logo
Reversing austerity: How Budget 3.0 can restore educational integrity and infrastructure in South Africa.

Reversing austerity: How Budget 3.0 can restore educational integrity and infrastructure in South Africa.

Daily Maverick15-05-2025

More than 23,000 posts in education departments have been cut, and now our classrooms are paying the price for austerity.
Budget 3.0 will be tabled on 21 May 2025 — a historic moment for our nation's democracy, which had until now failed to meaningfully challenge many of the National Treasury's regressive decisions.
While we welcome the ruling that declared the proposed fiscal framework that contained a regressive VAT increase as unlawful, it is only the beginning. We must remain steadfast in our efforts to hold the Treasury accountable to all its constitutional obligations. The new Budget cannot continue on an austere path, which systematically dismantles the public infrastructure and services upon which the most vulnerable depend.
Nowhere is the damage of austerity more visible — or more devastating — than in our social services, particularly education, where the effects are especially acute. The constitutional right to basic education — an immediately realisable right — has been eroded by years of budget cuts, staffing reductions, and chronic underfunding. Politicians often repeat the refrain that the government must 'trim the fat', but what has been slashed over the past decade is not excess — it is the very muscle of our public education system.
These cuts have gutted the core of teaching and learning: fewer teachers, overcrowded classrooms, inadequate infrastructure, and limited support services. The result is a generation of learners denied not just quality education, but the tools to fully realise their potential in a democratic society.
Austerity is driving teachers out of the classroom
Perhaps the most devastating impact has been on our teaching workforce. As we mark Workers' Month, we are confronted with the catastrophic reality of plummeting headcounts in the public education sector. Education departments' most recent annual reports show that 477,774 posts were occupied in the 2023/24 financial year. By the end of January 2025, this had decreased to 454,640. This means that in one financial year, more than 23,000 — almost 5% — of warm bodies in the public education workforce were decimated. When including funded but vacant positions, the number rises to more than 46,000 — nearly 8.5% of the workforce stripped away.
Those who remain do so under increasingly arduous conditions: overcrowded classrooms, chronic shortages of materials, and mounting administrative burdens. Many teachers now work far beyond their contracted hours, effectively subsidising the education system with their unpaid labour. Furthermore, the Treasury's R11-billion retirement incentive for public sector workers will probably accelerate this exodus by encouraging a wave of early retirements without a parallel plan to fill the gaps. This is not a profession in decline by choice — teachers want to teach. Austerity has created a crisis where experienced educators are leaving the profession in droves, while fewer young people see teaching as a viable career path.
Unfunded mandates, unrealised rights
It is deeply contradictory for the government to be cutting education posts while at the same time increasing its obligations to learners. Since the Bela Bill was signed into law in 2024, Grade R has become a legal obligation. Yet no corresponding funding has been allocated to support its implementation — there is no budget to increase teacher headcounts or equip schools with the infrastructure and resources needed to accommodate this expanded intake.
Parliament should not pass budgets with unfunded mandates — they undermine the rule of law and put constitutional rights at risk. The underfunding of Grade R is a clear and urgent example.
Budget 3.0 must end the infrastructure crisis in schools
The physical infrastructure of our schools tells an equally troubling story. It has been 12 years and counting for the government to eradicate pit latrines from all schools, which were officially declared illegal under the Norms and Standards for School Infrastructure. Despite legal guarantees, many students still attend schools without adequate sanitation, a reliable water supply, or safe buildings.
In 2023, the Department of Basic Education estimated that it would need approximately R42-billion each year to eliminate all backlogs and have well-functioning school infrastructure in all public schools by 2030. Even if current spending plans are protected against the VAT shortfall, the government will spend an annual average of R17.6-billion on school infrastructure over the next three years, less than half the required amount.
Even more troubling is that the government amended the Minimum Uniform Norms and Standards for Public School Infrastructure to remove critical deadlines for addressing these backlogs. This shift actively retrogresses against established frameworks to safeguard the right to education as an immediately realisable one.
Deadlines are essential for driving implementation, enabling proper planning, and securing ring-fenced funding. By scrapping them, the government has weakened accountability and signalled a retreat from its constitutional duties. While the rest of the world invests in equipping learners for a digital and knowledge-based future, South Africa's education system is still denied the minimum resources it requires to equip youth to actively participate and contribute to our future.
We stopped the VAT hike — now we must reverse the cuts
The victory against VAT increases has demonstrated that organised resistance to austerity can succeed. However, we must build on this momentum to demand not just the prevention of further cuts, but the restoration of what has been lost and investment in what should be.
Our education system needs immediate, substantial increases in funding for teacher salaries and recruitment, dignified and safe school infrastructure, learning materials, and support services. Even Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana has conceded to what we have long argued: austerity has failed to achieve its goal of reducing national debt. Instead, it has shifted the burden on to poor and working-class communities through degraded public services while economic growth stagnates.
If spending cuts have failed to deliver the promised stability or growth, then we must ask: why are we still sacrificing our teachers and our children's future at the altar of austerity? DM
Mahfouz Raffee is a researcher at Equal Education. Matshidiso Lencoasa is a budget analyst at SECTION27. Both organisations form part of the Budget Justice Coalition.
​​

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The EFF's Political Strategy: Is it Time for a Change?
The EFF's Political Strategy: Is it Time for a Change?

