
No Double Standards On Energy Trade: India On Latest EU Sanctions Package Against Russia
"Government of India considers the provision of energy security a responsibility of paramount importance to meet the basic needs of its citizens. We would stress that there should be no double standards, especially when it comes to energy trade," he added.
According to the EU, the 18th Russia sanctions package focuses on five building blocks: cutting Russia's energy revenues, hitting Russia's banking sector, further weakening its military-industrial complex, strengthening anti-circumvention measures, and holding Russia accountable for its crimes against Ukrainian children and cultural heritage.
"With this package, the number of listed vessels in Russia's shadow fleet reaches a total of 444 vessels, and the number of individual listings exceeds 2,500. This package also includes new sanctions against Belarus," read the EU statement.
On Thursday, Union Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas Hardeep Singh Puri said that India has diversified its sources for buying oil in the global market, due to which the government is not 'unduly worried' over any US crackdown on Russia's oil exports.
Speaking at the Urja Varta 2025, the minister said India currently buys oil from 40 nations, as compared to 27 countries in 2007, and the global market is well-supplied.
"There is a lot of oil available in the market. Iran and Venezuela are currently under sanctions. But are they going to be under sanctions forever? Many countries, including Brazil, Canada and others, are ramping up output. I am not unduly worried about supplies as of now. We have diversified our sources," Puri said.
The minister's statement came against the backdrop of US President Donald Trump announcing that secondary sanctions would be imposed on countries buying Russian oil.
On July 15, Trump had threatened to impose serious trade restrictions on Russia unless a peace deal with Ukraine is reached within 50 days. Trump said US tariffs on Russian exports would be increased to 100 per cent, while also threatening to impose secondary sanctions on countries such as India and China that buy oil from Russia.
Meanwhile, Moscow on Friday described the move as unlawful and emphasised that it will assess the latest package in order to minimise its impact.
"So far, we continue to observe a fairly consistent anti-Russian stance from Europe. We have repeatedly stated that we view such unilateral restrictions as illegal and we oppose them," Russian state-run news agency TASS quoted Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov as saying.
Peskov further emphasised that the Russian leadership will assess the latest package of European sanctions in order to minimise its impact. "Undoubtedly, the new package will need to be thoroughly analysed in order to minimise its impact," said Peskov.
He further asserted that Russia has developed a degree of immunity to sanctions over the course of repeated waves of Western restrictions. "Over time, we have indeed developed a certain immunity to sanctions and have adapted to living under such conditions," he noted.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
a minute ago
- Economic Times
Bank of Baroda Q1 Results: PAT grows 2% YoY to Rs 4,541 crore, NII decline 1.4%
Bank of Baroda's Q1 profit rose marginally to ₹4,541 crore as NII dipped, while deposits and advances saw double-digit growth across domestic and international segments. Synopsis Bank of Baroda posted a modest 2% YoY rise in Q1 FY26 profit to ₹4,541 crore. Net interest income dipped 1.4%, impacted by tax refund reclassification. Deposits and advances, both domestic and international, grew strongly year-on-year. State-lender Bank of Baroda (BoB) on Friday reported a 2% growth in its Q1 standalone net profit to Rs 4,541 crore versus Rs 4,458 crore in the year-ago period. The company's net interest income (NII) stood at Rs 11,435 crore which was down 1.4% from Rs 11,600 crore reported in the corresponding quarter of the last financial year. ADVERTISEMENT The NII includes the impact of reclassification of interest on income tax refund, a company filing to the exchanges said. BoB's domestic deposits were reported at Rs 12.04 lakh crore, witnessing an 8% uptick over Rs 11.14 lakh crore in the year ago period. International Deposits were up from Rs 2.01 lakh crore in Q1FY25 to Rs 2.31 lakh crore in Q1FY26, recording a 15% growth. Total deposits stood at Rs 14.35 lakh crore, a 9% YoY uptick. Retail Advances were up 17% from Rs 2.22 lakh crore in Q1FY25 to Rs 2.61 lakh crore in Q1FY26. Domestic Gross Advances grew 12% to Rs 9.91 lakh crore from Rs 8.81 lakh crore in the year ago period. Total advances were 14% up YoY at Rs 2.15 lakh crore in the quarter under review. GNPA Ratio stood at 2.28% in Q1FY26, declining by 60 bps over 2.88% in the year ago period. The NNPA ratio stood at 0.60 in Q1FY26, declining 9 bps on a YoY Adequacy Ratio increased 79 bps YoY from 16.82% in Q1FY25 to Rs 17.61% in Q1FY26. ADVERTISEMENT The PSU bank's operating profit was reported at Rs 8,236 crore, a 15% growth over Rs 7,161 crore reported in the year ago Read: Cipla Q1 Results: Cons PAT rises 10% YoY to Rs 1,298 crore, revenue up 4% (Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of Economic Times) ADVERTISEMENT (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel) Nikita Papers IPO opens on May 27, price band set at Rs 95-104 per share Nikita Papers IPO opens on May 27, price band set at Rs 95-104 per share Why gold prices could surpass $4,000: JP Morgan's bullish outlook explained Why gold prices could surpass $4,000: JP Morgan's bullish outlook explained Cyient shares fall over 9% after Q4 profit declines, core business underperforms Cyient shares fall over 9% after Q4 profit declines, core business underperforms L&T Technology Services shares slide 7% after Q4 profit dips L&T Technology Services shares slide 7% after Q4 profit dips Trump-Powell standoff puts U.S. Rate policy in crosshairs: Who will blink first? Trump-Powell standoff puts U.S. Rate policy in crosshairs: Who will blink first? SEBI warns of securities market frauds via YouTube, Facebook, X and more SEBI warns of securities market frauds via YouTube, Facebook, X and more API Trading for All: Pi42 CTO Satish Mishra on How Pi42 is Empowering Retail Traders API Trading for All: Pi42 CTO Satish Mishra on How Pi42 is Empowering Retail Traders Security, transparency, and innovation: What sets Pi42 apart in crypto trading Security, transparency, and innovation: What sets Pi42 apart in crypto trading Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Altcoins? How investors are structuring their crypto portfolios, Avinash Shekhar explains Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Altcoins? How investors are structuring their crypto portfolios, Avinash Shekhar explains The rise of Crypto Futures in India: Leverage, tax efficiency, and market maturity, Avinash Shekhar of Pi42 explains NEXT STORY


Indian Express
a minute ago
- Indian Express
What is the significance of Columbia's $221 million settlement with Trump administration?
