Trump's Middle East trip formalizes his rebuke of the Republican Party's ‘neocons'
Donald Trump touched down in Qatar on Wednesday as he began the second leg of his Middle East tour, the first official foreign trip of his second presidency.
But it was his remarks on Tuesday in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, that resonated across the US foreign policy sphere as the Republican president blasted 'interventionalists' on both sides of the American political spectrum — a message that was at once a rebuke of three living former presidents and much of the traditional Washington establishment.
In a speech to a US-Saudi investment forum, the president delivered the clearest vision yet of what his Middle East policy will look like in a second term — the departure from a status quo that governed how the US does business and forges partnerships in the region. His remarks rejected any notion of giving credit to past US or European leaders who'd left their successive stamps on the region in a condemnation that was reminiscent of the screeds he delivered against the Iraq War during his first run for the presidency in 2015-2016.
'This great transformation [of the Middle East] has not come from Western interventionists … giving you lectures on how to live or how to govern your own affairs,' Trump declared. 'The gleaming marvels of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi were not created by the so-called 'nation-builders,' 'neocons,' or 'liberal non-profits,' like those who spent trillions failing to develop Kabul and Baghdad, so many other cities.'
He went further: 'In the end, the so-called 'nation-builders' wrecked far more nations than they built — and the interventionists were intervening in complex societies that they did not even understand themselves.'
With those jabs, the US president capped off a dynamic that has emerged through his first 100 days in office, a time span defined so far by the rapid-fire DOGE-ification of the federal government and turmoil that has eaten away at the unity of Donald Trump's White House team from within. At the beginning of May, the president announced a personnel shift long speculated to be in the making: he ousted Mike Waltz, his national security adviser, moving the former congressman to a new posting as United Nations ambassador.
Seen as the most neoconservative foreign policy hawk in the White House, Waltz's ouster as national security adviser and departure from conversations that administration principles have about military action was thought at the time to be part of a broader shakeup marginalizing those voices within the second Trump White House. That now seems to be verifiably the case, as Waltz's deputies were caught up in a hunt for disloyal staffers undertaken by activist Laura Loomer and they appear to be on the back foot in every regard.
The president's condemnation of 'neocons' in his party comes as his administration conducts the first direct talks with Iran held by American officials dating back to his first term, when (at the urging of those same 'neocons') Trump tore up the JCPOA deal hashed out by his predecessor, Barack Obama, intending to constrain Iran's nuclear program. Trump is now pursuing a deal along those lines, with talks having proceeded through multiple rounds. The US president has praised Iran as 'acting very intelligent' and being 'reasonable' during negotiations, causing headaches for Washington hawks supportive of his first-term 'maximum pressure' policy.
His team also ended US military strikes targeting Houthi rebels in Yemen, where the militant group controls the capital and much of the surrounding territory. Houthi attacks on U.S. ships broke out again earlier this year with the breakdown of a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, but the US president now says that his administration received assurances that strikes on shipping lanes would end if American bombing ceased.
Trump has even bucked Israel as he has for months resisted calls from Jerusalem to support Israeli military action against Iranian nuclear sites and declined to retaliate against the Houthis for an attack on Ben Gurion airport. On Tuesday, he announced the end of sanctions on Syria, a development Israel's government opposed.
All of this is to say, Trump's break from the Washington foreign policy consensus that has engulfed every living president is producing a real environment for change.
In Ukraine, a ceasefire is potentially on the horizon as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and a team of Russian officials prepare to meet Thursday in Turkey for peace talks. Trump and his party have railed against the billions in U.S. munitions sent to aid Ukraine, while the president himself vowed that he could reach an agreement to end the conflict that broke out in 2022 and has since killed hundreds of thousands. The actual process has taken longer, but has reached the first real potential for a resolution since fighting began three years ago.
With Trump bleeding some support at home thanks to the chaos of his tariff policies and cost-cutting at the federal government, politicking across Ukraine and the Middle East seems to be areas where the president sees an opportunity for significant wins tied to his trademark dealmaking brand.
