logo
What are Americans' morning struggles?

What are Americans' morning struggles?

New York Post05-06-2025
Two in five Americans are 'bad' at mornings, according to new research.
The survey of 2,000 general population Americans revealed 38% agreed with this sentiment — and respondents get out of bed later than planned an average of eight times per month.
Advertisement
For one in 10 respondents, this happens more than 20 times per month.
When they're rushing through their morning routine, after staying in bed longer than planned, respondents were most likely to skip eating breakfast (41%).
But others will neglect their personal hygiene: 16% will skip showering, while 11% will go about their day without brushing their teeth.
5 The average alarm user sets two alarms in the morning, and a fifth will hit snooze at least three times before they actually get up out of bed according to new research.
Ana Blazic Pavlovic – stock.adobe.com
Advertisement
Commissioned by Avocado Green Mattress and conducted by Talker Research, the survey also looked at respondents' alarm habits. Less than half (43%) use an alarm to wake up in the morning — and for these respondents, the results revealed their first alarm goes off at 6:33 a.m.
Younger generations were more likely to rely on an alarm: While just a fifth (19%) of baby boomers set an alarm, 63% of Gen Z and millennials do the same.
Across ages, the average alarm user sets two alarms in the morning, and a fifth will hit snooze at least three times before they actually get up out of bed.
5 The survey revealed that less than half of the people who participated (43%) use an alarm to wake up in the morning
SWNS
Advertisement
The survey also split respondents by early birds and night owls to see how that impacts their alarm habits and their sleep overall. Two-thirds (67%) of early birds who use an alarm said it's 'very effective' at getting them out of bed on time — compared to just half (52%) of night owls.
Early birds were more likely to use a 'standard' or preset alarm sound (70% vs. 58%), while night owls were more likely to have an 'annoying' sound — like a fire alarm or honking cars — to wake them up (20% vs. 12%).
Unsurprisingly, night owls were more likely to struggle to get out of bed on time (54% vs. 17%). Night owls were also more likely to say their body needs more sleep than they're currently getting (70% vs. 55%).
That's despite the two groups getting about the same amount of sleep — right around six and a half hours per night.
Advertisement
'Whether you're a morning person or a night owl, quality sleep is non-negotiable,' said Laura Scott, Director of Brand Marketing at Avocado Green Mattress. 'Your natural sleep rhythm should be supported — not disrupted — by an environment designed for deep, restorative rest.'
5 51% of Americans are 'bad' at sleep due to their own anxieties keeping them awake.
SWNS
The top reason Americans aren't getting enough sleep? Their own worries are keeping them up (51%).
That was followed by a sleep condition (like insomnia, sleep apnea, etc.) (30%) and nightmares or stress dreams (20%).
Also in the top five was an uncomfortable bed or mattress making it more difficult to sleep (19%) and loud noises outside (14%) keeping respondents awake.
5 Sleep conditions, nightmares, uncomfortable mattresses, and loud noises are other significant sleep deterrents.
Prostock-studio – stock.adobe.com
While night owls (35%) and early birds (37%) were almost equally likely to struggle to stay asleep, night owls were more likely to face other difficulties.
This included going to bed later than they 'should' in the evening (48% vs. 24%), struggling to fall asleep (44% vs. 27%) and staying in bed longer than they 'should' in the morning (25% vs. 8%).
Advertisement
5 Creating a stable sleep habits is very important for daily living.
Elnur – stock.adobe.com
'So many of us lie awake at night, our minds racing with worry or stress,' said Scott. 'That's why it's so important to create sleep spaces and habits that are calm and supportive — so you can wake up feeling like yourself again.'
Survey methodology:
Talker Research surveyed 2,000 general population Americans; the survey was commissioned by Avocado Green Mattress and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between May 9–15, 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Piercing your kids' ears puts them at risk for this allergy — the EU even has laws for it
Piercing your kids' ears puts them at risk for this allergy — the EU even has laws for it

New York Post

time36 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Piercing your kids' ears puts them at risk for this allergy — the EU even has laws for it

