Back to drawing board for 2026 revised SASSA SRD grant
Parliament sent back the revised SASSA SRD grant to the Department of Social Development this week. It's touted to become a Basic Income Grant for the unemployed in 2026. However, the working group wants to see urgent changes before it is approved.
As such, a draft policy for the revised SASSA SRD grant was initiated with the committee for Social Protection, Community and Human Development back in November 2024. However, the committee sent it back to the DSD on Wednesday this week, citing 'affordability and economic opportunities for beneficiaries.' The none-permanent COVID-19 Social Relief of Distress grant has been extended every year since 2020. Image: File
Before the new-look stipend is approved, it must survive various engagements. Like with the Office of the Presidency, National Treasury and Department of Employment and Labour. The South African Social Security Agency believes this will be concluded within a few months. From there a draft will be published for public comment.
Policymakers from the DSD were told to 'better integrate pathways from income support to employment.' Currently, the grant pays out R370 each month to roughly 9-million beneficiaries living below the poverty line. However, the committee wants to see it become better 'aligned with broader economic objectives,' like jobs … South Africa's unemployment rate has only been increasing in the last decade, forcing many to exist in the informal sector. Image: File
Essentially, the 2026 Basic Income Grant will be for those without jobs, but not to the point of creating long-term dependency on the grant. Therefore, the DSD and SASSA have to improve their data systems and align government programmes to make it work efficiently. Government is concerned that if and when they make the grant permanent, it must be budgeted for every year to remain viable (unlike the current R370 SRD which isn't permanent).
While the department sets to work 'tightening' the revised SASSA SRD grant, it has requested that the National Treasury extend SRD for two more years. However, the Treasury has only approved the continuation of the current SRD grant until March 2026. There's simply not enough taxpayer money to ensure everyone who applies for a SASSA grant will be approved for one. Image: File
In response to yet another delay to the revised SASSA SRD grant, many MPs were scathing of the DSD's work. The EFF's Noluvuyo Tafeni noted the policy has been in development for over two decades and was still not ready. Likewise, the DA's Alexandra Abrahams questioned whether the revised SASSA SRD grant policy would ever see the light of day. Finally, the MK's Nhlanhla Gcwabaza argued that SASSA should work to help people exit the grant system, not make them dependent on it …
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
Musk deletes X posts accusing Trump of Epstein ties
Billionaire Elon Musk deleted several X posts linking former US President Donald Trump to Jeffrey Epstein, just days after criticising him over a congressional bill. On Thursday 5 June, Musk posted without providing evidence that the US Department of Justice had not released Epstein's files because they allegedly implicated Trump. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files,' Musk wrote. 'That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk deleted that post, along with others repeating the claim. The link now shows the message: 'Nothing to see here.' In another now-deleted post from Friday night, Musk said he would apologise to Trump 'as soon as there is a full dump of the Epstein files.' He also deleted a repost in which an X user called for Trump's impeachment and suggested replacing him with Vice President JD Vance. Musk had responded 'Yes' to the suggestion, appearing to endorse it. It remains unclear when the deleted posts were removed. As of today Musk has not retracted the accusations publicly, nor provided evidence to support them. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Child Trafficking: How South Africa is Failing its Children
In a high profile case involving the disappearance of six-year-old Joshlin Smith (from left) Jacquen Appollis, Steveno van Rhyn, and Kelly Smith were sentenced to life imprisonment for human trafficking and kidnapping in the Western Cape High Court. Our children are the most vulnerable victims of the broken promises of democracy, says the writer. Image: Ayanda Ndamane/Independent Newspapers Mary De Haas When three people found guilty of kidnapping and trafficking six-year-old Joslin Smith, including her mother, received life sentences, hopes were raised that the sentence would send a strong warning to the lowest form of criminal life. However, although hundreds of children are reported missing annually, with most never found, kidnapping has become a form of extortion prevalent in many communities, to extract ransom money from parents. Our children are the most vulnerable victims of the broken promises of democracy. Many suffer malnutrition, schooling worse than Bantu education, and horrific abuse and rape. Families and communities do not receive the government support services they should, while far too many girls are having children to access the childcare grants, and neglecting their offspring. The Smith case, like shock-inducing gender-based violence murders, demands that voters ensure accountability from government departments which is currently lacking – especially Social Development (DSD), Health, the SAPS and courts, who should be protecting and supporting children and their families. In the late 1980s the apartheid government, realizing the damage done to family life by a century of colonialism, formulated a Family Policy. It was not implemented by the incoming government. The Department of Social Development is a prime offender, as funding for many NPOs doing good work has been cut. The Children's Act of 2005 is an excellent piece of legislation but, with exceptions, the training of social workers has plummeted in recent decades, with some accused of criminality. The Family Courts often fail to implement the legislation, as illustrated by the following case not located in KZN The complicity of Joslin Smith's mother compounded public outrage, but it is not an isolated case. The daughter of grandmother M, who had not wanted to keep her baby, had left her toddler son T, with M when she left for a job overseas; evidence subsequently emerged that she had probably been trafficked herself. M loved the baby, and bonded closely with him but, many months after her daughter, with whom communication was erratic, had left, social workers from a local NPO removed the child from his creche, claiming that his mother had ordered it. The child was placed with a distant cousin he did not know. No documentation was provided to M, who was referred to the Family Court, where she attended and endured regular remands. