Republican supermajority passes bills to 'dismantle' DEI in state, local government
Two bills barring state and local governments, school districts and public colleges and universities from having diversity, equity and inclusion offices and considering race, ethnicity, sex or age in employment decisions will go to Gov. Bill Lee for his signature.
The 'Dismantling DEI Departments Act' and the 'Dismantle DEI in Employment Act' are meant to align Tennessee with the priorities of President Donald Trump's administration, according to Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson, a Franklin Republican and the senate sponsor of both bills.
The Republican supermajority's passage of the bills came over the staunch opposition of their Democratic colleagues — many of whom are minorities — who recounted their personal experiences facing hiring discrimination because of their race or ethnicity.
Johnson and House sponsor, Clarksville Republican Rep. Aron Maberry, said diversity is beneficial but DEI is a form of discrimination and enforces 'ideological viewpoints.' They said the bills aim to center merit, qualifications, skill and competency in employment decisions, and diversity will 'happen naturally through fair hiring practices.'
'The big problem in DEI is equity. We all know diversity, we all love including people. Equity is not equality, and it's not about treating people fairly or ensuring equal opportunity … equity in the context of DEI is essentially that everybody gets the same outcome,' Maberry said.
Sen. Raumesh Akbari, a Memphis Democrat, said it is 'funny' people believe they live in a post-racial society.
'Because, quite frankly, as much as we aspire for the ideals of Dr. King, where people are not judged by the color of their skin but the content of their character, that is not the case,' Akbari said.
Sen. Raumesh Akbari and Rep. Antonio Parkinson, both Memphis Democrats, speak to one another as the House considers the "Dismantling DEI Departments Act" on April 22, 2025. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout)
House Majority Leader William Lamberth gives a thumbs down motion as Memphis Democratic Rep. Justin Pearson look on. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout)
Clarksville Republican Rep. Aron Maberry sponsored a pair of bills aiming to "dismantle DEI" in state and local agencies, saying DEI is a form of discrimination and enforces 'ideological viewpoints.' (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout)
Memphis Democratic Rep. Antonio Parkinson speaks against the passage of the "Dismantling DEI Departments Act" on the House floor on April. 22, 2025. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout)
Nashville Democratic Rep. Vincent Dixie speaks against the "Dismantling DEI Departments Act" on the House floor on April 22, 2025. (Photo: John Partipilo/Tennessee Lookout ©2025)
Sen. London Lamar, a Memphis Democrat, said DEI initiatives are meant to address groups of people who are fully qualified but have been excluded from access to resources and jobs.
'You can't even be considered for these jobs if you don't meet the basic criteria,' Lamar said Tuesday. 'So the idea that people are being chosen based on their race or their gender is false.'
The Senate passed both bills Tuesday. The House passed the 'Dismantling DEI Departments Act' Tuesday, and passed its counterpart last week after the bill's supporters cut debate short.
'Many of us were denied the opportunity to even speak and represent our people,' Democratic Caucus Leader Rep. Karen Camper said Tuesday. 'Not only were we silenced, but really it almost felt like we (were dismissed). It was a lot of laughter and smugness, as if our lived experience of discrimination and injustice in this country were nothing more than some political talking points.'
The 'Dismantling DEI Departments Act' prohibits state and local governments, public institutions of higher education, and governor-appointed boards from using 'a discriminatory preference in an effort to increase diversity, equity, or inclusion or maintain an office, division, or department for such purposes.'
Decisions that grant or withhold benefits must be based on 'individual merit, qualifications, veteran status or lawful eligibility criteria,' according to the bill. The legislation also scrubs Tennessee Code of provisions that encourage support of women- and minority-owned businesses and goals for including minorities on appointed boards.
The act exempts demographic-based outreach for medically substantiated reasons in public health, medical research or disease prevention programs, in addition to 'lawful and neutral outreach programs that ensure equal access to state services or contracting' as long as there is no demographic-based 'preferential treatment.'
Entities can also submit written notice to the state comptroller requesting an exemption if complying with the act would cause the loss of federal funding.