Tiny studs, big trouble? Parents itching to pierce their kids' ears might want to put down the needle — a growing body of research suggests the popular practice could cost more than just a few tears. 'Delay ear piercings in young girls,' Dr. Niha Qamar (@doctor._.q), a board-certified allergist and immunologist, said in a recent TikTok, warning it could increase the risk of a serious, lifelong allergy. Dr. Niha Qamar is a board-certified allergist based in New York. TikTok/@doctor._.q Nationwide, nickel is the leading cause of allergic contact dermatitis — a red, itchy rash that flares up when the skin touches a normally harmless material. Roughly 1.1 million American children are affected by a nickel sensitivity, and studies show that number has quadrupled over the past 30 years. Researchers say early ear piercings are a major factor. In a Swedish study of 960 schoolgirls aged 8 to 15, researchers found that 'the ones who had ear piercings had 13% nickel allergy, versus 1% of the girls who didn't have ear piercings,' Qamar said. Another study out of Finland showed that 31% of pierced kids had a reaction to nickel — compared to just 2% of those without. And in the US, a study found that just 4% of men with no piercings were sensitive to nickel, while 11.1% and 14% of those with one or multiple piercings, respectively, were affected. 'Europe actually passed legislation to decrease the amount of nickel in jewelry (for this reason),' Qamar said. Many Americans get their ears pieced as infants or young children. deltahman – That regulation, the Nickel Directive, was introduced by the European Union in 1994 to limit how much nickel can leach from items like earrings. In the years since, countries like Denmark have reported major drops in sensitization, along with an estimated $2 billion in related health care savings. Nickel allergy isn't deadly, but it can make life miserable. Reactions may include hives, cracked skin, burning, itching and discoloration. More severe symptoms can strike when someone eats nickel-rich foods or has a metal device implanted. Blisters, diarrhea, fatigue, headaches and full-body swelling are all on the table. With no cure, managing symptoms becomes a lifelong battle — and avoiding nickel isn't easy, since it lurks in everything from jewelry and belt buckles to bra hooks and braces. Some people require treatment, which can include medication and even light therapy. With nickel sensitization on the rise in the US, major medical groups are calling for tighter regulations like those already in place in Europe. In 2020, the American Academy of Pediatrics urged the federal government to crack down on nickel in clothing and jewelry. 'The burden of symptoms and cost is high,' the policy statement notes. 'The United States can act on EU data revealing that legislation to limit exposures in childhood, especially with earrings, can impact the prevalence and potentially the severity of disease.' Until then, Qamar says parents should play it safe and hold off on piercing their kids' ears. 'If your child is getting pieced ears, get jewelry that is nickel free,' she recommended. 'That will reduce the risk of nickel sensitization.'

The Great Shift: How Gen Z is reshaping the future of nursing
The Great Shift: How Gen Z is reshaping the future of nursing

