I'm a security editor and this is one security rule I never break
And while there are plenty of reasons to make sure you're staying up to date on the latest phishing scams and protecting yourself by keeping the best antivirus software up to date, it's often the smallest habits that help protect you the most.
When you live in a city, you get used to parking your car under streetlights and not leaving change in the center console. When you're online, you should get used to similar habits and practices to keep yourself safe from the various threats that might be out there waiting for you to slip up.
From my time as a security editor, I can tell you there are several little practices you can put into place to make sure you – and all your devices – remain safe: keep your software and apps updated, get rid of old and unused accounts, only download apps from the authorized app stores, use passkeys and multi-factor authentication, and always use an antivirus.
However, if there is one rule I will never, ever break – ever – it is this one: I never, ever click on any link, attachment or QR code that I'm not expecting.
It doesn't matter if it's in a text message, email or through social media or what it says in the body of the message. If I'm not expecting it, there's no way I'm clicking.
When I started getting texts saying I owed toll fees? I deleted them and marked them as junk. When I get emails with PDF attachments that claim to be invoices from people I don't immediately work with? I report them to the IT department as phishing.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
Confirmations that claim I've purchased antivirus software? Shipping notifications from UPS? Thank you emails for orders I don't recognize? Social media messages asking me to model for a brand? Delete and report.
If it's something that is genuinely important, either I'm going to recognize who sent it or what it's about or the sender is going to resend it. Either way, I'd much rather ask forgiveness for a misunderstanding than have to deal with malware on my machine.
Granted, phishing is becoming more and more advanced and AI-enabled emails that resemble Netflix or Hulu are tricking even the savviest of computer users but that's even more reason to follow the rule: If it wasn't expected, it doesn't deserve a click.
You can (and should) always go to the source if you need to verify something.
Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Enterprises Push Ahead with AI-Powered Job Replacement Despite Risks
AI might be gunning for your job are increasing. Faced with pressure from stakeholders and competitors, many companies have pushed forward with slashing positions that they believe the tech is capable of handling. Last week, telecommunications firm Altice cut 1,000 employees, or 16% of its workforce, with AI creating redundancies among some jobs as the company cut costs. READ ALSO: Oracle Patent May Cut Latency in Edge Computing and Agents Gone Wild: How to Prevent AI Agent Sprawl Altice's decision is far from singular. Major firms like Klarna, UPS, Duolingo and Cisco have used AI to replace workers. Though the tech comes with its fair share of risks, companies are leveraging it to reduce labor costs, increase productivity and garner returns on their investments in the tech. Some may be feeling the squeeze of stakeholder scrutiny and competitive pressure, said Lisa Highfield, principal director of research and advisory services at HR research firm McLean & Co. 'When we see headlines such as 100 jobs laid off because of AI capabilities, competitors are bound to pay attention to that, and they don't want to fall behind that curve,' Highfield said. Questions remain, however, about whether AI is ready to become a member of the team rather than simply a tool. Highfield says it depends on the job and its specific tasks: Jobs involving 'repetitive, low-complexity knowledge tasks,' such as answering frequently asked questions, summarizing, entering data and scheduling, will likely be the first to go. Assistant and clerk positions, for example, may have a 'high exposure rate' to AI. Additionally, anything with 'clear rules and delineated answers,' such as writing templates or coding, is also ripe for automation. Many positions may have bits and pieces of their jobs automated, but 'not necessarily the entire job holistically,' said Highfield. 'Job security around that is really dependent on how much of your tasks are correlated to AI.' Enterprises seeking automation need to look within their specific industries and organizations to figure out where it's a good fit, said Highfield. 'We really need to understand how AI applies to our industry and the goals and tasks within an organization.' Plus, many jobs themselves are in a period of change in the wake of AI. In the same way that lamplighters were replaced with electricians and mathematicians no longer need to do long division by hand, new opportunities will be revealed as others fade. 'It's not just cutting jobs, it's what jobs are we creating,' said Highfield. However, enterprises also need to understand the risks associated with making the leap into AI, said Highfield. Along with potential brand and reputation damage, enterprises open themselves up to regulatory scrutiny and declining workforce morale. The tech itself still has issues, too, including a propensity for data security slip-ups, hallucination and bias, especially as tasks become more complex. Many companies may be better off starting with upskilling and augmentation of jobs, rather than replacing them with AI entirely, she said. 'There's a shift towards providing capabilities within the organization for our workers so that they can work with the technology.' This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive cutting-edge insights into technology trends impacting CIOs and IT leaders, subscribe to our free CIO Upside newsletter. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Are cheap TVs any good? I bought a budget TV from Amazon that's currently on sale for under $300 — the value is unbeatable