Columbia University has reached a deal with the Trump administration, and will pay $221 million to the federal government in exchange for reinstatement of federal research money that was cancelled over allegations of anti-semitism on campus. The University has also agreed to a bunch of demands of the administration. For instance, Columbia agreed to suspend, expel, or revoke degrees of some 70 students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. The development is a big win for the Trump administration, which has sued other universities over similar allegations. It has essentially paved a way for the administration to exert greater control over higher education, including campus activism. What settlement has Columbia University reached? On March 3, 2025, the Trump administration announced the review of alleged violations by Columbia University of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which 'prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistance'. The review was conducted by the 'multi-agency Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism' that was announced under Trump's Executive Order titled 'Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism.' This was followed by the cancellation of $400 million in grants and contracts to Columbia University on March 7, resulting in a freeze on research funding. Columbia University was the first university to be accused of anti-semitism on campus. Other universities, like Harvard and Cornell, were given similar accusations thereafter. On March 13, the Trump administration sent Columbia University a letter stating their demands for it to make changes to student discipline on campus and revise their admission policies. The letter stated that the University had 'failed to protect American students and faculty from anti-semitic violence and harassment'. The letter also said that the University should comply with demands like 'ban masks that are intended to conceal identity' and 'formalise, adopt, and promulgate a definition of anti-semitism.' The University agreed to these demands in the week that followed, when the government refused to negotiate on the $400 million restrictions. Since then, Columbia has expelled dozens of students for hosting pro-Palestine protests, including cases of deportation and cancellation of student visas. Around 180 researchers were also laid off due to the funding restrictions the university faced. Columbia obtains approximately $1.3 billion in federal research funding each year, and the University stated that it would have faced significant jeopardy had it stayed on the administration's list of excluded institutions. Therefore, the University decided to settle the case by paying $200 million over three years to the federal government and $21 million to settle the investigations by the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The agreement has led to the reinstatement of a vast majority of restricted federal grants and shows the university's 'broader commitment to combating antisemitism,' according to the Acting President, Claire Shipman. Why is this significant? The Columbia University settlement marks a significant moment in the Trump administration's broader strategy to regulate university governance through federal enforcement mechanisms. It is the first University to formally comply with the administration's demands related to alleged antisemitism on campus. This compliance sets a precedent for other institutions facing similar federal scrutiny. Harvard University, in stark contrast, chose to resist the administration's demands and instead filed a lawsuit against them. The University argued that the administration was attempting to overreach by exerting undue influence over its academic decision-making processes, threatening the institution's long-standing commitment to academic independence and integrity. The Columbia case and other government accusations reflect a growing trend of federal intervention in higher education, where funding is used as leverage to enforce political and administrative compliance. With Columbia's decision to settle, other universities may come under pressure to choose between legal resistance and financial risk. The outcome positions the federal government as a more assertive actor in shaping campus policy, particularly around issues of protest, speech, and civil rights enforcement.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
a minute ago
- First Post
‘EU rules unworkable': Meta says halting political advertising among bloc nations from October
Meta will ban political ads on Facebook and Instagram in the EU from October, citing legal uncertainty and operational burdens under the bloc's new political advertising rules. read more Meta announced on Friday that it will be compelled to stop allowing political advertising across its platforms in the European Union starting in October. The company cited the EU's new Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation as being 'unworkable." Meta described this as a challenging decision driven by the substantial operational difficulties and legal ambiguities introduced by the TTPA rules. The company emphasised that these obligations impose an unsustainable level of complexity and legal uncertainty for both advertisers and platform operators within the EU. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to Meta, these regulations will ultimately have a negative impact on European users. 'We believe that personalised ads are critical to a wide range of advertisers, including those engaged on campaigns to inform voters about important social issues that shape public discourse,' Meta said. 'Regulations, like the TTPA, significantly undermine our ability to offer these services, not only impacting effectiveness of advertisers' outreach but also the ability of voters to access comprehensive information,' the company added. 'This is a difficult decision - one we've taken in response to the EU's incoming Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation, which introduces significant operational challenges and legal uncertainties,' it said. The European Union legislation, called the Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation and which will apply from Oct. 10, was triggered by concerns about disinformation and foreign interference in elections across the 27-country bloc. The EU law requires Big Tech companies to clearly label political advertising on their platforms, who paid for it and how much as well as which elections are being targeted or risk fines up to 6% of their annual turnover. With inputs from agencies