Ghislaine Maxwell rejects DOJ bid to unseal grand jury transcripts as she pursues ‘legal options': ‘Jeffrey Epstein is dead'
Ghislaine Maxwell, the notorious sex trafficker linked to Jeffrey Epstein, on Tuesday opposed the Justice Department's bid to unseal grand jury transcripts from her case, after trying and failing to view the records herself.
'Jeffrey Epstein is dead. Ghislaine Maxwell is not,' her lawyers wrote in a Manhattan federal court filing.
'Whatever interest the public may have in Epstein, that interest cannot justify a broad intrusion into grand jury secrecy in a case where the defendant is alive, her legal options are viable, and her due process rights remain.'
3 Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein's convicted accomplice, wants grand jury transcripts in her case kept secret.
US District Court for the Southe
The disgraced British socialite — who is serving a 20-year prison sentence — is lobbying the US Supreme Court to review her December 2021 conviction on numerous sex crimes for grooming young girls for abuse by her on-and-off lover Epstein.
'Given that she is actively litigating her case and does not know what is in the grand jury record, she has no choice but to respectfully oppose the government's motion to unseal it,' Maxwell's attorney David Oscar Markus wrote.
Maxwell's push to keep the transcripts hidden comes weeks after a federal judge denied her attempt to see them as pursues her appeal.
US District Court Judge Paul Engelmayer noted in his ruling that 'black-letter law,' or fundamental legal principle, dictates that defendants cannot review grand jury transcripts, which are by definition secret.
3 The DOJ admitted in a court filing that the Maxwell grand jury testimony will likely not include any revelations.
US District Court for the Southe
DOJ officials have cited the 'public interest' in urging Engelmayer and a separate judge to unseal transcripts of testimony from an FBI agent and NYPD detective heard by grand juries in Epstein's case in 2019, and in Maxwell's case in 2020 and 2021.
But the feds admitted in a 12:04 a.m. court filing early Tuesday that 'much of the information' included in the Maxwell testimony was already made public during her headline-grabbing trial.
The Epstein grand jury testimony may yield more new details as he never made it to trial after dying in federal custody, in what was ruled a suicide.
3 Maxwell was Epstein's former lover who groomed young girls for the sick financier to abuse, trial testimony revealed.
US District Court for the Southe
But the testimony the government is seeking in both cases represents a tiny fraction of the 300 gigabytes of files it says it has about Epstein but has declined to release — sparking an uproar among many of President Trump's supporters.
An attorney for Epstein victim Maria Farmer, who testified at Maxwell's trial, wrote a letter to the court late Tuesday urging the judge to unseal both grand jury transcripts.
'Unsealing the grand jury transcripts will illuminate the scope of Epstein's and Maxwell's abuse, provide additional insight into those who enabled his abuse, and bring light to how these crimes were investigated and prosecuted,' lawyer Sigrid McCawley wrote.
Lawyers for Epstein's estate separately wrote to the court Tuesday that they take 'no position' on the government's move to unseal grand jury transcripts in his case.
Maxwell, 63, meanwhile was moved to a cushy Texas prison known as a 'Club Fed' last week, days after meeting with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former criminal defense lawyer.
