logo
How Kiko Milano Built Pricing Power

How Kiko Milano Built Pricing Power

Across the income spectrum, one thing unites all shoppers: everybody likes to feel that they got value for money. While macroeconomic shifts will increase wealth in concentrated pockets, the next five years could also see wealth decline in lower- and middle-income households. Wealthy customers will have more brands vying for their spend, while lower-income customers will want to make every penny count. Perceptions of value will become deciding factors for shoppers.
Kiko Milano, founded in 1997 in Italy, has long walked the tightrope between high quality cosmetics and accessible pricing. Since 2022, it has begun an elevation strategy, reducing promotions, changing its distribution strategy and introducing more premium products; as well as its $4.50 lip liners, it also offers a $28 serum-primer hybrid and a $32 eyeshadow palette. The brand can now also be found in premium department stores like El Corte Inglés in Spain and Galeries Lafayette in France. So far, the strategy is working: sales grew 14 percent in 2024 to €900 million (approximately $1 billion), while LVMH-backed investment firm L Catterton took a majority stake in the business the same year. Chief executive Simone Dominici says further premiumisation can help grow the brand's global appeal — and its margins — but that maintaining accessible pricing will enable Kiko Milano to add new customers across the wealth spectrum. Using hero franchises, social listening and strategic relationship-building with suppliers and customers is key to winning over discerning shoppers in the brand's more than 1,250 stores. Through collaborations with tastemakers like the model Sara Sampaio and the hairstylist Rossano Ferretti, the brand is working hard to establish a premium presence, whilst also fending off competition from other masstige players.
The Business of Beauty: Is your core customer shopping for affordable beauty only?
Simone Dominici: They mix and match. We define ourselves as an entry prestige brand now. In our stores, we see Prada bags and Louis Vuitton bags. The customer might have a lipstick from Chanel that they match with their eyeshadow from Kiko; the common denominator is the quality. Because we want to be entry prestige, it doesn't mean we need to have a lower prestige level than a true prestige brand. We need to have the same quality but more democratic price, otherwise, the equation doesn't work.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Business of Beauty: People sometimes say that affordable beauty is not as good quality as prestige. How do you challenge that?
SD: When I started here three years ago, low price was confused for low quality, and 80 percent of our sales were done on promotion. When you discount your product too much [it loses appeal], and that is what some drugstores and some chains do; that's why I don't want to have my product in drugstores. Instead, we're entering department stores and speciality retailers, among the more important ones. We replaced promotions with services, and invested heavily in them. We offer a 10-minute makeover in store for free, and we don't force you to buy. It's just for pleasure and to inspire your confidence. It's about exploring, experimenting, touching and playing with our products. When you convince people about the quality, then they become a loyal customer.
The Business of Beauty: The beauty space is being overtaken by dupe brands. How do you make a strong identity for yourself when other brands in your price bracket are doing dupes?
SD: There was a season in which consumers were loving dupes, but we never had a temptation to go for it. We're an innovative brand, and one of the reasons why we are strong in innovation is because we are sitting very close to the producers that produce half of the global cosmetics used in the world. So our marketing and R&D departments engage with these companies every day, and so we differentiate our innovation with our concept, packaging, design and quality, and the experience in our stores is luxurious and very unique. The environment where you buy the products also creates part of the positioning.
The Business of Beauty: What role do hero products play in your overall strategy?
SD: When we shifted from being a mass brand to becoming more premium, we immediately reviewed our portfolio. To become an iconic brand, my belief was we need to have strong franchises. The brand needed an iconic product that people chase, search for and have confidence in. Then we created a few iconic franchises, one of which is the 3D Hydra lip gloss. On one hand, the goal is to recruit new customers, but also, it's to create inspiration to create different looks. Now we have more than 35 shades, so you can create different looks, combine with a lip liner, and so on. You enter through a product, and then you explore the assortment and you fall in love with the opportunities to create looks. That ends up having a higher average ticket because you have more pieces per unit. Through the iconic franchise, you expand your community footprint, then store exploration, and then you expand the portfolio.
To become an iconic brand, my belief was we need to have strong franchises. The brand needed an iconic product that people chase, search for and have confidence in.
The Business of Beauty: What does the rest of your premiumisation strategy look like?
