
How Kiko Milano Built Pricing Power
Kiko Milano, founded in 1997 in Italy, has long walked the tightrope between high quality cosmetics and accessible pricing. Since 2022, it has begun an elevation strategy, reducing promotions, changing its distribution strategy and introducing more premium products; as well as its $4.50 lip liners, it also offers a $28 serum-primer hybrid and a $32 eyeshadow palette. The brand can now also be found in premium department stores like El Corte Inglés in Spain and Galeries Lafayette in France. So far, the strategy is working: sales grew 14 percent in 2024 to €900 million (approximately $1 billion), while LVMH-backed investment firm L Catterton took a majority stake in the business the same year. Chief executive Simone Dominici says further premiumisation can help grow the brand's global appeal — and its margins — but that maintaining accessible pricing will enable Kiko Milano to add new customers across the wealth spectrum. Using hero franchises, social listening and strategic relationship-building with suppliers and customers is key to winning over discerning shoppers in the brand's more than 1,250 stores. Through collaborations with tastemakers like the model Sara Sampaio and the hairstylist Rossano Ferretti, the brand is working hard to establish a premium presence, whilst also fending off competition from other masstige players.
The Business of Beauty: Is your core customer shopping for affordable beauty only?
Simone Dominici: They mix and match. We define ourselves as an entry prestige brand now. In our stores, we see Prada bags and Louis Vuitton bags. The customer might have a lipstick from Chanel that they match with their eyeshadow from Kiko; the common denominator is the quality. Because we want to be entry prestige, it doesn't mean we need to have a lower prestige level than a true prestige brand. We need to have the same quality but more democratic price, otherwise, the equation doesn't work.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Business of Beauty: People sometimes say that affordable beauty is not as good quality as prestige. How do you challenge that?
SD: When I started here three years ago, low price was confused for low quality, and 80 percent of our sales were done on promotion. When you discount your product too much [it loses appeal], and that is what some drugstores and some chains do; that's why I don't want to have my product in drugstores. Instead, we're entering department stores and speciality retailers, among the more important ones. We replaced promotions with services, and invested heavily in them. We offer a 10-minute makeover in store for free, and we don't force you to buy. It's just for pleasure and to inspire your confidence. It's about exploring, experimenting, touching and playing with our products. When you convince people about the quality, then they become a loyal customer.
The Business of Beauty: The beauty space is being overtaken by dupe brands. How do you make a strong identity for yourself when other brands in your price bracket are doing dupes?
SD: There was a season in which consumers were loving dupes, but we never had a temptation to go for it. We're an innovative brand, and one of the reasons why we are strong in innovation is because we are sitting very close to the producers that produce half of the global cosmetics used in the world. So our marketing and R&D departments engage with these companies every day, and so we differentiate our innovation with our concept, packaging, design and quality, and the experience in our stores is luxurious and very unique. The environment where you buy the products also creates part of the positioning.
The Business of Beauty: What role do hero products play in your overall strategy?
SD: When we shifted from being a mass brand to becoming more premium, we immediately reviewed our portfolio. To become an iconic brand, my belief was we need to have strong franchises. The brand needed an iconic product that people chase, search for and have confidence in. Then we created a few iconic franchises, one of which is the 3D Hydra lip gloss. On one hand, the goal is to recruit new customers, but also, it's to create inspiration to create different looks. Now we have more than 35 shades, so you can create different looks, combine with a lip liner, and so on. You enter through a product, and then you explore the assortment and you fall in love with the opportunities to create looks. That ends up having a higher average ticket because you have more pieces per unit. Through the iconic franchise, you expand your community footprint, then store exploration, and then you expand the portfolio.
To become an iconic brand, my belief was we need to have strong franchises. The brand needed an iconic product that people chase, search for and have confidence in.
The Business of Beauty: What does the rest of your premiumisation strategy look like?
