Katherine Lorenz
Lorenz is the leader of the Next Gen pack, officially known as the Giving Pledge Next Generation group, the heirs of the ultra-wealthy philanthropists who formally promised to donate the majority of their wealth to charitable causes in their lifetimes or their wills. Lorenz co-founded the group in 2014 with 24 members. Its ranks have now expanded to 300, ranging in age from 21 to 75, as the press of the challenges they're likely to face becomes more urgent. Dozens of the nearly 250 billionaires who signed the Giving Pledge have died before wrapping up their giving plans. And about 50 of the remaining Pledgers are over age 80.
'Giving away money is easy. Making an impact is hard.'
Lorenz's goal is to provide heirs with resources to help them establish decisionmaking processes, reduce family arguments, and deal with emotionally fraught questions like how strictly they need to adhere to their loved one's giving strategies vs. their own ideas about how and where they can do the most good. Lorenz, who is president of the Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation, the nonprofit that her grandparents established in 1978, says, 'Is this their foundation? Is it my foundation? Is it our foundation? Who gets to decide what's important? Carrying out someone else's legacy is not easy.'
To help, the Next Gen group offers in-person training sessions, WhatsApp chats, and access to help, such as consultants who can offer advice about ways to divide donation pools that allow disagreeing heirs to fund different charities. Last year, for the first time, the Next Gen group also attended the Giving Pledgers' annual meeting. Such big multigenerational gatherings are helpful, says Lorenz, who previously served as a senior adviser for the National Center for Family Philanthropy and deputy director of the Institute for Philanthropy. 'When you hear from other families what's worked for them or what hasn't worked, you get ideas,' she says.
Lorenz knows firsthand how challenging—and rewarding—inheriting the responsibility for fulfilling a pledge can be. She was steeped in her grandfathers' concerns about improving sustainability—Mitchell made his fortune by pioneering the shale-gas extraction method commonly known as fracking—and leaving a legacy for the greater good. He was deeply concerned n general about energy and environmental conservation. She recalls, 'Every time you saw him, he'd say, 'If you can't make the world work with 4 billion people, how are you going to make it work with 10 billion people? What are you going to do about it?''
Yet she also believes the Next Gen has to figure out how to forge their own giving path. Newbie philanthropists often start out by writing checks to their alma mater, Lorenz says. But as they begin to zero in on what causes they really care about and where their dollars will do the most good, donations often shift to organizations that have a more direct effect on a community, such as food banks, land trusts, or arts groups. 'Giving away money is easy,' says Lorenz. 'Making an impact is hard.'
In addition to helping families increase the size and impact of their donations, Lorenz says her goal is to help heirs turn a legacy from a potentially stressful burden to a joyous activity that brings relatives together—an outcome with benefits beyond the family. She says, 'When you enjoy it more, you give more.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
Leonard Tow, cable TV magnate and a major philanthropist, dies at 97
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Besides the Lincoln Center theater, Tow, once a member of the Forbes 400 list of richest Americans, funded a performing arts center at Brooklyn College (where he and his wife, both raised poor, had met); journalism programs at Columbia University and City University of New York; the Tow Center for Developmental Oncology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in Manhattan; and the Tow Youth Justice Institute in West Haven, Connecticut. Advertisement After an early career teaching economics at Hunter and Brooklyn colleges, Tow concluded that universities had 'too many people fighting over anthills,' and he jumped to the private sector. In 1964, he landed a job at the TelePrompTer Corp., a pioneer in the cable industry, where he was credited with expanding subscribers to 1 million from 50,000. Advertisement In 1973, he and his wife, who had been an elementary-school teacher, started their own cable business, Century Communications Corp. It was launched from their dining room table on a line of credit. The timing was perfect: The federal government had just deregulated the industry, and homes with cable subscriptions began to grow exponentially. New-Canaan-based Century became one of the country's largest cable providers, with some 2,300 employees and 1.6 million subscribers. In 1999, Tow, the chief executive, sold the company for $5.2 billion, in a mostly stock deal, to Adelphia Communications. He became Adelphia's largest shareholder after the founders, the Rigas family of Pennsylvania. Three years later, Adelphia filed for bankruptcy amid a corruption scandal that eventually sent John Rigas, the founder, and his son Timothy, the company's former chief financial officer, to prison. Tow's shares had declined by 70 percent. He had also jumped into the telephone business, buying a stake in 1989 in Citizens Utilities Co. of Stamford, Connecticut, a network of small phone companies that is now known as Frontier Communications. The New York Times called Tow, who as Citizens' chief executive grew the company, 'an aggressive acquisitor and deal maker.' But when it was disclosed that he was paid $21.6 million in 1992, more than any other utility executive in the country, shareholders, including the California Public Employees' Retirement Fund, sued. The lawsuits were eventually settled. Tow retired from business