SD: Other than creating franchises and switching from promotions to services, it's also elevating the pricing. This is mainly thanks to product mix, so we've introduced new products with a higher value perception. We did this partly through collaborations, which we've done with Disney, Bridgerton, and then celebrities like Sara Sampaio and Emma Roberts. We had our haircare range designed with [hairstylist] Rossano Ferretti. We don't want to become a multi-brand retailer — these are all still Kiko-branded products — but this allows us to increase the average price. Another way to increase average price is by growing in categories with a higher average price, like skincare.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Business of Beauty: With those collaborations that retail for a little bit more, presumably that's beneficial for your margins as well.
SD: Correct. That's why our gross margin has expanded and then we create room to open more stores, and room to increase our marketing investment, especially on digital and social media influencers.
The Business of Beauty: In what other ways have you been able to make incremental savings and boost your margins?
SD: We work very closely with our manufacturers, and we have an understanding of the formulaic products that maximise efficiency. Then when we launch a collection, we buy two million pieces. Our operational team, our supply chain, is capable of negotiating better pricing with our suppliers. It's like if you are in tech and you live in Silicon Valley, your network is helping you to be more innovative.
The Business of Beauty: A lot of beauty brands use social media virality to get people excited. How do you generate that with your customers?
SD: Of course, it's always good to go viral and have good user-generated content, but we couple [social media] with more traditional media like TV in countries where it's relevant to build penetration. We have 17.5 million people within our social media network. If you listen to them, you start learning a lot. Plus, we have over 7,500 beauty advisors in our stores. These people are connected with the customers every day, and most of them are real beauty lovers. They can give you a lot of insight into a community. We have an app that all of us share called Kiko Community.
The Business of Beauty: There's a lot of pressure to continually deliver newness; tell me how you handle that.
SD: There's social listening, and talking to suppliers, talking to customers through our loyalty program … it's an ecosystem. Our marketing team works with suppliers to download these ideas into concrete projects that can last between 12 and 18 months. It's a medium- to long-term innovation process. You start today thinking of the concept. What you think of today will probably be ready by the end of 2026 … the ingredients, the formulation, the regulation, the compatibility with the packaging, it takes time. True innovation doesn't come in a month, unfortunately.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Business of Beauty: But we see that customers are quite fickle, especially in cosmetics. How do you create repeat customers?
SD: Even when we are selling through department stores or marketplaces like Amazon, the majority of our sales are DTC so we have a direct relationship with our customers. We have almost 7 million active loyal customers, meaning they buy with us more than once in a year. On average, they buy with us 1.9 times a year. So in the last 12 months, these 7 million have bought twice. Our communication to them is more and more personalised.The newsletter you receive is not the same one that another one receives; it's based on your lifestyle and your past behaviours. The more you are personalising the approach, the more the customers feel heard and the more they come back. We also have a unified commerce platform through which our inventory, our customer database and our transaction data are shared.
The Business of Beauty: In 2025, we see a cooling in beauty market growth. How are you feeling about the near term?
SD: In the last three years, we doubled the percent, which is three times the market average. But still there is a lot of room for us because our market share is neglectable in some very large markets, like the US. This is where L Catterton is helping. It won't be easy, but there is room for high-quality products in this entry prestige market at a democratic price. We signed a deal with Reliance, one of the largest operators in India, at the beginning of the year, and we're expanding our presence in the market. We opened in Indonesia in January, which is home to 200 million people. We opened in Pakistan in 2024, and we're in Brazil, Chile and just opened in Mexico. We're entering Kenya, Ghana, Nigeria. In 2025, there will be 2 billion customers that we have never reached before. Our positioning is also well placed. On one side, we inspire the low middle class when they elevate their standard of living, and they want to have more refined products. At the same time, there will be some macroeconomic difficulties. When you slow down the middle class, they are starting to look at value with much more attention.
The Business of Beauty: What do you think the beauty consumer of tomorrow wants?
SD: I think they are more equipped than previous generations to spot inauthenticity. I think dupes will become less popular and there will be more demand for authenticity. Value will be an important element, because the economic conditions might not be so relaxed in the future.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
This article first appeared in The State of Fashion: Beauty Volume 2, an in-depth report on the global beauty industry, co-published by BoF and McKinsey & Company.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Luxury's Gulf Between Winners and Losers Is Widening
Luxury's Gulf Between Winners and Losers Is Widening

