logo
Cadillac F1 Signs Deal With Driver For The 2026 Season

Cadillac F1 Signs Deal With Driver For The 2026 Season

Newsweek5 hours ago
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
The Cadillac F1 team has reportedly signed its first driver for its debut season in 2026. The second American team on the grid is currently gearing up for its F1 entry, but the drivers were the missing part of the puzzle. Now though, it appears that one driver has been signed.
RacingNews365 reported that Valtteri Bottas, who was strongly linked to the Cadillac F1 team in recent months, has been appointed by the team, and an official announcement will be made next week. Bottas paused his full-time F1 career after parting ways with Sauber following the 2024 season.
Since then, he has remained on the sidelines as a Mercedes AMG reserve driver, the team he raced for from 2017 to 2021. Being an F1 veteran, Bottas comes with immense premier class racing experience, having driven for four different teams since his F1 debut in 2013.
Cadillac will use Ferrari power units from 2026, which also marks the year when F1 enters a new era of regulations. The cars will be powered equally by two sources- an internal combustion engine running on sustainable fuel and electric power. The team plans to start using its own power units, developed by General Motors, in 2029.
People attend an event to unveil the colors for the 2026 Cadillac debut in Formula One racing, ahead of the 2025 Miami Formula One Grand Prix, in Miami Beach, Florida, on May 3, 2025.
People attend an event to unveil the colors for the 2026 Cadillac debut in Formula One racing, ahead of the 2025 Miami Formula One Grand Prix, in Miami Beach, Florida, on May 3, 2025.
Giorgio VIERA / AFP/Getty Images
But given its technical partnership with Ferrari, Cadillac will likely run Testing of Previous Cars sessions with both its drivers towards the end of 2025 to make them familiar with Ferrari's power unit.
Speaking of Cadillac's second driver, it remains to be seen if the team signs former Red Bull Racing driver Sergio Perez or if it shortlists a young driver. The Mexican driver, who departed Red Bull after the 2024 season, set a condition for his F1 return in the future, suggesting that he would only race if the project appealed to him. Newsweek Sports reported Perez's comments:
"I do want to return, but only if the right project comes along, one where I feel I truly belong or should be. I don't want to come back at any cost. I'm not interested in traveling around the world as a third driver or just waiting around for an opportunity.
"I feel fortunate for the career I've had, and I do want to come back - because I don't want my career to end like this. But I'm also fully aware that I'll only return if it's truly worth the price you have to pay to be in Formula 1 - 24 races, and an entire life dedicated to the sport."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California voters support EV tax incentives, but are wary of sales mandates says poll
California voters support EV tax incentives, but are wary of sales mandates says poll

Politico

time2 minutes ago

  • Politico

California voters support EV tax incentives, but are wary of sales mandates says poll

That question again showed a partisan divide, with 80 percent of Democrats saying they back the approach, compared with 60 percent of independent voters and just 43 percent of Republicans. But the overall result bolsters Newsom's push to backfill incentives that the Biden administration used to coax drivers off fossil fuels, as he suggested using cap-and-trade revenues last year and directed state agencies to consider in a June executive order. But Jack Citrin, a veteran political science professor at UC Berkeley and partner on the poll, said a closer look at the poll results shows that Democrats need to keep affordability in mind. He pointed to the fact that 28 percent of respondents said they'd support new EV incentives only if gas prices aren't impacted and another 20 percent said they should be reserved for low-income buyers, reflecting the fact that cost of living was the top concern of voters polled. And 64 percent of respondents said gasoline prices are putting a significant, extreme or moderate burden on their household budgets. 'That reflects a concern with the cost of all of this,' Citrin said. 'Yes, we're for environmental protection. Yes, we're for all of this, just as long as it doesn't cost a lot.' The poll comes as state agencies released a joint report Tuesday with recommendations for countering Trump's assault, calling on lawmakers to bolster tax incentives, improve charging infrastructure and regulate facilities that attract polluting trucks, but offering few specific timelines or dollar figures. CARB Chair Liane Randolph framed the report — which Newsom asked for in his June order — as a first step in the state's defense against a hostile federal government. 'Clean air efforts are under siege, putting the health of every American at risk,' she said during a press briefing. 'California is continuing to fight back and will not give up on cleaner air and better public health.' Sperling called the report a surprisingly 'modest document,' and said it lacks the specificity he hoped to see.

