‘My children could pay up to 90pc on their inheritance. What can we do?'
Write to Pensions Doctor with your pension problem: pensionsdoctor@telegraph.co.uk. Columns are published weekly.
Dear Charlene,
I'm worried that with the upcoming changes to pensions, my children are going to potentially face 'double taxes' on what I leave to them. I've read about tax rates of 50pc, 60pc and even 90pc in some cases.
I'm 75 next month (my wife is already 75) and my two children are nominated to get one third each of my fund, with my share of the house and Isas to pass to my wife (and vice versa).
I've already taken the tax-free cash from my pensions which now stand at £800,000. Our Isas and cash savings are worth £400,000 between us and the house could potentially be worth £1m.
I'm weighing up taking more money out of my pensions even though we can comfortably live off our current income. Will this do anything to help or am I wrong about the high tax rates?
Kind regards,
– Roger
Dear Roger,
The proposals to bring pensions into inheritance tax (IHT) have led to this policy being described as a 'double whammy'.
The current income tax rules on inherited pensions revolve around the age of the pension holder. This is not due to change under the proposals.
Currently, if a pension holder dies before age 75, with a defined contribution scheme like a Sipp, no income tax will normally be paid by their beneficiaries on money they take from the pension.
If the pension holder was over 75 when they died, their beneficiaries pay income tax on any withdrawals.
This is why many people have described the new plans as being 'double tax', because some beneficiaries could see the pot reduced due to inheritance tax, and then income tax when they withdraw cash if the pension holder died age 75 or over.
A spousal exemption for IHT will still apply to any unused pension funds left to spouses or civil partners but anything left could form part of their estate on second death.
The combination of IHT, then income tax, means that anything that passes to your children could face a tax charge of up to 52pc if they are basic-rate taxpayers when they withdraw any inherited funds, 64pc if they are subject to higher tax rate and 67pc if they pay the additional rate of income tax.
Estates worth more than £2m
The 90pc rate is an extreme example – but relates to how 'nil-rate bands' for IHT are reduced in certain circumstances. Every estate gets a nil-rate band of £325,000 on which no IHT is payable.
If passing property to a direct descendant, then an additional 'residence nil-rate band' of up to £175,000 each is also available. Both of these allowances can be transferred between spouses, so it's common to hear that a married couple can leave up to £1m tax free between them before IHT applies.
Where an estate exceeds £2m the residence nil-rate band starts to be reduced at a rate of £1 for every £2 over the threshold, until it disappears for estates over £2,350,000.
The cumulative effect of the lost residence nil-rate band, plus the higher rates of income tax, could lead to an effective tax rate of 90pc for some large estates if unused pensions are also included for deaths after April 2027.
As I've mentioned before, it is difficult to weigh up options until we have more details on exactly how the rules will work.
People who are in their late 70s or 80s already understandably feel frustrated by the lack of detail, as they might feel they have less time to act compared to those in the early years of retirement.
Lots of people have considered simply spending more in retirement as a way of avoiding the tax man taking a share of their pensions under the new rules. For you, that will mean paying income tax on the extra money you draw from your Sipp. What rate of tax you'll pay depends on your other taxable income.
Others who feel they really don't need the money, or already have more than enough to last them through retirement and potential care costs, are considering making use of gifting rules and available exemptions in their lifetimes. I've covered how making gifts from income can end up funding pension contributions for younger family members – and even get them tax relief in this previous article.
What action is best for you will of course depend on your personal situation and is an area where advice could help you and your beneficiaries save money.
My suggestion would be to wait until we've got more information on the rules and then consider getting some professional advice about your estate planning, especially when it comes to reviewing your wills and considering gifts.
This could help avoid any costly mistakes and make a huge difference to the amount your loved ones can inherit.