Business of Fashion

time4 hours ago

  • Business of Fashion

Luxury's Gulf Between Winners and Losers Is Widening

For Europe's luxury stocks, this earnings season will hammer home the widening gulf between the winners and the losers. The industry got off to a promising start with robust earnings from British trenchcoat maker Burberry Group Plc that sent its stock up as much as 9 percent and better-than-expected sales at Cartier owner Richemont. But upcoming reports from LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE, Kering SA and Salvatore Ferragamo SpA look less promising. If sales at these companies undershoot already weak forecasts, the shares may extend this year's drop that has wiped out market value of as much as €175 billion ($205 billion). While the outlook for luxury shares is crucial for Europe's stalled equity market rally given the weight of these companies, investors have to be more selective about the stocks they pick. This gap has been widening as a web of ailing China demand, varying brand perception, a weaker dollar and high valuations impacts these companies differently. The season will be critical to determining the outperformers and laggards, with analysts expecting very wide revenue growth outcomes. 'It's not going to be one-tide-lifts-all-boats for the sector,' said Stefan-Guenter Bauknecht, a senior portfolio manager at DWS. 'It really depends on the category and how the brand is perceived in the category. And the VIP certainly helps.' One striking example of the sector's divide is LVMH versus French peer Hermès International SCA. Sales at LVMH's key Fashion & Leather Goods division are expected to have dropped 7.8 percent in the second quarter, according to analyst estimates. The company reports after the bell on Thursday. Hermes, which has been an example of how companies can thrive on selling the highest-end items, is expected to report revenue growth of 12 percent at its leather goods division. Its results are due on July 30. In the case of the Louis Vuitton and Tiffany & Co. owner, the stock has lost roughly half of its value over the past two years, losing its crown of Europe's biggest stock, with investors increasingly worried about an unprecedented demand slump in China. Hermes shares, on the other hand, are weathering the broader industry pullback. After a 160 percent jump since the end of 2020, the stock is little changed this year versus a 7 percent drop in Goldman Sachs Group Inc.'s basket of luxury shares. In the current economic context, pricing power is critical, said Helen Jewell, Europe, Middle East and Africa chief investment officer at BlackRock Fundamental Equities. 'The challenge for investors has been some of the names that we thought had greater brand strength, and it turned out they actually didn't,' she said, adding that there could be some buying opportunities after the selloff in the sector 'but you do need to be selective.' For the sector as a whole, the difference is stark between now and the 2021 to 2023 boom times, when investors were rushing to snap up any European luxury shares as they reaped the profits from shoppers on a post-pandemic spending spree. But with China's sluggish economy putting a dent into demand for pricey handbags and watches, investors are buying shares in the brands that can captivate consumers and selling the ones that can't. Among this year's winners, shares in Burberry have surged more than 30 percent. The UK fashion brand is gaining traction with its turnaround plan and winning new customers through its outwear push. To some investors, luxury valuations are still too high overall even after this year's plunge in a number of stocks. The industry has an average forward price-earnings ratio of 27, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That's a near 85 percent premium to the broader market and above the long-term premium from the past 10 years. 'This is a sector that is fully exposed to tariffs and fully exposed to the weaker dollar,' said Roland Kaloyan, head of European equity strategy at Societe Generale SA. 'It's going to be quite difficult, so I stick to my underweight.' By Sagarika Jaisinghani, Michael Msika, Julien Ponthus Learn more: Opinion: When Will Luxury's Perfect Storm Pass? The luxury sector is probably closer to the end of the storm than the beginning, but many valuations are pricing in the worst, writes Andrea Felsted.

LVMH Sales Fall But Luxury Conglomerate Outperforms Luxury Forecasts
LVMH Sales Fall But Luxury Conglomerate Outperforms Luxury Forecasts

Forbes

time5 hours ago

  • Forbes

LVMH Sales Fall But Luxury Conglomerate Outperforms Luxury Forecasts

Luxury conglomerate LVMH reported a decline in sales for the first half of 2025, as billionaire CEO Bernard Arnault announced plans to open a second factory in Texas amid concerns about how the luxury sector will navigate President Donald Trump's tariffs. CEO of LVMH Holding Company, Antoine Arnault speaks during a meeting after LVMH was named as final ... More premium sponsor of 2024 Paris Olympics, in Paris on July 24, 2023. (Photo by JULIEN DE ROSA / AFP) (Photo by JULIEN DE ROSA/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images The luxury conglomerate posted $22.95 billion (€19.5 B) in sales for Q2, in line with analyst expectations. While analysts predicted a 7.02% decline in sales growth, LVMH's second-quarter revenue outperformed expectations, with sales only down 3%. The firm is projected to earn $26.06 billion (€22.15B) this fiscal year. A mild slowdown in sales and uncertainty in Q1 was expected to continue into the second quarter, according to Morningstar equity analyst Jelena Sokolova, 'with no recovery or slowdown for these luxury players.' Cécile Cabanis, the firm's CFO, revealed that the wine and spirits division is experiencing an ongoing restructuring, adding the group does not expect to see significant sales growth in the sector until the second half of 2026. Wine & Spirits and fashion & leather goods divisions both experienced a 7% decline in revenue, due to continued inflation. Cabanis cited Japan's falling tourist economy as one of the main factors in the decline of fashion & leather goods sales. Although LVMH made no direct comment on Trump's tariffs, Cabanis said selective retailing helped maintain the market in the U.S., namely through Sephora. Tangent Loro Piana, which has seen a resurgence in recent years thanks to the 'quiet luxury' trend, was recently put under court administration in Italy for a year because of alleged worker exploitation within its supply chain. According to reports, investigators found workers were forced to work up to 90 hours a week, seven days a week and made less than $5 per hour. Cabanis said Thursday the firm had cut ties with that supplier. LVMH acquired 80% of Loro Piana for $2.57 billion in 2013. LVMH has three factories within the U.S., two in California and one in Texas. Reports say the Texas factory is one of Louis Vuitton's worst performing factories. Donald Trump attended the ribbon cutting for this Texas factory in 2019 with the expectation the factory would create 1,000 jobs over a five year period. However, reports state the headcount could be as low as 300. LVMH received a host of tax breaks from Johnson County, where the Texas factory resides, including a 10-year 75% property tax cut, saving the company an estimated $29 million. Forbes estimates LVMH Chairman and CEO Bernard Arnault and family to be worth $146 billion, making him the richest person in Europe and eighth richest in the world as of Thursday. Key Background The luxury sector faced a slowdown in 2024 due to a loss in consumer confidence caused by economic uncertainty and a shift in spending patterns. However, LVMH still dominated the global luxury market with nearly a quarter of market share last year. Investors were also watching as consumers in Asia have driven sales, boosting it to the top buying market, accounting for 37% of regional revenue in 2024. Moët Hennessy has recently been the weakest performing division within LVMH. It experienced a 36% drop in operational profits in 2024 and sales revenue down 9% in 2025. Alexandre Arnault, Bernard Arnault's son, began heading the division in February 2025 in a bid to target younger consumers, and cut the sector's workforce by 10% this May. His appointment comes after success in rejuvenating Tiffany and Rimowa through high profile celebrity endorsements and collaborations.

