Nigel Farage accused of 'offensive' attack on female cops after 'big strapping officers' call
Nigel Farage has been accused of an "offensive" attack on female police officers after calling for "big strapping" officers on the beat.
Labour's policing minister, Dame Diana Johnson, said female cops put themselves in harm's way every day as she branded Mr Farage's remarks "woefully out of touch" She accused him of peddling "divisive, outdated nonsense" that undermine frontline officers.
The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) has also leapt to their defence, saying we "must not jeopardise our progress by diminishing the value and role women play".
It came after Mr Farage declared Britain was lawless and said police should look scarier. He told a press conference in London on Monday: "I think society needs, you need just that tiny little bit of fear and I think that for people out looking for trouble, and if they see a couple of big strapping police officers, they'll think, 'well, you know what, this may not be quite such a good idea'.'
He said the public should be "maybe a touch fearful" of police in the same way children are of teachers. Reform MP Sarah Pochin went on to tell the BBC: "I never like to see two female police officers out together... I'd much rather see a great big strapping male police officer with a female."
In response to the remarks, Dame Diana said: 'If Nigel Farage ever came to the Police Bravery Awards, he would realise how lucky we are as a country to have so many brilliant female officers who run towards danger to tackle violent criminals, and risk their own lives to keep the public safe.
"Week in and week out, they put themselves in harm's way for the protection of our communities, and for Reform MPs to question their fitness for the job is not only offensive, it is woefully out of touch. Instead of undermining the police with this kind of divisive, outdated nonsense, politicians from all parties should be backing our men and women in uniform in the difficult work they do every day to keep us all safe.'
And Chief Constable Gavin Stephens, chair of the NPCC, said: "Over a third of our officers and around 40% of our chief constables are women, and we must not jeopardise our progress by diminishing the value and role women play in our workforce.
'There are no roles in policing which women cannot do, and the same exacting standards to qualify are met by all men and women who undertake some of the most challenging tasks of any profession."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
22 minutes ago
- Spectator
Cabinet ministers urge Starmer to recognise Palestine
Parliament may have risen for recess but that doesn't mean that Sir Keir Starmer is getting much of a break. It transpires that the Prime Minister is facing growing calls to immediately recognise Palestine as a state with a number of Cabinet minister understood to be piling pressure on the PM alongside dozens of his backbenchers. On Tuesday, just before MPs left Westminster for summer recess, Health Secretary Wes Streeting urged Sir Keir to recognise Palestine 'while there's still a state of Palestine left to recognise'. He went on: I deplore Israel's attacks on healthcare workers as well as other innocent civilians trying to access healthcare or vital aid. These actions go well beyond legitimate self-defence and undermine the prospects for peace. I sincerely hope that the international community can come together, as the foreign secretary has been driving towards, to make sure that we see an end of this war but also that we recognise the state of Palestine while there is a state of Palestine left to recognise. Streeting isn't the only member of the Cabinet understood to have pushed the issue in meetings. As reported by the Guardian, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood and Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn have also brought it up. The Health Secretary's intervention follows that of nearly 60 Labour MPs, who sent a letter to Foreign Secretary David Lammy at the start of the month after Israeli defence minister Israel Katz proposed plans to force Gaza's into a camp in Rafah. While Israeli human rights lawyer Michael Sfard described the move was 'about population transfer to the southern tip of Gaza in preparation for deportation outside the strip', the MP group wrote: 'Though an accurate description, we believe there is a clearer one. The ethnic cleansing of Gaza.' Of course, it's not just Labour politicians who have been vocal on the Middle East. As Mr S wrote in May, more than a dozen senior Tory MPs and peers broke ranks to write to Starmer to urge the PM to immediately recognise Palestine as a state. The seven MPs and six House of Lords grandees have signed a letter that insists 'recognising Palestine would affirm our nation's commitment to upholding the principles of justice, self-determination and equal rights'. The letter was signed by several Tory moderates – including MPs Kit Malthouse, Simon Hoare and father of the house Sir Edward Leigh alongside peers such as Nicholas Soames and Hugo Swire. Mr S was rather interested to note that there were some more surprising signatories, however, with right-wing Conservative MP Sir John Hayes backing the call. Starmer hadn't changed the UK's stance after the Tory group or the Labour backbenchers reached out – but will he be swayed by his own Cabinet ministers? Stay tuned…
The Herald Scotland
35 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
More than 100 cyclists set off on ride to remember murdered MP Jo Cox
