logo
What will finally put an end to the Birmingham bin strike?

What will finally put an end to the Birmingham bin strike?

Independent14-04-2025
Days after the deputy prime minister, Angela Rayner, called in the army to assist in the logistics side of the Birmingham bin strike (rather than collecting rubbish), after six weeks out, and even after an improved offer from the council, the Birmingham bin strike is to continue. The latest strike ballot is overwhelmingly – 97 per cent – in favour of further industrial action. The build-up of rubbish, increasingly unsanitary conditions and the onset of warmer weather have increased the pressure on all involved to reach a settlement. Even now, it will cost £200m for a clean-up. The situation is turning critical from a public health point of view…
Whose fault is the strike?
Hard to say. No one forced Unite at the point of a gun to call a strike, nor the workers to democratically vote for such a long dispute. They do, however, feel that the changes in the pay and conditions they were being asked to accept were intolerable – Unite has claimed a planned restructuring of Birmingham's refuse service would see 50 workers lose £8,000 a year and about 20 lose £2,000 per annum, and put 170 jobs at stake. Now, it adds that the future of the drivers is also in jeopardy. The council denies this, saying only 17 workers would be affected and 'no worker needed to lose a penny'. The latest offer included temporary pay protection and a compensatory lump sum for affected workers – but it's not enough.
What's behind it?
Birmingham is bust. It applied for the municipal equivalent of protective bankruptcy in 2023, as a result of which the then minister responsible appointed commissioners to take over and sort things out. The lead commissioner is Max Caller, with half a century of local government experience behind him. Like all local authorities, Birmingham has had its problems, but the immediate and principal cause of its financial stress was a back-dated equal pay claim that amounted to £760m, way beyond its resources even if it was the best-run organisation in the Western world. The costs of running the successful 2022 Commonwealth Games have also added to the strains.
Although Birmingham councillors are still running things and negotiating with Unite on the refuse workers' pay, according to Sharon Graham, Caller is 'the power behind the throne and pulling the strings in Birmingham. He, along with the council's management and leadership, is responsible for the ongoing rubbish dispute. The commissioners and the council have had months to resolve this dispute but have singularly failed to do so. Birmingham residents need to be asking why they have to pay through the nose for this mess. They deserve better than this.'
Why send the army in?
It's not that unusual for the military to find itself obliged to answer a call for 'military aid for civilian authorities '. The most long-lasting such exercise was the deployment of British troops in Northern Ireland as law and order was breaking down in 1969, 'aid' being quickly converted into suppressing guerrilla warfare. Less lethal but high-profile deployments include acting as firefighters, ambulance drivers and Border Force officials. However, every government has been wary of asking the soldiers to do jobs they are sometimes untrained for, unduly dangerous, or where they risk becoming politicised – scabs and strike-breakers. Now, in the middle of a challenging round of local elections, Rayner must decide whether, in effect, to break the strike by asking troops or contract labour to remove the rotting rubbish – to avoid a serious public health disaster – rats, flies, and cockroaches at large with all that implies.
Rayner won't enjoy taking on her comrades – but also can't relish the prospect of the first child to be bitten and infected by an emboldened rat.
Who's winning?
No one, except maybe some well-nourished Brummie rats.
The Conservatives are seeking to make some capital out of the 'mess in Labour-run Birmingham', but there are no elections there until next year (which will prove interesting) and the read-off in the other county councils more generally is weak. National issues are, as usual, more important, and the protest vote seems to be heading for Nigel Farage and Reform UK. Kemi Badenoch is having what she admits is a difficult campaign, so soon after the disaster of last year's general election.
Will there be more of this?
Yes. Although not as dramatically as Birmingham, which happens to be the largest single local body outside the Greater London Authority, in the coming years, more local councils will find themselves in the hands of the commissioners and making radical cuts to jobs and services – with tough union resistance guaranteed. Rayner, herself a former trade union official, will be very busy just trying to sustain the very minimum functions of local authorities, run by all parties, that have run out of money.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JD Vance's secret service 'circus' takes over sleepy Cotswolds village
JD Vance's secret service 'circus' takes over sleepy Cotswolds village

