logo
Trump's relentless tariff strategy finally crashes into delicate geopolitical reality

Trump's relentless tariff strategy finally crashes into delicate geopolitical reality

Yahoo16 hours ago
President Donald Trump's relentless use of tariffs to coerce foreign counterparts into favorable deals is about to run headlong into the limits of geopolitical reality.
Trump's willingness to dramatically escalate the long-running US economic warfare in response to Russia's war on Ukraine is real, advisors say. His threat to accelerate sweeping tariffs on India is certain to come to fruition, they insist. But he also faces the backdrop of a looming deadline to extend a trade truce with the world's second-largest economy that requires a degree of caution as White House deliberations come to a head.
'He's pissed,' one person close to Trump said of his rapidly deteriorating view of Russian President Vladimir Putin in recent weeks. 'But he's also aware of the competing priorities here.'
Trump faces a unique challenge balancing all of his simultaneous demands: He is threatening punishing sanctions on the Russian energy production that serves as the financial linchpin of Putin's war machine at the same moment he is seeking leverage in trade talks with India while maintaining a fragile trade détente with China.
The convergence of conflicting priorities have driven intensive discussions inside the West Wing about the range and scope of the options Trump could trigger as soon as today – and put a significant amount of weight on the meeting between Putin and Steve Witkoff, his trusted foreign envoy, underway in Moscow.
Trump has threatened sweeping secondary sanctions on Russian energy that would primarily hit China and India, the two largest purchasers of Russian energy. But he's also considering more tailored options, including sanctions that target specific tankers – known inside the government as the 'shadow fleet' – that are utilized to skirt the existing Western sanctions regime in the transport of Russian oil, two US officials with the knowledge of the matter said.
The Biden administration's evolving sanctions actions found success in blacklisting the vessels critical to Putin's sanctions evasion efforts. Secondary sanctions tailored specifically to India in some form have also been discussed, the officials said.
Trump feels empowered to trigger the those secondary sanctions that were long weighed by his predecessor, but never deployed due to soaring inflation and concerns about a significant increase in domestic gas prices.
That is a problem Trump simply doesn't have right now, as waning global demand and a steady increase in output by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies have mitigated the concern about the energy price spikes that bedeviled the Biden administration.
For the Trump administration, that has created leverage as frustration with Putin's refusal to come to the table has dashed Trump's envisioned quick end to the three-plus year conflict.
Breakdown in India trade talks
Those dynamics also played directly into the recent breakdown in long running and intense trade negotiations between the US and India, advisors say.
While there is obvious overlap between Trump's escalating threats targeting Russia and his explicit warnings about India's energy purchases, the dispute with the world's fifth-largest economy is specific to the trade talks, the officials say.
'We consider a wide range of options, but this is a situation more of convenient coincidence than overarching strategic long-game,' one of the officials said.
Trump has acknowledged as much.
'The sticking point with India is that tariffs are too high,' Trump said in an interview Tuesday with CNBC. Peter Navarro, Trump's senior counselor for trade and manufacturing, has called India as 'the Maharaja of tariffs,' underscoring a long-running view that India's expansive protection of its domestic markets has been a significant frustration for Trump and his trade team.
As the clock ticked toward Trump's August 1 'reciprocal' tariff deadline and foreign partners offered significant concessions on US market access, India was a notable exception, officials said.
'The president wanted deals that substantially opened markets – everything or near everything,' a senior administration official said. 'The were interested in opening some of their markets, but not nearly ambitious enough to meet the president's view of what would constitute a good deal.'
So while India's purchases of Russian energy and Russian military equipment was well known on the periphery, Trump elevated those friction points to the forefront as he sought to pressure Indian negotiators, the official said.
Russia complicates China deal, too
Any large-scale effort to trigger secondary sanctions, however, would crash directly into the delicate maintenance of US-China trade talks which have seen both countries utilize economic statecraft, sanctions and export controls to exert or ease pressure on the bilateral relationship over the course of months.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned his Chinese counterparts directly, during the third round of face-to-face talks last week, that Trump was serious about secondary sanctions and it was something Chinese officials needed to prepare for in the weeks ahead.
But as US and Chinese officials have quietly continued discussions over the technical details of an agreement to extend their existing trade truce, the concern about the impact secondary sanctions would have on those dynamics has been a factor inside the administration, officials say.
Trump has yet to officially sign off on an extension, even as his top advisors made clear it was only a matter of time before Trump blesses it.
For Trump, who has operated throughout his second term in a perpetual state of running deadlines, that clock is ticking concurrently with his deadline for Putin.
The decision on the latter now weighs heavily on the status of the former.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