BCG says some of its staff circumvented its controls in Gaza work
BCG says some of its staff circumvented its controls in Gaza work

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

BCG says some of its staff circumvented its controls in Gaza work

BCG says some of its staff circumvented its controls in Gaza work By Stefania Spezzati and Andrew MacAskill LONDON (Reuters) -An investigation commissioned by Boston Consulting Group has found that some of its U.S.-based staff sidestepped its risk controls to do work related to the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation and to "post-war reconstruction" for the Palestinian enclave, the consulting firm said. In a response to a British parliamentary committee inquiry published on Thursday, BCG detailed the role some of its staff played in establishing GHF during late 2024 and early this year, and then the efforts made by one of its managing directors to carry out further work in March. GHF is a U.S.- and Israeli-backed organisation that began delivering humanitarian supplies to Palestinian civilians in Gaza in May, bypassing traditional aid channels including the United Nations. Its operations have been beset by violence and chaos including deadly shootings of scores of Palestinians near its food distribution sites guarded by Israeli forces, Reuters has reported. The U.N. and other humanitarian groups have refused to work with GHF, questioning its neutrality and criticising the new distribution model as militarising aid and forcing displacement of Palestinians. "We deeply regret that, in connection with the work about which the committee has asked, we did not live up to our standards," BCG said in its July 22-dated response to the parliamentary committee inquiry. BCG's role in the setting up of GHF dragged the firm into controversy and raises questions over its internal risk processes and controls. Its decision not to publish the full investigation could lead to further questions about the level of that involvement. A "largely complete" review led by law firm WilmerHale had shown that "BCG's approval processes were circumvented" by now-former BCG staff, the Boston-based management consulting firm said, in relation to work carried out earlier this year. BCG said it "will not publish the findings of this investigation" by WilmerHale. BCG said a team led by two U.S.-based and now former employees "provided pro bono support" to establish GHF between October last year and January, including its subsidiary in Switzerland, and that such work was directed by a U.S.-based security contractor, Orbis Operations. BCG said the information provided by its staff related to the establishment of the foundation was "incomplete, inaccurate and/or untruthful". SECOND PROJECT Later in March, a BCG employee started "a second, for-fee, project related to the operational and logistical effort to deliver aid", and entered into a contract with U.S.-based private equity firm, McNally Capital. BCG said it cancelled the invoice for this project "as soon as we understood more about the scope and nature of the work." Representatives for McNally Capital did not immediately reply to requests for comment. A spokesperson for Orbis said that "Orbis's involvement was limited to feasibility work," without giving further details. Despite being told by BCG's risk officer not to engage in such a project, the same employee started a team to model "post-war reconstruction" scenarios, BCG said in its letter. He did not enter into a contract with any counterparty for this work, BCG said. "This unapproved work was shared and discussed on Signal" and "those communications were not maintained," the consulting firm said. BCG added that "the only UK-based organisation with which we understand the team interacted during this work was the Tony Blair Institute," referring to post-war scenario planning for Gaza. The Financial Times reported on July 4 that BCG had modelled the costs of "relocating" Palestinians from Gaza and that the Tony Blair Institute participated in a project to develop a post-war Gaza plan. A Tony Blair Institute representative said the firm "has had many calls with different groups on post-war reconstruction of Gaza but none have included the idea of forcible relocation of people from Gaza." Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store