
Draft of major MAHA report calls for more education, less regulation — and offers few policies
Childhood vaccine schedule reform is on the agenda, though the report offers no details on how Kennedy will change the list of recommended childhood vaccines, if at all. He has for years cast suspicion on vaccines, often citing flawed research, and promoted the idea that early shots are harming children. The report similarly calls for 'addressing vaccine injuries.'
Advertisement
'Together, this strategy will translate the work of the MAHA movement to policies that make a transformative and lasting impact for Americans and end the childhood chronic disease crisis,' says a draft document, dated Aug. 11 and published by Politico.
Advertisement
The strategy notably avoids mention of the
'This report has one overriding implied message: More research needed,' Marion Nestle, a leading nutrition researcher and professor emeritus at New York University, said via email. But, she said, 'we already know the problems. It's way past time to start addressing them.'
Perhaps the most forceful regulatory proposals in the report have to do with marketing. One recommends the Health and Human Services Department work with other federal agencies to enforce direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs, including among social media influencers and telehealth companies. The move falls short of the full ban Kennedy previously talked about. A separate recommendation would create new industry guidelines to 'limit the direct marketing of certain unhealthy foods to children,' though it seems those rules would still be voluntary. (Some of the largest food and beverage companies currently self-regulate under a
'Though still light on specifics, these draft recommendations are a bit of a mixed bag,' said Andrew Binovi, director of government affairs for the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine.
Advertisement
Among the ideas is
Nestle says the first Trump administration tried to implement a similar plan with pre-packed food boxes distributed through food banks and other organizations, which was 'a disaster for small farmers initially recruited to do these labor intensive and perishable boxes. It makes much more sense to make sure people have enough money to buy food.' Trump's recent tax cut bill
The report also suggests the government should incentivize more breastfeeding, either through the WIC program or other routes. There is little mention of ultra-processed foods, or UPFs, which are expected to be a focus of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, due later this year. HHS is also crafting a definition of what constitutes a UPF.'It appears that big food lobbyists have been busy and successful,' said Jerold Mande, CEO of the nutrition nonprofit Nourish Science, who previously held senior policymaking roles at the FDA and USDA under the George H.W. Bush, Clinton, and Obama administrations.
'Who expected the MAHA report to do more to get whole milk in schools than to get UPF out?'The report also says that the USDA will 'prioritize precision nutrition research,' a line of research that aims to provide people with more personalized recommendations by taking into account their body's individual needs and responses to certain foods. Former NIH nutrition researcher Kevin Hall
Advertisement
The draft report is 'the most ambitious federal plan yet to confront childhood chronic disease,' said Marty Irby, president and CEO at Capitol South and Competitive Markets Action, who previously lobbied for ranchers and farmers. 'Still, there are gaps: the USDA school lunch program continues to force dairy on many children — particularly kids of color — who are lactose intolerant, with little to no alternatives, and the plan offers little to promote local, farm-to-table food in schools.'
Aviva Musicus, science director for the Center for Science in the Public Interest, criticized the report as embodying 'the idiosyncratic beliefs' of one person, Kennedy. 'He might be right about food dyes, but the report's recommendations to alter our vaccine framework, restructure government agencies, and promote meat and whole milk are going to promote disease, not health,' Musicus said.
While the draft report is not a budget document, it is unclear how much funding would be needed for the various efforts or where it would come from. Already, Congress
Advertisement
Many of the proposals involve Medicaid, WIC,
Instead of regulation, the administration plans to run public awareness and education campaigns aimed at adolescents about physical fitness, screen time, substance use, vaping and 'root cause issues that impact adult infertility.' Another initiative aims to train school and library workers on how to handle overdoses, and expand their access to the overdose-reversal medication Narcan, per the report. States will be encouraged to re-adopt the Presidential Fitness Test, which grades students on their ability to do things such as complete a mile run.
HHS will also establish an 'infertility training center,' though the report offers limited details on precisely what services would be offered at such a facility. (Kennedy allies have been pushing for widespread use of what's called
Medical schools, which have already been pushed by the administration to
Advertisement
Elsewhere in the department, National Institutes of Health officials plan to launch two new offices, one focused on developing alternatives to animal testing, such as organ-on-a-chip technologies, and another to organize chronic disease research. NIH will also start a new task force on children's health, and create a database of researchers' funding sources, similar to the OpenPayments system run by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, per the draft report.
