
The plight of boys and men, once sidelined by Democrats, is now a priority
For Democrats, reaching male voters became a political necessity after last fall's election, when young men swung significantly toward President Donald Trump.
But for some — like Maryland Gov. Wes Moore — it's also a personal goal. The first-term governor, who has spoken about his own struggles as a teenager, recently announced plans to direct his 'entire administration' to find ways to help struggling boys and men.
'The well-being of our young men and boys has not been a societal priority,' Moore said in an interview. 'I want Maryland to be the one that is aggressive and unapologetic about being able to address it and being able to fix it.'
Moore's not the only Democrat vowing to help boys and men.
In her State of the State address, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer shared plans to help boost young men's enrollment in higher education and skills training. And Connecticut Gov. Ned Lamont announced what he called 'a DEI initiative, which folks on both sides of the aisle may appreciate,' to get more men into teaching.
The announcements come at a critical time. Researchers have argued that the widening gender gap reflects a crisis that, if not addressed, could push men toward extremism. And Democratic pollsters fret that if liberal politicians, in particular, do not address these issues, the party is at risk of losing more men to the GOP.
'When Trump talks about fixing the economy and being strong, they hear someone who gets it,' said John Della Volpe, director of polling at Harvard Kennedy School's Institute of Politics, and an adviser to Joe Biden's 2020 presidential campaign. 'That doesn't mean they trust him. But it does mean he's speaking to their reality in a way most Democrats aren't.'
On the campaign trail, Kamala Harris often spoke about issues of importance to women, emphasizing reproductive rights, for instance, and paid family leave policies. But soul-searching over her loss has prompted Democrats to reach out more aggressively to men, by engaging more with sports, for instance, and looking for ways to make the party seem less 'uncool' to young voters.
Shauna Daly, a Democratic strategist and co-founder of the Young Men Research Project, said candidates need to do more than show young men that they can hang. 'Where the Democratic Party has really fallen short with this cohort is that they don't feel like Democrats are fighting for them,' she said.
They need policies like those the governors have proposed, Daly said, that address men's tangible problems.
In every state, women earn more college degrees than men. Boys are more likely to be disciplined in class, and less likely to graduate high school on time than girls. Men die by suicide at higher rates than women and are more likely to rely on illicit drugs and alcohol. And while women increasingly participate in the workforce at higher rates, men have steadily dropped out of the labor market.
The governors' speeches touched on many of these issues, and earned cautious applause from masculinity researchers, who said they reflected a promising shift.
'I think it's part of a growing recognition among Democrats that neglecting the problems of boys and men is neither good policy nor good politics,' said Richard Reeves, founder of the American Institute for Boys and Men, who has informally advised Moore's staff. 'If Democrats weren't thinking about male voters, and especially young male voters, then it would be a pretty serious dereliction of duty, looking at the polls.'
In the past, Democrats might have been wary of targeting programs toward boys and men for fear of excluding girls. Whitmer seemed aware of this dynamic in her speech, when she followed her announcement about young men with a shoutout to women and a vow not to abandon her 'commitment to equal opportunity and dignity for everyone.'
A handful of other states, including some run by Republican governors, have already launched initiatives targeting men in recent years. Utah established a task force that aims to help 'men and boys lead flourishing lives,' and North Dakota created the position of a men's health coordinator to study and raise awareness of disparities affecting men.
Moore said he was partly inspired by his own experience growing up in the Bronx after his father passed. He has described how troubles in his youth — including a brush with the police for vandalism, skipping school and getting poor grades — led his mother to send him away to military school, which he credits with helping him straighten up.
'It is very personal for me, because I was one of those young men and boys that we're trying to reach,' he said. 'And I felt like so many of the conversations that were being had about me were not being had with me.'
Moore will hold a cabinet meeting in April to discuss plans for the state agencies, but he has some initial goals: to encourage more men in his state to pursue jobs in education and health care, help boys within the juvenile justice system, and make sure he solicits input from boys and men on how the initiatives are designed.
