From hallway jets to ‘pregnant' toothbrushes: my chaotic water flosser showdown
The Guardian's journalism is independent. We will earn a commission if you buy something through an affiliate link. Learn more.
Water flossers, for those that don't know, are exactly what they sound like. Rather than sticking a bit of dental floss or an interdental brush between your teeth and along your gums, the idea is that you can instead fire a jet of water. It's more convenient and saves you the embarrassment of seeing what grim detritus you've been hoarding between your teeth each day.
Are they as effective as regular flossing? 'Probably not' was the consensus I got from the dental experts I spoke to, but it's also an improvement on nothing, which is, lamentably, what most of us are doing now.
'In terms of plaque removal, flossing and interdental brushes will be better,' Dr Sam Jethwa, president of the British Academy of Cosmetic Dentistry, told me. 'The example I give patients is a boat sitting in a dock for a long time – it's got algae on the bottom. Get a hose pipe to try to get it off, it's not going to do anything. You need the water, but you need the mechanical movement there.' I'm pleased to report that my mouth isn't full of algae, and I certainly felt some benefit from my time water flossing, even if it had its limits.
The cordless models look like pregnant toothbrushes – although sadly this isn't where baby toothbrushes come from. Rather, the distended lower section is designed to be filled with between 150ml and 400ml of water that can then be fired at your unsuspecting teeth and gums.
After collecting machines from the likes of Oral-B, Panasonic, WaterPik and Philips, and lining them up along my sink like a tiny police identity parade, I set to work devising how to test a group of products that, on the surface of things, are very similar indeed.
For starters, some manufacturers list water pressure in PSI, which is pounds per square inch. Others, however, don't bother with this nerdy nonsense, leading you to guess against the ones that do.
One messy (but not especially scientific, given their different heights and jet angles) test saw me firing water from them down the hallway and measuring their reach. My other half had the unenviable job of following the jets down the hallway with a towel, shouting out the measurements like a darts caller, while I tapped the figures into my somehow still dry laptop.
The water tank test was far more civilised, if not as fun. This involved filling the tanks from the tap before decanting the contents back into a measuring cup to see if the declared specs were accurate. Some were a little optimistic, while others understated how much water you could get in there.
Other metrics are obvious as soon as you open the box, like how easy they are to hold and manipulate, and how many tips are supplied. The standard jet head is consistent between them all, but others are designed with orthodontics and periodontal pockets in mind.
But there's plenty that's subjective too. For example, one model was marked down because you need to hold down a button to stop and start the water flow. That's a very sensible design for a travel-safe flosser, saving you a suspiciously vibrating suitcase that could be detonated by overzealous airline staff, but less positive when your mouth is rapidly filling with water and you need to cut the power quickly.
My personal favourite model, meanwhile, isn't the most powerful, and nor is it practical for those without much space, given it plugs directly into the bathroom mains. But its handle is light and easy to manoeuvre, and it offers 10 pressure levels to make it the most flexible of the bunch.
Towards the end of my testing, I had a long-scheduled dental hygienist appointment where, for once, I could proudly say that I had not just been flossing daily, but multiple times an hour. While a psychologist could undoubtedly take issue with that, surely no dentist would?
Sadly, I wasn't asked, but nor was I given a mortifying critique on my dental hygiene. So I'm calling that a very small win, and an unspoken go-ahead to keep jet washing my teeth and gums. Albeit not as regularly, now the testing period is – thankfully – over.
'I ran 1,830 miles in these, and they're still going strong': trail running essentials (and what to skip)
The best wedding guest dresses and outfits: 30 favourites for every dress code and budget
'The closest I tried to homemade': the best supermarket mayonnaise, tasted and rated
From shiraz-infused gin to a 468-piece London landmarks Lego set; wildlife cameras to hot honey; customised plates with his children's artwork to the world's best potato masher – our Father's Day gift guide has 83 ideas for every type of dad, even those most difficult to shop for. (And in case you forgot, it's on 15 June.)
Monica HorridgeDeputy editor, the Filter
It's been the hottest, sunniest spring on record in the UK, with the risk of a drought this summer. So, in our age of climate crisis and heightened awareness of water consumption, an immaculate, well-watered lawn is becoming increasingly taboo.
But you don't need to ditch the lawn altogether, wrote Matt Collins last month. Provided we take a more sustainable approach to their upkeep, embracing beneficial 'weeds' and leaving areas of long grass, reducing our lawns' size, and mowing less often, they can still have a place in our gardens. And while you're at it, sow some native British wildflowers to encourage more pollinators and boost biodiversity: social enterprise Pollenize's seed packet contains grass – as well as wildflower seeds.
Has something you bought made you fitter or healthier? It could be the budget resistance bands that have you working out every day, or a bento box that has inspired you to pack healthier lunches.