The commission's recommendations, while largely centered at Kennedy's HHS, also affect the USDA and the Environmental Protection Agency — though not as severely as some in the food and agriculture industries feared. Unlike
While calling for more 'innovative growing solutions,' the report also says the government ought to 'ensure that the public has awareness and confidence in EPA's robust pesticide review procedures.'
When it comes to air quality — a
'The commission has a historic opportunity to protect America's kids, but only if it resists corporate influence and turns bold ideas into real, accountable action,' Irby told STAT.
Here are other highlights from the document:
Mental health: More prior authorization
Pediatric mental health remains a key focus for Kennedy and his MAHA allies. In February, a White House executive order called mood stabilizers and antipsychotic drugs a '
The draft echoes this language, highlighting the overmedicalization of children as a key challenge to overcome and calling for HHS to form a working group that will evaluate prescription patterns for SSRIs, antipsychotics, stimulants, and other drugs that children take. They also ask the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to work with states to increase prior authorization requirements and tighten prescribing safeguards particularly for ADHD. The draft says the Veterans Administration will provide NIH with de-identifiable data on ADHD, diabetes, and pharmaceutical usage among spouses, dependents and survivors of veterans under 18.
It's true that kids can be overmedicalized, said Jennifer Mathis, deputy director for the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law. But it was 'disheartening, however, that the leaked draft strategy makes no mention of well-established services that are critical for children with significant mental health needs, such as intensive care coordination, intensive behavior support, and mobile crisis services,' Mathis said.
Rates of anxiety, depression and ADHD in the U.S. are increasing, but the scientific explanation for their rise is
Although the scientific literature on screen use offers
Notably absent from the report, however, was the startling rise of youth suicide over the last two decades. Suicide is one of the leading causes of deaths in this demographic and is particularly pronounced among Black teenagers. One in five high school students
Fluoride: New scrutiny of water standards
In discussing the importance of water quality, the document focuses on one element: fluoride. The document does not directly name other contaminants, like PFAS or lead. The report states that the CDC and USDA will 'educate Americans on the appropriate levels of fluoride, clarify the role of EPA in drinking water standards for fluoride under the Safe Drinking Water Act, and increase awareness of the ability to obtain fluoride topically through toothpaste,'
Experts largely agree that fluoridation at the level currently recommended by the CDC is safe, despite some growing concern that higher levels of fluoride intake could be
The draft of the report also states the FDA will evaluate liquid drops and tablets. This process has already begun, with a
Electromagnetic radiation: Studies ahead
The report also says HHS plans to study electromagnetic radiation and health research 'to identify gaps in knowledge, including on new technologies to ensure safety and efficacy.' The report doesn't explain what sources of electromagnetic radiation its authors consider possible cause for concern. But Kennedy has claimed — contrary to scientific consensus — on
The
But while there's not evidence of a link between cell phones and cancer, it's true that the devices have changed dramatically since the advent of smartphones and that kids' usage has skyrocketed, said Emanuela Taioli, director of the Institute for Translational Epidemiology at Mount Sinai's Icahn School of Medicine, via email. 'Perhaps a new study on kids specifically is worth doing.'
Daniel Payne and Chelsea Cirruzzo contributed reporting.
If you or someone you know may be considering suicide, contact the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline: Call or text 988 or chat
. For TTY users: Use your preferred relay service or dial 711 then 988.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Zelenskyy brings Europe's top leaders with him to meet Trump on ending Russia's war
WASHINGTON (AP) — Ukraine's future could hinge on a hastily assembled meeting Monday at the White House as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy brings with him an extraordinary cadre of European leaders to show U.S. President Donald Trump a united front against Russia. The European political heavy-hitters were left out of Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin last Friday, and they look to safeguard Ukraine and the continent from any widening aggression from Moscow. By arriving as a group, they hope to avoid any debacles like Zelenskyy's February meeting in the Oval Office, where Trump chastised him for not showing enough gratitude for American military aid. The meeting also is a test of America's relationship with its closest allies after the European Union and United Kingdom accepted Trump's tariff hikes partly because they wanted his support on Ukraine. Monday's showing is a sign both of the progress and the possible distress coming out of the Alaska meeting as many of Europe's leaders are descending on Washington with the explicit goal of protecting Ukraine's interests, a rare and sweeping show of diplomatic force. 