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ There were no reports from DSD social workers, nor any attempt by them to arrange the contact between T and M, as required by the legislation. It transpired that they did not know how to arrange contact or write court reports. M approached the local police about her trafficking concerns, but they did not assist. Months after T was removed, M's daughter told her mother she was returning to South Africa but, when she did, and took T herself, she announced she was returning overseas (probably, from previous travels, to the Middle East). The assistance of the Family Violence Unit and the Hawks was enlisted, to no avail, and an intervention by a social worker for M to the court was ignored. T's mother, who had lied to the court, was allowed to remove him from South Africa, raising questions about how often Family Courts fail in their mandate. This M case led to a small group of experienced social workers and academics exchanging ideas and experiences, and engaging with the professional council, to improve training, and to motivate for continuing professional development. Rigorous practical experience is the most important part of social work training, and too many students have not received it because some universities enrolled more students than staff capacity could handle – and because many were deployed to DSD for the practical component, and often left to fend for themselves. Students who do not know how to implement legal processes to ensure the best interest of the child, and cannot write coherent reports, should never graduate. As with other government departments, it may be near impossible to make contact with DSD social workers when they are needed in vulnerable communities. Telephones do not work or are not answered. With funding for NPOs scarce, many voluntary and faith-based bodies try to fill the gap in child protection. However, given that the most vulnerable communities are often terrorized by drug dealers, and there is an acute shortage of rehabilitation facilities for them, the poor remain the most vulnerable to traffickers. Yet no one is holding the government, and its near-broken criminal justice system, to account. It was Nelson Mandela who said 'History will judge us by the difference we make in the everyday lives of children'. His immortal words are a glaring indictment of our government and all of us who fail our children – the future of our country. For our children, every day – not once a year – should be a Mandela Day. * Mary de Haas is a violence monitor in KZN, a honorary Research Fellow at the University of KZN's School of Law and a member of the Navi Pillay Research Group on justice and human rights. ** The views in this article do not necessarily represent the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
210 000 social grants delayed as Sassa probes undeclared income
The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) will delay June grant payments for approximately 210 000 beneficiaries who have not fully disclosed their income. Heidelberg Nigel Heraut reports that the move follows a joint investigation with registered credit bureaus that identified potential irregularities in which some social grant recipients may be receiving alternative income that was not truthfully declared at the time of application, or subsequently. Under the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004, all grant applicants are legally required to disclose all sources of income during the application process and to report any changes in their financial status after approval. Failure to do so constitutes a breach of the Act and may result in corrective action. As part of the ongoing review, affected beneficiaries must report to their nearest Sassa local office within 30 days from the notice date for a mandatory grant review, as required by Regulation 30 of the Act. Non-compliance may result in grant suspension, and continued failure to act could lead to the permanent lapsing of the grant. The initiative aims to ensure that beneficiaries update their personal and financial information, and it forms part of Sassa's effort to correct potential inclusion errors in the system. According to the agency, while a person may have qualified for assistance at the time of application, an improvement in financial circumstances may render them ineligible over time. Sassa has urged all beneficiaries to disclose any additional sources of income or undeclared bank accounts as soon as possible. In a related advisory, Sassa is also encouraging beneficiaries still using the green bar-coded ID book to replace it with the smart ID card, citing the increased fraud risk associated with the outdated ID format. The agency has reaffirmed its zero-tolerance approach to fraud. Should there be any evidence of Sassa officials colluding with beneficiaries to defraud the system, disciplinary and legal action will follow to preserve the integrity of the agency. For questions about the review process, beneficiaries are urged to contact the Sassa toll-free line at 0800 60 1011 or email grantenquiries@ Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