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

The Great Shift: How Gen Z is reshaping the future of nursing

It's no longer a "coming trend" - Gen Z nurses have arrived, and they're already changing the dynamics of the U.S. nursing workforce. Born between the mid-1990s and early 2010s, this is the most racially and ethnically diverse generation in American history and the first to grow up entirely in the digital age. They enter the world of registered nurses, a profession with deep traditions and high-pressure demands. Yet they carry with them a distinctly modern set of priorities: flexible scheduling, mental health resources, technology that works for them, and a sustainable work-life balance. Many Gen Z RNs completed their education and clinical training during the COVID-19 pandemic, stepping into hospitals and clinics in a time of crisis. The urgency of that period shaped their perspective. They believe nursing is meaningful work, but it cannot come at the expense of their health, autonomy, and professional growth. That shift is challenging employers to rethink long-standing nursing workforce norms and update their healthcare staffing strategies. The alternative - continuing with business as usual - risks losing this generation to burnout or career changes, worsening an already critical shortage. A 2024 study from the NCSBN (National Council of State Boards of Nursing) reported that more than 138,000 registered nurses had left the workforce since 2022 and 40% (1.6 million nurses) plan to exit the workforce by 2029. In the same period, the median age of RNs increased from 46 to 50 and the number of nurses reporting a change in job setting increased by 4%. Vivian Health shares how healthcare organizations must adapt their retention strategies for registered nurses to meet the expectations of Generation Z and secure the future of patient care. 1. Explore Flexibility in Scheduling To provide round-the-clock coverage, hospitals and clinics often rely on long, fixed shifts and rotating schedules designed more around staffing efficiency than staff choice. Even off the clock, many RNs remain on call for their employers. But for Gen Z, flexibility is a central measure of job satisfaction, ranking alongside - or above - pay. According to Kaylee Parker, BSN, RN, and Senior Customer Success Manager at Vivian Health, this has proven true for younger nurses in her experience. "[Gen Z nurses are] more willing to trade traditional 12-hour shifts for shorter, mixed, or set schedules if it means better work-life balance, says Parker. "They're more likely to request self-scheduling, predictable rotations, or the option to swap shifts digitally. While older generations often accepted overtime as part of the job, many Gen Z nurses draw clearer boundaries and are more vocal about avoiding burnout." Employers are testing flexible nurse scheduling systems that allow more input from the nurses over shift selection and offer shorter or split shifts to reduce fatigue. Allowing nurses to have some control over the shifts they work (including preferences for days off or working consecutive days, flexibility for unit-specific needs, and providing transparency) greatly improves the level of reported job satisfaction. Technology may be able to help too. Some health systems are adopting AI-powered staffing tools to anticipate patient surges and match available nurses accordingly. Flexible scheduling is not just an HR perk - it's becoming a competitive advantage in nurse recruitment. 2. Make Mental Health Support a Core Job Benefit Gallup research shows that 68% of Gen Z reports feeling stressed "a lot of the time." For nurses, that's layered on top of high patient loads, life-and-death decision-making, and exposure to employers are beginning to treat mental health resources as core infrastructure, including: On-site counseling for immediate support networks to create safe spaces for shared sessions after critical incidents. By normalizing these supports in hiring, during onboarding, and in everyday operations, employers signal that their nurses' well-being is a priority and part of the job description - not a personal luxury. 3. Integrate Better Healthcare Technology That Actually Helps Nurses Nurses need tools that work, and those tools must enhance patient care rather than create administrative headaches. Gen Z nurses, as digital natives, are less tolerant of outdated or inefficient systems. Modern nursing is being transformed by new technology designed to improve efficiency, boost patient safety, and reduce nurse workload. Smart IV pumps automate accurate medication delivery through built-in dose error reduction, reducing the need for constant manual monitoring by nurses. Smart beds enhance both comfort and safety by repositioning patients, detecting attempts to exit, and syncing data directly to electronic health records, reducing manual documentation and preventing fall risks. Electronic Health Records (EHRs) centralize clinical documentation, support AI-powered alerts, provide mobile charting options, and streamline team communication, helping nurses focus more on patient care. Across the board, these innovations reduce manual work, accelerate decision-making, and contribute to more efficient, coordinated nursing workflows. Organizations investing in these improvements can market themselves to job seekers as innovation-driven workplaces. 4. Redefine Work-Life Balance in Nursing The leading causes of nurses leaving the workforce are "stress and burnout" and "workload," but for Gen Z, work-life balance for nurses is not just a factor - it's often a deal-breaker. The profession's traditional schedules - with unpredictable shifts and mandatory overtime - are in direct conflict with Gen Z's priorities. Some healthcare systems are taking steps toward structural change, including reducing reliance on mandatory overtime, establishing predictable rotation patterns, and expanding paid leave programs to encourage actual rest. Frontline caregivers have suggested adopting rotating shift schedules, allowing remote charting, and even offering "mental health days" that don't count against vacation or sick leave, as changes that could help staff better manage personal needs without compromising patient care. 5. Offer Meaningful Career Development The cultural dimension of nursing workforce trends is just as important as operational ones. The #1 takeaway from a 2024 Forbes article about Gen Z's impact on the workforce is that Gen Z employees place a premium on feeling that they are doing meaningful work and making a positive impact. However, traditional career ladders in nursing often lead to administrative or management roles. Gen Z is reshaping advancement expectations and wants growth opportunities that align with personal purpose and skill-building, not just hierarchical promotions. "Many younger nurses see nursing as a launchpad," says Parker. "They're open to leadership, advanced practice roles, or even branching into healthcare tech and policy. The new generation is more entrepreneurial. They're interested in roles that allow autonomy, creativity, and cross-disciplinary skills. Rather than staying in one unit for decades, younger nurses anticipate pivoting through multiple specialties and settings during their career. Gen Z also values transparency, collaborative problem-solving, and approachable leadership. Including frontline nurses in policy discussions, creating cross-generational mentorships, and rewarding contributions based on impact can keep engagement high. Institutions that implemented peer-support programs, frequent leadership check-ins ("leadership care rounds"), and town halls to discuss concerns found better morale and improved ability to handle stress during the crisis. Why These Adaptations Matter The arrival of Gen Z nurses coincides with one of the most challenging staffing landscapes in modern healthcare. Retention is not just about filling schedules - it's about sustaining the profession's capacity to deliver safe, high-quality care. The nursing workforce trends shaping today's hospitals and clinics are driven by both demographic shifts and the lived experiences of these new professionals. Healthcare employers who embrace flexible nurse scheduling, invest in mental health in nursing, commit to nursing technology integration, and prioritize work-life balance for nurses aren't just responding to Gen Z demands - they're building resilience into their organizations. This story was produced by Vivian Health and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. © Stacker Media, LLC.