D-Wave Quantum Stock Stays Sluggish On Earnings Shortfall
D-Wave Quantum Stock Stays Sluggish On Earnings Shortfall

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

D-Wave Quantum Stock Stays Sluggish On Earnings Shortfall

Shares of D-Wave Quantum (NYSE:QBTS) were mostly in the red early trading on Thursday after investors digested a mixed set of second quarter figures. The company posted an adjusted net loss of $0.08 a share for the quarter ended June 30, a modest improvement from the $0.12 loss a year earlier but shy of analysts' $0.05 loss estimate. Revenue climbed 42% year-over-year to $3.1 Million, topping consensus forecasts. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with QBTS. On the earnings call, CEO Alan Baratz walked us through the highlights. He noted the launch of the sixth-generation quantum computer, a new memorandum of understanding for an on-premises system in South Korea and completion of assembly work at Davidson Technologies. He also flagged a suite of developer tools designed to advance quantum AI and machine learning innovation, and reminded listeners that D-Wave closed the quarter with a record $819 Million in cash. Bookings jumped 92% year-over-year to $1.3 Million, and the company said it has served over 100 revenue-generating customers in the past four quarters. That strong top-line growth and hefty cash cushion help cushion the earnings shortfall and point to growing market will be watching closely for Q3 guidance when D-Wave reports results in late October. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump nominates CEA chair Stephen Miran to Federal Reserve Board
Trump nominates CEA chair Stephen Miran to Federal Reserve Board

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump nominates CEA chair Stephen Miran to Federal Reserve Board

