What to know about the hack at Tea, an app where women share red flags about men
The app, Tea Dating Advice , allowed women worried about their safety to share information about men they might date. Its premise was immediately polarising: Some praised it as a useful way to warn women about dangerous men, while others called it divisive and a violation of men's privacy.
On July 25, Tea said that hackers had breached a data storage system, exposing about 72,000 images, including selfies and photo identifications of its users.
Here's what to know about the situation.
What is the Tea app?
Released in 2023, the US-based app says it is a resource for women to protect themselves while dating, with some online likening it to a Yelp service for women dating men in the same area.
Women who sign up and are approved can join an anonymous forum to seek feedback on men they are interested in, or report bad behaviour from men they have dated.
Other tools on the app allow users to run background checks, search for criminal records and reverse image search for photos in the hope of spotting 'catfishing', where people pass off photos of others as themselves.
According to Tea's site, the app's founder, Sean Cook, launched the app because he witnessed his mother's 'terrifying' experience with online dating. He said she was catfished and unknowingly engaged with men who had criminal records.
When did it take off?
Interest in the app this week escalated after it became the subject of videos and conversations about dating and gender dynamics on social media.
On Thursday, Tea reported a 'massive surge in growth', saying on Instagram that more than 2 million users in the past few days had asked to join the app. It was listed as the top free app in Apple's download charts, and was also highly ranked in the Google Play store.
Critics however, including some users on 4chan, an anonymous message board known for spreading hateful content, called for the site to be hacked.
What happened in the breach?
On Friday, Tea said that there had been a data breach of a 'legacy storage system' holding data for its users.
The company said it had detected unauthorised access to about 72,000 images, including about 13,000 selfies and images of identification documents, which the company solicited to verify that users are women.
Images from posts, comments and direct messages in the apps were also included in the breach, it said.
Whose data was hacked?
Tea said that the data belonged to users who signed up before February 2024.
According to Tea's privacy policy, the selfies it solicits are deleted shortly after users are verified.
The hacked images were not deleted. That data set was stored 'in compliance with law enforcement requirements related to cyberbullying prevention', Tea said in its statement, and was not moved to newer systems that Tea said were better fortified.
Where did it end up?
Data from the hack, including photos of women and of identification cards containing personal details, appeared to circulate online Friday.
An anonymous user shared the database of photographs, which the user said included driver's licenses, to 4chan, according to the tech publication 404 Media, the first outlet to report on the breach.
Some circulated a map, which The New York Times was unable to authenticate, that purported to use data from the leak to tie the images to locations.
That thread was later deleted. According to an archived version of the thread, the user accused the Tea app of exposing people's personal information because of its inadequate protections.
What happens now?
Tea said that it was working with third-party cybersecurity experts, and that there was 'no evidence' to suggest other user data was leaked.
The app's terms and conditions note that users provide their location, birth date, photo and photo ID during registration. Tea said, that in 2023, it removed a requirement for photo ID in addition to a selfie.
The conversation around Tea has tapped into a larger face-off over the responsibility of platforms that women say can help protect them from dating untrustworthy or violent men.
Many of them, such as 'Are We Dating the Same Guy?' groups, have spread widely on platforms like Facebook. But such groups have increasingly drawn accusations of stoking gender divisions, as well as claims from men who say the groups have defamed them or invaded their privacy. – ©2025 The New York Times Company
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
26 minutes ago
- The Star
Asian streaming giant iQiyi seeks US$300mil for Hong Kong listing set for this year
HONG KONG (Bloomberg): IQiyi Inc is seeking to raise US$300 million for a listing in Hong Kong this year, potentially becoming the latest US-listed Chinese firm to tap investors closer to home. The Netflix-style streaming service, owned by Baidu Inc., has begun discussions with global banks about a second listing in the city, people familiar with the matter said, asking to remain anonymous discussing a private deal. IQiyi's US stock rose as much as 6% but pared gains to close little changed in New York. IQiyi, which hosts a plethora of content from Chinese period dramas to blockbuster Hollywood films, joins the likes of Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Ltd. in exploring a second listing in Hong Kong. The company vies with Tencent Holdings Ltd. and Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. to rank among the biggest video-streaming platforms in China, with an estimated 400 million-plus monthly active users. Negotiations around a listing are fluid and iQiyi may still reconsider. A company spokesperson didn't provide comment when reached by Bloomberg News. If it goes ahead, the Chinese firm will join a wave of listings that've fueled Hong Kong's revival this year. They helped the city reclaim its standing as the world's second-largest market for share sales for the first time since 2012, reversing a years-long slump following the Covid-19 pandemic. Loosening regulations helped. Chinese companies have propelled that trend - mostly, like CATL, mainland-listed firms. For US-listed Chinese firms such as iQiyi, Donald Trump's return to the White House this year has revived the threat of their stock getting delisted in America, with his administration seeking to determine if they are meeting auditing standards covered by the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act. A 2020 US law empowered the Securities and Exchange Commission to order the delisting of Chinese firms if the regulator was unable to inspect their audits for two consecutive years. The legislation was passed after the accounting practices of US-listed companies headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong became a flash point during the first Trump presidency. The concerns were considered resolved in 2022 after US officials said they'd gained sufficient access to review audit documents. Analysts have speculated that companies like iQiyi and PDD Holdings Inc. would consider the idea of a market debut on friendlier ground. Before the pandemic, companies such as Alibaba and Baidu successfully debuted in Hong Kong after initial public offerings in the US. -- ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Leave your offices at home: Starbucks draws line at desktops in South Korea