DOJ officials have not explained why the convicted sex trafficker was transferred to a lockup typically reserved for convicts spending far less time behind bars.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
12 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
London police arrest 365 people as pro-Palestinian protesters defy new law
LONDON — British police said they arrested 365 people in central London on Saturday as supporters of a recently banned pro-Palestinian group flouted the law as part of an effort to force the government to reconsider the prohibition. Parliament in early July passed a law banning Palestine Action and making it a crime to publicly support the organization. That came after activists broke into a Royal Air Force base and vandalized two tanker planes to protest Britain's support for Israel's offensive against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Backers of the group, who have held a series of protests around the U.K. in the last month, argue that the law illegally restricts freedom of expression. More than 500 protesters filled the square outside the Houses of Parliament on Saturday, many daring police to arrest them by displaying signs reading, 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' That was enough for police to step in. As the demonstration began to wind down, police and protest organizers disagreed over the number of arrests, as the organizers sought to show that the law was unworkable. 'The police have only been able to arrest a fraction of those supposedly committing 'terrorism' offenses, and most of those have been given street bail and allowed to go home,' Defend Our Juries, which organized the protest, said in a statement. 'This is a major embarrassment to [the government], further undermining the credibility of this widely ridiculed law, brought in to punish those exposing the government's own crimes.' London's Metropolitan Police Service rejected that assertion, saying that many of those gathered in the square were onlookers, media members or people who didn't hold placards supporting the group. 'We are confident that anyone who came to Parliament Square today to hold a placard expressing support for Palestine Action was either arrested or is in the process of being arrested,' the police force said in a statement. On Friday, police said the demonstration was unusual in that the protesters wanted to be arrested in large numbers to place a strain on police and the criminal justice system. The government moved to ban Palestine Action after the activists broke into a British air force base in southern England on June 20 to protest British military support for Israel's war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The activists sprayed red paint into the engines of two tanker planes at the RAF Brize Norton base in Oxfordshire and caused further damage with crowbars. Palestine Action had previously targeted Israeli defense contractors and other sites in the United Kingdom that they believe have links with the Israeli military. Supporters of the group are challenging the ban in court, saying the government has gone too far in declaring Palestine Action a terrorist organization. 'Once the meaning of 'terrorism' is separated from campaigns of violence against a civilian population, and extended to include those causing economic damage or embarrassment to the rich, the powerful and the criminal, then the right to freedom of expression has no meaning and democracy is dead,' Defend Our Juries said on its website. The arrests outside Parliament came amid what is expected to be a busy weekend of demonstrations in London as the war in Gaza and concerns about immigration stoke protests and counterprotests across the United Kingdom. Though Prime Minister Keir Starmer has angered Israel with plans to recognize a Palestinian state later this year, many Palestinian supporters in Britain criticize the government for not doing enough to end the war in Gaza. Pro-Palestinian protesters gathered Saturday afternoon in central London for a march that ended outside the gates of No. 10 Downing St., the prime minister's official residence and offices. On Sunday, a number of groups are scheduled to march through central London to demand the safe release of the Israeli hostages in Gaza. Palestinian militants have held the captives since Hamas-led attackers surged into Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostage. There are 50 remaining hostages, with 20 of them thought to be alive. Israel's retaliatory attack in Gaza has killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to the territory's Health Ministry, which doesn't distinguish between civilians and combatants in its count but says more than half are women and children. Police are also preparing for protests outside hotels across the U.K. that are being used to house asylum seekers. Protesters and counterprotesters have squared off outside the hotels in recent weeks, with some saying the migrants pose a risk to their communities and others decrying what they see as anti-immigrant racism. Deputy Assistant Commissioner Ade Adelekan said the scale of the events would 'put pressure' on the police department. 'This is going to be a particularly busy few days in London with many simultaneous protests and events that will require a significant policing presence,' Adelekan said before the protests began. Kirka writes for the Associated Press.
Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
Appeals court rules Trump clamp-down on spending data defies Congress' authority
'No court would allow a losing party to defy its judgment. No President would allow a usurper to command our armed forces,' Judge Karen Henderson, a George H.W. Bush appointee, wrote in support of the decision to deny the Trump administration's request to keep the data under wraps while litigation over the issue goes forward. 'And no Congress should be made to wait while the Executive intrudes on its plenary power over appropriations.' The Trump administration ignited the legal battle when it decided in March to abruptly shut down the database , claiming the widely available public data threatened the president's ability to manage federal spending. Henderson noted that the decision came amid a torrent of lawsuits questioning whether the administration was preparing to illegally 'impound' — or withhold — congressionally mandated spending required by law to disburse. The administration claimed the database also forced the disclosure of information meant to be shielded from public view. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan rejected that view out of hand last month, in a lawsuit brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and the Protect Democracy group. The Clinton-appointed judge ordered the administration to immediately restore the website. The Justice Department quickly appealed and won a short-term pause of Sullivan's decision. But Saturday's ruling by the appeals court panel ends that pause. Henderson agreed with Sullivan, saying Congress' power is 'at its zenith' when it comes to both approving federal spending and requiring details of that spending to be publicly disclosed. In other words, only Congress — not the administration — could decide to shut down the database. Judge Robert Wilkins, an Obama appointee, joined Henderson's 25-page opinion. The third judge on the panel, Biden appointee Bradley Garcia, voted with Henderson and Wilkins but did not join her opinion. The ruling lands just as a simmering fight over Trump's authority to dictate federal spending has been ramping up on Capitol Hill. Trump has long flirted with the notion that the president has the power to impound funds that he views cut against Executive Branch priorities, and courts have eyed warily his administration's decision to mass-terminate federal grants and contracts representing billions of dollars in congressionally required spending. The Justice Department has argued that the funds for those terminated programs could be reissued in plenty of time to satisfy Congress' requirements, but Trump budget officials have floated workarounds that have made some lawmakers uncomfortable. The decision Saturday is not a final ruling on the underlying legal question about whether the administration is obliged to make the data public. But unless the full bench of the appeals court steps in or the administration gets relief from the Supreme Court, the ruling means the data is likely to be public within days. The panel agreed to give the administration until Aug. 15 to restore the database.
UPI
an hour ago
- UPI
Trilateral U.S., U.K. and Ukrainian meeting weighs possible peace
Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, U.S. Vice President JD Vance and Ukrainian Presidential Chief of Staff Andriy Yermak, from left to right, meet on Saturday at Chevening House in Kent, England, along with representatives from France, Germany, Italy, Finland and Poland to discuss a route to peace in Ukraine. Photo via UK Foreign Secretary/UPI | License Photo Aug. 9 (UPI) -- U.K. Foreign Secretary David Lammy and U.S. Vice President JD Vance met with Ukrainian officials and others to discuss ending the war when Russia attacked its neighbor in February 2022. Ukraine Presidential Chief of Staff Andriy Yermak and Ukraine Defense Secretary Rustem Umerov joined Lammy and Vance on Saturday to discuss matters in Ukraine and its defensive war with Russia. "The U.K.'s support for Ukraine remains ironclad as we continue working toward a just and lasting peace," Lammy said Saturday in a post on X. The meeting occurred at Lammy's official residence in Kent, England, where Vance is staying with his family through the weekend. Yermak and Umerov were invited to join Lammy and Vance on short notice and ahead of Friday's scheduled summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also might join the meeting with Trump and Putin, but he has not been invited as of Saturday evening. Officials from the European Union, Finland, France, Germany, Italy and NATO also attended Saturday's meeting at Lammy's official residence, the BBC reported. U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer did not join the meeting, but he talked with Zelensky by phone before it occurred. Starmer and Zelensky agreed the meeting at Lammy's residence is an important prelude to Friday's scheduled summit in Alaska, Starmer's office said in a news release. Zelensky afterward told Ukrainians Putin is the only one standing in the way of ending the war. "His only card is the ability to kill, and he is trying to sell the cessation of killings at the highest possible price," Zelensky said during a national address. He also dismissed the notion of a cease-fire instead of ending the war. "What is needed is not a pause in the killings but a real, lasting peace," Zelensky said. He said Trump supports an immediate cessation of hostilities and said the United States has the "leverage and determination" to make it happen via sanctions against Russia. Putin "fears sanctions and is doing everything to bail on them," Zelensky said. "He wants to exchange a pause in the war, in the killings, for the legalization of the occupation of our land," Zelensky told Ukrainians. "We will not allow this second attempt to partition Ukraine."
