RM6,400-a-week sex racket: Man filmed wife for porn, ran prostitution ring from Shah Alam hotel, say police
Kuala Lumpur police chief Datuk Rusdi Mohd Isa said the couple, aged 34, was detained at 8 pm by a team from the D7 (Anti-Vice, Gambling and Secret Societies) division of the Kuala Lumpur police contingent headquarters.
Preliminary investigations revealed that the husband acted as the content creator, promoting and selling pornographic videos featuring his wife and their clients, while also managing a prostitution ring to generate income.
'His wife acted as the prostitute, playing the lead role in the videos. They earned up to RM6,400 a week,' he said.
'They targeted clients via the X platform to sell their pornographic videos, while prostitution activities were coordinated through Telegram,' he said in a statement yesterday.
Rusdi added that their fees ranged from RM450 to RM800 at a four-star hotel, while pornographic videos were priced at RM50 and RM150.
'The couple has been remanded for three days until July 4. The case is being investigated under Sections 372(1), 372B and 372A of the Penal Code, as well as Section 233 of the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998,' he said. — Bernama
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
3 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Hong Kong busts ‘upskirt' voyeur ring, 10 arrested over 15,000 illicit images
HONG KONG, Aug 21 — Hong Kong police said on Thursday they had arrested six men and four women for running online channels that procured and shared thousands of 'upskirt' and other non-consensual images of women. Four of the suspects took clandestine intimate photographs and videos, many in public spaces such as bus stations and shopping malls, before sharing them in a group with nearly 9,000 members, police alleged. The suspects distributed around 15,000 such images over the course of three years, police said, charging users for 'VIP' content to make HK$4 million (RM2.2 million). The online platform, which was not identified, has been blocked and more arrests are possible, police warned. 'Every user who downloads these images is also an accomplice,' police clinical psychologist Fung Ho-kin said. Hundreds of women were targeted, including 200 students. 'The victims will suffer varying degrees of mental trauma,' Fung said. The suspects are aged from 20 to 62 and have been charged with a range of offences, including conspiracy to 'publish intimate images without consent'. — AFP
Malay Mail
4 hours ago
- Malay Mail
RM336,000 in false claims lands ex-military man a RM48,000 fine in Labuan
LABUAN, Jan 24 — The Labuan Special Corruption Court today fined a former Malaysian Armed Forces (MAF) veteran RM48,000 after he pleaded guilty to 12 alternative charges of submitting false documents in claims exceeding RM336,000. Fairuzul Fazillah Musa, formerly attached to MAF Labuan, had initially been charged under Section 471, read with Section 468 of the Penal Code. He was accused of using forged documents as genuine in claims for local training and annual honorarium allowances between January 2015 and February 2016. The prosecution later offered 12 alternative charges under Section 471 read with Section 465 of the Penal Code, to which he pleaded guilty. Judge Jason Juga also imposed a fine of RM4,000 on each charge, in default four months' imprisonment, amounting to RM48,000, which was fully settled by the accused. Deputy public prosecutor Joe Randy Juster appeared for the prosecution, while the accused was unrepresented. — Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
4 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Court annuls land transfers over RM9.5mil loan
The Court of Appeal ordered the re-transfer of 16 properties to AJ Kasturi Sdn Bhd and MA Joseph Capital Sdn Bhd, with damages to be assessed, and costs of RM320,000. PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has unanimously ordered the re-transfer of 16 properties to two companies, ruling that the assets were unlawfully pledged as collateral to secure an illegal RM9.5 million loan. Delivering the broad grounds of judgment, Justice Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin said the property transactions were null and void as the loans – given by eight individuals and one company to AJ Kasturi Sdn Bhd and MA Joseph Capital Sdn Bhd – were illegal moneylending transactions. 'The Moneylenders Act 1951 exists to protect borrowers and cannot be circumvented,' he said in allowing appeals brought by AJ Kasturi and MA Joseph Capital. The appeals court set aside a High Court ruling after the two borrower companies successfully established that the 16 sales and purchase agreements (SPAs) were a sham. 'The trial judge erred in law and facts, which warrants appellate intervention,' said Fairuz. The bench also set aside judgment for vacant possession, outstanding rental and damages entered by the High Court in favour of the lenders on their counterclaim. AJ Kasturi and MA Joseph Capital were also awarded general, exemplary and aggravated damages to be assessed by the High Court and RM320,000 in costs. Fairuz said the trial judge was wrong to conclude that the transactions were genuine property sales dealings. The panel was chaired by Justice Nazlan Ghazali, with Justice Faizah Jamaludin sitting as its other member. According to the facts of the case, the two companies had wanted to raise funds urgently for a property acquisition in 2014 after their application for a bank loan was rejected. A representative of the companies then approached lawyer M Pannirselvam who offered to arrange a loan with interest charged at 4% per month. The companies agreed and pledged the properties progressively as security for the loan. The lawyer and the lenders relied heavily on an instrument called a 'letter of option' which the appeals court held was questionable and defied commercial logic. The 'letter of option' was not executed by the lenders. The company repaid the loan in part but subsequently defaulted, whereupon the lawyer facilitated transfers of the properties to the lenders. Dissatisfied, the companies filed three suits to recover the properties, all of which were dismissed by the High Court, giving rise to the present appeal. Lawyers Hariharan Tara Singh and Tan Eng Seng represented the companies, while counsel R Thayalan appeared for the lawyer. Ringo Low and Faiz Abdul Rahim appeared for the lenders.