SD: Other than creating franchises and switching from promotions to services, it's also elevating the pricing. This is mainly thanks to product mix, so we've introduced new products with a higher value perception. We did this partly through collaborations, which we've done with Disney, Bridgerton, and then celebrities like Sara Sampaio and Emma Roberts. We had our haircare range designed with [hairstylist] Rossano Ferretti. We don't want to become a multi-brand retailer — these are all still Kiko-branded products — but this allows us to increase the average price. Another way to increase average price is by growing in categories with a higher average price, like skincare.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Business of Beauty: With those collaborations that retail for a little bit more, presumably that's beneficial for your margins as well.
SD: Correct. That's why our gross margin has expanded and then we create room to open more stores, and room to increase our marketing investment, especially on digital and social media influencers.
The Business of Beauty: In what other ways have you been able to make incremental savings and boost your margins?
SD: We work very closely with our manufacturers, and we have an understanding of the formulaic products that maximise efficiency. Then when we launch a collection, we buy two million pieces. Our operational team, our supply chain, is capable of negotiating better pricing with our suppliers. It's like if you are in tech and you live in Silicon Valley, your network is helping you to be more innovative.
The Business of Beauty: A lot of beauty brands use social media virality to get people excited. How do you generate that with your customers?
SD: Of course, it's always good to go viral and have good user-generated content, but we couple [social media] with more traditional media like TV in countries where it's relevant to build penetration. We have 17.5 million people within our social media network. If you listen to them, you start learning a lot. Plus, we have over 7,500 beauty advisors in our stores. These people are connected with the customers every day, and most of them are real beauty lovers. They can give you a lot of insight into a community. We have an app that all of us share called Kiko Community.
The Business of Beauty: There's a lot of pressure to continually deliver newness; tell me how you handle that.
SD: There's social listening, and talking to suppliers, talking to customers through our loyalty program … it's an ecosystem. Our marketing team works with suppliers to download these ideas into concrete projects that can last between 12 and 18 months. It's a medium- to long-term innovation process. You start today thinking of the concept. What you think of today will probably be ready by the end of 2026 … the ingredients, the formulation, the regulation, the compatibility with the packaging, it takes time. True innovation doesn't come in a month, unfortunately.
ADVERTISEMENT
The Business of Beauty: But we see that customers are quite fickle, especially in cosmetics. How do you create repeat customers?
SD: Even when we are selling through department stores or marketplaces like Amazon, the majority of our sales are DTC so we have a direct relationship with our customers. We have almost 7 million active loyal customers, meaning they buy with us more than once in a year. On average, they buy with us 1.9 times a year. So in the last 12 months, these 7 million have bought twice. Our communication to them is more and more personalised.The newsletter you receive is not the same one that another one receives; it's based on your lifestyle and your past behaviours. The more you are personalising the approach, the more the customers feel heard and the more they come back. We also have a unified commerce platform through which our inventory, our customer database and our transaction data are shared.
The Business of Beauty: In 2025, we see a cooling in beauty market growth. How are you feeling about the near term?
SD: In the last three years, we doubled the percent, which is three times the market average. But still there is a lot of room for us because our market share is neglectable in some very large markets, like the US. This is where L Catterton is helping. It won't be easy, but there is room for high-quality products in this entry prestige market at a democratic price. We signed a deal with Reliance, one of the largest operators in India, at the beginning of the year, and we're expanding our presence in the market. We opened in Indonesia in January, which is home to 200 million people. We opened in Pakistan in 2024, and we're in Brazil, Chile and just opened in Mexico. We're entering Kenya, Ghana, Nigeria. In 2025, there will be 2 billion customers that we have never reached before. Our positioning is also well placed. On one side, we inspire the low middle class when they elevate their standard of living, and they want to have more refined products. At the same time, there will be some macroeconomic difficulties. When you slow down the middle class, they are starting to look at value with much more attention.
The Business of Beauty: What do you think the beauty consumer of tomorrow wants?
SD: I think they are more equipped than previous generations to spot inauthenticity. I think dupes will become less popular and there will be more demand for authenticity. Value will be an important element, because the economic conditions might not be so relaxed in the future.
This interview has been edited and condensed.
