
China's clumsy sea aggression marks escalation with Philippines
Photos show the damage sustained by China Coast Guard vessel 3104 after it was rammed by a Chinese PLA Navy warship during an incident Monday morning, August 11, 2025, near Scarborough Shoal. The collision occurred while the two Chinese ships were harassing the BRP Suluan of the Philippine Coast Guard. Image: YouTube Screengrabs
MANILA – China's pincer strategy in the South China Sea appears to have shifted toward more aggressive naval enforcement of its claim to Philippine territory, Philippine armed forces chief General Romeo Brawner said Tuesday (August 12).
That move backfired on August 11 after a China People's Liberation Army Navy ship accidentally rammed into a China Coast Guard (CCG) vessel while harassing a Filipino coast guard boat near the contested Scarborough Shoal, which is situated within the Philippines' exclusive economic zone.
While China has been harassing Philippine vessels in the sea for years – even in waters that are clearly within Manila's territorial EEZ – it has never directly involved the PLA Navy in the conflict.
This week's harassment indicates that Beijing has raised the level of its aggression, short of signaling an open conflict with the Philippines, the United States' long-time strategic ally in the region.
'We can see here a change in China's tactic,' Brawner told reporters in Manila. 'They are now deploying their PLA Navy. This symbolizes China's aggressiveness.'
'They claim that we are causing trouble in the West Philippine Sea, but we clearly saw yesterday the opposite, because they continue to claim Bajo de Masinloc or Scarborough Shoal as their own territory.'
Lying just 125 nautical miles (232 kilometers) from the Philippines' main island of Luzon, the shoal has long been a traditional fishing ground for generations of local fishermen.
Beijing, however, claims historical rights to the shoal because it is inside its so-called nine-dash line map, which experts argue is illegal under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS).
The shoal has been under de facto Chinese control since 2012. Manila took Beijing to an international court of arbitration in 2013, and three years later, it ruled in favor of the Philippines, a victory that was cheered by the international community led by the United States and other Western powers.
China ignored the ruling, which lacked an enforcement mechanism, and accused Washington of seeking to cause discord in the region. The Philippines is a strategic military ally of Washington, with a mutual defense agreement dating back to 1951 that binds both nations to come to each other's aid in times of foreign aggression.
Recently, both countries refined the coverage of the treaty to cover acts of war to include hostilities in the South China Sea, even as Filipino officials have stressed that the time has not yet come for Manila to invoke the treaty.
On Tuesday, Brawner was emphatic. The country, he said, cannot agree to China's position because the Philippines 'is backed up by law.' 'The 2016 arbitral ruling states that China's nine-dash line is baseless,' Brawner said. 'So they cannot claim Bajo de Masinloc.'
He said it was clear on Monday that the PLA Navy had intended to ram the tiny Philippine Coast Guard boat. 'That is the assessment of our Philippine Coast Guard. It was a good thing that our coast guard was fast and the two Chinese vessels hit each other.'
Brawner said China would now be hard-pressed to offer any counter narrative on this week's incident. 'What happed there was their fault, because it was caused by their aggressive maneuvers,' he said. 'We were just there to protect our Filipino fishermen that are there in Scarborough Shoal. That is our only goal, because that is our traditional fishing ground.'
BRP Suluan, the Philippine vessel, had outmaneuvered the Chinese Navy ship and a Chinese Coast vessel, with bow number 3104, leading to a collision between the chasing Chinese watercraft. The Chinese Navy ship hit and caused substantial damage on the forward portion of the CCG vessel.
Suluan was in the area to distribute fuel and ice to the Filipino fishermen in the area. It was initially harassed with a water cannon, but the 'seamanship skills by PCG crew members allowed the vessel to successfully evade from getting hit,' the coast guard said.
'Fortunately, the (Philippine) Coast Guard was fast and evaded the PLA Navy and Chinese Coast Guard. This lead to the collision between the two Chinese vessels,' said Brawner.China has used its Coast Guard and maritime militia to harass PCG and even Filipino-flagged vessels in the West Philippine Sea in recent years.Brawner said the military was meeting soon with the leadership of the PCG to discuss future actions in dealing with situations similar to Monday's incident.'Of course, we're also going to seek guidance from our President because of what has happened,' said Brawner without saying when the meeting will take place.'We're going to discuss future actions, future tactics to counter what China is doing to prevent us from getting close to Bajo de Masinloc,' said Brawner, referring to the Scarborough Shoal.
One of the options, Brawner said, is to send Philippine Navy ships nearer to the shoal to ensure the safety of the PCG when doing humanitarian missions in the area, noting that the Navy has been staying at a far distance from the shoal.
Navy spokesman for the West Philippine Sea Rear Admiral Roy Vincent Trinidad, meanwhile, said similar mishaps may occur in the future if China does not cease such illegal actions in the contested area.'So long as they will maintain their ICAD (illegal, coercive, aggressive and deceptive) activities and presence, incidents like this may happen again in the future,' said Trinidad.Asked if they expected China to be more aggressive in preventing a Philippine presence in the vicinity of the shoal following the incident Monday, Trinidad said: 'We do not speculate. We do not anticipate but so long as they have their illegal presence, their coercive and aggressive actions will continue.'Trinidad implied that the harassment against the PCG vessel was not enough for the Navy to step in. He said military units are government by rules of engagement, or 'rules that governs the use of force for mission accomplishment.''The Chief of Staff has been very clear that in all operations in the West Philippine Sea to include Bajo De Masinloc, the use of force for mission accomplishment is not authorized without infringing on the universal right of self-defense, defense of one's unit or defense of others,' said Trinidad.
'The guidance has been very clear in conducting our aerial missions, in conducting our patrols, maritime patrols, air surveillance flights. The use of force is not authorized except for self-defense situations,' added Trinidad.
Jason Gutierrez was head of Philippine news at BenarNews, an online news service affiliated with Radio Free Asia (RFA), a Washington-based news organization that covered many under-reported countries in the region. A veteran foreign correspondent, he has also worked with The New York Times and Agence France-Presse (AFP).
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