SEOUL: Starbucks Korea is telling customers to leave their offices at home. The company has banned the use of desktop computers, printers, power strips and large partitions in its cafes. On Aug 7, Starbucks confirmed it has posted new notices in every branch across the country. The signs also ask customers to take their belongings along when leaving for long periods and to make room at shared tables so that others can sit. The move targets a small but persistent group of clients known as cagongjok. The term blends the Korean words for cafe and study tribe. It refers to people who work or study for hours in coffee shops. Most use only laptops. But Starbucks says some have been setting up large monitors and printers. Photos of these elaborate set-ups have spread widely on Korean online forums. In some cases, printers were placed on nearby chairs, preventing others from using them. A few customers even brought in partitions to turn tables into private booths. A Starbucks Korea spokesperson said the decision was made to keep stores comfortable for all visitors. The company also cited the risk of theft or loss when belongings are left unattended. The backdrop is South Korea's massive cafe boom. Statistics Korea reports that the number of coffee shops rose from about 51,500 in 2015 to over 100,000 in 2024. That is nearly double the combined total outlets of the country's four largest convenience store chains. The popularity of cafes as study and work spaces has partly driven this growth. But extended stays can be costly for owners. The Korea Food Service Industry Research Institute estimated in 2019 that a 4,100 won (US$2.95) coffee covers only one hour and 42 minutes of seat time before it becomes unprofitable. In 2024, that figure dropped to one hour and 31 minutes. Starbucks is not banning laptops or ordinary study sessions, but the new rule prohibits transforming cafes into full-scale offices. - The Korea Herald/ANN
The Star
4 hours ago
- The Star
Anti-graft body questions ex-Indonesian minister Nadiem Makarim over Google Cloud graft case
Former education, culture, research and technology minister Nadiem Makarim (second right) talks to journalists on Aug 7 after undergoing questioning at the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) headquarters in Jakarta. - JP JAKARTA: The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has questioned former education, culture, research and technology minister Nadiem Makarim in an investigation into alleged graft pertaining to the procurement of Google Cloud services for schools across the country during his ministerial term. Nadiem came to the KPK headquarters in South Jakarta for an interrogation session on Thursday (Aug 7) morning accompanied by famed lawyer Hotman Paris Hutapea. The questioning lasted for nine hours, with Nadiem only speaking briefly to reporters upon leaving the antigraft body's headquarters after the interrogation. ' Alhamdulillah [Praise to God], I have finished providing information about the ministry's Google Cloud procurement,' the former minister said, as quoted by 'Alhamdulillah, it went smoothly. I was able to present my statement, and I want to extend sincere appreciation to the KPK for providing this opportunity,' he The antigraft body kicked off its investigation into the case in July, suspecting that the procurement of the Google Cloud system that took place during Nadiem's tenure as the education minister was rigged. KPK investigations director Asep Guntur Rahayu previously said that the procurement was allegedly done under Nadiem's discretion. Google Cloud is a cloud-based service primarily designed for data storage. It played a central role during the transition to remote learning in schools across the country when learning activities in classrooms were forced to shut down due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Investigators questioned several individuals for the case, including the education ministry's former special staffer Fiona Handayani on July 30. The KPK also questioned two former tech company Gojek Tokopedia (GoTo) officials, namely former director Melissa Siska Juminto and former CEO Andre Soelistyo, as witnesses. Nadiem co-founded Gojek in 2015 and stayed with the company until 2019, when he stepped down from his role to join then-president Joko 'Jokowi' Widodo's cabinet. The company later merged with e-commerce platform Tokopedia in 2021. KPK spokesperson Budi Prasetyo said on Tuesday that investigators suspected that the company was involved in the procurement. Nadiem has been implicated in another corruption case pertaining to the ministry's procurement of Google Chromebook laptops for schools across the country during the pandemic. The Attorney General's Office (AGO) is investigating the Chromebook case and has named four people, including Nadiem's former special staffer Jurist Tan, as suspects in the case. They were suspected of abusing their authority by rigging the laptop procurement project worth Rp 9.3 trillion (US$563 million). Investigators alleged that the suspects favoured the Google-based laptop over other products despite the ministry's research team not recommending the product, citing the device's ineffectiveness in regions lacking internet access. State loss from the laptop case is estimated at around Rp 1.9 trillion, largely due to the alleged pricing markups in the project. AGO investigators have questioned the former minister twice for the Chromebook case. He remains a witness in the case. When asked about whether Nadiem would be named as a suspect in the case, the AGO said investigators were still gathering evidence, including how the rigged procurement had benefited certain parties. KPK's Asep said on Thursday the antigraft body was coordinating with the AGO for its investigation in the Google Cloud case, because it was 'intertwined' with the Chromebook case. Nadiem previously denied allegations of collusion to favour the Chromebook over other laptops, while rebuking claims that his ministry dismissed a study outlining the laptop's disadvantages. He also defended the Chromebook procurement, saying that the gadgets were intended to prevent 'learning loss' among students in areas with adequate internet connections and to help educators in their teaching process during the Covid-19 pandemic Nadiem also claimed that the Chromebook programme was a success, with 97 per cent of more than one million laptops procured during his term delivered to 77,000 schools by 2023. -The Jakarta Post/ANN