This article first appeared in The State of Fashion: Beauty Volume 2, an in-depth report on the global beauty industry, co-published by BoF and McKinsey & Company.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
12 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Luxury Brands Are Getting Hit by a Vibe Shift
Is the luxury industry going through a short-term blip or something more serious? Bernard Arnault, the billionaire owner of Louis Vuitton and more than 70 other luxury brands, says the current sales slump will blow over. If he is right, now is the time to buy LVMH MC 3.92%increase; green up pointing triangle stock, which is down a fifth so far this year. He has spent more than $1 billion of his own cash on the company's shares since January.


Forbes
13 hours ago
- Forbes
LVMH's Fashion And Leather Goods Sales Plunge 12%, Signaling A Broader Luxury Slowdown
'In periods when the economic climate is more difficult, when the market slows down, which is the ... More case today, we tend to come out stronger,' shared LVMH CEO Bernard Arnault with the Wall Street Journal. (Photo by VCG/VCG via Getty Images) Luxury market leader LVMH just reported a disappointing first half 2025, with total revenues down 4% to $46.7 billion (€39.8 billion) from $48.9 billion (€41.7 billion) last year. Those results weren't too alarming since numerous industry analysts have forecast a luxury market slowdown in 2025. More troublesome is that the revenue decline accelerated as the year progressed from 2% in the first quarter to 7% in the second ended June 30. And profitability is down, with net profits declining 22% to $6.9 billion in the first half. But most disturbing, the fashion and leather goods segment – one of LVMH's five reporting segments that generated just about half of LVMH revenues last year – fell an alarming 4% (or 5% organically) in the first quarter and 12% in the second to end the first half off 8% to $22.4 billion on a reported basis. In a statement, Chairman and CEO Bernard Arnault put a positive spin on the news, emphasizing LVMH showed 'solidity in the current context' of geopolitical and economic disruptions. 'Beyond the prevailing uncertainties, we remain focused thanks to the long-term vision that has always guided our family group,' he said and reassured investors, 'We head into the second half of the year with great vigilance.' Extended Turbulence Ahead LVMH finds itself in unfamiliar territory, being on the losing end of a market slowdown. It didn't miss a beat during the last global luxury market downturn in 2008/2009 and, excluding 2020, it has steadily grown since then. That was until 2024. Last year, revenues dropped 2% to $99.4 billion and profits declined 17% to $14.7 billion, driven by a downturn in its chief money maker: fashion and leather goods, down 3% to $48.2 billion and net profits from recurring operations dropping 10%. For the remainder of 2025, the company provided no financial guidance, stressing the market's uncertain environment. That said, Bain in association with Altagamma is predicting a decline of up to 5% in the global luxury market this year. Yet, when the industry's juggernaut – LVMH – sees its flagship segment experiencing such a dramatic 8% decline through the first half of the year, Bain's forecast could be optimistic. 'The global luxury sector this year confronts its most far-reaching disruptions – and its biggest potential setbacks for at least 15 years – amid mounting economic turbulence, alongside complex social and cultural shifts,' Bain reported and ominously warned, 'Turbulence is set to be the sector's new baseline for an extended period.' Path Forward Despite the financial headwinds, LVMH will stay the course, powered by its long-term strategy of carefully nurturing the creativity and craftsmanship of the 75 iconic luxury brands in its portfolio. With so much riding on its fashion and leather goods segment, two of its premier brands – Christian Dior and Loewe – have new fashion directors, but it will take time for their influence to translate into sales. Dior's Jonathan Anderson has just shown his first men's collection, sparking excitement about his upcoming women's collection, set to debut this fall at Paris Fashion Week. At the same show, Loewe's Jack McCollough and Lazaro Hernandez will introduce their first collection. On the flip side, Loro Piana is caught in an expanding controversy surrounding allegations of worker abuse in the luxury supply chain. Loro Piana is the fifth luxury brand – and LVMH's second after Dior in 2024 – to suffer reputational damage that threatens to taint not only the brands involved, but also the entire luxury industry. Management noted that Dior experienced continued 'softness' and underperformed its segment since then. According to TD Cowen's estimates, Dior contributes between 20% and 25% of revenue to the fashion and leather goods segment. And LVMH's prized jewel, the Louis Vuitton