Let us know by replying to this newsletter or emailing us at thefilter@theguardian.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Majority of British public back prostate screening
Nine in ten Britons want to see prostate cancer screening introduced, polling has found. A survey of 2,000 adults found widespread problems around the current system, which relies on men to come forward and ask GPs for tests when they already have concerns. Polling of the British public found one in five have had a male family member or close friend die from the disease. Among those, more than three quarters believed earlier diagnosis could have saved the life of their loved one. And more than one quarter of those polled had no trust, or not much trust at all, in the current NHS system to detect prostate cancer at an early stage. The poll found 91 per cent of participants thought the NHS should introduce routine screening for prostate cancer screening in men as it does for breast cancer in women. Women aged between 50 and 70 are offered mammograms every five years. More than half of those polled said their opinion of their local MP would worsen if they opposed the introduction of screening. Targeted screening The research by OnePoll was commissioned by charity Prostate Cancer Research, which is calling for the introduction of targeted screening. The survey found a strong desire among its respondents for the NHS to be more proactive about collecting and sharing information about medical history. In total, 69 per cent of those polled said in the event they were diagnosed with prostate cancer, they would want their male family members' NHS records to be automatically updated to reflect this. Having a family history of the disease – like breast and ovarian disease – means an increased risk. There was also considerable appetite for technological innovation, with 60 per cent supporting the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve prostate cancer diagnosis, for example, by reading MRI scans faster and more accurately. The call for targeted screening has been backed by MPs including Rishi Sunak, the former prime minister, Sir James Cleverly, the former home secretary, and Calvin Bailey, a Labour MP and the chairman of the all-party parliamentary group on prostate cancer. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, has applauded The Telegraph's campaign, saying he would like to see a screening programme in place if the evidence supports it. David James, the director of patient projects and influencing at Prostate Cancer Research, said: 'These poll results send an unequivocal message to policymakers: the public overwhelmingly supports the introduction of a national prostate cancer screening programme. 'The current system is clearly failing to meet the public's expectations for early detection and proactive management of genetic risk. 'With such strong support for investment and participation, it's time for the NHS to prioritise a targeted screening programme that could save countless lives and alleviate the long-term burden on our healthcare system.' Prostate Cancer Research is calling for urgent improvements to screening provision to tackle rising prostate cancer deaths and health inequality in the UK. The charity's research suggests targeted screening – focused on black men, those with BRCA1/2 mutations and those with a family history of the disease – could mean an extra 775 additional early diagnoses per year for those aged between 45 and 69. The research also suggests these changes could spare almost 300 men a year from a stage 4 diagnosis, in which prostate cancer becomes incurable. A Department for Health and Social Care spokesman said: 'Every life lost to prostate cancer is a tragedy. 'We're working to strengthen cancer services across the NHS and will carefully consider the evidence on prostate cancer screening to ensure we're doing everything possible to catch this disease early and save lives. 'This Government has been clear we would like to see screening in place, but the decision must be evidence-led. 'The UK National Screening Committee is looking at this as a priority, including reviewing the evidence for screening men with a family history of prostate cancer and other high-risk groups. 'While this review takes place, we're getting on with improving cancer treatment and prevention – investing £16m in the TRANSFORM trial to find better detection methods, and deploying cutting-edge technology to personalise medicine, catch sickness sooner, and save lives.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Could YOU have the virus prompting Covid-era restrictions in China? What you need to know about chikungunya virus
China is currently facing what is believed to be the country's largest outbreak of the mosquito-borne chikungunya virus. More than 10,000 cases have been reported in China, and an increasing number of countries across Asia and Europe are reporting near record-high cases or cases for the first time. The CDC has issued a Level 2 travel advisory for China, urging Americans to take extra precautions when visiting the region. However, experts fear the outbreak may have already reached the US. Dr Louisa Messenger, a mosquito researcher in Nevada, told Daily Mail: 'This outbreak in China is very concerning. It [the virus] could already be here in the US; and really it's just one plane flight away.' Chikungunya is primarily spread by Aedes mosquitoes, the same species that carry dengue and Zika viruses. It is rarely fatal but can cause debilitating symptoms, including fever, joint pain and, in severe cases, life-threatening brain and heart damage. Below, Daily Mail reveals everything you need to know about chikungunya virus: What is the situation in China? China has recorded approximately 10,000 chikungunya viruses this year, and about 3,000 of those have cropped up in the last week. Roger Hewson, virus surveillance lead at the UK's Wellcome Sanger Institute, said the current outbreak in China is the largest ever, Al Jazeera reported. To combat the spread of the virus, Chinese officials had ordered travelers from Foshan, the epicenter of the outbreak, to undergo a 14-day home quarantine, similar to Covid restrictions, but that has since been withdrawn. Infected patients are being isolated in hospital wards and covered with mosquito nets. They are required to remain there for a week or until they test negative, if sooner. Images show Chinese state workers spraying clouds of disinfectant around city