The annual ride aims to keep alive the legacy of the Batley and Spen Labour MP – who was killed by a far-right terrorist in June 2016 – by championing the causes she was passionate about. This year's ride marks the 100th anniversary of women's suffrage, with riders wearing the purple, white and green colours of the suffragettes. They left the stadium just after 9.30am to cheers from crowds, including Ms Leadbeater, now the MP for Spen Valley. She said: 'Jo was a passionate campaigner for gender equality so it's wonderful to see nearly 60 women riding this year and showing that cycling really is for everyone. 'It's a tough challenge but a brilliant five days – everything Jo would have loved. 'It's also a great way to meet people from different walks of life and to celebrate that we have 'more in common', as Jo said in her maiden speech in Parliament 10 years ago. 'Cycling has so many physical and mental health benefits and also helps combat loneliness and isolation, causes which Jo cared about deeply. 'My mum, dad and I wish all the cyclists the very best of luck on their epic journey.' The cyclists are due to arrive in Buxton in Derbyshire on Wednesday evening and will reach Flat Iron Square in London on Sunday, following Jo Cox's journey from growing up in the Spen Valley to representing the area in Westminster. Ken Avery, from Liversedge, 76, who has terminal cancer, is taking part. His daughter rode alongside him as he left the stadium on Wednesday morning, and his son will ride with him in London. He said: 'I think they're both proud of me because I'm doing something that I enjoy and it's keeping me fit and healthy.' The youngest rider this year is 21, and the oldest, Kath Lyons from Skipton, celebrates her 80th birthday a month after the ride. She said: 'You see so much hatred on social media these days, people hide behind it. I'm doing the Jo Cox Way again to remind myself what Jo stood for – it's more relevant now than when she said it.' To learn more about The Jo Cox Foundation visit and to donate visit
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Can Rachel Reeves avoid a new fiscal crisis?
Photo by Jack Hill -Many British governments enter office vowing 'never again'. In Rachel Reeves' case the promise was that the country would never again endure the economic turmoil that Liz Truss subjected it to. To justify this boast, one of her first acts was to pass a bill strengthening the powers of the (now maligned) Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). Yet the charge levelled at the Chancellor is precisely that Britain faces a return to Truss-style instability. This doesn't emanate only from Conservatives desperate for political revenge on Labour. 'Our finances are precarious, we've seen that in the past few weeks,' Gary Smith, the general secretary of the GMB (Reeves' own union), told me when I interviewed him for this week's NS. 'We are beholden to the bond markets; this could unravel very quickly.' Helen Thompson, the Cambridge professor of political economy, who sits on the advisory board of the Labour Together think tank, warns that 'there's a real risk there could be a crisis quite quickly because of the situation with the bond markets'. The air is thick with invocations of 1976 – the year when the plummeting value of the pound forced Jim Callaghan's Labour government to accept a £2.3bn bailout from the International Monetary Fund. Is this justified? Here are the facts: the UK, as the OBR recently warned, has the sixth-highest debt, fifth-highest deficit and third-highest borrowing costs among advanced economies. In June, the government recorded the second-highest borrowing figure since monthly records began in 1993 (exceeded only by the pandemic-afflicted month of June 2020). The markets are tolerant of indebted states that have a clear plan to reduce their borrowing. But the question that bond vigilantes are asking is whether Labour does. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe A one-year-old government with a landslide Commons majority has been forced to U-turn on relatively minor savings: £1.5bn from means-testing winter fuel payments and £5bn from cutting health and disability benefits (public spending stands at £1.3trn a year). In these circumstances tax would normally take the strain but Reeves has ruled out raising those taxes that account for two thirds of revenue: income tax, National Insurance (on employees), VAT and corporation tax. This leaves her with a much smaller menu of taxes on wealth – which investors fear will further depress economic growth. Here is the 'doom loop' that critics fear Britain is trapped in. Is there a route out? Reeves is increasingly confident in facing down those who argue that inflexibility is her greatest weakness and that she should loosen her fiscal rules. There is, she recently told the cabinet, 'nothing progressive in paying £1 in every £10 to US hedge funds' (a message she repeated yesterday during her appearance before the House of Lords' Economic Affairs Committee). Reeves' allies argue that her recent tears during Prime Minister's Questions served an inadvertent purpose. 'It was a reminder that she's trusted by the markets for a reason because people think she is sincere about keeping a grip on the finances,' one told me of the negative market reaction to speculation over the Chancellor's future. But continued trust may come at a price: the narrow fiscal headroom of £9.9bn that Reeves maintained last time, bond vigilantes warn, is not enough: they would like something closer to £20bn. Yet Labour aides insist that 'the manifesto stands' and will not be broken in pursuit of this goal. Here, then, is the question that Reeves may be forced to answer at the Budget: what happens when the irresistible force of the markets meets the immovable object of her tax pledges? [See also: Has Zarah Sultana already been sidelined from her new party?] Related