in 2004 to focus on philanthropy through the Tow Foundation. Advertisement In 2012, he and his wife signed the Giving Pledge led by Bill Gates and Warren Buffett to have the world's richest people promise to contribute at least 50 percent of their wealth to nonprofits. The Tows committed to give away nearly 100 percent of their assets. The Tow Foundation reported $321 million in assets in 2024, a sum that will grow considerably with the addition of bequests from Tow following his death, according to his family. Leonard Tow was born on May 30, 1928, in Brooklyn to Louis and Estelle (Weiss) Tow, Jewish immigrants from Russia whose family name derived from the Hebrew word for 'good.' Leonard and a brother grew up in a one-room apartment behind Tow's Discount House, a store his parents owned in the Bensonhurst neighborhood. He received a bachelor's degree in 1950 from Brooklyn College, where he met Claire Schneider, a member of the class of 1952. He belonged to the Longfellows Club, a group for male students over 6 feet in height, and she was in the Hi Hites, an equivalent group for tall female students. They married in 1952. Tow earned a master's in 1952 and a doctorate in economic geography in 1960, both from Columbia University. Survivors include his sons Andrew and Frank; a daughter, Emily; eight grandchildren; and a great-granddaughter. The Tows funded the Leonard & Claire Tow Center for the Performing Arts at Brooklyn College, the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia and the Tow-Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism at City University of New York. The two journalism ventures aim to find ways for journalism to survive in the internet age and combat misinformation. 'I'm really worried about the print-journalism side of the business,' Tow told the Times in announcing the first grants of $8 million to the journalism programs in 2008. 'There's so much contraction of employment going on; every day you pick up the paper and this chain or that chain has laid off another 10 percent, and we're watching advertising support slowly disintegrate.' Advertisement In 2016, the Tow Foundation donated $25 million to Barnard College to help build a new teaching center. Tow received the Carnegie Medal of Philanthropy in 2019. Criminal justice is also a focus of the foundation: It donated six-figure sums in 2023 to the Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth, PEN America's Prison and Justice Writing program, and the Yale Prison Education Initiative. And as part of an overhaul of Damrosch Park on the Lincoln Center campus, which was announced in May, the Tow Foundation pledged $20 million toward an outdoor community stage. This year, the foundation underwrote the salaries of 14 resident playwrights at nonprofit theaters who received their first New York productions. 'My father was at the theater three weeks ago,' Emily Tow said. 'He was interested in everything, it didn't matter how avant-garde. Some weeks he'd see three or four plays, from a basement in the Lower East Side to the fanciest Broadway production.' This article originally appeared in
Newsweek
4 days ago
- Newsweek
New Trains Set For High-Speed Route Linking Washington D.C. And Boston
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Amtrak will begin rolling out NextGen Acela trains on August 28, launching five trainsets that will operate on the Northeast Corridor between Boston and Washington, D.C. The new trains offer up to 160 mph top speeds, more seats per departure and upgraded onboard amenities, according to Amtrak. Newsweek contacted Amtrak for more information via email. Why it Matters Amtrak is the largest high-speed rail provider in the United States, carrying over 30 million passengers annually. It is supported by state and federal subsidies, much of which is focused on maintaining the Northeast Corridor, which is the busiest part of its network. Amtrak has long-term plans to double the number of passengers it carries in the next three decades. If these construction works go to plan, the route could transport 66 million people a year by 2040. What To Know The NextGen Acela will operate along the Northeast Corridor between Boston and Washington, D.C, stopping at major stations including Providence, New York City, Stamford, New Haven's Union Station, Philadelphia and Baltimore. A map of the new route that Amtrak's NexGen Acela trains will run on. A map of the new route that Amtrak's NexGen Acela trains will run on. Amtrak Next-gen Acela offers roughly 27 percent more seating per departure compared with the prior Acela sets, along with ergonomic seating, larger windows, individual USB ports, power outlets and complimentary 5G-enabled Wi‑Fi, according to Amtrak. The new NextGen fleet was assembled at Alstom's Hornell, New York, facility using components from suppliers across multiple states. Amtrak has not released final pricing for the NextGen Acela seats or definitive, companywide changes to scheduled trip times on the corridor at the time of writing. What People Are Saying Jason Abrams, Amtrak senior public relations manager, told NBC Connecticut: "We're very excited about the new Acela trains, they are the biggest thing we're doing as a company in the past 25 years. "It's more frequencies, more seats, more opportunities to ride, we'll have more service on weekdays and weekends and there's also more trains on the fleet so more opportunities to travel." Amtrak President Roger Harris, in a news release quoted by CTNewsJunkie on Aug. 12, 2025: "NextGen Acela is more than a new train—it's an evolution of travel. In just a few weeks, history will be made with the debut of NextGen Acela as we launch a new standard for American train travel." What Happens Next Amtrak plans to continue phased deliveries through 2027 to reach 28 NextGen Acela train sets and to operate both legacy Acela and NextGen trains during the transition.