The 'Dismantle DEI in Employment Act' prohibits government entities in Tennessee from 'considering race, ethnicity, sex, age, or any other demographic characteristic' in employment decisions.
It contains the same exemption request process for instances that would jeopardize federal funding.
Johnson and Maberry said neither bill will affect existing state laws or programs that support people with disabilities.
Rep. Harold Love, Jr., a Nashville Democrat, said the legislation has implications beyond the printed word. Love described a 'chilling effect': people who are hiring may reconsider selecting minorities for roles even if they are qualified, because they don't want to be perceived as breaking these laws.
The Senate rejected an amendment proposed by Nashville Democratic Sen. Jeff Yarbro that would have prohibited hiring on the basis of familial relationship, past or present political activity, campaign involvement, service as an elected official, financial contributions and referrals by elected officials, political appointees or campaign representatives that were not based on merit.
Johnson said those issues were already covered by two pieces of legislation regarding state government employment. In rejecting the amendment, the legislature declined to extend these rules to local governments and educational institutions throughout the state.
Yarbro said some of the pieces of Tennessee Code eliminated or re-written by this legislation had been on the books for decades.
'Using this political cudgel that's been developed in the last three or four years as a rationale to go back in time and repeal progress that was made in the 70s, 80s and 90s? We shouldn't do that,' Yarbro said.
The House rejected an amendment proposed by Rep. Larry Miller, a Memphis Democrat, that would have required reporting on hirings and firings based on merit broken down by demographic. Miller argued the amendment should be welcome if the supermajority thought it would prove their justification for the bill.
Using this political cudgel that's been developed in the last three or four years as a rationale to go back in time and repeal progress that was made in the 70s, 80s and 90s? We shouldn't do that.
– Sen. Jeff Yarbro, D-Nashville
Johnson, when pressed by Lamar for examples of situations in which someone has been hired based on race or gender over merit, said he had examples but could not disclose them.
'If you've not been contacted by someone who feels like they were overlooked because of diversity, I don't know what to say about that,' Johnson said.
Asked if Black people or women currently employed by state or local governmental entities were hired based on their qualifications or their demographics, Johnson said he believes they were hired because they were qualified, but the DEI movement has become 'insidious.'
The legislation does not infringe on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, he said, noting he is 'glad (those protections) are there.'
'Diversity is a good thing, but diversity for diversity's sake alone is not a good thing,' Johnson said.
Several representatives later said on the house floor that they do not know of any Black man who has gotten a job who was not qualified for that position.
Rep. Antonio Parkinson, a Memphis Democrat, said DEI is not meant to put one group of people above another.
'It is simply to show you that we exist,' he said. 'It removes the invisible cloak from veterans, disabled individuals, Black people, women and others. We exist.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
2 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump will be present at Kennedy Center as honorees are announced today
President Donald Trump, embracing his new role as chairman of the Kennedy Center, was set to be on hand Wednesday as the recipients of its annual award are announced, and both he and the performing arts venue hint at coming renovations to its building. Trump avoided the Kennedy Center Honors awards program during his first term after artists said they would not attend out of protest. This year, the Republican president has taken over as the Kennedy Center's new chairman and fired the board of trustees, which he replaced with loyalists. 3 President Trump, embracing his new role as chairman of the Kennedy Center, was set to be on hand Wednesday as the recipients of its annual award are announced. AP In a Truth Social post on Tuesday, Trump teased a name change for the center, formally the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, and said it would be restored to its past glory. 