For Della Volpe, from the Harvard Kennedy School, the governors' announcements are encouraging. 'The truth is, young men are speaking,' he said. 'They've been telling us they want respect, opportunity, and strength. If Democrats don't listen — and act — they'll keep losing ground. But this moment offers hope.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump will look at giving Ukraine more Patriot missiles as he calls on Putin to end war
Donald Trump said he is considering sending more Patriot missile systems to Ukraine, as he renewed calls on Russian leader Vladimir Putin to end the war. The president added that he isn't ruling out a new defense assistance package, when he spoke to reporters at the Nato summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday. Trump, who has surrounded himself with isolationist-minded advisers who've publicly opposed continued support for Kyiv, responded, 'We'll see what happens' when asked whether the U.S. would contribute anything on top of the $8 billion pledged by NATO allies as part of the 32-member bloc's continued support for Ukraine's war effort. Click here for the latest updates on the war in Ukraine Speaking at a press conference on the heels of a closed-door sit-down with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, Mr. Trump said there has been 'a lot of spirit' in Ukraine's fight against the invasion Putin ordered in February 2022. Trump also appeared to shift blame for the continuation and escalation of the war to Putin, marking a dramatic reversal from how he characterized the situation during a contentious Oval Office meeting with Zelensky earlier this year. 'Vladimir Putin really has to end that war,' the president said. 'People are dying at levels that people haven't seen before for a long time.' He recounted to reporters how he'd rebuked Putin during a recent phone call after the Russian leader offered to mediate an end to hostilities between Israel and Iran, stressing he would rather he brought an end to the conflict in Ukraine. He later added that Putin has been 'more difficult' than Zelensky, with whom Trump has had a contentious relationship dating back to his first term, when a phone call with the Ukrainian leader launched a scandal that led to the first of his two impeachment trials in the Senate. Trump's relationship with Putin has long been far friendlier, but even that has appeared to sour in recent months as the Russian dictator has continued to pound civilian targets in Ukraine with drones and missiles, killing thousands and complicating efforts by Trump to cajole both sides to the negotiating table. In April, he became so irate over Putin's attacks on civilians that he took to Truth Social to exhort the Russian leader to halt the attacks and get to the negotiating table, writing: 'Vladimir, STOP! 5,000 soldiers a week are dying. Let's get the Peace Deal DONE!' Since then, he has floated the possibility of imposing harsh new sanctions on Moscow if Putin refuses to cooperate in the U.S.-led efforts to bring about a settlement in the three-year-old conflict. The president's changed view of the war and Putin's culpability also became evident when he had an emotional exchange with a reporter for the BBC's Ukrainian service, who asked whether the U.S. was prepared to sell more Patriot anti-air missiles to Ukraine. Last year, the Biden administration announced they would prioritize deliveries of Patriot interceptors to Ukraine on account of Russia's accelerated pace of aerial attacks against civilians and infrastructure, but Kyiv has had to expand their use of the missiles and has been running low on them. Trump asked the reporter if she was currently living in Ukraine, at which point she replied that she was based in Warsaw with her children while her husband has remained in Ukraine. The president responded: 'That's rough stuff.' He asked the journalist again to confirm that she was living outside of Ukraine and working as a reporter, replying 'good' when she answered in the affirmative. 'Let me just tell you, they [Ukraine] do want to have the anti-missile missiles, as they call them, the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available,' he said. Trump added that such weapons were 'very hard to get' and 'very effective', while admitting that the U.S. had been prioritizing supplies for Israel amid that country's ongoing wars. 'They do want that more than any other thing, as you probably know,' he said before praising her 'very good question' and telling her to 'say hello' to her husband for him. Trump's apparent openness to sending more American aid to Ukraine comes as NATO's 32 member nations pledged to 'reaffirm' what they described as 'enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine,' calling Ukrainian security efforts a contribution to NATO's own security. The alliance also pledged to include 'direct contributions to Ukraine defense' as part of efforts to have each country meet a threshold of spending five percent of gross domestic product on defense.


