B.C. NDPers try to cast themselves as the good guys in reversal over pricy drug
'From the very first day Charleigh's family reached out, my office and I have advocated for her as we do for all constituents, with respect, compassion, and in confidence,' the Langford-Highlands MLA wrote Friday on his social media account.
That was not the view of Charleigh's mother, Jori Fales, who led the fight on the girl's behalf since the threat to cut off her coverage materialized back in February.
'He (Parmar) called once in February when we started our appeal,' Fales said on social media. 'There's been no communication since February except when I emailed Mr. Parmar June 27 asking for his urgent help.
'He responded saying he was glad I'll have the opportunity to meet with Josie Osborne,' he said, referring to a meeting with the health minister on July 4.
The public record discloses little other evidence to support Parmar's claim of 'steadfast' advocacy over the six months.
When he did weigh in, it was mostly to repeat the government line that decisions on funding expensive drugs for rare diseases — like Brineura, the only treatment for Charleigh's Batten disease — must be left up to the 'medical experts.'
Parmar's most recent posting said 'the medical experts who reviewed this case agree: sadly, at this stage of Charleigh's disease, Brineura no longer offers a clinical benefit.'
That claim was disputed by numerous experts in Batten disease, something the government finally acknowledged in restoring funding last week.
Perhaps the key to understanding the victory lap Parmar took Friday was the claim that his advocacy was undertaken 'in confidence.'
Publicly he echoed the premier and the health minister about not overruling the province's hand-picked medical experts.
But all the while, he was fighting the good fight on Charleigh's behalf behind the scenes — or so he'd have us believe.
'The case involving Charleigh Pollock has been one of the most difficult I've faced in my many years of service to my community,' said Parmar. 'It is complex, emotional, and at its core, heartbreaking.'
Almost as if he were the victim, no?
Parmar's self-serving statement might placate some gullible NDP supporters.
But for those wondering how the NDP picked a fight it could not win with an ailing 10-year-old, consider the widespread silence of New Democrats on an issue where they knew their government was wrong, wrong, wrong.
Nor was Parmar's claim that he'd always been there for Charleigh and her family the most preposterous utterance in this affair.
That nod would go to Premier David Eby, when he defended the system that led the province to cut off funding for the only medication that could mitigate the severe seizures associated with Batten disease.
'These are profound and awful decisions that have to be made by experts and physicians and not by politicians,' Eby told reporters last month.
'It doesn't make any sense for that family. I recognize that. But I also recognize that the other course is, if I can say it — is actually worse.'
No, you can't say that. Not when the premier's initial deference to provincially selected experts relegated Charleigh's family to raising money over the internet to pay for the one drug that offered the little girl relief in the time she has left.
As for Parmar, he may be in line for another kind of relief in his capacity as minister of forests.
His mandate letter from the premier directs him to 'work toward a harvest of 45 million cubic metres per year,' from provincial forests, a 50 per cent increase over last year's harvest.
The target was discounted as unlikely to be achieved, owing to permitting, regulations, Indigenous approvals and other obstacles.
Finance Minister Brenda Bailey signalled her doubts in the provincial budget, forecasting a status quo timber harvest of 30 million cubic metres this year and next, followed by a reduction to 29 million in 2027.
Now recent events on the trade front may provide Parmar with an out.
Premier David Eby and Prime Minister Mark Carney both said last week that Canada may be able to settle the long-running softwood lumber dispute with a quota system.
Canada would try to head off or reduce tariffs — currently 14.38 per cent and headed for 34.45 per cent — by capping soft lumber exports to the U.S.
Parmar was quick to embrace the quota option.
'It just may be able to address this issue once and for all,' the forests minister told Mark Page of Black Press Media last week.
Then again, 'the president seems to really like tariffs and, so, he may say, bugger off,' Parmar acknowledged.
Still, the quota option could provide Parmar with an excuse for giving up on the 50 per cent increase in harvesting.
B.C. supplies about 40 per cent of this country's lumber exports to the U.S. and would presumably have to absorb its share of any cap on exports. The cap would in turn reduce the need for any increase in harvesting.