'GREAT Nominees for the TRUMP/KENNEDY CENTER, whoops, I mean, KENNEDY CENTER, AWARDS,' Trump wrote. He said work was being done on the site that would be 'bringing it back to the absolute TOP LEVEL of luxury, glamour, and entertainment.' 'It had fallen on hard times, physically, BUT WILL SOON BE MAKING A MAJOR COMEBACK!!!' he wrote. In a statement on its social media feed, the Kennedy Center said it is 'honored' to host Trump, who will be visiting for the third time since January, and hinted that he would announce a construction project. 'Thanks to his advocacy, our beautiful building will undergo renovations to restore its prestige and grandeur,' the venue said. 'We are also excited to be announcing this year's INCREDIBLE slate of Kennedy Center Honorees.' Trump complained during a March visit that the building is in a state of 'tremendous disrepair.' 3 Donald Trump and Melania Trump attend 'Les Misérables' opening night at the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 11, 2025. REUTERS It is unclear how this year's honorees were chosen, though Trump had indicated he wanted a more active role. Historically, a bipartisan advisory committee selects the recipients, who over the years have ranged from George Balanchine and Tom Hanks to Aretha Franklin and Stephen Sondheim. A message sent to the Kennedy Center press office asking how this year's honorees were selected wasn't returned on Tuesday. The Kennedy Center did post this on social media, however: 'Coming Soon … A country music icon, an Englishman, a New York City Rock band, a dance Queen and a multi-billion dollar Actor walk into the Kennedy Center Opera House …' In the past, Trump has floated the idea of granting Kennedy Center Honors status to singer-songwriter Paul Anka and Sylvester Stallone, one of three actors Trump named as Hollywood ambassadors earlier this year. Anka was supposed to perform 'My Way' at Trump's first inaugural and backed out at the last moment. The Kennedy Center Honors were established in 1978 and have been given to a broad range of artists. Until Trump's first term, presidents of both major political parties traditionally attended the annual ceremony, even when they disagreed politically with a given recipient. Prominent liberals such as Barbra Streisand and Warren Beatty were honored during the administration of Republican George W. Bush, and a leading conservative, Charlton Heston, was feted during the administration of Democrat Bill Clinton. In 2017, after honoree Norman Lear declared that he would not attend a White House celebration in protest of Trump's proposed cuts to federal arts funding, Trump and first lady Melania Trump decided to skip the Kennedy Center event and remained away throughout his first term. Honorees during that time included such Trump critics as Cher, Lin-Manuel Miranda, and Sally Field. Since taking office for a second time, Trump has taken a much more forceful stance on the Kennedy Center and inserted himself into its governance. Besides naming himself chairman and remaking the board, he also has indicated he would take over decisions regarding programming at the center and vowed to end events featuring performers in drag. 3 Trump took over as the Kennedy Center's new chairman and fired the board of trustees, replacing them with loyalists. AFP via Getty Images The steps have drawn further criticism from some artists. In March, the producers of 'Hamilton' pulled out of staging the Broadway hit musical in 2026, citing Trump's aggressive takeover of the institution's leadership. Other artists who canceled events include actor Issa Rae, singer Rhiannon Giddens, and author Louise Penny. House Republicans added an amendment to a spending bill that Trump signed into law in July to rename the Kennedy Center's Opera House after Melania Trump, but that venue has yet to be renamed. Maria Shriver, a niece of the late President Kennedy, a Democrat, has criticized as 'insane' a separate House proposal to rename the entire center after Trump. Recipients of the Kennedy Center Honors are given a medallion on a rainbow ribbon, a nod to the range of skills that fall under the performing arts. In April, the center changed the lights on the exterior from the long-standing rainbow to a permanent red, white, and blue display.


