her own MPs over plans to trim £5 billion from the benefits bill. More than 100 Labour MPs have warned party whips they could vote against the plan to restrict eligibility to disability benefits. Ministers are trying to contain the rebellion by suggesting possible concessions. Under one proposal, those affected would continue to receive their benefits for a further 13 weeks to give them more time to find a job. The compromise is set to be included when the legislation needed to push through the cuts is published next week. But leading rebels dismissed the idea. Poole MP Neil Duncan-Jordan said the proposal was 'not a concession' as it was already included in a government consultation on the cuts. Mr Duncan-Jordan, a long-time anti-poverty campaigner, said the cuts would 'make disabled poorer'. He added: 'No amount of warm words mask the reality - cuts don't create jobs they create austerity. I'm voting No.' Fellow rebel Rachel Maskell said: 'I'll have to vote against something which will cause such harm to my constituents - too many lives will be put at risk if they press ahead.' Ms Reeves used the £5 billion package of benefit cuts to help balance the books when she gave her spring statement on the economy in March. Without them she would have been at risk of breaking her own fiscal rules set just five months earlier. Economists say the cuts will hit 1.2 million people, with those affected losing an average of around £4,500 per year each. The government's own impact assessment suggested the changes would drive 250,000 people into poverty, including 50,000 children. But Ms Reeves signalled she will not back down further, despite her recent U-turn on cuts to the winter fuel allowance. Ruling out a climb down, she said reform was needed to prevent the welfare system becoming unsustainable. 'It is important we reform the way the welfare state works so there is a welfare state there for people,' she said. 'We are the only developed country where the number of people in the labour market is lower than it was before Covid. The number of economically inactive people of working age is rising.' The Chancellor said sickness benefits are forecast to rise sharply despite the cuts, with official estimates suggesting they will reach almost £100 billion a year by the end of the decade.

'I was Mrs Poundland, but I stopped going when their prices went up'
'I was Mrs Poundland, but I stopped going when their prices went up'

BBC News

time28 minutes ago

  • BBC News

'I was Mrs Poundland, but I stopped going when their prices went up'

Sharon Carroll once shopped so much at her local Poundland that her friends described her as "Mrs Poundland". "I'd just buy so many things," says Sharon. "I'd spend £40 to £50."When everything used to be £1 it was a big attraction."But when the company began to change its pricing strategy, increasing the prices of some products from £1, the 45-year-old says she cut down on her purchases."The quality of the products was also going down and you were paying more for things." Other shoppers also told the BBC that they were put off when the retailer started putting its prices week, the struggling budget chain was sold for (appropriately) £1 by its owner Pepco to a US investment firm, Gordon Brothers. Up to 100 stores are at risk of £1 promise was Poundland's "most compelling proposition", says Howard Lake, a retail consultant at Kantar."Removing this identity alienated its core shopper base."The company clearly agreed. After it raised some prices from £1 in 2017, earlier this year it said it was returning to its roots, increasing the number of products it offered that cost £1 or less from 1,500 to 2,400, almost half its range. Small towns Poundland has 825 stores in the UK, with around 16,000 of those shops are former Woolworths or Wilko branches, which it hoovered up after the two brands became the biggest occupant of ex-Woolworths stores after the retailer went into administration in 2009, taking on 93 of its stores, more than 10% of the Woolworths estate. In September 2023 it took over the leases of 71 former Wilko these stores were in the kinds of small towns where other large retailers do not have a presence."They might have had a Woolworths, a bank and a charity shop," says Jonathan de Mello, a retail analyst and the founder of JDM Gray loves going into her local Poundland in Bangor, Northern Ireland. Recently, she found a pair of small ceramic houses in the store, which were a copy of a design she had seen at Zara. "We don't have a Zara near where I live," she says. Poundland's presence in small towns has been crucial to fostering a sense of customer loyalty, says retail psychologist Kate Nightingale."Simply being present in people's daily rituals is one of the strongest ways to build interdependence."Presence plus reliance are some of the most important qualities of loyal relationships and it is no different to relationships we build with brands."But de Mello says when Poundland expanded into small towns, not enough people went in, which hit their bottom line."In the small locations that they've opened multiple stores in, I feel the volumes aren't there in terms of footfall, unfortunately." Increased competition In 2016 Poundland expanded into fashion, beginning the roll-out of its Pep&Co clothing range, but this soon faced a trading update in May 2024, the company admitted that changes to the way it sourced clothing had reduced the number of sizes on offer. While the wide range of products stocked by Poundland may have been handy for consumers, it became a problem for the stocked so many different products – from food to clothing, to homewares and baby products – that it became, says Kantar's Howard Lake, a "supermarket-general store hybrid".That made it vulnerable to competition from numerous other the food side, there are Aldi and Lidl, whose UK presence has grown rapidly in recent years. On the homewares side are Home Bargains and B&M. And on the clothing side are Shein and Temu, the cheap Chinese exporters which have enjoyed a surge in popularity among British says Lake, consumers found these other offers "far more attractive". Poundland told the BBC: "Our missteps have been well documented and those include the execution of Pepco-sourced clothing and general merchandise product ranges in a way that didn't fully align with UK & Ireland customers' expectations."We're looking forward to having the opportunity to put those missteps right as we put our recovery plan in place." Shoppers like Elinor Martin in Sutton Coldfield hope the company uses Poundland to pick up snacks for her sons' packed lunches, stationery and birthday cards for school, plus shampoo, shower gel and cleaning says she would miss her local branch if it were to close. "I can get things I need at Poundland. I find things cheaper there [than local supermarkets]."Elizabeth Gray in Bangor says she would miss her local store too if it went."I would be sad if it closed," she says. "I'm kind of in love with Poundland." Additional reporting by Charlotte Edwards and Tom Espiner

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store