'It's important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine, and therefore for all of Europe,' Zelenskyy said on X. The night before the meeting, however, Trump seemed to put the onus on Zelenskyy to agree to concessions and suggested that Ukraine could not regain Crimea, which Russia annexed in 2014, setting off an armed conflict that led to its broader 2022 invasion. "President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight," he wrote Sunday night on social media. 'Remember how it started. No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!' Zelenskyy appeared to respond with his own post late Sunday, saying, 'We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably.' He went on to say that 'peace must be lasting,' not as it was after Russia seized Crimea and part of the Donbas in eastern Ukraine eight years ago, and 'Putin simply used it as a springboard for a new attack.' The sitdown in Alaska yielded the possible contours for stopping the war in Ukraine, though it was unclear whether the terms discussed would ultimately be acceptable to Zelenskyy or Putin. The European heavyweights coming to Washington Planning to join Zelenskyy in America's capital are European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. On the table for discussion are possible NATO-like security guarantees that Ukraine would need for any peace with Russia to be durable. Putin opposes Ukraine joining NATO outright, yet Trump's team claims the Russian leader is open to allies agreeing to defend Ukraine if it comes under attack. Trump briefed Zelenskyy and European allies shortly after the Putin meeting, and details from the discussions emerged in a scattershot way that seemed to rankle the U.S. president, who had chosen not to outline any terms when appearing afterward with Putin. 'BIG PROGRESS ON RUSSIA,' Trump posted Sunday on social media. The president also bemoaned media coverage of his summit with Putin and said on Truth Social: "I had a great meeting in Alaska." Following the Alaska summit, Trump declared that a ceasefire was not necessary for peace talks to proceed, a sudden shift to a position favored by Putin. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Sunday that a ceasefire was still possible but that 'the best way to end this conflict is through a full peace deal." The issues on the table for the European allies European officials confirmed that Trump told them Putin is still seeking control of the entire Donbas region, even though Ukraine controls a meaningful share of it. And Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said the U.S. and its allies could offer Ukraine a NATO-like commitment to defend the country if it came under attack as the possible security guarantee. "How that's constructed, what we call it, how it's built, what guarantees are built into it that are enforceable, that's what we'll be talking about over the next few days with our partners who are coming in from overseas,' Rubio told NBC's 'Meet the Press.' Rubio said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that such a commitment 'would be a very big move" by Trump. He expects the delegations will 'spend six, seven hours talking about these things, maybe more, and try to get to a point where we have something more concrete.' Monday's meeting will likely be very tough for Zelenskyy, an official close to the ongoing talks said. That official spoke on condition of anonymity to speak openly about thinking within Ukraine and between allies. Zelenskyy needs to prevent a scenario in which he gets blamed for blocking peace talks by rejecting Putin's maximalist demand on the Donbas, the official said. It is a demand Zelenskyy has said many times he will never accept because it is unconstitutional and could create a launching pad for future Russian attacks. If confronted with pressure to accept Putin's demands, Zelenskyy would likely have to revert to a skill he has demonstrated time and again: diplomatic tact. Ukrainian leadership is seeking a trilateral meeting with Zelenskyy, Trump and Putin to discuss sensitive matters, including territorial issues. Zelenskyy is looking to avoid another Oval Office blowup After enduring a public tirade by Trump and Vice President JD Vance in February, Zelenskyy worked to repair relations with the U.S. Constant diplomatic communication and a 15-minute meeting at the Vatican in April on the sidelines of Pope Francis' funeral helped turn the tide. Trump appeared at the time to be swayed by Zelenskyy's conditions for peace. But Trump says he cares primarily about ending the war, an ambition that led him after his meeting with Putin to discard the need for a ceasefire. European allies also have worked with Trump, reaching a deal in July for NATO allies to buy weapons from the U.S. for Ukraine. Ahead of Monday's meeting, France's Macron stressed the importance of building up Ukraine's military and the need to show Putin that Europe interprets his moves as a threat to other nations. 'If we are weak with Russia today, we'll be preparing the conflicts of tomorrow and they will impact the Ukrainians and — make no mistake — they can impact us, too,' Macron said. ___ Kullab reported from Kyiv, Ukraine. Associated Press writer John Leicester contributed from Le Pecq, France.