Scotsman
34 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Why UK needs to pander to Trump but should not necessarily believe him
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Following the US attack on Iran, Donald Trump said its nuclear enrichment facilities had been 'completely and fully obliterated', setting back the tyrannical regime's plans by 'decades'. However, according to a leaked preliminary assessment by the Pentagon, the missile strikes only caused a delay of a few months. Amid the ensuing uproar over these very different takes, the US President attacked the media for reporting the classified document's findings, saying they were "scum" and "disgusting", while US Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused those behind the leak of being "professional stabbers". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But, clearly, what matters is what has actually happened. If Iran still has the ability to quickly develop nuclear weapons, the world needs to be alive to that threat. With the situation still unclear, it would be far better to err on the side of caution. Keir Starmer speaks to US President Donald Trump at the Nato summit in The Hague (Picture: Kin Cheung/pool) | Getty Images Axis of Autocracies Where Trump deserves credit is that the US attack has demonstrated to Iran's leaders how vulnerable they are, and this may have a deterring effect on a regime, widely despised by its own people, which poses a very real threat to world peace. It is a member of what former Nato Secretary-General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, has described as the 'Axis of Autocracies', along with Russia, China and North Korea. The combined threat these dictatorships pose is the reason why the world needs a much stronger Nato. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And that means European leaders must sometimes swallow their pride and be rather sycophantic towards Trump, even as he continues to cast doubt on his commitment to the Nato treaty which states an attack on one will be treated as an attack on all. The UK and Europe have no choice but to spend more on defence – commensurate with the increased threats facing the world and also, again erring on the side of caution, in case Trump decides to withdraw from the alliance, formally or not.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Morning Bid: Trump punches at Powell, dollar recoils
A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Ankur Banerjee Just as investor sentiment was recovering from the latest geopolitical jolt, buoyed by the Israel-Iran ceasefire, President Donald Trump rattled markets again with an attack on the Fed chair that revived worries over the central bank's independence. The result has been another bout of dollar selling, which pushed the euro to its strongest level since November 2021 and the Swiss franc to its highest in a decade. A report from the Wall Street Journal said Trump has toyed with the idea of naming Fed Chair Jerome Powell's replacement as early as September, which could undermine Powell's authority for the remainder of his term to next May. Trump has repeatedly chastised Powell for not cutting interest rates and said he was "terrible" in the latest attack on Wednesday, eroding investor faith in the U.S. central bank's independence in setting policy. Earlier this month, Trump openly contemplated firing Powell and even mused about making himself the Fed chair, although he subsequently backed off. "I know within three or four people who I'm going to pick," Trump told reporters on Wednesday, when asked if he is interviewing candidates to replace Powell. All that uncertainty, along with Trump's chaotic trade policies and their potential threat to economic growth, have taken a toll on the U.S. dollar as investors look to move their money elsewhere. The dollar index , which measures the currency against six other units, is down 10% this year and on course for a sixth straight month in the red. The last time it had a run like this was in 2017. While the "sell America" theme has faded somewhat in the past few weeks, as evidenced by U.S. stocks hitting record highs, investors remain worried about the dollar and how Trump's tariff policies could affect it. Trump's tariffs are coming back onto the markets' radar as the clock ticks down to his July 9 deadline for trade deals. In Thursday's Asia trade, futures indicated a muted open for European stock markets. Investors will keep an eye on defence stocks after NATO leaders backed the big increase in defence spending that Trump had demanded. The big news in the corporate world was Shell (SHEL.L), opens new tab denying it was in talks to buy British rival BP (BP.L), opens new tab, after the Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that the oil majors were in early discussions about a takeover. Key developments that could influence markets on Thursday: Economic events: Germany Gfk consumer sentiment for July Trying to keep up with the latest tariff news? Our new daily news digest offers a rundown of the top market-moving headlines impacting global trade. Sign up for Tariff Watch here.