IOL News

time16 hours ago

  • IOL News

The EFF's Political Strategy: Is it Time for a Change?

EFF leader Julius Malema engaging President Cyril Ramaphosa in a recent parliamentary debate. Is it advisable for the EFF to be fixated on micro issues or has the time come for the party to redirect its focus on macro politics?, asks the writer. Image: Phando Jikelo/Parliament of SA Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu ON 26 July 2013, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) was established as a new political party. It promised to reshape South African politics by breathing life into parliament. This was not a voluntary decision. The party was formed following the expulsion of Julius Malema by the ANC and the subsequent exodus of other then and former ANC Youth League members who sympathized with Malema. Some of the youth who did not belong to any political party at the time saw the EFF as their political home thus giving hope about the future of this party. After the 2014 general election, the EFF emerged as one of the high performers with 25 seats in the National Assembly. It came third following the ANC and the DA which obtained 249 and 89 seats respectively. This enviable upward trajectory continued in the subsequent election in 2019 where the EFF obtained 44 seats. There was optimism that the party would continue to grow until the newly formed MKP emerged on 16 December 2023 and participated in the 2024 general election. The MKP caused an upset to the EFF which was moved to position four and to the ANC which was reduced to 159 seats or 40.18%. But one of the characteristic features of the EFF which gave it popularity was how it changed parliament through its radical stance. Soon after the EFF joined parliament, many South Africans got interested in following parliamentary proceedings. The EFF was also clear that it was going to ensure that politicians did not go to parliament to sleep. It kept its promise. Something unprecedented was when it confronted a sitting president directly and even flouted parliamentary rules. This is what happened with former President Jacob Zuma with its popular slogan 'pay back the money!' President Cyril Ramaphosa had a taste of the EFF's radical stance. Firstly, it blamed him for the Marikana massacre. Later, it took him head-on following the Phala Phala saga. Recently, the EFF was one of the political parties that successfully challenged the 2% VAT hike proposed by Minister of Finance Enoch Godongwana. Following the tabling of Budget 3.0 on 21 May 2025, the EFF approached the High Court challenging the increase of the petrol levy. Although the court dismissed the application, the EFF made its views public. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ While all these actions by the EFF should be understood in context, and while it is true that they have acted in this manner on behalf of the public, critical questions must be asked now, especially following the EFF's declined performance in the 2024 general election. Firstly, should the EFF change its tactics to rebrand itself? In life, there is no strategy that is good and effective for all times and situations. As times change, so should the strategies. With so many political parties emerging and the electorate having more options on election day, some political party strategies could easily be deemed obsolete. Secondly, is it advisable for the EFF to be fixated on micro issues or has the time come for the party to redirect its focus on macro politics? It is true that some micro issues still matter. But given what is happening in the geopolitics it would serve the EFF well to look at how it can contribute to the country's broad agenda of responding to these global issues. Thirdly, following the outcome of the 2024 general election, and given the mishaps in the current coalition government, is it still advisable for the EFF to take a firm stance that it will never work with the MKP with which it shares opposition benches? The DA swallowed its pride and is working with the ANC, which it had been publicly accusing of corruption, inefficiency, theft, and related matters. What would prevent the EFF from working with the MKP which is a new political party? Fourthly, as the EFF continues to lose some of its influential leaders such as Floyd Shivambu, Mzwanele Manyi, Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi, Adv. Dali Mpofu, and Adv. Busisiwe Mhkwebane, is it still wise to maintain a radical stance and refuse to work with like-minded political parties? Politics is a numbers game. When party support declines, and when votes go down, the party leadership must revisit its stance. The EFF can draw lessons from COPE which dropped from 30 seats to 3 seats, and then literally dissipated. Fifthly and lastly, should Malema change his leadership style? One of the concerns about the EFF in the public eye has been that his leadership style is making others uncomfortable, which results in other members leaving the organisation. Whether this accusation is true or not is neither here nor there. Perceptions matter in politics. If he were to change his leadership style, that would be good for his party. After all, Malema has done well with his leadership collective to grow the EFF to where it is today. It would be regrettable if he were to contribute to its untimely demise. The significant decline in ANC support coupled with the DA's dismal failure to capitalise on the ANC's mistakes means that chances of one political party winning with an outright majority are very slim at best and non-existent at worst. With the MKP coming into the picture and performing in the manner it did even the so-called 'tried and tested strategies' must be revisited to keep the party relevant, focused and growing. Any party which overlooks or disregards these facts would be doing so for its peril. I don't think that this is the route the EFF would like to go, especially after having worked so hard since its formation in 2013. In a nutshell, it is time for the EFF to grow. The party has made its presence felt in South African politics. It has taken bold decisions and left indelible footprints. But at times political strategies must be changed. This includes the tone, language, actions, focal points, and political alliances. * Prof. Bheki Mngomezulu is Director of the Centre for the Advancement of Non-Racialism and Democracy at Nelson Mandela University. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