Millions More Americans Are Being Exposed to Contaminated Water
Millions More Americans Are Being Exposed to Contaminated Water

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Millions More Americans Are Being Exposed to Contaminated Water

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New data released by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has shown that millions more Americans are drinking water that is contaminated with carcinogenic chemicals, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) reported. The findings come as part of the EPA's Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, known as UCMR 5, requiring U.S. water utilities to test drinking water for 29 individual PFAS compounds. PFAS chemicals, a group of thousands of different substances, are classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and have previously been found in U.S. drinking water systems. Newsweek has contacted the EPA via email for comment. Why It Matters PFAS chemicals, also known as "forever chemicals," are used across various industries, featuring in consumer products and even smartwatch wristbands. While these chemicals are favored for their long-lasting nature, research highlighting their potential health risks has been accumulating in recent years. Other than PFAS chemicals, arsenic contamination in U.S. drinking water systems has also become a growing concern across the country. File photo: a person fills a glass of water from the tap. File photo: a person fills a glass of water from the tap. Hendrik Schmidt/dpa via AP What To Know Jared Hayes, a senior policy analyst at EWG, told Newsweek the EPA's latest release of data confirmed the presence of at least one type of PFAS compound in an additional 200 locations—which in total serve 7 million people. He added that, based on previously collected UCMR and state data, it is now clear that more than 172 million Americans are being exposed to PFAS-contaminated drinking water. The EPA previously wrote in a fact sheet that long-term PFAS exposure "can cause cancer and other serious illnesses that decrease quality of life or result in death." Studies have also found that even low levels of exposure to the chemicals can have wide-reaching impacts on multiple systems in the body. While these numbers "are not entirely surprising given what we know about the persistence and mobility of PFAS in the environment," Vasilis Vasiliou, chair and professor of environmental health sciences at Yale School of Public Health, told Newsweek, it "underscores the magnitude of the problem." He added the findings showed "PFAS contamination is both widespread and underreported." However, Marc Edwards, a professor in civil and environmental engineering at Virginia Tech, told Newsweek, on the flipside, "We already knew that PFAS chemicals are very widespread—the new data just confirms that expectation." He added the EPA is taking steps to reduce PFAS exposure, and "as our understanding improves and new treatments become available, we'll get a better understanding of what to do about it," he said. Additionally, it is not clear to what degree these additional water utilities were contaminated with PFAS chemicals, Natalie Exum, a professor of environmental health and engineering at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told Newsweek. "These chemicals are designed to never breakdown so we should expect that over time every water system in the U.S. will ultimately be contaminated," she said. "I will be more concerned when we can understand at what amounts they are occurring in drinking water and what health effects we are finding at those levels," she added. What People Are Saying Susan Richardson, a professor of chemistry at the University of South Carolina, told Newsweek: "There is the possibility for adverse health outcomes, but I personally would not be concerned at low parts-per-trillion levels. The good news is that drinking water plants will have to meet the new EPA regulation by 2031, and many plants will use granular activated carbon (GAC) to remove it. GAC can also remove natural organic matter precursors to disinfection by-products that are generally present in our drinking water at a thousand times higher levels than PFAS. So, there should be a great co-benefit of using GAC." Jennifer Freeman, a professor of toxicology at Purdue University, Indiana, told Newsweek: "It is very important PFAS drinking water testing continues so we can attain a fuller understanding of where the contamination is occurring and where treatment methods may be needed to reduce exposures." She said: "It is likely already impacting health outcomes across the country with these exposures likely occurring over the past several decades. On the positive side, as drinking water testing continues we now have a better understanding of the PFAS presence in our drinking water supplies and are identifying the regions where contamination is higher and action is needed." Vasiliou told Newsweek: "Chronic exposure to PFAS, even at low levels, has been linked in multiple studies to serious health outcomes, including certain cancers, immune dysfunction, thyroid disease, liver toxicity, and developmental effects. The sheer scale of potential exposure means this could become a major public health challenge in the years ahead. Addressing PFAS contamination is not just an environmental issue, it is a public health imperative." He said: "As monitoring expands, I expect even more communities will be identified, since PFAS are extremely persistent and widespread. What we need now is stronger regulation, expanded monitoring, investment in water treatment, and a rapid phase-out of non-essential PFAS uses." Exum told Newsweek: "PFAS gets into drinking water in so many different ways and over time as they are spread in sewage sludge, sprayed in pesticides, and even travel in rainwater, we should expect that their presence will only increase over time. But their presence may be in low levels depending on the source of contamination, and that is the important question to answer. And it gets answered by the EPA taking action to both regulate these chemicals for their known harms and for the agency to fund the science to understand the public health implications for exposures to these chemicals." She added: "Overall, with more PFAS exposure we should expect to see more cancer, harm to fetal development and reduced vaccine effectiveness, among others. The public needs to be aware and concerned and advocating to their elected officials for the EPA not to weaken the landmark PFAS protections in drinking water." What Happens Next The EPA is expected to release more UCMR 5 results in the coming months. For those who are concerned, Richardson said "activated carbon filters that are certified to remove PFAS" can be used to filter drinking water to reduce exposure.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store