President Trump said Thursday that he would nominate Stephen Miran, current chair of the president's Council of Economic Advisers, to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Miran will replace outgoing governor Adriana Kugler, who is set to step down on Friday. Miran's term will run until Jan. 31, 2026. "It is my Great Honor to announce that I have chosen Dr. Stephen Miran, current Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors, to serve in the just vacated seat on the Federal Reserve Board until January 31, 2026," Trump said in a post on Truth Social. "In the meantime, we will continue to search for a permanent replacement," Trump continued. "Stephen has a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University, and served with distinction in my First Administration. He has been with me from the beginning of my Second Term, and his expertise in the World of Economics is unparalleled — He will do an outstanding job. Congratulations Stephen!" Miran served as an adviser of economic policy for the Treasury Department during Steven Mnuchin's tenure as Treasury Secretary during Trump's first administration. He was also a senior strategist at Hudson Bay Capital Management. Miran is credited as being one of the authors of Trump's tariff policy and a key architect of his economic agenda. He has also been linked with the push for a so-called Mar-a-Lago currency accord, based on a paper he wrote laying out various strategies for rebalancing US trade while working in the private sector. Kugler unexpectedly announced last week that she would step down from the Fed's Board of Governors, just under six months before her term was set to expire on Jan. 31, 2026. Kugler, who has served as a Fed governor since Sept. 13, 2023, will return to Georgetown University as a professor this fall. Miran's appointment will add not only a Trump administration official onto the Fed board, but also likely another member who is in favor of the central bank cutting interest rates as soon as its September policy meeting. Last week, Fed governors Chris Waller and Michelle Bowman both voted against the Fed's decision to keep interest rates unchanged in a range of 4.25%-4.50%. Paul Ashworth, chief North America economist for Capital Economics, said the president's decision to nominate Miran is a "welcome surprise," noting that while he doesn't always agree with Miran he is a "good pick" who should easily be confirmed by the Senate. Miran's confirmation is pending Senate approval, but with lawmakers currently on August recess, it's unclear how long that could take. The nomination hearing will be a priority for the Senate Banking Committee, but lawmakers aren't due back in session until September 9, which is just one week before the Fed's policy meeting on September 16 and 17. The tight timeline makes it unlikely Miran could be confirmed and sworn in by the meeting. Senator Tim Scott, chair of the Senate Banking Committee, called Miran "an accomplished economist" and said that he "looks forward to quickly considering his nomination in the Senate Banking Committee." While Miran is set to be on the Fed's board for only a few months, investors will be looking for any clues about what his nomination means for the president's eventual nomination for the next Fed Chair and his intentions for influencing monetary policy. President Trump will need to nominate someone to the Fed Board of Governors for a full 14-year term once the short-term Fed Governor position's term is up on January 31 next year. If Miran performs to Trump's liking it's possible he could be re-nominated to a full 14-year term. The president said he's narrowed down his choice for the next Fed Chair to three individuals. Bloomberg reported earlier on Thursday that Waller is emerging as the favorite to replace Jerome Powell as Fed chair among Trump's advisers. The president said he also favors former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh and current Director of the president's National Economic Council Kevin Hassett. Warsh has experience navigating the central bank as he served as a Fed governor from 2006 until 2011 and acted as former Fed Chair Ben Bernanke's liaison to Wall Street during the chaos of the 2008 financial crisis. Warsh is also a known figure to Trump, who interviewed him for the Fed chair post eight years ago before deciding to nominate Powell. Warsh has been critical of the Fed of late, saying that the central bank needs a regime change and that it's not just about the chairman, but a range of people. He's argued on Fox Business last month that the costs involved in renovating the Fed's headquarters represent one of several examples of how the Fed "has lost its way" and that the American people "need a reformer to fix" the institution and rebuild its credibility. When it comes to policy, Warsh has suggested that the Fed could look past inflation related to tariffs because they'd be a one-time increase. Hassett, meanwhile, already has a close relationship with Trump, given that he advises the president on economic policy and served in the first Trump administration. Hassett has said there's no reason why the Fed shouldn't cut rates now, something the president has repeatedly hammered the central bank to do. He has indicated he would accept the job of Fed Chair if Trump chooses him. This week he accused the central bank of injecting politics into its decision making during an appearance on Fox Business. Similar to Warsh, Hassett suggested Fed leadership has lost its way, noting that 'the job of the leadership is to drive a nonpartisan consensus of the board, and that's not what we're seeing right now.' He said the Fed board 'is going to have to change,' and that he favors going back to the era of Alan Greenspan— where the Fed chair had a large influence over policy decisions. 'The board is going to have to go back to the kind of … Alan Greenspan approach of driving consensus, having healthy debate,' said Hassett. The White House also hopes that Powell will decide to leave the Fed Board of Governors when his chairmanship is up next year in May 2026. That would open up a second seat that Trump can fill. Powell has not yet said whether he intends to do that; his term as a Fed governor is not up until 2028. If Powell does not vacate his seat, the open governor's seat could be the only opportunity the president has to put his stamp on a fresh face for Fed Chair. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

MSCI announces changes to equity indexes
MSCI announces changes to equity indexes

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

MSCI announces changes to equity indexes

NEW YORK (Reuters) -MSCI said on Thursday it will add 42 securities and delete 56 from its widely followed ACWI equity index. The three largest companies by market cap to be added to the developed markets index are Rocket Lab Corp, Sofi Technologies and Affirm Holdings, all headquartered in the United States. The three largest companies to be added to the emerging markets index are China Citic Bank, Dian Swastatika Sentosaand Laopu Gold. All changes will be made as of the close of August 26, MSCI said. Error al recuperar los datos Inicia sesión para acceder a tu cartera de valores Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos Error al recuperar los datos

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store