Back to drawing board for 2026 revised SASSA SRD grant
Back to drawing board for 2026 revised SASSA SRD grant

The South African

time18 hours ago

  • The South African

Back to drawing board for 2026 revised SASSA SRD grant

Parliament sent back the revised SASSA SRD grant to the Department of Social Development this week. It's touted to become a Basic Income Grant for the unemployed in 2026. However, the working group wants to see urgent changes before it is approved. As such, a draft policy for the revised SASSA SRD grant was initiated with the committee for Social Protection, Community and Human Development back in November 2024. However, the committee sent it back to the DSD on Wednesday this week, citing 'affordability and economic opportunities for beneficiaries.' The none-permanent COVID-19 Social Relief of Distress grant has been extended every year since 2020. Image: File Before the new-look stipend is approved, it must survive various engagements. Like with the Office of the Presidency, National Treasury and Department of Employment and Labour. The South African Social Security Agency believes this will be concluded within a few months. From there a draft will be published for public comment. Policymakers from the DSD were told to 'better integrate pathways from income support to employment.' Currently, the grant pays out R370 each month to roughly 9-million beneficiaries living below the poverty line. However, the committee wants to see it become better 'aligned with broader economic objectives,' like jobs … South Africa's unemployment rate has only been increasing in the last decade, forcing many to exist in the informal sector. Image: File Essentially, the 2026 Basic Income Grant will be for those without jobs, but not to the point of creating long-term dependency on the grant. Therefore, the DSD and SASSA have to improve their data systems and align government programmes to make it work efficiently. Government is concerned that if and when they make the grant permanent, it must be budgeted for every year to remain viable (unlike the current R370 SRD which isn't permanent). While the department sets to work 'tightening' the revised SASSA SRD grant, it has requested that the National Treasury extend SRD for two more years. However, the Treasury has only approved the continuation of the current SRD grant until March 2026. There's simply not enough taxpayer money to ensure everyone who applies for a SASSA grant will be approved for one. Image: File In response to yet another delay to the revised SASSA SRD grant, many MPs were scathing of the DSD's work. The EFF's Noluvuyo Tafeni noted the policy has been in development for over two decades and was still not ready. Likewise, the DA's Alexandra Abrahams questioned whether the revised SASSA SRD grant policy would ever see the light of day. Finally, the MK's Nhlanhla Gcwabaza argued that SASSA should work to help people exit the grant system, not make them dependent on it … Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.

Project to extend dam on schedule
Project to extend dam on schedule

eNCA

timea day ago

  • eNCA

Project to extend dam on schedule

JOHANNESBURG - Work is underway to expand the Clanwilliam Dam, with completion set for 2028. Water Minister Pemmy Majodina says her department will seek approval for extended working hours to stay on schedule. The R5.7 billion project will triple the dam's capacity. Construction teams are working on the expansion of the Clanwilliam Dam to ensure they meet the project's 2028 completion deadline. Water and Sanitation Minister Pemmy Majodina announced that the department will seek permission to extend overtime working hours to achieve their targets. During her visit to the site, Majodina said that she plans to monitor progress by visiting every three months. The R5.7-billion project will triple the dam's water capacity. Located on the Olifants River, the Clanwilliam Dam serves as a vital water source for the region's farmers, municipalities, and businesses. It currently holds 123 million cubic meters of water. The mega project was originally set for completion in 2018, but delays have pushed the date back to 2028. Officials have stressed the importance of meeting this deadline. Local leaders have underscored the crucial role the Clanwilliam Dam plays in the local economy, saying the completion of the upgrades will further accelerate the rollout of hydro-energy projects planned for the west coast corridor and will also bolster the region's agricultural sector.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store