With best wishes,
–Charlene
Charlene Young is a pensions and savings expert at online investment platform AJ Bell. Her columns should not be taken as advice or as a personal recommendation, but as a starting point for readers to undertake their own further research.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
Nigel Farage calls for ‘re-industrialisation' of Wales
Nigel Farage has said his party wants to restart Port Talbot's blast furnaces and 're-industrialise Wales'. On a visit to South Wales, the leader of Reform UK said the resumption of traditional steelmaking and coal production is the party's long-term ambition if it comes to power. The speech came one year ahead of the Senedd elections in May next year, where the party is looking to end Labour's 26 years of domination. Addressing reporters, Mr Farage acknowledged that plans to open a traditional furnace could take years and cost 'in the low billions'. The GMB Union has branded the plans 'more lies from an opportunistic chancer'. Port Talbot's remaining blast furnaces were shut down in September last year, with a new electric arc furnace being built in their place. 'Our ambition is to re-industrialise Wales,' Mr Farage said. 'We are going to be using more steel over the next few years than we have probably ever used. 'As we increase military spending and as we attempt a house building programme in Wales, and even more so in England, of massive proportions, just to catch up with the population explosion over the last 20 years, we are going to need a lot of steel.' The Reform leader said 'specific types of coal' are needed in the UK, particularly for a new blast furnace. 'We should be producing ourselves, rather than importing,' he said. While he acknowledged 'mining is dangerous', he said the industry could provide well-paying jobs. Mr Farage acknowledged the plan to open a new furnace would cost 'in the low billions' and would be 'no easy thing'. 'It's a massive, expensive job to re-open blast furnaces, we're going to need cheaper energy, we're going to need much cheaper coal, we are going to need private business partners prepared to come into a joint venture,' he said. Responding to the GMB Union allegations that his party's plans were 'lies', Mr Farage said the union was tied to the Labour Party as one of its biggest funders. He said: 'They see us as a challenge, and therefore, they'll be rude about us. 'What you will find is that increasingly, GMB members are going to vote for us, and the more GMB members vote for us, the more upsetGMB officials and leaders will become. 'Frankly, the trade unions have done nothing to protect British workers through open borders over the last 20-25 years.' During his speech, Mr Farage said he doubted that the electric arc furnace, which is due to come online in 2028, 'will ever, ever be switched on'. Challenged on what evidence he had, he argued that with British energy prices being so high, it would be producing 'very, very expensive secondary steel'. He added: 'I hope I'm wrong, an electric arc furnace is not the real deal, but it's better than nothing.' Mr Farage said the party's campaign for the Senedd election next May 'starts today', but would not say when Reform would announce aleader in Wales. Regional officer Ruth Brady, speaking at the GMB's annual conference in Brighton, said: 'The people of Port Talbot will see this for what it is – more lies from this opportunistic chancer. 'Nigel Farage was happy to let British Steel go to the wall. He'll trot out any line when the cameras are rolling. He doesn't care about steel communities or steel workers.' Ms Brady said the plans to shut the blast furnaces were made by the last Tory government and the union wanted Labour to 'make good on their promises to our members in Port Talbot'.
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Church sacked accountant for being non-Catholic
A church sacked an accountant after she was discriminated against for not being Catholic, a tribunal has found. University of Cambridge-educated Janet Parker argued with her female boss after she asked for leave to care for her newly adopted daughter. When the 55-year-old's request for flexible working was refused, she complained, observing that 'the Catholic Church does not have a blemish-free history when it comes to adopted children or children in care'. Ms Parker was then subjected to a 'witch hunt' investigation for alleged professional negligence, which led to her dismissal from her £60,000-a-year role. She has now won claims against Clifton Diocese after a tribunal ruled it discriminated against her, harassed her and then unfairly sacked her because she was not religious. Ms Parker, who later told a reporter that she was an atheist, claimed the diocese's approach to her flexible working request was 'tainted by negative views of adoption, emanating from the religious beliefs of its staff'. Disapproval of adoption leave Details of her tribunal claim emerged at a disciplinary hearing, conducted by the Institute of Chartered Accountants (ICAEW), into abusive messages she sent to Lyn Murray, the diocese chief operating officer, after her dismissal. According to the full judgment – which has not been made public – the hearing in Bristol was told that she had worked at the diocese, which covers the west of England, from February 2015 until her dismissal in October 2021. Ms Parker, described by the tribunal as a 'very intelligent, articulate, and able woman', had been a chartered accountant since 1998 and worked in London at Deloittes and Credit Suisse before moving to the charity sector in 2009. In 2019, her application to adopt a baby girl was approved and in January 2020 she informed Mrs Murray, who she said had previously been supportive, of her intention to take 52 weeks of adoption leave. The tribunal was told: 'Mrs Murray did not react well, arguing that she did not believe that [Ms Parker] could 'go on leave with no notice,' as she described it, and expressed dissatisfaction that [she] would 'do that to her'.' Ms Parker began her leave in September 2020 but the tribunal heard that during her absence, her replacement flagged potential financial irregularities in the accounts for which she had been responsible. Church launched disciplinary investigation In July 2021, Ms Parker had a conversation with Mrs Murray about reducing hours and working from home because she was struggling to find childcare for her daughter. However, her request was refused, and the following month the diocese launched disciplinary proceedings against her before putting her on suspension. Ms Parker responded by issuing a grievance against Mrs Murray, she said: 'This behaviour is not in accordance with the professed beliefs of the Catholic Church. 'I know that the Catholic Church does not have a blemish-free history when it comes to adopted children or children in care, but I hoped that this kind of prejudice had been eradicated long ago. Maybe I am wrong.' The hearing was told that the ICAEW was asked to investigate the allegations against her and eventually found there was insufficient evidence to support the complaints. However, at the conclusion of its investigation, the diocese decided to dismiss her for gross misconduct. The tribunal heard this led to Ms Parker sending an email to Mrs Murray saying: 'There is one thing I always wanted to say to you. Now I can. F--- OFF YOU B---H.' and 'Your god might forgive you but I never will. B---h.' She then put out Facebook posts saying: 'You asked for it and I'm coming for you,' and 'Nolite te bastardes carborundorum, b----es,' – meaning 'don't let the bastards grind you down, b----es' in Latin. 'Witch hunt' Employment Judge Adam Midgley said Ms Parker, as a non Catholic, had been religiously discriminated against. He said: '[She] has argued that from the moment she challenged the [diocese], particularly from the point at which she referenced the Catholic Church's treatment of vulnerable children, her card was marked, and [it] closed ranks to protect itself and dismiss her.' 'Those are very serious allegations. The claimant is required to produce some evidence from which we could, properly directing ourselves, conclude that the reason for the matters she complains of was her religion or belief – ie that she was a non-Catholic.' He described the investigation that led to her dismissal as appearing like 'witch hunt' and said it was 'derisory in its depth, unbalanced and focused on establishing fault'. Ms Parker has yet to receive compensation following the judgment as the diocese is understood to have launched an appeal. Speaking after the ICAEW issued her a caution over the abusive messages, Ms Parker said: 'I wasn't happy with the ICAEW outcome but I suppose it was the best outcome given the situation. I don't think what I did was wrong and I think I just did what probably millions of people around the country want to do when they leave their jobs.'
Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain's biggest solar farm threatens Domesday villages
The developer of Britain's largest solar farm has told residents of three Norfolk villages that appear in the Domesday Book that their land may be 'required'. Dozens of villagers in Hempnall, Saxlingham and Tasburgh were sent letters warning them that their homes may be needed to create space for the East Pye Solar project. The development will cover 2,500 acres, an area the size of Chichester, in West Sussex, and it is 10 times bigger than the UK's current largest solar farm in Flintshire, Wales. Letters sent in the last two months asked villagers detailed questions about their mortgages. In total, residents in 23 villages between Long Stratton and Diss are believed to have been sent the letters, which state their land may be 'required'. If the East Pye Solar proposal goes ahead, it would deliver up to 500 megawatts of electricity, enough to power 115,000 homes annually. As the plans are deemed a nationally significant infrastructure project (NSIP), the developer, Island Green Power, could have the power to compulsorily purchase land. Farmers around the UK have been threatened with the possibility of compulsory purchase orders for solar farm development, but this is believed to be the first time homeowners have been approached. Residents of Hempnall, which has a population of 1,238, criticised the letter's 'impertinent' and 'unreasonable' line of questioning. Yvonne Davy, 89, is among dozens of residents who received letters from the developer's lawyers, Dalcour Maclaren. Ms Davy, who has lived in Hempnall since 1973, said she received three letters, dated April 9, May 2 and May 29, and an unwanted phone call. The great-grandmother, who has an electric car and solar panels on her roof, said: 'I thought that can't be right. They were asking about my finances and my mortgage. It is quite impertinent. I wasn't very pleased when they rang me at the seaside, and I told them what they're planning to do isn't very nice at all. I don't know how they got my number.' Developers would get her land 'over her dead body', she added, saying: 'They're putting these vast numbers of panels, and it's going to blight the countryside. Where I walk and where I live is going to be surrounded by solar panels the height of a house. It would be dreadful. 'I'm going to be 90 this year, and I'm happily settled. I don't want to lose my property.' Robert Eagle, 77, has also received multiple letters, with the first in early April, followed by three reminders to fill out the questionnaire. Mr Eagle, who has lived in Hempnall for 27 years, said he felt 'unreasonably' chased by the company for his financial information. He said: 'At first I was surprised to receive the letter because I didn't realise such detailed information would be needed at this stage. If I had to give up my home, I would certainly not be pleased. We've been here a long time and we'd like to remain here. 'The thing that really hits us is how unreasonable the project is in terms of scale.' David Hook, the chairman of Hempnall Parish Council, said it was 'extremely concerned' about the solar farm proposals. He said: 'The East Pye scheme, if permitted, would surround our village and cover in total 2,718 acres of South Norfolk countryside with solar panels. 'Our objection to these schemes is due primarily to the fact that their construction would result in the industrialisation of large areas of attractive, tranquil countryside with solar panels and security fences. 'The NSIP regime also provides developers with compulsory purchase powers and this is causing great concern to many local residents, in Hempnall and many other villages included in the scheme, who have received letters saying their home 'may be required'. Island Green Power said: 'As part the development consent order process, East Pye Solar will be undertaking land interest questionnaires to identify people and organisations that have a legal interest in land or property that may potentially be impacted by the scheme. 'This is a statutory obligation under the 2008 Planning Act, and is routine for helping to identify those with legal interest in land. 'Completing land referencing questionnaires allows these stakeholders to be consulted on the development consent order application and ensures they receive formal notification such as when the scheme is accepted for examination.' The Telegraph has contacted the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