Boston Globe
16 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Zelenskyy brings backup to the White House as Trump aligns more closely with Putin
By most accounts, the European officials want to ensure that Trump has not pivoted too close to the Russian side and does not try to strong-arm Zelenskyy into a deal that will ultimately sow the seeds of Ukraine's dissolution. And they want to safeguard against the risk of the United States, the linchpin of European security since NATO's creation in 1949, undermining that interest. In a call with Zelenskyy on Saturday, Trump offered support for U.S. security assurance for Ukraine after the war, a shift from his stance that Europe should bear the burden of protecting the country, though the specifics were unclear. Advertisement At a news conference Sunday in Brussels, Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Union's executive arm, stressed the importance of security guarantees for Ukraine and respect for its territory. But she also said it was paramount to 'stop the killing' and urged talks among the presidents of Russia, Ukraine and the United States 'as soon as possible.' Advertisement One senior European diplomat, who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of fear of angering Trump, described a sense of panic among European allies. The diplomat had not seen a meeting like the one set for Monday come together so quickly since just before the Iraq War. The foremost concern, the diplomat said, was to avoid another scene like the one that took place in February when Zelenskyy met with Trump in front of the television cameras at the White House. At that meeting, Trump berated the Ukrainian president, saying 'you don't have the cards' in the war -- essentially telling a weak foreign power to bend to the demands of a far more powerful one. The president did so again Friday night, after Putin flew back to the Russian Far East, telling a Fox News interviewer that Ukraine was going to have to realize that Russia was a more 'powerful' country, and that power meant Zelenskyy was going to have to make concessions. On Sunday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who sat in on the meetings with Putin at the U.S. air base outside Anchorage, Alaska, disputed the idea that the Europeans were coming as a posse to protect Zelenskyy from a repeat of the February shouting match. 'They're not coming here to keep Zelenskyy from getting bullied,' Rubio insisted to Margaret Brennan on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' 'They are coming here tomorrow because we've been working with the Europeans,' he said, listing the many meetings the United States had engaged in before and after the Putin visit. 'We invited them to come.' European officials said Saturday that Trump told Zelenskyy he was free to bring guests to the meeting, and later the White House extended invitations to several European leaders. Advertisement Whatever the motive for the leaders to upend their schedules on short notice, there is little question that elements of the negotiation will test the cohesiveness of the Atlantic alliance. Putin's agenda is larger than just seizing part or all of Ukraine. For nearly a quarter-century, his grandest ambition has been to split NATO, dividing European allies from the United States. As Europe and Ukraine struggle to navigate Trump's sudden reversal of strategy for ending a war that has stretched well past three years, Putin has a renewed opportunity to realize his dream. The United States and its European allies now appear to be pursuing different negotiating strategies. The differences have been long brewing. But in the weeks before the Putin meeting, they broke out into the open. 'We're done with the funding of the Ukraine war business,' Vice President JD Vance said flatly a week ago. The Europeans, however, have promised continued support, through a grouping of countries operating outside of the NATO alliance. They got Trump to promise to supply weapons, as long as the United States was paid for them from European coffers. The message was clear: Defending Ukraine was Europe's problem, not Washington's. That was a wedge that Putin sought to exploit in Anchorage, and he did it skillfully. Trump has adopted many of Putin's talking points, and few of the West's. Even before he met face to face with Putin, he assured the Russian leader that Ukraine's application to join NATO would be put on long-term hold -- a position that his predecessor, Joe Biden, also took. At various moments, he hinted that Ukraine invited invasion by applying to the alliance and to membership in the European Union. Advertisement After the Friday summit with Putin, he went another step. Trump and European allies had agreed last week that a ceasefire must precede a peace accord, but he abandoned that view and sided with the Russian leader. 'With Trump abandoning the ceasefire, but making no reference to the 'severe consequences' he threatened, we are at a dangerous moment for the alliance,' said James G. Stavridis, a retired Navy admiral who served as NATO's supreme allied commander from 2009-13, when the United States still viewed Russia as a NATO partner, if a difficult one. This is exactly the kind of split that European leaders were trying to avoid after Trump's return to power in January. NATO's new secretary-general, Mark Rutte, a former prime minister of the Netherlands, visited Washington frequently for quiet meetings with Trump. He was determined to avoid the kind of public breach that took place in the first term, when Trump came to the edge of withdrawing the United States from what he called an 'obsolete' alliance. Rutte helped engineer the announcement in June, at a NATO summit, that nearly all members of the alliance had committed to spend 5% of their gross domestic product on defense. (Of that, 1.5% is infrastructure spending only tangentially related to military spending.) That gave Trump an early win -- and demonstrated that, even if a decade late, Europe was getting serious