vpalmer@postmedia.com
Related
Self-styled 'progressive B.C. government' picks fight with 10-year-old that it couldn't win
B.C. backtracks and restores rare drug coverage for 10-year-old Charleigh Pollock
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
18 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Bill Would Force Hospitals to Warn If They Aren't Equipped to Save Premature Babies
Hospitals would be required to disclose how they make key decisions regarding extremely premature infants in a bill set to be introduced Thursday by Sen. Tom Cotton (R., Ark.). The legislation is in part prompted by a Wall Street Journal investigation last year that found mothers had been told no lifesaving measures were possible for their extremely premature infants, even though other hospitals nearby offered care for infants born at similar gestational ages.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Hospitals across nation ending transgender care for minors in wake of federal policy changes
Fox News correspondent Alexandria Hoff discusses the push to discontinue 'gender-affirming' medication prescriptions in hospitals across the U.S. due to President Donald Trump's policy changes on 'Special Report.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I'm a nutritionist. These are the healthiest fruits to eat — and how much you should be eating
If you're trying to eat healthier, fruit is one of the easiest — and tastiest — ways to get more nutrients into your day. But with so many options to choose from, you might wonder: which fruits actually pack the biggest nutritional punch? Madelyne Beckles, a registered holistic nutritionist, say while all fruits offer benefits, some stand out more than others for their powerhouse nutritional profiles. This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Contact a qualified medical professional before engaging in any physical activity, or making any changes to your diet, medication or lifestyle. Below, we've rounded up Beckles's top picks for the healthiest fruit to eat. From antioxidant-rich berries to fibre-filled apples and vitamin C–loaded citrus, here's what to know about the fruits worth working into your routine. The healthiest fruits, according to a nutritionist 1. Blueberries Want to eat healthier but you're not sure where to start? Beckles says you can't go wrong with blueberries. 'They're full of antioxidants, vitamin C and fibre,' she said. 'They support your digestion and your blood sugar balance.' Their dark blue hue is more than just pretty — it signals a high concentration of antioxidants that help fight off free radicals, which are unstable molecules that can damage your cells over time. According to Beckles, free radicals cause tissue breakdown that can lead to "aging, fatigue and dull skin." 2. Strawberries In addition to being high in antioxidants and vitamin C, strawberries have another benefit: hydration. 'They're the highest water-containing berry,' said Beckles. 'We love to drink our water, of course, but eating water also helps to support our bodies.' 3. Apples Beckles turns to apples when she needs a convenient and filling snack,'They're full of fibre,' she said. 'They're crunchy, satisfying and easy to take on the go.' She noted that apples contain both soluble and insoluble fibre — one supports digestion, the other keeps things moving. 'They're so low-maintenance and they keep fresh for a long time,' she added. 4. Grapefruit Citrus fruits are well known for their immunity-boosting powers and grapefruit brings bonus benefits. 'It supports the liver,' said Beckles, which she called one of the most hardworking organs in the body. 'The liver gets burdened by stress, alcohol, sugary foods and fatty foods, so I love grapefruit to support its function.' 5. Stone fruits Stone fruits like peaches, nectarines and plums help bring a healthy glow. 'Orange fruits and vegetables have vitamin A, which is really supportive to our skin,' she said. 'Retinol is a form of vitamin A, so you can eat your retinol through stone fruits.' The fuzzy skin also provides gut-friendly fibre that nourishes your microbiome. How much fruit should you really eat? Wondering if there's such a thing as too much fruit? Don't overthink it. Beckles said it's best to aim for a couple of servings a day to help support digestion, immunity and steady energy levels. She also recommended reaching for fruit in the morning to kick-start your day and again around 3 p.m. when energy tends to dip. 'It's a quick transit food,' she said. 'It takes about 20 minutes for your body to digest.' Fruit myths debunked Despite being packed with nutrients, fruit sometimes ends up on the 'avoid' list, especially in diet circles worried about sugar. But Beckles said there's no need to be cautious. 'Fruit is not something to be feared,' she said. 'It's so good for you. It has tons of fibre, tons of vitamins, minerals and essential nutrients that we all need.' Fruit may be a natural source of sugar, but it comes wrapped in fibre, which helps regulate blood sugar spikes and leaves you feeling fuller for longer. 'Don't be afraid of eating it on its own,' Beckles said. 'When you're eating it in its whole form, it has enough fibre that it's not going to spike your blood sugar.' Another one of the most persistent myths around fruit is that fresh is better than frozen. But Beckles said frozen options are just as nutritious. 'I'm very pro-frozen fruit,' she said. 'It doesn't spoil, so you're going to have it for a long time. It's really helpful for people who are on the go.' Additionally, while there's no 'wrong' time to eat fruit, Beckles suggested eating with the seasons when possible. Not only is seasonal produce more sustainable and often more affordable, but it may also support the body's natural rhythms. 'I really emphasize eating seasonally because that means we're eating locally and we're eating foods that our body understands based on the temperatures outside,' she said. 'Eating tropical fruits in the winter, for example, can be very confusing to our bodies.' Summer is the perfect time to eat more fruit, with so many fresh options in season. Beckles called it 'the peak fruit moment.' The bottom line Whether you're reaching for berries, apples or stone fruit, you're fuelling your body with fibre, vitamins, hydration and energy-boosting carbs. With summer bringing an abundance of fresh, flavourful fruit, it's an ideal time to make fruit a daily habit. If you're going to commit to just one? 'Blueberries would be my top pick,' said Beckles. But you don't have to play favourites. 'The body loves variety,' she added. Your body — and your taste buds — will thank you for mixing it up.