UPI
4 minutes ago
- UPI
Gov. Gavin Newsom says California will redraw its districts to counteract Texas
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, shown here in July, said his state will redraw its distrcts to neutralize Texas' redistricting efforts. Photo by Jonathan Alcorn/UPI | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- California Gov. Gavin Newsom said his state will redraw its districts to establish more Democratic congressional seats. Newsom's office said in a post on X signed with his initials that President Donald Trump missed his deadline of Tuesday evening to respond to a letter he sent the White House on Monday. In the letter, he demanded that Trump stop the mid-decade, partisan redistricting efforts in heavily Republican states, like Texas and Ohio. "Donald 'TACO' Trump, as many call him, 'missed' the deadline!!!," Newsom said in an all-caps post mimicking Trump's way of posting on social media. "California will now draw new, more 'beautiful maps,' they will be historic as they will end the Trump presidency (Dems take back the House!). Big press conference this week with powerful Dems and Gavin Newsom -- your favorite governor -- that will be devastating for 'MAGA.' Thank you for your attention to this matter!" The most populous state in the nation, California has 43 Democratic members of the house and nine Republican members. In late July, Newsom and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker warned that they would take this measure. "Donald Trump called up [Texas] Governor [Greg] Abbott for one simple reason: to rig the 2026 elections. California's moral high ground means nothing if we're powerless because of it," Newsom said after meeting with Democrats from the Texas House. "This moment requires us to be prepared to fight fire with fire. Whether that's a special election, a ballot initiative, a bill, a fight in court. If they proceed in Texas, we will be ready." "This is not a bluff. This is real, and trust me, it's more real after listening to these leaders today, how existential this is," Newsom added. In Monday's letter, also posted on X, Newsom asked Trump to call on Texas and other red states to stop the "hyper-partisan gerrymander to rig the upcoming midterm elections." "You are playing with fire, risking the destabilization of our democracy, while knowing that California can neutralize any gains you hope to make," the letter said. "This attempt to rig congressional maps to hold onto power before a single vote is cast in the 2026 election is an affront to American democracy." Ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, Republicans hold a 219-212 advantage in the House with four vacancies -- three Democrats who died and one Republican who resigned. More than a dozen Texas House members fled to Illinois and California -- two blue states -- in late July to meet with Newsom and Pritzker, during which they revealed their intentions. But on Tuesday, the Texas Senate voted 19-2 along party lines to approve a congressional redistricting map that is identical to a version in the Texas House. The measure, Senate Bill 4, redraws the state's U.S. House of Representatives districts. Trump believes an additional five seats could be created by changing the borders. Of the state's 38 districts, 25 are held by Republicans. Democrats hold seats in big cities of Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth, Houston, Laredo, McAllen and San Antonio. Nine of the 11 Democrats in the Texas Senate walked out immediately before the chamber voted to approve the new redistricting map.
Yahoo
4 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge orders Trump administration to restore part of UCLA's suspended funding
By Kanishka Singh and Nate Raymond WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Tuesday ordered President Donald Trump's administration to restore a part of the federal grant funding that it recently suspended for the University of California, Los Angeles. U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco ruled that the grant funding suspensions violated an earlier June preliminary injunction where she ordered the National Science Foundation to restore dozens of grants that it had terminated at the University of California. That order had blocked the agency from cancelling other grants at the University of California system, of which UCLA is a part. "NSF's actions violate the Preliminary Injunction," Lin, an appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden, wrote. The White House and the university had no immediate comment on the ruling. UCLA said last week the government froze $584 million in funding. Trump has threatened to cut federal funds for universities over pro-Palestinian student protests against U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. The Los Angeles Times newspaper reported that the judge's order asked for the restoration of more than a third of the suspended $584 million funding. The University of California said last week it was reviewing a settlement offer by the Trump administration for UCLA in which the university will pay $1 billion. It said such a large payment would "devastate" the institution. The government alleges universities, including UCLA, allowed antisemitism during the protests. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly equates their criticism of Israel's war in Gaza and its occupation of Palestinian territories with antisemitism, and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. Experts have raised free speech and academic freedom concerns over the Republican president's threats. Democratic California Governor Gavin Newsom called the Trump administration's settlement offer a form of extortion. Large demonstrations took place at UCLA last year. Last month, UCLA agreed to pay over $6 million to settle a lawsuit alleging antisemitism. It was also sued this year over a 2024 violent mob attack on pro-Palestinian protesters. Rights advocates note a rise in antisemitism, anti-Arab bias and Islamophobia due to conflict in the Middle East. The Trump administration has not announced equivalent probes into Islamophobia. The government has settled its probes with Columbia University, which agreed to pay over $220 million, and Brown University, which said it will pay $50 million. Both accepted certain government demands. Settlement talks with Harvard University are ongoing.