This "unbeatable" budget TV is on sale for $280 right now. I was recently in the market for a new smart TV and given that I've never actually been in charge of selecting a device on my own, I was pretty stumped. All I knew was that I didn't want to spend a fortune and that the TV needed to have the ability to stream apps like Disney+, Prime Video, Netflix and other favourites. Other than that, I wanted something that was fairly light and with decent visuals After doing some research, I settled on a relatively inexpensive TCL Smart TV from Amazon Canada that seemed to fit all my criteria. However, given that it's regularly only $350 — and currently on sale for $280 — I was skeptical about whether it would actually be decent quality. I've been using it for a few months now, and I'm happy to report that I shouldn't have been skeptical — this cost-effective TV is fantastic and has seriously improved our leisure time. Scroll onwards to read my full review of the TCL 43-Inch Class S4 4K LED Smart TV and see if it's the right fit for your home. Amazon deal: Save $70 on a TCL 43-Inch Class S4 4K LED Smart TV The details The TV has 4K Ultra HD Resolution, Motion Rate 120 and HDR PRO that provides exceptional visual detail, improved motion clarity and enhanced contrast. It also has Dolby Atmos which provides an immersive, cinematic audio experience. For streaming, it has Netflix, Prime Video, Disney+, Spotify and dozens of other popular services as well as the ability to search and download less popular apps. It has three HDMI inputs for gaming and other needs, and has Alexa technology that let's you hold down the voice button and ask her to find and launch content. In terms of appearance, the TV has an edge-to-edge glass design that would look perfect in any setting. What I like about it The interface: As mentioned, I'm not very tech-savvy, so I anticipated that I'd struggle — but I truly had no issues. It's extremely user-friendly to find what your looking for and to start watching right way. It also has voice control technology, so you can ask it to launch programs for you when you don't feel like typing. The interface is also customizable and you can change the audio-visual options tor the different streaming apps. Streaming options: The TV comes loaded with all of the most popular apps like Netflix, YouTube and more — and you can search and download more niche apps. For instance, my partner downloaded the Kanopy app so he can watch library-sourced documentaries and Armenian animations. As well, we found it easy to stream from our phones and laptops and cast it to the TV. The visuals: One of the first things we did was watch The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King and the difference in visual quality between the TCL and our old TV was immediately noticeable. A few quotes from my fiancé: "Shit, that's crisp!" "I'm getting lost in Elijah Woods's blue eyes." "There's even enough brightness settings to make The Rings of Power watchable." The set up: From taking the TV out of the box to getting it mounted on our wall and watching Netflix, the entire process took maybe 10 minutes. It likely would have taken us less than that but it took us a a bit to figure out how to attach it to our wall mount (entirely our own fault, not a negative to the TV at all). The weight: I was genuinely shocked at how light this TV is! Our old, non-smart TV weighs about 30 pounds. The TCL weighs under five pounds, which made it extremely easy to carry up the stairs to our apartment and subsequently hang on the mount we already owned. Not for you? 5 other TV deals on Amazon What I dislike about it The size: The only thing I dislike about this TV is the size, and that's entirely my own fault for choosing a 43" instead of a 50." When doing the measurements, I made the error of measuring the width of the wall we would mount it on. From that I surmised I needed a 43" TV, but the way TVs are measured is across the diagonal. Because of my error, the television is a little too small for the area we have it in, but it's not the worst problem to have! What others are saying The TV has a 4.0-star rating on Amazon Canada and has been bought more than 300 times in the last month. "The best budget TV I've ever owned," says one customer. "I would recommend it all day." Another notes that they're "impressed with what this TV offers," particularly "at such an affordable price point." Others write that "the colours are rich and vibrant," it's "very easy to set up" and offers "unbeatable value." However, a few people say "the sound isn't the best" — I would agree that it's not exactly cinematic or comparable to what you'd get out of a sound bar, but the sound quality is not a concern at all for me. The verdict I am extremely pleased with the TCL 43-Inch Class S4 4K LED Smart TV, and would 100 per cent recommend buying it. In fact, I'm likely going to repurchase this TV in a bigger size when it's on sale. I've been using it for a few months now and I'm impressed with the quality of this device, its weight and how easy it is to set up — and at just $280, it doesn't break the bank, which is always a bonus. If you're on the hunt for an affordable TV that gives excellent performance, I'd definitely check it out.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why PubMatic Stock Fell 33.7% This Morning
Key Points PubMatic stock fell 33.7%, despite beating second-quarter earnings and revenue expectations. Video-advertising revenue jumped 34%, with connected TV ads growing 50% year over year. The stock fell to an all-time low. 10 stocks we like better than PubMatic › Shares of PubMatic (NASDAQ: PUBM) took a swan dive on Tuesday morning, starting the morning session 33.7% below Monday's closing price. The company reported second-quarter earnings last night with strong results but uninspiring forward guidance. The stock had recovered to a 19.4% drop by 12:50 p.m. ET, but that's still a painful price cut. Beating estimates isn't always enough for Wall Street The digital-advertising expert saw second-quarter sales rise 6% year over year to $71.1 million. Omnichannel video revenue jumped 34% higher, led by a 50% increase in video ads for connected TVs (CTV). The adjusted bottom line swung from a $0.10 net loss to a $0.05 profit per diluted share. The average analyst would have settled for a $0.16 net loss per share on sales near $67.8 million. The results also exceeded PubMatic's guidance targets across the board. However, the stock plummeted anyway due to a modest view of the upcoming quarter. The midpoint of management's guidance range points to a 4% year-over-year revenue drop and weaker adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA). PubMatic might be sandbagging its guidance again On the earnings call, PubMatic CEO Rajeev Goel said that the digital-advertising market is changing, as is PubMatic's strategy. The company is diversifying its customer list -- a necessary step after losing a significant amount of business from a large but unnamed client in the second quarter. It's also exploring ways to use artificial intelligence (AI) in the creation and management of online ad campaigns. Investors hated the muted third-quarter outlook, but PubMatic is in the habit of setting up low guidance targets, only to knock them down with authority. Is this report's soft Q3 guidance another example of this tactic? CFO Steve Pantelick's remarks point in that direction, as he presented the targets as "a conservative approach." PubMatic's stock dropped to an all-time low today. Some would call it a falling knife, but I see it as a tempting buy right now. Should you invest $1,000 in PubMatic right now? Before you buy stock in PubMatic, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and PubMatic wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 11, 2025 Anders Bylund has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends PubMatic. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why PubMatic Stock Fell 33.7% This Morning was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