How those deals turn out could end up defining much of the legacy of his second presidency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Iran attack shunts Gulf into more volatile realm
LONDON, June 13 (Reuters Breakingviews) - The Middle East has taken one of its periodic lurches into turmoil. Earlier this week, impending talks between the United States and Iran raised the prospect of a nuclear deal that would have eased tensions in the region. A series of strikes by Israel on the Islamic Republic on Friday morning mean that's off the table. Any talk of stability in the Middle East rings hollow given Israel's near two-year campaign in Gaza, that region's unfolding humanitarian crisis, direct military strikes between Israel and Iran, and attacks by Iran-aligned Houthis on ships in the Red Sea. But U.S. President Donald Trump's recent tour of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, plus his decision to lift sanctions on Syria, had pointed to a less fraught future. A U.S. deal to curtail the capability of Tehran to build nuclear weapons would have cemented relative regional peace, which in turn would help to enable inward investment in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries as they seek to wean their economies off oil. That's a bigger prize for Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman than settling old scores with Tehran. Much depends on how and where Iran responds. One option is that Tehran restricts its retaliation to Israel, as it did in April and October last year when responding to Israeli strikes which targeted the leadership of Iranian proxies like Hezbollah. Right now that's the outcome oil traders seem to be betting on. The price of a barrel of Brent crude was up just 6% at $74 on Friday morning - roughly the same level as in March and the autumn of last year, and far off the spike above $120 a barrel that followed Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Saudi and the United Arab Emirates collectively have 4 million barrels a day of spare capacity to deploy, while the International Energy Agency expects, opens new tab global supply to grow by 1.6 million barrels daily this year, more than twice the increase in demand. In other words, there's plenty of scope for the global economy to avoid an oil shock. Still, it's equally possible that Iran sees Israel's strikes as a calculated extension of its negotiations with Trump – who used a social media post, opens new tab on Friday to urge a deal - and decides to respond by targeting U.S. military bases in Qatar and Bahrain. That could spark a regional struggle that might threaten the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world's daily supply passes, choke off Iranian crude exports of 1.5 million barrels per day, and chill foreign investment in the Gulf. The risk that the latest flare-up in the Middle East turns into something more prolonged and economically problematic is clear – and arguably underpriced. Follow George Hay on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
How might Iran retaliate against Israel? Five potential scenarios
The Israeli air force struck Iran on Thursday night. Israel Katz, Israel's defence minister, declared a special state of emergency throughout the entire country. As talks attempting to secure a nuclear deal between Washington and Tehran drag on, Israel has launched a strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. A conflict with Iran would be 'messy', the US has warned, and would risk plunging the entire region into war. • Israel attacks Iran — follow live Despite being severely weakened over the past couple of years by sanctions and becoming increasingly isolated, Iran still has the capacity to destabilise both the region and the global economy. So how might Iran respond? Iran has thousands of medium-range missiles that can reach US bases scattered across the region, including sites in neighbouring Iraq, and the al-Udeid airbase in Qatar. In 2020, it attacked airbases in Iraq that hosted American troops after the military commander Qasem Soleimani was killed by a US drone strike. • Why Israel is attacking Iran There were no US deaths because the base was evacuated in time, having been given warning by Iran. An attack now could target several bases at once and employ Iranian proxies and allies in Iraq and Yemen, making it difficult to intercept the Iranian missiles. The Middle East produces roughly 30 per cent of the world's oil supply, much of it in Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait. In 2019, a missile and drone attack on an oil installation that Saudi Arabia said was sponsored by Iran temporarily halved Saudi production. It took offline 5 per cent of the world's supply. Iran has since drawn closer to Saudi Arabia and other countries, but it has suggested that it could target regional oil fields if its nuclear sites came under attack. The challenge for Israel and the US would be to strike as many missile batteries as they could in the first wave of any attack, to lessen the impact of an Iranian retaliation. The Persian Gulf acts as a key conduit for oil shipments, with up to 30 per cent of global oil passing the Strait of Hormuz, and a conflict could bring shipping to a halt. Britain's maritime agency, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations, has already advised ships travelling in the region to be cautious. In the past, Iran has blown up ships in the area to put pressure on other Gulf states and the US. Iran has threatened to attack Israel again if Israel strikes against its nuclear sites. In October, in retaliation for Israel bombing Iranian missile production facilities and air defences, Iran fired a barrage of missiles at Israel. These were mostly intercepted by Israeli air defences, with support from the US, Britain and France, but multiple missiles made it past the aerial defences, landing in an airfield hosting a fleet of F35 jets only a few hundred metres from the headquarters of the Mossad spy agency. For decades, Iran's main ally, Hezbollah, has acted as a deterrent against Israel. However, the group has been decimated, as has Hamas in Gaza. Iran still has Houthi allies in Yemen, who regularly fire missiles at Israel, and proxy forces in Iraq, which have also attacked Israel and US bases in Iraq and Syria.
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Former England star Trevor Sinclair declared bankrupt after ‘burying head in sand' over £36k tax bill
FORMER England star Trevor Sinclair has been declared bankrupt after "burying his head in the sand" over a £36,000 tax debt. The footballer made a fortune during his career with QPR, West Ham and Man City before becoming a pundit after he retired. 5 5 But he failed to pay taxes and penalties totalling £36,424 in relation to his TV and radio career between 2021 and 2022. As a result, Sinclair was told to come up with the cash or find an alternative way to pay. The ex-Premier League star failed to turn up to court though and has now been made bankrupt in his absence. Judge Caroline Wilkinson said HMRC had received no contact from the former star and concluded that he is "unable to pay his debts as they fall due." The case previously reached Central London County Court in April when the judge heard that Sinclair ended up owing a sizeable chunk of cash to the taxman after his accountant died. His bill included more than £13,000 for work as a pundit, plus outstanding National Insurance and penalty payments. HMRC barrister Shabab Rizvi saying: "The debtor is a former Premier League footballer and should have the means to satisfy the debt, but there's been no contact with HMRC at all." However, the case was adjourned to give him more time to pay after his lawyer Robert Lee told the court Sinclair was working in the media and "currently in receipt of a job offer in Saudi Arabia." He said the debt arose from Sinclair "being considered self-employed when he ought not to have been." Judge Wilkinson granted the adjournment on the basis Sinclair face up to his impending bankruptcy. He said: "Mr Sinclair has to wake up to the fact that there's no more head in the sand because this is serious". The case returned to court yesterday, where the judge was told Sinclair had failed to materialise. Granting the bankruptcy order, Judge Wilkinson said the case had been paused for Sinclair to consider pursuing an alternative to bankruptcy such as an "individual voluntary arrangement". She continued: "Mr Sinclair is not in attendance today and no proposals have been put forward for paying his debt. "In the circumstances, the court finds that Mr Sinclair is unable to pay his debts as they fall due and it will make the bankruptcy order." Sinclair received 12 caps for England during his career - including four during the 2002 World Cup. His famous bicycle kick goal for QPR against Barnsley won him Match of the Day goal of the season in 1997. Sinclair hung up his boots in 2008 but he returned to screens as a pundit for TV and radio. However, this came to an end in 2022 when he questioned why "black and brown people" were mourning the Queen. 5 5