Newsweek
4 days ago
- Newsweek
These Billionaires Pledged To Give Away Their Wealth. Instead, Most Are Getting Wealthier
Advocates for ideas and draws conclusions based on the interpretation of facts and data. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Giving Pledge just turned 15. Bill Gates, Melinda French, and Warren Buffett founded the Pledge in August 2010 to boost charitable giving among billionaires. Pledgers agree to give away half or more of their wealth within their lifetimes, or upon their deaths. The effort was inspired by Duty Free Shoppers founder Chuck Feeney, the reluctant billionaire who advocated "giving while living." Feeney gave away over $8 billion before he died, relinquishing his billionaire status to live a more modest life. "[Feeney] told me we should encourage people not to give just 50 percent," Gates recounted, "but as much as possible during their lifetime." The Giving Pledge is the largest and most visible public commitment that billionaires have made to distribute their vast fortunes. Over 256 individuals, couples, and families have signed, including 194 from the United States. U.S. money is pictured. U.S. money is pictured. Getty Images Our tax code's charitable deductions effectively allow billionaires to "opt out" of taxes—ostensibly to give back through charity. In the absence of higher taxes on the wealthy that could fund a stronger social safety net, voluntary commitments like the Giving Pledge are important. But in an era of staggering wealth inequality—and tax avoidance—privately held fortunes are larger than anyone can fathom. And charitable contributions simply aren't keeping up with what could be raised from a fairer tax code. In our new report, The Giving Pledge at 15, we found that the explosive growth of Giving Pledgers' wealth is outpacing their giving. At this rate, the Giving Pledge appears to be mostly an empty promise. Along with our co-authors Helen Flannery and Dan Petegorsky, we analyzed the philanthropic records of the pledgers. Some are bold and direct, like MacKenzie Scott, who's vowed to "keep at it until the safe is empty." Others need to pick up the pace, like John Paul DeJoria, whose foundation has awarded $54 million since its inception eight years ago—a paltry sum compared to his roughly $3 billion fortune. And there are those who seem to cravenly intertwine personal benefit with philanthropy—like Elon Musk, who in 2021 enjoyed some fortuitously timely tax relief from a stock transfer to his foundation. Across nearly every example, there's proof that the Pledge is unfulfilled, unfulfillable, and not our ticket to a fairer, better future. If hundreds of billionaires pledge to give away half their wealth in their lifetimes, we should expect that some would have less wealth than when they took the Pledge. But when adjusted for inflation, the 32 original U.S. pledgers who are still billionaires have collectively gotten 166 percent wealthier since they signed on in 2010. (Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan's wealth has increased an inflation-adjusted 2,919 percent since 2010!) Only one couple in this group, Laura and John Arnold, has fulfilled their commitment, moving billions in their lifetime—mostly to their own foundation. But that raises another issue. By our count, 80 percent of Giving Pledge donations have gone to private foundations—and billions more to other intermediaries. Donors get an immediate tax deduction, but the funds can remain sidelined for generations before they're granted out to real working charities—if ever. Play this out another 15 years and we'll witness the rise of family-controlled dynastic foundations worth trillions. These foundations will wield tremendous power, especially as their windfalls contrast with catastrophic cuts to the social safety net like those in the GOP's Big Beautiful Bill. A select few families will essentially decide how publicly subsidized funds are spent, concentrating power over our politics and civil society and jeopardizing our democracy. At 15, the Giving Pledge must either go big or reconsider its value. One path forward is to encourage a "Feeney Giving Pledge," an augmented commitment for existing pledgers to pay their fair share of taxes, give more while alive, and empower organizations led by non-billionaires to solve the urgent problems of our day. Feeney's example echoed in Bill Gates's May announcement that he would donate 99 percent of his Microsoft stock to his foundation, which he's pledged to wind down and close within 20 years. This voluntary effort would pair nicely with structural reforms. We should tax billionaires at a fair rate. And taxpayer-subsidized foundations and donor-advised funds (DAFs) should be subject to stronger transparency rules—and required to grant out funds to real, working charities more quickly. If billionaires' best intentions can't deliver a fairer economy, then it's up to the rest of us not to count on them. Chuck Collins directs the Program on Inequality at the Institute for Policy Studies. Bella DeVaan is the associate director of the IPS Charity Reform Initiative. They're coauthors of the new IPS report The Giving Pledge at 15. The views expressed in this article are the writers' own.