streets, residential areas and construction sites where people may come into contact with virus-bearing mosquitoes in or near standing water. Drones are also reportedly being used to hunt down insect breeding grounds and spray insecticide, and residents are being asked to empty bottles, flower pots or other outdoor receptacles that may collect water. Failure to comply with any restriction may lead to fines of up to $1,400 (10,000 Yuan) and locals can have their electricity cut off, according to state media. Is the virus in the US? A small number of cases of chikungunya virus are recorded in the US every year. As of August 5, the CDC reported 46 cases of chikungunya in the US this year, all contracted by travelers returning from high-risk areas. No deaths have been reported. It is unclear how many of these could be linked to China's outbreak. Estimates suggest 1.6million people travel between the US and China every year, with experts saying it only takes one bite from a mosquito on one infected traveler to then pass the virus throughout America. The US has experienced limited local transmission of the virus previously. In 2014 and 2015 cases were detected in Florida and Texas. Locally acquired cases in US states and territories have not been reported since 2019, however, according to the CDC. What is the CDC saying? The CDC is warning Americans to take extra precautions when traveling to high-risk areas. In addition to the travel advisory for China, the agency also issued a warning for eight other countries: Bolivia, Kenya, Madagascar, Mauritius, Mayotte, Réunion, Somalia and Sri Lanka. It is advising travelers to wear insect repellent, long-sleeved shirts and pants, and to stay in places with air conditioning. Travelers are also been advised to get vaccinated against chikungunya, with two vaccines available that have been approved in the US. Dr Messenger told this website: 'People should be concerned about these diseases, wear topical repellents, wear long sleeves, and get vaccinated against them if they can.' The CDC says that pregnant women should avoid traveling to high risk areas because they are at higher risk of complications from the virus. What are symptoms? About 15 to 35 percent of people infected with the virus are asymptomatic, the CDC reports. The incubation period is typically three to seven days and the most common symptom is a sudden onset of a fever over 102 degrees Fahrenheit (39 degrees Celsius). Other symptoms of chikungunya virus include headache, nausea, rash, muscle aches, swelling and redness of the conjunctiva (the white part of the eye and inner eyelids) and joint pain that is sometimes severe and debilitating in the hands or feet. In severe cases, life-threatening complications involving the heart and brain can occur such as inflammation, irregular heartbeats and organ failure. Symptoms usually last seven to 10 days, but patients may experience lifelong complications such as persistent joint pain. Those experiencing symptoms or who think they are infected with the virus should contact their primary care provider or visit a hospital. Infections can be diagnosed through a patient history, symptoms, blood tests and serum tests. How is the disease treated? There is no specific treatment for chikungunya virus, though there are several options being investigated, according to the CDC. Doctors instead focus on trying to ease symptoms through rest, fluids and over-the-counter pain relief medications like acetaminophen (Tylenol). For people who continue to experience pain, over-the-counter pain relievers, steroids and physical therapy are typically the course of treatment. There are two vaccines available for chikungunya virus and they are recommended for people visiting areas with an outbreak or that may pose a higher risk of infection.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Benefits claims among over-50s hit record high
'Older workers bring decades of skills, insight, and experience. Their absence represents a serious depletion of the UK's human capital at a time when economic growth is urgently needed,' it said. 'Even a modest rise in employment among economically inactive people over 50 to 64 years old could generate billions in tax revenue and welfare savings.' The think tank urged the Government to overhaul the sick note system to ensure it better supported older workers with manageable health conditions to remain in work. It also called for new age-specific employment targets for workers in their 50s and 60s. Older workers hit hardest by pandemic The research found the pandemic has had a disproportionate impact on older workers, with the economic inactivity rate among 50 to 64-year-olds at 25.9 per cent as of May this year – more than double the 11.5 per cent rate for 35 to 49-year-olds. The think tank highlighted how people aged 50 to 64 years old accounted for almost a third (32 per cent) of the total increase in economic inactivity among 16 to 64-year-olds since Covid. This translated to around 185,000 more 50 to 64-year-olds who are not in work and not looking for work. By contrast, economic inactivity among those aged 35 to 49 decreased over the same period. The report also highlighted significant gender disparities. Some 29.5 per cent of women were economically inactive in May 2025, compared to 22.2 per cent of men. One of the main reasons for this is barriers to re-entry into the workforce – including caring responsibilities – which disproportionately affected older women. 'Overlooked pool of potential workers' The number of economically inactive older people who said they would like to work declined from 19 per cent in 2015 to 14 per cent last year. Of those willing to work, most are not actively seeking employment. The CSJ said this highlighted a critical yet overlooked pool of potential workers. It urged the Government to establish a new National Work and Health Service to take pressure off GPs and provide better support with workplace adjustments. The report said this change could help to reduce unnecessary workforce drop-out for older workers and keep them meaningfully engaged with employment, even if at a reduced level. The Labour MP Carolyn Harris, a deputy chair of the CSJ, said the research showed the economy was suffering a 'mid-life crisis'. She urged the Government to accelerate its WorkWell scheme, a new integrated work and health support service, to 'stem the flow of the 300,000 or so who exit work every year due to sickness, and ensuring people get the support they need'.