CFP committee adding weight to games against strong opponents, limit reward for beating weak foes
CFP committee adding weight to games against strong opponents, limit reward for beating weak foes

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

CFP committee adding weight to games against strong opponents, limit reward for beating weak foes

The College Football Playoff selection committee announced Wednesday it will place more emphasis on strength of schedule this year when determining which teams make the 12-team field. The committee said in a statement that the schedule strength metric has been adjusted to apply greater weight to games against strong opponents. An additional metric, record strength, has been added to go beyond a team's schedule strength to assess how a team performed against that schedule. 'This metric rewards teams defeating high-quality opponents while minimizing the penalty for losing to such a team,' the committee said. 'Conversely, these changes will provide minimal reward for defeating a lower-quality opponent while imposing a greater penalty for losing to such a team.' The adjustment to the evaluation process comes after some in the Southeastern Conference complained about last season's inclusion of — at the time of selections — an 11-2 SMU of the Atlantic Coast Conference over a 9-3 Alabama or even a 9-3 South Carolina or 9-3 Mississippi. SMU's losses were to an unranked BYU and a ranked Clemson in the ACC championship game. Alabama had bad losses against Vanderbilt and Oklahoma, both .500 at the time, but also had wins over a second-ranked Georgia, No. 21 Missouri and No. 14 LSU. Prompted by concerns about how teams that don't play in conference championship games are judged, the committee reviewed the movement of idle teams from the second-to-last ranking to final ranking. The selection committee reaffirmed that movement in the final week should be evidence-based and did not recommend creating a formal policy prohibiting such movement. The committee also updated its policy on recusal of selection committee members. A member will be fully recused from the evaluation of a team if he or she receives direct compensation from the school in question or has an immediate family member who is a football player, football staff member or senior administrator at the school. A fully recused member is not allowed to participate in any deliberations or vote concerning that school. A member will be partially recused if he or she has a secondary relationship with the school in question, such as an immediate family member employed by the institution but outside of the football program or senior administration. A partially recused member may remain present and participate in discussions related to the team in question but is not allowed to participate in votes involving the team. The selection committee will release its five weekly Top 25 rankings on Nov. 4. The final rankings and playoff field will be announced Dec. 7. ___ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college football: and

CFP committee adding weight to games against strong opponents, limit reward for beating weak foes
CFP committee adding weight to games against strong opponents, limit reward for beating weak foes

Associated Press

time32 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

CFP committee adding weight to games against strong opponents, limit reward for beating weak foes

The College Football Playoff selection committee announced Wednesday it will place more emphasis on strength of schedule this year when determining which teams make the 12-team field. The committee said in a statement that the schedule strength metric has been adjusted to apply greater weight to games against strong opponents. An additional metric, record strength, has been added to go beyond a team's schedule strength to assess how a team performed against that schedule. 'This metric rewards teams defeating high-quality opponents while minimizing the penalty for losing to such a team,' the committee said. 'Conversely, these changes will provide minimal reward for defeating a lower-quality opponent while imposing a greater penalty for losing to such a team.' The adjustment to the evaluation process comes after some in the Southeastern Conference complained about last season's inclusion of — at the time of selections — an 11-2 SMU of the Atlantic Coast Conference over a 9-3 Alabama or even a 9-3 South Carolina or 9-3 Mississippi. SMU's losses were to an unranked BYU and a ranked Clemson in the ACC championship game. Alabama had bad losses against Vanderbilt and Oklahoma, both .500 at the time, but also had wins over a second-ranked Georgia, No. 21 Missouri and No. 14 LSU. Prompted by concerns about how teams that don't play in conference championship games are judged, the committee reviewed the movement of idle teams from the second-to-last ranking to final ranking. The selection committee reaffirmed that movement in the final week should be evidence-based and did not recommend creating a formal policy prohibiting such movement. The committee also updated its policy on recusal of selection committee members. A member will be fully recused from the evaluation of a team if he or she receives direct compensation from the school in question or has an immediate family member who is a football player, football staff member or senior administrator at the school. A fully recused member is not allowed to participate in any deliberations or vote concerning that school. A member will be partially recused if he or she has a secondary relationship with the school in question, such as an immediate family member employed by the institution but outside of the football program or senior administration. A partially recused member may remain present and participate in discussions related to the team in question but is not allowed to participate in votes involving the team. The selection committee will release its five weekly Top 25 rankings on Nov. 4. The final rankings and playoff field will be announced Dec. 7. ___ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here. AP college football: and

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store