about taking responsibility for its own defense. Trump took credit, and left the summit praising NATO's reforms. Then European leaders designed the program to buy U.S. weapons for Ukraine, recognizing its appeal to the president. The United States could remain Ukraine's arms supplier, but at no cost to American taxpayers. Advertisement The strategy seemed to be paying off a few weeks ago, when Trump castigated Putin for holding friendly conversations while continuing to kill civilians. He set deadlines and threatened to impose secondary sanctions on countries that were buying oil from Russia. For the first time since Trump's inauguration, Washington's approach, including the threat of new sanctions on Russian oil and gas if there was no ceasefire, and Europe's continued military and economic pressure seemed roughly aligned. Last Wednesday, European leaders talked with Trump, and he agreed to hold firm with Putin that a ceasefire must precede a longer peace negotiation. That alignment is what blew up in Anchorage. 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement,' Trump wrote on his social media site early Saturday. Trump's flip-flops stand in contrast to Putin's determination to stay the course with the war, even as the body count of Russians killed has soared. 'Peace will come when we achieve our goals,' he proclaimed in late 2023. Even then, Putin privately was sending signals that he was open to discussing a ceasefire, but only if it froze existing battle lines -- meaning Ukraine would have to cede control over roughly 20% of its territory. His overtures were rebuffed at the time. But now the Russian military is making considerable gains, so Putin no longer has interest in a ceasefire. 'They feel like they've got momentum in the battlefield,' Rubio said, 'and frankly, don't care, don't seem to care very much about how many Russian soldiers die in this endeavor.' Advertisement 'It's a meat grinder,'' he added, 'and they just have more meat to grind.' That reality would seem to suggest that the timing is hardly right for a peace agreement. Putin may calculate his best strategy is to drag out the talks. But when European and U.S. officials gather at the White House on Monday, they will have more to discuss than just boundaries. The Europeans have to find a way to bring Trump on board for concrete security guarantees for Ukraine -- which could include a peacekeeping force that would deter Putin from restarting the war in a few years. In his conversation with European leaders after the Putin summit, Trump suggested for the first time that he might be willing to join that effort -- though the assumption is that he would contribute U.S. intelligence, not troops. In London on Sunday, after a virtual meeting of European countries that call themselves a 'coalition of the willing' -- a phrase used in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars -- British Prime Minister Keir Starmer issued a statement that commended Trump for his 'commitment to providing security guarantees for Ukraine.' That phrasing seemed intended to lock him into the effort. The statement reiterated that the United Kingdom and other European nations were ready to 'deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased, and to help secure Ukraine's skies and seas and regenerate Ukraine's armed forces.' The United States has never been that specific. This article originally appeared in .


New York Times
17 minutes ago
- New York Times
Zelensky Calls for ‘Lasting' Peace, and Warns of Russia's Intentions
President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine on Sunday called for a 'lasting' peace to end the war there, and warned that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had previously seized Ukrainian land as 'a springboard for a new attack.' Mr. Zelensky made the comments on social media after he arrived in Washington ahead of planned high-stakes meetings at the White House on Monday with President Trump and several European leaders. Mr. Trump met Mr. Putin in Alaska on Friday for talks on Ukraine that ended without the cease-fire Mr. Trump had been insisting was necessary to secure a peace deal. Instead, he backed Mr. Putin's plan for a sweeping peace agreement based on Ukraine ceding territory it controls to Russia. Russia already occupies almost a fifth of Ukraine, including the entire Crimean Peninsula and large portions of an eastern region known as the Donbas. Mr. Trump told European leaders after his Alaska meeting that a peace deal could be struck quickly if Mr. Zelensky agreed to give up the rest of the Donbas. In his comments on Sunday, Mr. Zelensky appeared to subtly push back against that idea — not directly, but by describing Russia's 2014 annexation of Crimea and invasion of eastern Ukraine as a cautionary tale. 'We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably,' he wrote. 'And peace must be lasting. Not like it was years ago, when Ukraine was forced to give up Crimea and part of our East — part of Donbas — and Putin simply used it as a springboard for a new attack.' Mr. Zelensky said the 'so called' security guarantees that Ukraine received from Russia, the United States and Britain under a 1994 accord — in exchange for giving old Soviet nuclear weapons back to Russia — also had not worked. 'Of course, Crimea should not have been given up then, just as Ukrainians did not give up Kyiv, Odesa, or Kharkiv after 2022,' he wrote, referring to Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine that year. Mr. Zelensky will meet Mr. Trump at the White House early Monday afternoon. Later in the day, they will be joined by the leaders of France, Germany, Britain and Italy, as well as the secretary general of NATO and the president of the European Union's executive arm. Mr. Trump's recent reversal on a critical negotiating point for Ukraine and Europe — obtaining a cease-fire before negotiating land or security guarantees — has left many European officials wondering whether Mr. Trump was swayed by Mr. Putin in Alaska.