HKFP
16 minutes ago
- HKFP
NGOs urge UK to probe Telegraph newspaper sale over ‘China' ties
The UK government must investigate The Telegraph newspaper's sale to US investment group RedBird Capital and the risks of China's influence, human rights and freedom of expression groups demanded Wednesday. An open letter addressed to UK media minister Lisa Nandy, signed by nine organisations including Human Rights in China and Hong Kong Watch, alleged 'RedBird Capital's ties to China … threaten media pluralism, transparency, and information integrity in the UK'. RedBird Capital chair John Thornton sits on the advisory council of the China Investment Corporation, the country's largest sovereign wealth fund, the letter noted. In May RedBird agreed to buy the Telegraph Media Group (TMG), comprising the 170-year-old paper's print and online operations, for £500 million (US$678 million). Wednesday's letter provides a new twist to The Telegraph takeover saga, already marked by UK government intervention over foreign press influence. US-Emirati consortium RedBird IMI, comprising Redbird Capital, struck a deal for TMG in late 2023. However, the previous UK government triggered a swift resale amid concern over the potential impact on freedom of speech given Abu Dhabi's press censorship record. 'Pending robust investigations, the (new) planned merger should be placed on hold,' NGOs, including also Article 19 and Free Tibet, stated in Wednesday's letter. 'We believe that there is reasonable ground to suspect the Telegraph acquisition by RedBird Capital raises both public interest and potential foreign media influence concerns,' it added. RedBird Capital Partners rejected accusations of China's influence. 'There is no Chinese involvement or influence in RedBird Capital's proposed acquisition of the Telegraph,' a spokesperson said in a statement emailed to AFP. 'After two years of regulatory limbo, it is now time to close this acquisition and finally position The Telegraph for growth.' The UK government had yet to respond.


South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
PLA ‘warns off' US ship near Scarborough Shoal, China property woes: SCMP daily highlights
Catch up on some of SCMP's biggest China stories of the day. If you would like to see more of our reporting, please consider subscribing A US destroyer has entered disputed waters in the South China Sea, less than two days after an apparent collision involving a Chinese coastguard vessel and a PLA Navy ship while the former was pursuing a Philippine coastguard vessel in the area. Chinese scientists have boosted the speed of new hybrid crop development fivefold with a combined strategy of 'robot-friendly' gene editing and artificial intelligence-driven robotics. Illustration: Reuters China decided on Wednesday to sanction two European banks as a countermeasure against previous financial sanctions from the 27-member bloc.


South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Unlike the US, China is not trying to shut out the future
In their op-ed in The New York Times, economists David Autor and Gordon Hanson – whose work first defined the 'China Shock' – warn of a new wave of disruption, one they label 'China Shock 2.0', this time driven not by textiles or toys, but by electric vehicles (EVs), clean energy, artificial intelligence and biotechnology. The fear is that China is no longer merely catching up but is poised to overtake in sectors that once defined Western leadership. Yet the term 'China Shock 2.0' practically begs misinterpretation. Both authors clearly understand this: they speak against the reflexive protectionism that such a framing inspires and posit instead a forward-facing ideal of careful investment and subsidy. It must be stressed that today's changes are not a repeat of past disruptions. They are not about factory closures or lost jobs; they are about the construction of entirely new systems and industries. China is not here as a destabiliser, but as a builder. Today's shift, the China Shock 2.0, is better termed a future shock. And it is led by capital-intensive, hi-tech industries: EVs , solar power, wind turbines, batteries , smart grids and artificial intelligence. These sectors are not driven by low wages but by scale, supply chain integration and a relentless push for innovation driven by a series of world-leading institutions that only seem to be strengthening because of a switch away from state-led subsidies to a greater emphasis on market discipline and research-driven innovation. If the 19th century belonged to steam and the United Kingdom, and the 20th century to silicon and the United States, then the 21st century will belong to those who lead the green transition. China is doing just that. The benefits are being felt worldwide. In 2023 alone, China installed more solar capacity than the entire rest of the world combined: 1.6 times as much. It had nearly double the rest of the world's wind installations and is driving down clean energy costs worldwide. The cost of solar panels has dropped from 24 US cents per watt of capacity in 2023 to just 11 US cents in 2024. China is not so much supporting the green transition as underwriting it.