Metro

time28 minutes ago

  • Metro

JD Vance's secret service 'circus' takes over sleepy Cotswolds village

Locals have been left shell-shocked after US vice-president JD Vance and his secret service motorcade rode into their sleepy hamlet on his very British holiday to the Cotswolds. Taking time off from being ruthlessly mocked in South Park, the US vice president is winding down for the summer holidays in the hamlet of Dean, near Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire. But villagers are being overwhelmed by the 'Men in Black' like security entourage treating 'old ladies like terrorists' and implementing roadblocks that put a burden on the idyllic location. One woman told The Times the village had seen 'one blinking pantomime after the other' and said: 'We are used to the great and good here. Before David Cameron moved in we had Douglas Hurd and he was lovely. 'We have Ben Kingsley in Spelsbury and we see him in the woods walking his dog, but to close off the roads is ridiculous.' The woman told the paper she and a friend had been stopped by police blocking a footpath while walking through the area, and said: 'I told the police 'we are two old ladies, we are hardly terrorists'.' Another local told the Guardian police were knocking on doors asking for personal details of residents and their social media accounts. He said: 'I know several people refused. We asked them if they were protecting us, or Vance. At least they were honest and said it is for him and that it will all be passed on to the American security people.' One local ranted to LBC: 'Generally we like to welcome everybody to Chipping Norton, but no, I'd absolutely kick him in the shins.' Vance is visiting the Cotswolds, nestled in the lush rollinghills, with his wife Usha and children Ewan, Mirabel and Vivek. They are renting a luxurious home from Johnny and Pippa Hornby, who have transformed the Edwardian garden into a 'waterworld' with added swimming pools. In a message seen by The Telegraph, Ms Hornby told neighbours she was 'so sorry for the circus that is there for the next few days', and that she hoped it would not be 'too disruptive'. But JD Vance was mixing business with pleasure as he visited British foreign secretary David Lammy on Saturday. The meeting took place at the Foreign Secretary's official country retreat, Chevening, in Kent, where Mr Vance stayed at the start of his UK jaunt. After the meeting, Mr Lammy said: 'The UK's support for Ukraine remains ironclad as we continue working towards a just and lasting peace.' It is understood that the meeting had been called at Washington's request, and included representatives from the US, Ukraine, France, Germany, Italy, Finland and Poland as well as the UK. MORE: Fact Check: Will Trump make way for oldest frenemy Steve Bannon to run for president?

Manchester United fans' group postpones protest against owners
Manchester United fans' group postpones protest against owners

North Wales Chronicle

timean hour ago

  • North Wales Chronicle

Manchester United fans' group postpones protest against owners

The 1958 had organised a protest march to Old Trafford on August 17, ahead of United's clash with Arsenal, with banners referring to minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe. The 1958 has overseen numerous demonstrations in recent years, principally aimed at unpopular majority shareholders the Glazers, but frustration has now spread to Ratcliffe. 🗣️Postponement of Protest – Arsenal (H), August 17th After careful reflection, and in light of the survey results. We have made the decision to postpone the planned protest for the Arsenal home game on Saturday, August 17th. For us, it has always been, and will always be, about… — The 1958 (@The__1958) August 11, 2025 The billionaire British businessman, who owns a 28.94 per cent stake in United, has instigated wide – often unpopular – changes since taking over day-to-day operational control from the Glazers in February 2024. 'Jim Ratcliffe chose to get into bed with the Glazers and, in our opinion, is helping keep them in charge,' said a group representative, who added Ratcliffe was 'no saviour' and 'like a (red) devil in disguise,' last week. However, after conducting a survey, the group has acknowledged opinion is split and the time is not right for a protest. A statement read: 'With a fanbase as diverse and passionate as ours, finding the right balance isn't always easy. We've had to consider momentum, timing, fan appetite, broader consequences of protest activity whilst assessing how current and future decisions may impact us as fans. 'Given the current sentiment within the fanbase and particularly in light of these recent survey results, it's clear there is no unified view on the direction of the club under Ratcliffe. 'That split is real, and we believe it would be irresponsible to risk creating a situation that could result in any 'red on red' conflict inside or outside the stadium.' The group say almost 63 per cent of the near 26,000 respondents to their survey said Ratcliffe and his Ineos company should be held to account for their decisions so far by means of a protest. However, 68 per cent also believed they should be given more time.

Manchester United fans' group postpones protest against owners
Manchester United fans' group postpones protest against owners

Leader Live

time2 hours ago

  • Leader Live

Manchester United fans' group postpones protest against owners

The 1958 had organised a protest march to Old Trafford on August 17, ahead of United's clash with Arsenal, with banners referring to minority owner Sir Jim Ratcliffe. The 1958 has overseen numerous demonstrations in recent years, principally aimed at unpopular majority shareholders the Glazers, but frustration has now spread to Ratcliffe. 🗣️Postponement of Protest – Arsenal (H), August 17th After careful reflection, and in light of the survey results. We have made the decision to postpone the planned protest for the Arsenal home game on Saturday, August 17th. For us, it has always been, and will always be, about… — The 1958 (@The__1958) August 11, 2025 The billionaire British businessman, who owns a 28.94 per cent stake in United, has instigated wide – often unpopular – changes since taking over day-to-day operational control from the Glazers in February 2024. 'Jim Ratcliffe chose to get into bed with the Glazers and, in our opinion, is helping keep them in charge,' said a group representative, who added Ratcliffe was 'no saviour' and 'like a (red) devil in disguise,' last week. However, after conducting a survey, the group has acknowledged opinion is split and the time is not right for a protest. A statement read: 'With a fanbase as diverse and passionate as ours, finding the right balance isn't always easy. We've had to consider momentum, timing, fan appetite, broader consequences of protest activity whilst assessing how current and future decisions may impact us as fans. 'Given the current sentiment within the fanbase and particularly in light of these recent survey results, it's clear there is no unified view on the direction of the club under Ratcliffe. 'That split is real, and we believe it would be irresponsible to risk creating a situation that could result in any 'red on red' conflict inside or outside the stadium.' The group say almost 63 per cent of the near 26,000 respondents to their survey said Ratcliffe and his Ineos company should be held to account for their decisions so far by means of a protest. However, 68 per cent also believed they should be given more time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store