brand, makes up about half. While LVMH doesn't report brand sales, it stands to reason that Louis Vuitton has nosedived recently too. Cowen sees it facing increased competitive pressure from upstart 'quiet luxury' leather brands such as Cuyna, Patou and Polène in the $700 to $2,000 price range. LVMH, through its partnership with L Catterton, has a minority stake in Polène, which reportedly doubled sales in the last year. To counter their incursion, Cowen recommends Louis Vuitton invest in innovation and improved quality at the brand's lower price points, which start at in the low $2,000s. But is that enough when even the ubiquitous Neverfull bag is largely priced out of reach for many of the so-called aspirational luxury consumers – traditionally the bag's prime target demographic – who face mounting financial pressures? Bain reports the luxury market lost 50 million aspirational customers between 2022 and 2024 and those who remain are shifting spending to wellness, second-hand luxury – Neverfull bags are widely available at accessible price points second-hand – and trading down to more affordable fashion brands. Coach, for example, ended its third quarter up 13% and acquired 1.5 million new customers in North America, mostly next generation GenZ and Millennials. A new report from EY, examining the aspirational luxury customer segment, described the challenge for legacy luxury brands, like Louis Vuitton, in the current market where aspirationals, previously the industry's growth consumer segment, pull back, while the far more selective high-net-worth consumers continue to spend. 'The more desirable a brand becomes, the more sales grow, the more people wear brands, the less desirable the brand becomes,' it explained, and that is a key challenge for Louis Vuitton. Ironically, Louis Vuitton finds itself in a position best expressed by the mythic ouroboros symbol – the serpent that eats its own tail. Strategies that fueled growth over the years have turned against it, threatening to erode its continued mystique, particularly among luxury's highest potential clientele. Or as BCG and partner Altagamma wrote in their latest report on the global luxury market, 'In a race for scale, some of the soul of luxury was lost, as much of the industry traded exclusivity for reach, exchanging stability for volatility.' BCG also noted that brands with more than 50% of their client base made up of aspirational consumers are seeing the sharpest declines in sales. Mitigating Factors CEO Bernard Arnault, now Europe's wealthiest individual and the seventh richest man in the world, according to Forbes, holds plenty of levers to see his company through the current downturn. He is working feverishly with European leaders to avert a trade war with the U.S. and the 30% tariff on EU imports that could kick in on August 1, the Wall Street Journal reports. With the U.S. accounting for 25% of revenues in the first half, he also announced plans to open a second Texas factory by early 2027 to keep on the right side of his long-time friend President Trump. Besides the current Johnson County, TX factory that opened in 2019, the company also operates two others in California. And the Wall Street Journal just reported that LVMH is shopping the Marc Jacobs brand to bring in $1 billion, off the $1.4 billion Prada is paying Capri Holdings for the Versace brand. Authentic Brands Group, which also owns Reebok, is said to be in the running, as are WHP Global, which acquired Vera Wang for an undisclosed sum earlier this year to add to its Rag & Bone and Joe's Jean's holdings, and Bluestar Alliance, that acquired the Off-White brands from LVMH late last year. Wait And See Investment advisor TD Cowen downgraded LVMH stock from Buy to Hold in April, and it remains unchanged, citing weakness across LVMH's portfolio during the first half and limited visibility on a near-term rebound. Besides the 8% shortfall in the fashion and leather goods segment, LVMH's second largest, selective retail, including Sephora and Le Bon Marché, was flat at $10.1 billion, while watches and jewelry, its third largest, anchored by Tiffany, Bulgari and TAG Heuer, was off 1% to $6 billion, followed by perfumes and cosmetics, also down 1% to $4.8 billion. Its smallest segment, wine and spirits, at $3 billion, and dependent on the U.S. market for 35% of revenues, fell 8% in the first half. Arnault has ruled out selling this business, but confided to the WSJ that he plans to simplify the unit's structure and concentrate on its flagship brands, which include Dom Pérignon, Moët & Chandon, Veuve Clicquot and Krug champagnes, Hennessy cognac, Belvedere vodka, Glenmorangie whisky and numerous wine brands. In conclusion, Cowen stated that it doesn't expect to have clearer visibility on LVMH until after the second half of the year, signaling renewed growth may not materialize until 2026 or beyond. In the meantime, Arnault is doubling down. Far from being deterred, he is embracing the current adversity as a catalyst for innovation and ultimate transformation, as he shared with the WSJ: 'In periods when the economic climate is more difficult, when the market slows down, which is the case today, we tend to come out stronger.' See also:
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Marc Jacobs on the Block as LVMH Looks for $1B
The Marc Jacobs brand might be coming back to America. Twenty-eight years after Bernard Arnault stepped in to first help support the designer's brand, LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton is said to be working with investment bankers at J.P. Morgan to find a buyer willing to pony up $1 billion for the business. More from WWD A Sofia Coppola Documentary on Marc Jacobs to Premiere in Star-studded 2025 Venice Film Festival EXCLUSIVE: Marc Jacobs Introduces The Cristina Bag in 'Who Is She' Campaign Marc Jacobs' New Bag Proves the Y2K-era Satchel Is Officially Back WWD had heard in January that the brand was quietly being shopped, but high-level sources at LVMH denied at that time that there was a process under way. The process ultimately drummed up a good deal of interest from the licensing experts. Multiple sources said Authentic Brands Group, WHP Global and Bluestar Alliance are all said to be interested and involved in the talks. Of the three, Jamie Salter's Authentic is the largest and has a joint venture with Saks Global to develop luxury brands using its licensing chops. But Salter is by no means the only IP specialist angling for luxury brands. WHP bought Vera Wang earlier this year and Bluestar bought the late Virgil Abloh's Off-White from LVMH last year. LVMH, J.P. Morgan, Authentic and WHP all declined to comment. Bluestar could not be reached. The talks for Marc Jacobs were earlier reported by The Wall Street Journal. The potential sale of such a well-known and respected designer brand shines a bright light on big changes in luxury on both sides of the Atlantic. LVMH is the undisputed powerhouse in the sector, but is also in the midst of a kind of evolution. Arnault, who built the company through decades of hard-nosed dealmaking and absolute fidelity to brand, has been positioning his children in key positions throughout the company, with one of them expected to step up eventually. Meanwhile, the luxury market is down, Jonathan Anderson has stepped up as creative head at the company's Dior brand and even the powerhouse Louis Vuitton, which Jacobs once designed, has not been immune to a more sluggish consumer. LVMH's track record for buying and developing U.S. fashion brands is not its strongest suit. Arnault, who is known for buying and holding, also once owned Donna Karan, but sold the business after several difficult years to G-III Apparel Group, which has been building the brand with U.S. retailers. Marc Jacobs itself has gone through its share of ups and downs under LVMH's ownership. With Jacobs at the creative helm and his business partner Robert Duffy overseeing operations, the brand had a strong run in both fashion and accessories, especially with its Marc by Marc line (since discontinued) and there was even talk of floating the company separately on the stock exchange. But Duffy exited a decade ago and the brand has seen a series of different strategies ever since. The most recent under chief executive officer Eric Marechalle has Jacobs, who remains one of the most exciting and creative designers in fashion, focusing on fantastical collections for the fashion connoisseur and a separate team creating the more commercial products that take only some inspiration from what Jacobs shows. The brand has been performing at retail, sources say, and its fragrances remain strong performers. If having Marc Jacobs on the sales block speaks to a new focus at the big European luxury houses, having companies like Authentic, WHP and Bluestar jockeying for position on the other side of the transaction illustrates where the American market is. The onetime consolidators of the industry — including PVH Corp., VF and any number of private equity players — have ceded much of the acquisition market to the licensing houses as they push through their own transformations. (The private equity companies are still involved indirectly, they've just shifted to backing the IP players). But the intellectual property model that takes ownership of a brand and focuses on marketing, while cutting licensing deals for production to partners, is not as well tested in luxury, which delicately balances image and product quality. Marc Jacobs would be a big test of the budding luxury IP model. — With contributions from Jean E. Palmieri Best of WWD Harvey Nichols Sees Sales Dip, Losses Widen in Year Marred by Closures Nike Logs $1.3 Billion Profit, But Supply Chain Issues Persist Zegna Shares Start Trading on New York Stock Exchange 擷取數據時發生錯誤 登入存取你的投資組合 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤 擷取數據時發生錯誤